<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marleau: The gathering storm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Kent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4856</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4856</guid>
		<description>I respect Col. Drapeau and his opinions, but there&#039;s at least one disconnect for me in this letter:
&quot;He notes that in an unprecedented closed-door, invites-only “consultation” about Marleau’s proposed changes (...) 25% of invitees were federal public servants, an “over-representation… obviously at the expense of users/ complainants”&quot;.

I&#039;ve worked in 3 different departments as a public servant, and I occasionally have to deal with ATI requests. I&#039;ve never sensed any desire on the part of my managers, directors, deputy ministers, or even Ministers&#039; Offices or the PMO to delay or obstruct any request. The delays are always due to workload issues: some of the requests can take dozens if not hundreds of hours to complete, and it&#039;s impossible for me to abandon all of my other tasks - ie, the things the public expects me to do - every time a request shows up.

Whatever the solution may be, it will involve public servants. Having a number of them in the room when these issues are discussed is hardly an &quot;over-representation&quot;. How many users/ complainants are needed in the room to say &quot;the System ain&#039;t working&quot;?

&quot;Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompentency.&quot; Or in this case, inadequate staffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respect Col. Drapeau and his opinions, but there&#8217;s at least one disconnect for me in this letter:<br />
&#8220;He notes that in an unprecedented closed-door, invites-only “consultation” about Marleau’s proposed changes (&#8230;) 25% of invitees were federal public servants, an “over-representation… obviously at the expense of users/ complainants”&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked in 3 different departments as a public servant, and I occasionally have to deal with ATI requests. I&#8217;ve never sensed any desire on the part of my managers, directors, deputy ministers, or even Ministers&#8217; Offices or the PMO to delay or obstruct any request. The delays are always due to workload issues: some of the requests can take dozens if not hundreds of hours to complete, and it&#8217;s impossible for me to abandon all of my other tasks &#8211; ie, the things the public expects me to do &#8211; every time a request shows up.</p>
<p>Whatever the solution may be, it will involve public servants. Having a number of them in the room when these issues are discussed is hardly an &#8220;over-representation&#8221;. How many users/ complainants are needed in the room to say &#8220;the System ain&#8217;t working&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8220;Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompentency.&#8221; Or in this case, inadequate staffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoSaidThe.Organization &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Big Guns Show Up in Comment Fields</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4855</link>
		<dc:creator>SoSaidThe.Organization &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Big Guns Show Up in Comment Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4855</guid>
		<description>[...] Information Commissioner of Canada, Robert Marleau, provided his own personal reaction to a blog posting by Paul Wells, a columnist and blogger for Macleans [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Information Commissioner of Canada, Robert Marleau, provided his own personal reaction to a blog posting by Paul Wells, a columnist and blogger for Macleans [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marleau: The InfoComm speaks! And speaks&#8230; : Inkless Wells : Macleans.ca Blog Central</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4854</link>
		<dc:creator>Marleau: The InfoComm speaks! And speaks&#8230; : Inkless Wells : Macleans.ca Blog Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4854</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8226; Robert Marleau    Imagine our surprise here at Macleans.ca when comments appeared on a post about criticism of the new Information Commissioner, Robert Marleau — comments that appeared to come from Robert Marleau. My first reaction was that this was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &bull; Robert Marleau    Imagine our surprise here at Macleans.ca when comments appeared on a post about criticism of the new Information Commissioner, Robert Marleau — comments that appeared to come from Robert Marleau. My first reaction was that this was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Marleau</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4853</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Marleau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4853</guid>
		<description>&#039;Tis indeed the Commissioner and my office will confirm by phone in the morning and also correct Mr.Potter on his facts for this rescue attempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Tis indeed the Commissioner and my office will confirm by phone in the morning and also correct Mr.Potter on his facts for this rescue attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wells</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4852</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4852</guid>
		<description>Andrew, I&#039;m awaiting a callback from Marleau&#039;s office on whether this is indeed him. Your point is well taken indeed, but we&#039;re hanging fire on whether this comment is authentic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I&#8217;m awaiting a callback from Marleau&#8217;s office on whether this is indeed him. Your point is well taken indeed, but we&#8217;re hanging fire on whether this comment is authentic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Potter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4851</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Marleau --- if indeed it is you in the above comment:

So if it is so important for you to give your side of the story, why didn&#039;t you do so when we (at the Ottawa Citizen) tried -- repeatedly -- to get you to reply to Drapeau&#039;s letters for the story Andrew Thomson wrote for us, which Paul Wells links above?

We asked for the other side of the story. You refused to give it.

Sincerely,

Andrew Potter
Public Affairs columnist, Maclean&#039;s
News editor, Ottawa Citizen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Marleau &#8212; if indeed it is you in the above comment:</p>
<p>So if it is so important for you to give your side of the story, why didn&#8217;t you do so when we (at the Ottawa Citizen) tried &#8212; repeatedly &#8212; to get you to reply to Drapeau&#8217;s letters for the story Andrew Thomson wrote for us, which Paul Wells links above?</p>
<p>We asked for the other side of the story. You refused to give it.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Andrew Potter<br />
Public Affairs columnist, Maclean&#8217;s<br />
News editor, Ottawa Citizen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Marleau</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4850</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Marleau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4850</guid>
		<description>It never ceases to amaze me how somewhat reputable journalists, sometimes go for the easy headline without the courtesy of asking for the other side of the story before formulating a judgment. Every syllogism has two premises before a conclusion can be sustained. Your last 2 blogs were based on only one premise:
1) The commissioner reports 0 systemic investigations, therefore he has abandonned them.
2)Some critics say the commissioner is anemic, therefore he is anemic.
I would have expected better journalism from you and better overall from Maclean&#039;s.
The Commish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never ceases to amaze me how somewhat reputable journalists, sometimes go for the easy headline without the courtesy of asking for the other side of the story before formulating a judgment. Every syllogism has two premises before a conclusion can be sustained. Your last 2 blogs were based on only one premise:<br />
1) The commissioner reports 0 systemic investigations, therefore he has abandonned them.<br />
2)Some critics say the commissioner is anemic, therefore he is anemic.<br />
I would have expected better journalism from you and better overall from Maclean&#8217;s.<br />
The Commish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4849</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4849</guid>
		<description>Great letter from Drapeau. Here&#039;s hoping the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics gets on with this and calls Marleau in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great letter from Drapeau. Here&#8217;s hoping the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics gets on with this and calls Marleau in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeslieE</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4848</link>
		<dc:creator>LeslieE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4848</guid>
		<description>The last sentence in the Ottawa Citizen article – “…a spokeswoman … said the information commissioner&#039;s office was committed to improving the status quo…”.
Worth a smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last sentence in the Ottawa Citizen article – “…a spokeswoman … said the information commissioner&#8217;s office was committed to improving the status quo…”.<br />
Worth a smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Access to Information wants to be free. From Robert Marleau. : Inside the Queensway : Macleans.ca Blog Central</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/11/marleau-the-gathering-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-4847</link>
		<dc:creator>Access to Information wants to be free. From Robert Marleau. : Inside the Queensway : Macleans.ca Blog Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1926#comment-4847</guid>
		<description>[...] to Information &#8226; cranky letters &#8226; michel drapeau &#8226; Robert Marleau    Wells has the full story on the soon-to-be-infamous Drapeau letter, in which the retired colonel has a few home truths for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Information &bull; cranky letters &bull; michel drapeau &bull; Robert Marleau    Wells has the full story on the soon-to-be-infamous Drapeau letter, in which the retired colonel has a few home truths for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

