Savage Washington

Savage Washington

Luiza Ch. Savage covers political life south of the border. Follow Luiza on Twitter: @luizachsavage

Obama: NAFTA not so bad

by Luiza Ch. Savage on Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:15pm - 0 Comments

My friend, the wonderful Nina Easton, has an interview with Barack Obama in Fortune magazine that looks like a bit of a defensive move aimed at a business audience ahead of John McCain’s free trade speech in Ottawa tomorrow.

Nina writes: ” In an interview with Fortune to be featured in the magazine’s upcoming issue, the presumptive Democratic nominee backed off his harshest attacks on the free trade agreement and indicated he didn’t want to unilaterally reopen negotiations on NAFTA.

“Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified,” he conceded, after I reminded him that he had called NAFTA “devastating” and “a big mistake,” despite nonpartisan studies concluding that the trade zone has had a mild, positive effect on the U.S. economy.

Does that mean his rhetoric was overheated and amplified? “Politicians are always guilty of that, and I don’t exempt myself,” he answered.

Obama says he believes in “opening up a dialogue” with trading partners Canada and Mexico “and figuring to how we can make this work for all people.” ”

MORE

Did we all see this coming, or what?

Bookmark and Share
  • Pingback: Come home, Austan Goolsbee… : Inkless Wells : Macleans.ca Blog Central

  • http://andrewcoyne.com Andrew Coyne

    “Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified.”

    So Austin Goolsbee was right! Or rather, the consular official in Chicago who transcribed his meeting with them was right. Bonus points: Jim Travers and other handwringers over Canada’s alleged “interference” in the American election are … in need of another topic.

  • http://www.maderblog.com David Mader

    Does this mean the Tories can attend the McCain speech now?

    Or more to the point: does this mean that if Tories did attend the McCain speech, they wouldn’t be pilloried in the press?

  • Neil

    It’s a shame the Tories can’t attend the McCain speech, just because there’s anti-Republican sentiment in many parts of Canada right now. If the Liberals can invite Howard Dean to speak at their lack-of-Leadership Convention, while taking Tony Blair’s talking points on child poverty, why can’t the Conservatives pay a visit to one of the few dignified politicians left in the United States, regardless of party affiliation? Maybe Mac can teach the Tories a thing or two about bi-partisanship.

    Liberals define “pro-Canadian” as being anti-American, unless those Americans being dealt with are very liberal protectionist Democrats.

    Conservatives define “pro-Canadian” as promoting Canada’s military heritage and international peace-making commitments, while working with any U.S. administration on resolving common issues (FTA, acid-rain treaty, softwood lumber).

From Macleans