Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Le ciel est bleu: liveblogging Stephen Harper's first Quebec City event of Campaign '08

by Paul Wells on Sunday, September 7, 2008 2:50pm - 40 Comments

2:41:18 PM

So here’s the thing. I don’t actually plan to do a lot of liveblogging during this campaign, because that’s ITQ’s thing and I’m not so much the blackberry-typing guy. Thumbs hurt. But two things happened on the way to the Quebec City Hilton (official motto: “Since We Renovated, The Decor Sucks A Lot Less”). Here are the two things:

1. ITQ told me how to do the datestamp thing, so now I can datestamp at any time. Look: 2:44:07 PM

2. When we landed at the airport, they told us the dogs would be sniffing the bags when we get back on, and while I have nothing the dogs will find suspicious, it got me thinking about lugging my backpack all over Quebec’s half acre, and I thought, why bother?, so I left my backpack on the plane. This seemed clever until I realized we have 2 hours of filing time after the event here, and I got nothing but my berry.

So I might as well use it. Hence: a liveblog! Translated from French, in part! Steve Blaney is here, so you know it’ll be a party. The fun starts in about 15 minutes.

3:08:44 PM small delay. I had imagined a bigger room and a bigger crowd, and apparently when the plane left Ottawa the Conservatives still weren’t sure whether they’d hold the event indoors or out. (Just as the PM wasn’t sure whether he’d walk or drive to Rideau Hall. Harper ’08: it’s highly improvisational, you just can’t tell from the visuals.) In the end, we’re in a room just off the lobby that’s designed to handle 200 or 300 people, which is handy because that’s what we’ve got.

There is milling. I spotted a familiar Quebec City Conservative face and asked him how it looks for the party here. “Around Quebec City? Solid,” he said. “Making gains in the city itself?” He puffed out his cheeks and rolled his eyes: it’ll take hard work if it can be done.

And still there is milling.

3:38:36 PM
So much has happened, including my blackberry crashing. Josée Verner introduced the boss while the Quebec City region MPs and candidates cheered her name as they would have if they were actually excited to see her, an unlikely prospect as she is not really a roof-raising kind of lady.

Now Harper’s up. He made a point of introducing his candidates. By name. Something he was rather famously unable to do when he came to Quebec City on the second day of the 06 campaign. So, progress.

And no sooner had he completed that exploit than he’s lighting into the Bloc, hammer and tong. This is the Message of the Event, and I’m not just guessing, because we’ve been handed press releases with the headline, “Quebec Must Choose Between Harper and Dion.” The Bloc? “As their slogan says, they’ll be present” — not deciding or running things, Harper says.

3:44:08 PM
It’s the Harper government that lowered taxes and recognized Quebec — Oops! The Québécois — as a nation, “Not the Bloc or the Liberals,” Harper says.
And a small thing, but striking to me at least: just as, at Rideau Hall, he made a point of saying how much he had appreciated even having the job, he hits hard here on the part of his speech where he thanks Quebecers for their support while he’s been PM. “It’s true that not everyone in Quebec agrees with everything I’ve done — but you know, not everyone in Alberta agrees with everything I’ve done either.” But he tries to deserve Quebecers’ support, including by “speaking your language.” He allows as how his French isn’t perfect — in fact today it’d been a little shakier than I remember it, without being a real problem; nerves, I suspect — “but I hope that every day it’s getting better.” Warm applause at this. “Because a prime minister must be able to transmit your pride to the world.”

And with that, the event, mostly just a rally, is over. Mme Verner is gonna scrum in a couple of minutes, but unless she says something surprising, I’ll sign off.

Flying to Vancouver tonight. For now, two hours filing time with nothing to do but flâner dans le vieux-Québec. Boy I love campaigns.

Bookmark and Share
  • franktremb

    From the Macleans.ca archives:

    “A few years ago, Sleeman, then unknown in Quebec, was able to capture a sizable chunk of the province’s crowded and chauvinistic beer market simply by recording radio ads in which he sounded exactly like what he is: an anglo who tries to speak French. Quebecers are not hostile to other Canadians, François Lacoursière, the ads’ creator, told Maclean’s at the time. “An anglo who tries to speak French is instantly welcome, if only for trying.”

    If Harper is going to run as Louis St. Laurent in English Speaking Canada I’m pretty sure from what I heard yesterday that he’s going to run as the Sleeman guy in Quebec.

  • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

    Hazzard

    Don’t know if you are talking about me or not but I wouldn’t vote Liberal in a million years and it has nothing to do with accents.

    I was only pointing out that I use to give Chretien a chance to make his point, I would listen to him.

