Here's a thought: why don't we just pick the best people for the job?

In the wake of the Bernier debacle, talk has turned to the inevitable cabinet…

by Andrew Coyne on Friday, May 30, 2008 3:56pm - 0 Comments

In the wake of the Bernier debacle, talk has turned to the inevitable cabinet shuffle. It’s billed as a chance, not just to replace Bernier at Foreign Affairs, but to relaunch the government after the serial embarrassments of recent weeks – the NAFTA memo, RCMP raiding Conservative headquarters, etc. etc. It would, however, be the third such relaunch in a little over two years in office; if all that is achieved is to move the same familiar faces a few feet this way or that around the cabinet table, it may succeed only in reminding people of how thin the Tory ranks really are. What’s needed is not so much a shuffle as new cards, drafting in some of the brighter members of caucus who have been left to languish on the back benches or in junior ministerial posts. That can’t happen so long as the choice of ministers is left to the spoils system – racial, sexual, and especially regional – that cabinet government has become in this country.

In few other democratic countries is such a rigid system of quotas imposed, calculated down to the last decimal point — what percentage of cabinet goes to Quebec, how many women, and so on. The press is as much to blame as anyone. Cabinets are scrutinized not, as in other countries, for what they reveal about the governing party’s ideological direction, or for what this or that appointment might mean for a particular department. Why should they be? Parties don’t stand for anything, and the prime minister makes all the important decisions anyway. So instead it’s all fun with figures.

Cabinet posts in this country are not, as they are elsewhere, opportunities for able people to serve their country. They are gifts to be offered up to this or that region or interest group to buy their votes. The perverse consequence: the fewer MPs a region elects, the more cabinet ministers it is awarded. Quebec may have relatively few Conservative MPs, but they are nearly all guaranteed a cabinet post at some point. Whereas MPs from BC and Alberta, where the party is hip-deep in talent, can pretty much buy a lottery ticket for all the chance they have of being picked. 

It’s exactly this kind of process that resulted in Maxime Bernier being installed at Foreign Affairs: a process that, so long as it remains, only sets us up for the next hasty shuffle. Perhaps it’s time we started fishing at the deep end of the talent pool. 

Bookmark and Share
  • Paul Wells

    This is totally ripped off from what that guy said on At Issue last night.

    I’m pretty sure any prime minister who actually appointed his cabinet by talent would endure three days of nasty headlines in regions that got left out, and then he’d have no problem. And a better cabinet. An imperfect analogy is when Bill Clinton appointed another young centrist Southerner as his running mate. Turned out ticket-balancing wasn’t so important after all.

  • Wayne

    Speaking of the At Issue section on the National last night I thought they all had some very good points. Lately I have been paying more and more attention to Chantal as I have noticed the last few years that her observations and predictions have been more often than not spot on as far as my views go. As to the issue of best person for job I am of 2 minds on the one hand a cabinet post to me is more of an opportunity to train a new PM by having MP’s rotate through the seats as well as trying to use this to a political advantage on the other maybe certain postions should be treated differently as Foreign Affairs, Finance .. I don’;t know I can not make up my mind on this one but I think I am starting to agree with Andrew up to a point.

  • Paul Secam

    Andrew’s next post — “Here’s a thought: let’s get rid of this bilingualism stuff”.

    And to top that, he’ll offer — “Here’s a thought: let’s abolish the provinces”

    I think the value of these “thoughts” is only a little less than what I just paid to read them. Can I get a refund?

  • http://mikeanddean.blogspot.com Dean P

    I agree with Andrew. One of the strengths of the American system is that the President can pick anyone he wants, meaning they get moron presidents but cabinets that have at least some skill (on paper). A westminster system of responsible government is still preferable, but the Tories are thin enough on talent as it is.

    Or maybe I’m just a Central Canadian Bastard–i.e. a good Ontarian who doesn’t really think of himself as Ontarian but rather as Canadian. Heck, if the entire cabinet were from BC, I’d be okay with that, if they were the best people and put Canada’s interest first.

    The problem with Harper, of course, is that he’s all about regionalism, and a cabinet full of BC/Alta. Tories would probably do their level best to screw Ontario, the Maritimes, and Quebec in the process.

  • Anon

    Hey Andrew – who are the people languishing on the backbenches? Moore – pompous blowhard, Buckler’s ex-boyfriend? Kenney – blowhard #2? Polievre? Who exactly is languishing that are so much better than the ones on the front bench now?

    Harper runs the show. Regardless of who he has on TV shows, it’ll be him deciding what comes out of their mouths.

  • dan in van

    Seems to me maybe this is one instant where Harper may be glad to have some more senate seats available to appoint MORE democratically challenged cabinet ministers… Anon is right. The crop of unremarkable MPs behind the PM is so thin and threadbare, a farmer would just turn over the crop and put it to pasture.

  • Windbag

    To be fair, Jonathan Kay made a similar point earlier in the week — but he used it to buttress a call for Republican government.

  • Marthe

    Wouldn’t that be a novel idea. To chosen a person for a position because they’re the most capable and qualified for the job. Harper could set an example for the whole country that excellence matters and that would supersedes regional differences.

    Unfortunatley, raising standards has never been a priority for Canadians, no way, Hosea.

  • Windbag

    “Here’s a thought: why don’t we just pick the best people for the job?”

    I’d like to start with the Governor General’s office

  • Pingback: Where in the world is Josée Verner? : Deux maudits anglais : Macleans.ca Blog Central

From Macleans