Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

BTC: Read his lips

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:46pm - 0 Comments

Perhaps in hopes of reminding the Prime Minister when he might muster excitement, his speechwriters sprinkled exclamation points throughout tonight’s text. The words Mr. Harper was prompted to hit with particular enthusiasm were as follows: Done! Quebeckers! Government! Debt! Predators! Forever! Opposition! Word! Percent! Pensioners! Office! Trudeau! Claims! Taxes!

The most inspiring of these is surely that last one, Taxes! As in, “As long as I will be Prime Minister, as long as I have MPs like Jacques Gourde, there will be no new taxes.”

Thus does the PM’s pep rally climax. And thus does he make history, becoming surely the first politician to make a promise he’s already publicly broken.

It would be an odd line even if it weren’t demonstrably untrue. Twenty years ago this summer, George H. W. Bush accepted the Republican nomination with his signature line and eventual epitaph: “Read my lips, no new taxes.” And it’s difficult to read the phrasing here as anything less than an homage—an ironic and possibly subversive homage by Mr. Harper’s speechwriters, but an homage all the same.

It was, of course, rather ruinous for Herbert Walker. Two years after taking office he had to raise taxes. Two years after that Bill Clinton and the Democrats had great fun at his expense. And still now the line (written by Peggy Noonan) lingers as tangible proof that politicians are natural liars and all your reflex cynicism for the political process is justified. (Surely Herbert Walker smiles now to see that his son has exceeded him tenfold in this regard.)

But even if Bush Sr. had never begged us to pay uncomfortably close attention to his mouth, even if this government hadn’t already introduced a new tax, tonight’s pledge would still be a juvenile bit of rhetoric. Precisely because it’s physically impossible, or at least bizarrely reckless, to vow, as a government, that you won’t ever raise taxes. Unless you’re psychic it’s not possible to know what economic stumbles or crises may come. You’re dealing with an inherently volatile system, dependent on myriad variables beyond your control. (As Harper warned tonight of fiscal trouble, “no country is immune.”) In effect, promising you won’t ever raise taxes is roughly akin to promising you won’t ever go to war. You can say it. You can promise it. And you might get lucky enough to stick with it. But it’s at best a guess. And a self-limiting guess at that. 

Granted, “If our national economic situation should reach a point where it would be prudent and necessary to adjust the taxation formula, we may be forced to introduce new taxes” isn’t quite as fun to say as “no new taxes.” Even if you put an exclamation point at the end. But it’s, you know, at least somewhat closer to the truth.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis (Second Thots)

    boudica and Scott M, I don’t see how Harper has done anything to violate the principles of Parliamentary democracy in establishing fixed election dates. In fact, he has empowered Parliament by giving it final say on matters of confidence, while taking away the universally politicized power to arbitrarily set election dates.

    And, again, he has kept his promise.

    T. Thwim, Harper has appointed one unelected Senator who will almost certainly lose either the unelected status or Senator status after the next election. Otherwise, he has appointed an elected Senator from Alberta, left all other Senate openings unfilled, and marched on with other numerous reforms which the Liberals are blocking. How is that breaking his promises on the Senate?

    Softwood lumber? I thought Harper promised better relations leading to a good deal. And I thought that’s what we got. Maybe I’m mistaken.

    Oh Boy, of course politicians yell and scream in opposition, then do many of the same things themselves. I don’t know an opposition in the world who hasn’t done that. Yet, again, given that this is human nature and politics, it doesn’t mean that they’re all the same. Some are better than others, and I actually do think Harper is better than recent Liberal governments.

    I know I come across as Conservative hack. But I just think that sometimes they’re held to unfairly high standards — in part set by Harper himself, yes.

    People try to make the exception the rule. I can understand Liberals being ultimately hypocritical about it. But for others and the media?

    They also try to suggest that if some promises are broken, then it justifies whoppers like we get from McGuinty. I just don’t believe that. I believe in scorecards and general evaluations that don’t involve having to be perfect.

    And, even on that score, Harper said he wasn’t going to be perfect. Another kept promise! lol

  • boudica

    “boudica and Scott M, I don’t see how Harper has done anything to violate the principles of Parliamentary democracy in establishing fixed election dates.”

    Dennis, I never said he did. I said that giving up your right as PM to call an election was dumb and his current predicament proves it. Perhaps you are confusing my post with someone else’s?

  • T. Thwim

    As always, the internet is your enemy: http://www.gowlings.com/resources/enewsletters/govbrief/Htmfiles/governmentBulletin12092005.en.html

    Do a search on the words “First and foremost” to see what it is Mr. Harper promised.

  • Steph C

    *cough* gun registry *cough*

  • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis (Second Thots)

    Boudica, what exactly is his current predicament? I don’t get it, especially as it relates to democratic reform.

  • Pingback: BTC: What he said : Capital Read : The Commons : Macleans.ca Blog Central

From Macleans