    While with Dion he has about 5 seconds to make his point or I mute the sound until he’s done. Dion’s tone and demeanour is the equivalent of nails on a chalkboard.

  • Andrew

    jwl:

    I would hazard to guess that it’s not too important what you think of Dion or his accent.=, as it will have no bearing on anything.

  • Don Smith

    Are any leaders debates scheduled yet, and how many will there be? I’m interested to see how Dion does in an English debate environment. He was very bad in the English Liberal Party leadership debates (obviously, ie. priorities), looking forward to see if he has improved.

  • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

    Andrew

    True, my one vote won’t mean much of anything.

    However, I do know 3 people (aged 40+) who have previously voted Liberal in every fed and prov election but have a similar reaction to Dion as I do. One is going to vote NDP and the other two are going Con or not vote. I think Dion is underwhelming many of his own supporters and it’s going to show at the polls.

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Oh God…..get off the Dion’s English. Do I understand what he is saying? Yup, accent and all.

    You realize that criticizing someone with an accent – you are criticizing how many Canadians today?

    Get to work journalists….talk about their policies, etc.

    I cannot believe that politics has come down to an accent or the fact that a PM has children and all this nonsense.

    If this doesn’t improve, I’ll go back to watching the US race.

  • hazzard

    JWL isn’t that kind of the point of my commment? If you let someone’s voice/accent/demeanor stop you from even listening to what he/she has to say then you really don’t vote on issues. That’s hardly different than the petty reasons Jerry and George would find to justify dumping a girlfriend on Seinfeld.

    As for never voting Liberal in a million years, again such disinterest in listening and deciding based on platforms. If you only vote Conservative, which I’m assuming based on this comment, that becomes a rather odd statement since Harper has gone to great lengths to govern like a Liberal. So either you do, in fact, like Liberal governing or you believe that with a majority the true Harper will show his stripes and govern the way you have always wanted. But then you have to ask, would you really want such a untrustworthy chameleon running our country? You know….kind of like what the opposition parties have been saying?

  • sf

    I would not vote liberal in a million years, and the reason is their policies, their philosophy, their history, and their platform. If Harper were to govern completely like a Liberal, I would stop voting for him, too. However, that has not happened.
    The fact that Dion is incomprehensible at times, well, that is just another reason to not vote Liberal, because the leader of a country should be comprehensible in the official languages of the country.

  • Andrew

    So, sf=jwl? I’m confused.

    At any rate, jwl, my point is that you already have cast your vote. Your vote is note up for grabs. You are therefore irrelevant in the discourse of this election. It’s not that your vote is insignificant (I’d wager that your vote counts more than mine, as I live in a heavily populated riding).

  • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

    Hazzard

    I am different from you, I guess. I have a political philosophy which I believe would be best for our country and I vote for the party that is closest to my ideology, which means Cons or Libertarian.

    You are correct when you question me about whether I support Harper because I am on the fence at the moment. Harper talked the talk before becoming Con leader, and so I voted for him the past two elections, but now I am thinking he’s governing like a Lib and I am not impressed at all.

    I think all politicians are untrustworthy chameleons so that doesn’t really bother me all that much.

    Who’s a libertarian suppose to vote for when all our major parties are socialist to varying degrees? At the moment, Philip Bender is looking likely to get my vote.

  • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

    Sandi

    I think media/public are focusing on other things than policy because the major parties are basically offering the same plans.

    All seem to believe that government spending is good and the only difference between them is how fast expenditures should expand.

    It’s all rather tweedledum and tweedledee at the moment and I don’t expect it to change.

  • bud

    Can someone,anyone explain to Dion what the name of his website is?

    2 days in a row he has sent people to greenshift.ca, who happen to be suing Dion. They have a banner saying their name has been hijacked. Is this like a unique form of Parisian masochism? Should we have a pool how many days out of 36 that Dion will send people to the wrong site?

    Dion’s conference was all about how Harper is a liar.

    If Dion, just yesterday, said his campaign was not going to be negative, and he starts off calling Harper a liar, doesn’t this make him a…er……..a..liar?

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Bud……Harper is a liar. That’s not negative campaigning – it’s truthful campaigning.

    By the way…..Harper started negative at 6 a.m this morning.

  • http://www.hieyeglasses.com Hieyeglasses

    Yea, it was too early to comprehend but he did start negative.

  • dblue

    Paul is right; the riding named Québec is pretty much the only one which we could say in really ‘in the city’. The other ridings are consisting mostly of the suburbs like Charlesbourg, Sillery, Ste-Foy, etcetera. The Conservatives are having a hard time making a breakthrough in the city itself and are way stronger in the suburbans areas which are dominated by home owners.

From Macleans