This doesn’t bode well for the YPF World Tour

by kadyomalley on Friday, August 8, 2008 11:11am - 0 Comments

After what happened last weekend in Surrey, it’s not hard to see why the Conservatives would want to retreat to less perilous pandering grounds: taxpayer dollars and naughty words. A classic combination – all this story needs is a gloatbyte from Charles McVety, and it’s C-10 all over again:

Ottawa axes arts travel program

Tories say funds going to programs that would ‘raise the eyebrows of any typical Canadian’

David Akin,  Canwest News Service

Published: Thursday, August 07, 2008

OTTAWA — The federal government will cancel a program on Friday that sent artists abroad to promote Canadian culture because the program’s grant recipients included “a general radical,” “a left-wing and anti-globalization think-tank” and a rock band that uses an expletive as part of its name.

The Conservatives are cancelling the $4.7-million PromArt program administered by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade because most of the money “went to groups that would raise the eyebrows of any typical Canadian,” said a government official, speaking on condition of anonymity. […]

The recipients singled out by the Conservatives include:

- $3,000 to Toronto-based experimental rock band Holy F— for a week-long tour of the United Kingdom.

- $5,000 to former CBC broadcaster Avi Lewis, who now works for al Jazeera and who is described in a Conservative memo as “a general radical,” to help pay for his travel to film festivals in Australia and Argentina;

- $16,500 to send Tal Bachman, a best-selling recording artist and the son of The Guess Who’s Randy Bachman, to South Africa and Zimbabwe for music festivals.

“I think there’s a reasonable expectation by taxpayers that they won’t fund the world travel of wealthy rock stars, ideological activists or fringe and alternative groups,” the source said.

There is absolutely no indication that the program was somehow biased towards foul-mouthed subversives like “left-leaning columnist” Gwynne Dyer, who apparently got $3,000 to cover his travel costs for a Cuban lecture tour, and who will no doubt be somewhat gobsmacked to be lumped in with Avi Lewis and the North South Institute as a dangerous rabblerouser who can pay his own way to make nice with the Communists, by George.

Nowhere in the talking points does it suggest that applications from funding from family-friendly music groups or right-leaning political activists were promptly fed to the departmental shredder; in fact, as Akin notes later in the story, the vast majority of recipients would be unlikely to raise the eyebrows of even the most conservative Canadian. Somehow, I don’t think many see the Canadian Museum of Civilization, the Royal Winnipeg Ballet or the Rheostatics as hotbeds of radical thought. And as for that “experimental rock band” with the vapour-inducing moniker Holy Fuck (or, as the Post calls it, “Holy F—‘), they sound a bit too discordant to make it onto the ITQ iPod, but they were nominated for a Juno last year, so they can’t be pure evil, right? Wait, don’t answer that.

What is particularly disheartening here –aside from the pointless pettiness, partisan pandering, and inevitable appearance of Pierre Poilievre as official media go-to guy on the issue  – is the implication that a “typical Canadian” would be more appalled by government grants going towards purportedly obscene artistic and political views than  the obscene spectacle of that same government refusing a plea for money to rebuild a First Nations grade school. I may not be Muttart the Great and Terrible, but I think I know which one is more likely to raise not only eyebrows, but voter ire.

UPDATE: Comrade Colleague Wells rips the lid off another honeypot for subversive globetrotters — courtesy of the White House, no less!

Bookmark and Share
  • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

    Mike Horn

    The ChiComs have been doing cultural exchanges since the beginning of their reign and look at well how that’s worked out for the people of China. I am sure the people forgot all about their troubles during the Cultural Revolution as they watched Canadian and American ping pong teams do their thing.

    I would like to see your source for claim that art is one our most profitable export industries. I am looking at StatsCan table and it says our most valuable exports are Agriculture/Fish, Energy, Forestry, Industrial Products and Machinery. The ChiComs are buying a lot our primary resources but I don’t see the see connection with ping pong.

  • http://runesmith.blogspot.com Jennifer Smith

    I’m a little late to the game here, but two points:

    1) This is a program that cost the taxpayers a whopping $4.7 million dollars a year. That’s, what, a buck for every person in the GTA? A day and a half in Afghanistan?

    2) If you actually read through the full list of recipients (kindly posted by Stephen Taylor of all people), you will notice that not only does this fund pay to send performing artists and filmmakers to festivals abroad – it also pays to bring foreign buyers HERE to attend things like the Banff Television Festival and the Toronto International Film Festival so they can buy our product.

    In other words, it’s BUSINESS. And isn’t that what the Conservatives are supposed to be all about?

  • Mike Horn

    Sorry JWL let’s finish connecting the dots. Cultural exchanges were being used by Kissenger and Peking as a back door diplomatic channel before risking open talks. That was part of a little project called “humiliating and destroying the USSR” in which we made China a key partner.

    In the present day international trade specialists empahasize the importance of cultural understanding when penetrating the Chinese free market. Which last I checked was bigger and freeer than the Russian version. As for profitability, as opposed to volume of trade, art does well. How many goverment dollars went into educating and promoting Shania Twain? How much profit has she made from her singing lessons? Inuit take rocks they find on the ground and sell them for big bucks after a few days of carving. thats very profitable.

    Sorry for coming home tipsy last night and going all serial postie there but… I’ve started a facebook group to fight this and I think we can win this argument during the election. But we’ll need to get organized fast.

  • Juliet

    Thank you for this. I’m deeply upset and disappointed that this program– a mere few million dollars worth of investment that created at least that amount of value in terms of exposure for Canadian artists and Canada’s profile in the world– has been cancelled. And the blatant pandering to the right wing though imposing an ideological framework onto this program is very disturbing.

    Also, Holy Fuck are hardly the stuff of nightmares. They make electronic, highly danceable, instrumental music. We’re not talking corpse-paint and Hail Satan here, you know?

  • Juliet

    “You really are gunning to be one of the most boring countries in the world when even your artists aren’t allowed to be “fringe and alternative groups.”

    Just had to quote that, because it deserves to be read at least twice.

  • Mike

    Reality check, just because you don’t understand the art doesn’t mean it isn’t worth funding, it means you haven’t tried hard enough yet. If you can’t handle paying a dollar per year to help promote Canadian culture you’ve got to stop for a second, pull your head out of your ass, and look at the bigger picture. The arts are what defines a nations cultural identity. You probably pay more money in pocket change every year to homeless beggars in the streets, than you do in tax dollars to this type of program, and last time i checked the homeless wasn’t doing too much positive work for Canada’s global image.

  • Pingback: We’ll always have the Canada Pavilion in Shanghai, at least: More on those cuts to arts and culture : Capital Read : Inside the Queensway : Macleans.ca Blog Central

From Macleans