One of the reasons critics get addicted to Cannes is the rush of seeing something thing they’ve never seen before, an experience that’s increasingly rare in the weekly grind of the multiplex. These things aren’t always pretty, or even worthwhile. Tonight I saw Serbis (Service). a shabby piece of video verite from the Philippines, which has being inexplicably placed in the main competition. Directed by Brillante Mendoza, it’s set in a dilapidated movie theatre that plays old soft-corn porn, but which mostly serves as a site for gay sex and prostitution—a grindhouse, as Tarantino would say. The irony is that the name of the cinema on the marquee is FAMILY, and that this forlorn theatre/brothel is, in fact, a family-run joint, the dysfunctional home to three generations trying to make ends meet. While hustlers ply their trade in the darkened theatre, a mother does laundry and a small boy wheels around on a tricycle and spies on his teenage sister, who preens naked in a front of a mirror, practicing romantic moves. There are interludes of graphic sex in the film, which is not uncommon on the taboo-busting frontier of a film festival. The blow job is the new French kiss. But the film does show us something we never seen before [warning: sentence contains adult situations!]: a young man, engaged in what what appears to be unsimulated sex with a young woman, asks to shift positions, because of a large, painful boil on his butt—which (brace yourself) he later bursts using the mouth of an empty bottle. Whether by coincidence or design, this year’s programming at Cannes seems to be developing have a daily thematic bent. The festival kicked off with a series of movies about incarceration. Today we saw two films about dysfunctional working class families struggling to survive in large urban centres, while crime threatens to engulf their children’s lives. The other example was Brazil’s Linha de Passe, which is set in San Paulo. Directed by Walter Salles (Central Station, Motorcycle Diaries), it’s far superior to Service. But there are some uncanny parallels. Both films are kinetic, neo-realist dramas about a crumbling family tethered to a stubborn matriarch. And, weirdly, in both films there are scenes of sons taking charging by using a plunger to try clear a plugged drain—literal instances of kitchen sink drama. But really there’s no comparison between the two films. Salles has made a gripping, if un-commercial, drama, exploring faith and desperation with mix-and-match themes of religion, soccer and race. The peformances—all but one by first-time actors—are magnetic. The long-sufering matriarch is a pregnant single mother who works as a maid and smokes and worries. Her children include an aspiring soccer star angling for a break who figures he’s washed up at 18, a gas station attendant devoted to street-corner evangelism, a motorcycle courier who gambles his life by threading between transport trucks, and sunny young kid who rides the bus all day, dreaming of being the driver. But Linha de Passe’s most haunting character is the city of San Paulo itself, a city of 20 million. We saw glimpses of it in Blindness. Here it plays a central role: a gray, high-rise landscape of traffic and concrete that seems to extend into infinity, alien and anonymous. Another case of world cinema showing us a place we never imagined existed.
Categories: Blog Central, Brian D. Johnson Unscreened
Things we’ve never seen before
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
11044 Responseshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/17/things-weve-never-seen-before/Things+we%27ve+never+seen+before2008-05-18+00%3A20%3A22Brian+D.+Johnson to “Things we’ve never seen before”
- Credibility is what’s really melting - 302 Comments
- Col. Russell Williams' double life? - 57 Comments
- Shy Adam Lambert comes to town - 49 Comments
- Our banking rules are smarter, not tighter - 29 Comments
- How Letterman, Leno and Oprah Came Together - 1 Comments
- That’s a shame Tuesday, February 9, 2010 8:56 - 1061536 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/thats-a-shame/That%27s+a+shame2010-02-09+13%3A56%3A20Aaron+Wherry
- Coyne V. Wells on Jim Prentice, Danny Williams, and sacred cows Tuesday, February 9, 2010 8:00 - 1061400 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/coyne-v-wells-on-jim-prentice-danny-williams-and-sacred-cows/Coyne+V.+Wells+on+Jim+Prentice%2C+Danny+Williams%2C+and+sacred+cows2010-02-09+13%3A00%3A13macleans.ca
- Caption Challenge Vol. 2, No. 6: Vote Now Tuesday, February 9, 2010 5:20 - 1061590 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/caption-challenge-vol-2-no-6-vote-now/Caption+Challenge+Vol.+2%2C+No.+6%3A+Vote+Now2010-02-09+10%3A20%3A50Scott+Feschuk
- Alberta Kremlinology bite of the week Tuesday, February 9, 2010 4:41 - 1061573 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/Alberta+Kremlinology+bite+of+the+week2010-02-09+09%3A41%3A27Colby+Cosh
Contrary to popular belief, the ceremonial lighting of the Olympic flame at the Opening Ceremonies is, in fact, a decidedly modern affair. The culmination of the torch relay in a grandiose display at the Opening Ceremonies is a relic of the 1936 Berlin Games—just one of many attempts by the Nazi regime to lend a mythical air to the Games. Still, despite its dubious history, the lighting of the cauldron has evolved into one of the most spectacular and ostentatious displays at the Games. And the secretiveness that surrounds the lead-up to the ceremony only lends to the hype.
When it comes to the 2010 Games, the speculation about who will be selected to light the cauldron has coalesced around whether VANOC will go the traditional route and opt for a former Olympian or take the road less-travelled and pick someone from outside the sports world. Facebook groups have popped up promoting everyone from Terry Fox’s mother, Betty, to former Vancouver Canucks captain Trevor Linden. So far, Vancouver’s Olympic organizers have kept a tight lid on who the potential candidates might be. We’ve assembled a list of the names making the rounds, but feel free to add your own in the poll or in the comments below.
Need to Watch
From Macleans
Beyond The Commons

The Commons: Jack Layton doing as Jack Layton does
In all sorts of ways, it’s difficult to imagine him ever stopping
Business

Inside the fall of a famed hedge fund
A Bay Street legend, a whiz kid manager and the angry investors
Colby Cosh

The Wardrobe Malfunction Paradox
Colby Cosh on the current state of the Super Bowl halftime show—and how to fix it
Can't Miss NFL Picks and Other Lies

Super Bowl XLIV: A liveblog, but with naps and long pauses
Eight and a half hours in front of the TV and, finally, kickoff
Canada

The war on the civil service
Pensions and layoffs are just one front in a long-brewing battle
Arts & Culture

Tales of over-the-top Christmas
In a wealthy suburb, a writer discovers people who take celebrating to a whole new level
Newsmakers

Friend in high places, Dog tired and Bubba’s other bombshell
Newsmakers of the week








the thematic similarities between the two films may be attributed to cultural similarities between brazil and philippines.
You stupid ass … who are you to call the film a shabby piece of video verite from the Philippines?
Who are you to question the cannes jury who had the film included, IN COMPETITION?
Let the jury speak for the film, let the legitimate film critics speak for the film. Go live your life of arrogance amidst the world’s poverty and chaos.
SHUT UP!!!!
[...] New York Times called it a “rambunctious, noisy film.” One critic thought it was “a shabby piece of video verite from the Philippines” and wondered why it “inexplicably” competed in Cannes. The critic of [...]
[...] New York Times called it a “rambunctious, noisy film.” One critic thought it was “a shabby piece of video verite from the Philippines” and wondered why it “inexplicably” competed in Cannes. The critic of cinematical.com [...]