Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

BTC: Sorry Liz

by Aaron Wherry on Monday, September 8, 2008 3:51pm - 32 Comments

Fresh from the inbox.

“The Consortium approached the parties to explore the possibility of including the Green Party in all or part of the Leaders’ Debates. However, three parties opposed its inclusion and it became clear that if the Green Party were included, there would be no Leaders’ Debates. In the interest of Canadians, the Consortium has determined that it is better to broadcast the debates with the four major party leaders, rather than not at all.”

The cynical reaction? This might be the best thing to happen to Elizabeth May.

First, she’s relatively untested on the national stage and there’s no guarantee she would have succeeded against Messrs. Harper, Dion, Duceppe and Layton. As much as appearing might have given her legitimacy, she might just as easily have bombed.

Second, as various the comments below seem to demonstrate, this may only galvanize support for the Greens in some sectors.

Bookmark and Share
  • Kevin

    When the court decides against her, it may well take her repeatedly expressed support for the Liberals into account. We’ll never know – courts aren’t always explicit about the factors influencing their decisions.

    Playing footsie with Dion gained her party absolutely jack-squat. And it may have cost her the chance to participate in the debate.

    I repeat: She did this to herself. Now, she will spend thousands of dollars of other peoples’ money trying to fix the mess she created. Everyone who wrote a cheque to the Green Party thinking they were buying some smart lawyers their 2009 summer vacations, raise your hand.

  • Kevin

    Also, recall that the Bloc MPs in the House in 1993 weren’t all “switchers.” They had elected MPs under their banner. The first MP elected as a BQ member was current leader Gilles Duceppe, who won a 1990 by-election as a member of the BQ.

    What, if a loony MP on his last legs decides to join some lunatic fringe party, that gets them into the debate? That was the logic May was working on when she pulled this stunt with Blair Wilson. Pretty weak.

    May was sending cheerleading e-mails to Liberal candidates as recently at 9:19 am this morning. Hilarious. Half her party wants to string her up by this point.

  • Jeff

    Sending this to Jack Layton:

    I’d just like to say as a voter who has supported the NDP in the past I was both astonished and embarrassed to read in the paper this morning that Mr. Jack Layton was one of the conspirators who refused to participate in the televised debates if Elizabeth May of the Green Party had been invited.

    However you choose to spin it, this is nothing but a simple act of cowardice. I guess I was wrong to expect better of you and the NDP. Good luck with the campaign, but you just lost another voter to the Greens. You squandered whatever opportunity you had to retain my vote when you slapped democracy in the face by threatening to take your ball and go home.

  • 300baud

    Why does not Elections Canada and CPAC host debates?

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Okay, everyone talks about “the Consortium” like they are a secret society…who exactly are the “Constortium” and who BY NAME make the decision?

  • LeslieE

    Who is/are in the “Consortium” that allowed themselves to be strong-armed and blackmailed? I want to give them a piece of … advice.
    :[

  • Diogenes

    I disagree with Elizabeth May’s decision to sit, as the Green Party’s first MP, an ex-Liberal MP who was booted from the Liberal caucus for campaign spending irregularities. However, I think she deserves a spot at the debating podium because nearly 700,000 people voted Green in the last election and, if polling results over these past few months translate into pro votes at the ballot box, the Greens should near, and perhaps surpass, the one million mark. Hundreds of thousdands of Canadians, who care enough about the environment and the future to vote for something other than the mainstream parties, deserve a spot at that podium through Elizabeth May.

    I suspect the biggest reason that Tubby objected to having her there is because his charisma-challenged “school monitor” personality would have taken a drubbing in the unforgiving glare of public television once feisty Elizabeth’s sharp tongue got going. By the way, the other three deserve to be condemned too for not having the decency to take a stand and side with May in this matter. Paint Tubby (who is reputed to be rather thin-skinned) into a corner and we’d see the real Harper emerge.

From Macleans