Willyoubetricked.cons

Just how weird is the Tories’ new carbon-tax attack site, willyoubetricked.ca? Plenty.
Amid the…

by Andrew Coyne on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:10am - 0 Comments

Just how weird is the Tories’ new carbon-tax attack site, willyoubetricked.ca? Plenty.

Amid the faux-populist fulminations against the “cosmopolitan elites” who supposedly favour the tax (versus the jes’-plain-folks who would be hurt by it, including farmers, fishermen, cabbies and … economists), the pandering to lefty paleo-greens who find carbon taxes too market-oriented (the tax will “give polluters an unlimited license to pollute,” it claims, which is not only untrue but contrary to acres of previous Tory speechifying to the effect that “carbon is not a pollutant” — which is true), the undergraduate rhetoric (“weasel words”) and grade school humour (farting cows), it will perhaps be overlooked that the main thrust of the piece — that the carbon tax will not be revenue-neutral, as the Liberals claim, but rather is just another in a long line of sneaky tax grabs — is aimed squarely at the Conservatives’ own exposed flank.

Of the six historic examples the Tories provide (click on “Tax Tricks Timeline”), at least four happened under Conservative prime ministers: the income tax (introduced in 1917, under Robert Borden), the gas tax (1932, R. B. Bennett), the corporate income tax surtax (1987, Brian Mulroney), and — most astonishing of all – the GST (1991, Mulroney again). [UPDATE: Make that five of six: the "McGuinty health care premium" introduced by the Ontario Liberal government in 2004 was simply a revival of a tax first introduced under the Conservatives, and scrapped by a previous Liberal government. Another Conservative "health care" tax, the Fair Share Health-Care Levy introduced under Mike Harris, was never repealed, but simply became the Ontario surtax.]

Given this government’s increasingly reckless disregard for the truth, I had thought at first this showed a becoming candour, on the GST especially. That was until I read the accompanying copy.

“The GST,” it reads, or rather sneers, “was introduced as another ‘revenue-neutral’ tax that would merely replace the manufacturer’s sales tax.” Yes, that was the Conservative talking point of the day. It also happens to be the truth. Look it up. In 1989-90, the last full year of the MST, the federal government collected some $17.7-billion from the tax. That was equal to 15.3% of federal revenues, or about 2.7% of GDP. Flash forward to 2005-06, the last full year before the Harper government began cutting the GST. In that year, the tax yielded $33.0-billion. Tax grab? Hardly: in proportionate terms, that was down to 14.9% of revenues; as a share of GDP, it was also down, to 2.4%.

The notion that the GST was some sort of tax grab is one of those things that “everybody knows” that just ain’t so. Either the Tories themselves were unaware of this rather salient fact — or they knew, and preferred to pander to populist ignorance. Either way, I can’t say I’m surprised.

Bookmark and Share
  • boudica

    Sophie, no. It’s not just you.

  • Calgary Junkie

    These attack ads are just a repeat of the strategy in the “Dion is not a leader” ads. I.E., define the Carbon Tax (Dion) before he does.
    The Liberals tried that with Harper, as soon as he became Canadian Alliance leader.

    It’s no big deal either way. It’s called hardball politics, which is what Harper is going to be playing from now until the end of the election campaign. There’s no “fear” here, far from it. I never sensed that Martin feared Harper either.

    BTW, whatever happened to Dion’s “Poverty Plan”–remember that ? He introduced it last November. It was supposed to be the centre piece of his election campaign. How much explaining and advocating did Dion do with that plan ? Almost zilch.

  • http://bluesclair.blogspot.com/ Blues Clair

    Calgary Junkie,

    Just to remind you in case you forgot. Dion and Liberals are not in power, they don’t need to explain their policies until the election comes around. It’s the government’s job to explain it’s policies while it… governs.

  • Calgary Junkie

    Blues Clair, Dion started the policy ball rolling with his two speeches about “taxing bad thing more and good things less”. Then we heard he was going to roll out the details over the summer.

    These ads have just speeded up the process for Dion. He has less time to do what he was going to do anyway. Harper likes surprises, and putting pressure on his opponents to act and think fast. He’s doing it again here.

  • http://bluesclair.blogspot.com/ Blues Clair

    Calgary Junk,

    Dion looks forward to making the enviroment a central issue in the election. I’m not sure Harper feels the same.

  • Calgary Junkie

    “As one Liberal activist in Ontario lamented in a letter to MPs: “Dion is the worst proponent in Canada I would choose to communicate a carbon tax. His lack of salesmanship will be exacerbated by the fact that his policy will have lots of fine print — and most people only read the headlines.”

    Read more here …
    http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=586447

  • Sophie

    “for your third pillar”
    …sorry, but I mention that any chance I can get. It’s amusing.

  • Geiseric the Lame

    ‘“carbon is not a pollutant” — which is true’

    Actually, if you’re low enough in the marine food chain (one or two up from plankton), it IS a pollutant. its a pH thing. But hey, close enough for rock and roll.

From Macleans