What, already? Cabinet shuffle metaspeculation

A cabinet shuffle tomorrow? Really?
With all due respect to Le Devoir, and its…

by kadyomalley on Monday, June 16, 2008 8:58am - 0 Comments

A cabinet shuffle tomorrow? Really?

With all due respect to Le Devoir, and its no doubt impeccable sources, I can’t quite believe that the Prime Minister is so frantic to push the bishops, knights and Jim Prentice that comprise his current cabinet around the board that he would buck tradition and do so before the summer recess – which is, after all, just four days away. I can’t even remember

the last time we had a non-emergency cabinet shuffle while Parliament was in session. After all, it’s usually preferable to give newly minted (and re-minted) ministers at least a few days to blitz through the briefing books and sit through PowerPoint presentations by deputy and associate deputy ministers before expecting them to effectively fend off opposition attacks in the House.

My theory, not that I have any particular inside knowledge, is that there may, at one point, have been a Tuesday shuffle in the planning stages, but one that rested entirely on Peter Van Loan being able to successfully convince the opposition to let his government off early. When he failed – somewhat spectacularly – to win even the bare majority of support needed to extend the sitting hours for the rest of the session, it would have been painfully obvious to even the most Pollyannaish of House planners that an early adjournment – and a subsequent shuffle – just wasn’t in the cards.

My guess? Next Monday at the earliest, but really, there’s no particular reason why he has to do right this minute – or even the minute the House adjourns. The Maxime Bernier-shaped hole at Foreign Affairs has been filled for the moment by the quietly competent David Emerson, and there are no other major ministerial meltdowns at the moment. He could wait until mid-July or even August to rearrange the furniture. Which would give us reporters that much longer to drive ourselves, and everyone else, crazy with our increasingly esoteric predictions, so really, everybody wins.

Bookmark and Share
  • Paul Wells

    Ah, but with Dion’s policy dump on Wednesday, is there not some advantage to owning the headlines on Tuesday?

    Even as I say that I’m not entirely sure I believe it. “Harper shuffles cabinet because Maxime Bernier…” is not a headline that will necessarily end well.

  • Anon

    The La Presse/CP article that you linked to doesn’t say “Tuesday”.

  • Paul Wells

    But the original Le Devoir story did say Tuesday. Still, a Tory of my acquaintance, speculating but with more information than I have, agrees that Thursday would make more sense for a shuffle because then everyone would spend Wednesday speculating about what might happen, burying coverage of what actually was happening (Dion, see above)

  • Scott M.

    I doubt cabinet shuffle speculation could supplant Dion’s announcement in the headlines on Wednesday, but if they could entice someone to cross the floor on that day…

  • TobyornotToby

    Or maybe the idea is to overshadow the session ending without any progess stories? Reveiews of the Conservative progress on the Big 5 priorities?

  • R Keller

    You forgot the language-of-Moliere alert.

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    I don’t know; I think cabinet shuffles are fascinating to political junkies like us (both amateur and professional), but not really all that interesting to normal human beings. We’ll go crazy with coverage, of course, but I suspect most regular folks will be more interested in the much-anticipated “tax on everything” than what secretary of state got promoted to which b-list cabinet post, and what it all means. Plus, a shuffle isn’t, by nature, a guaranteed *good* news story for a government. It’s a story – neutral, with the potential for bad or good, depending on how cranky the media is. I wouldn’t necessarily want to go up against another event – like, for example, McCain’s speech, which would be the case on Thursday/Friday, since there will be setup pieces galore on What It All Means, or even the green shift. It would make more sense to wait until next week, and then do it when you’re the only show in town.

  • Paul Wells

    Zut! Quelle tristesse! Que cette vilaine langue
    Vienne troubler ce cabinet exsangue!

  • Sophie

    Unlikely? Sure. Fun? Definitely. Although, without cabinet speculation to obsess over,and without an upcoming election (but maybe October!) what on earth will we all talk about all summer? We’ll have to get lives or something. Althoguh, I agree with Kady- I’ve heard quite a few more normal people (otherwise known as ‘humans’) talking about this crazy tax-thing that no (normal people) ones quite sure involves.

  • Dot

    Predicted next topic of metaspeculation: What will the spouses/dates be wearing at Rideau Hall, their cleavages lines, and what it all means in the post Couillard period…

  • Sophie

    We took your point, Paul, you are officially better than approximately 50% of the country. You, are, however, only marginally better than 17%. What the remaining 23% doesn’t know won’t hurt them.

  • Sophie

    That sounds a lot nastier than I intended for it to

  • dan in van

    Perhaps the ‘speculation’ has been planted to crowd out the ‘tax everything’ pronouncement of this week, especially among the printed word and talking head types in the media. If, given an overseeing editor with an Asper whispering in his ear, you opined on what to right next – a dissertation on what’s good/bad about Dion’s proposal, or who or who isn’t heading to Rideau Hall with some trophy biker chick?
    My guess is that 3 of 5 times the speculating will win out. Of course not on these fine pages, however…

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    Actually, I’d be far less surprised by a chiefs of staff shuffle – which is also hinted in the Devoir piece – because that seems more in keeping with Harper’s When In Doubt, Pull The Reins Tighter strategy of ministerial micromanagement. Independent Thought Alarm going off in certain offices? Time to send in someone controlled entirely from the Langevin mothership to make sure nothing goes on without his knowledge and approval. The fact that, at this point, they may actually be running out of competent, intelligent, experienced staffers who are willing to put all that competence, intelligence and experience aside in order to wait for instructions from Sandra Buckler, however, may make that tricky.

  • http://www.punditsguide.ca Pundits’ Guide

    Unlikely? Sure. Fun? Definitely. Although, without cabinet speculation to obsess over,and without an upcoming election (but maybe October!) what on earth will we all talk about all summer?

    How about the forthcoming byelections? In order of the seats having been vacated, Westmount-Ville Marie, Saint-Lambert, Guelph, and Don Valley West will be as of July 1.

    Would the Conservatives (or Liberals or anyone else for that matter) be at all interested in having a few other seats freed up for a transfusion of new blood? Anyways, I believe Westmount-VM has to be called by July 25 or 28 at the latest.

    See, there’s always a fix around the corner for political junkies!

  • C. Ralph

    Listening to Emerson stumbling through his answers about the prison break — might make Harper think about a full-time Foreign Affairs Minister. Emerson sounded old – he sounded tentative and rather out of it on the news tonight.

  • James from Vancouver

    Could they be shuffling to take steam and attention away from Dion’s proposed Green Shift plan due out tomorrow? It would be typical Harper fashion.

From Macleans