Kidnapped in Somalia

The inside story of how Albertan Amanda Lindhout found herself being held for a US$2.5-million ransom

by Jonathon Gatehouse and Nicholas Köhler on Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:00am - 8 Comments

The online reviews make Mogadishu’s Hotel Shamo sound almost pleasant. “The rooms are large, with air conditionned, wi-fi and electricity 24 h day, [sic]” a Kenyan visitor wrote last December. “The restaurant is extremely decent, and serves lobster when available at the fish market.” And above all, notes the entry, the hotel is “relatively safe”—not a small consideration for travellers to Somalia, a country that stopped functioning so long ago it now qualifies as a “post-failed” state.

Amanda Lindhout, a 27-year-old freelance journalist from Sylvan Lake, Alta., and her friend Nigel Brennan, a 35-year-old Australian photographer, checked in on Aug. 20. They spent two days scouting for stories in the former capital—chasing reports of a roadside bomb aimed at African Union peacekeepers, interviewing shopkeepers at the Bakara market about the almost daily mortar attacks from Islamic insurgents. Then early on the morning of Aug. 23, the pair crammed into a hotel-owned Toyota Land Cruiser for the journey into even more dangerous territory, a camp that houses some of the estimated 400,000 people displaced by the fighting in Mogadishu.

The trip to Afgoyee doesn’t take long— the sprawling refugee shantytown is just 20 km to the northwest—but it is outside the zone controlled by the grandly named Transitional Federal Government (TFG), Somalia’s notional authority. So, at the Sarkus checkpoint on the city’s edge, Lindhout and Brennan bid goodbye to their two AK-47-toting guards, dressed in TFG uniforms, but employed by the hotel for $10 a day. Another security “team” (read members of a different militia) were supposedly waiting for them at the next roadblock, just 1.5 km down the highway. The journalists, their guide, the hotel driver and another local man who hopped in to show them the way disappeared en route. Lindhout had travelled to Somalia hoping to sell stories about the deteriorating security situation and burgeoning humanitarian crisis to networks in Canada and France. Her only television appearance so far has been in a grainy video her captors released to al-Jazeera last week. Dressed in a red abaya, and surrounding by masked and armed men, the Albertan called on the Canadian and Australian governments to work for her and Brennan’s release. A communiqué read by one of her captors called for an end to foreign aggression in Somalia. But the demands transmitted through other channels have been anything but political—US$2.5 million in cold, hard cash.

The video was released by a group calling itself the Mujahideen of Somalia, but according to the clan leader who has been negotiating with the kidnappers, ideology has not entered into the discussions. “They are not Shabaab,” Dahir Farah says by phone from Mogadishu, referring to the al-Qaeda-linked Islamist militia who are the TFG’s main military rivals. “They are not another faction. They are bandits.” Farah, a well-known figure in Mogadishu, says he first heard from Lindhout’s captors on the day of the abductions. Their initial demand was for US$5 million, a sum that he says he convinced them was too high. Despite media reports to the contrary, the negotiator says he has been unable to speak directly with any of the hostages, but has been assured that they are being well looked after. However, Farah is frustrated by what he perceives as a lack of urgency on the part of the Australian and Canadian governments. The Aussies, through their High Commission in Nairobi, Kenya, have flatly refused to pay a ransom. And Farah claims he has heard nothing from Canadian diplomats. “These journalists, they are in very much danger. Your governments, they must take action as soon as possible. Trust me, these kidnappers are not good people.”

Maclean’s has obtained a cellphone number for the men who are holding Lindhout and Brennan. But the magazine decided against contacting the group at this point, for fear of jeopardizing the safety of the captives, or ongoing efforts to free them. Last week, Australia’s Foreign Minister Stephen Smith wrote to his media asking for restraint in their coverage. No such demand has been made by the Canadian government. In fact, in sharp contrast to the Australians, it took Foreign Affairs in Ottawa more than three days to respond to Maclean’s request for their input on the matter. Among the initial concerns expressed by Rodney Moore, a department spokesman, were potential violations of Canada’s Privacy Act, and the possibility of adverse media coverage. Ian Burchett, the director general of communications for Foreign Affairs, says the government is “working with all channels to seek further information about the case, and [the hostages’] welfare and early release.” But he declined to comment on Farah’s allegation of diplomatic indifference. “It’s a very sensitive case,” says Burchett.

Bookmark and Share
  • Shtan W

    I fail to see why keeping Lindhout and her companions name in the limelight would be detrimental.
    The kidnappers seek money not publicity.

  • http://www.gerard-white.com gerard white

    Nice article. First to answer the other comment, it is detrimental because the kidnappers use the media and set Google Alerts to help them argue their case for ransom against those attempting to negotiate their release.
    Jonathan, I thought your article was well researched and informative even you touched on a vital key point KRI. So I am left wondering why you posted the story, is it to help AH and NB or just you wanted to post a story? It was interesting without mentioning your colleagues by name which may (i’m no expert) add to teh difficulties negotiating for their safe release.

  • http://thewealthyblogger.net Paul MacPherson

    I ponder on two keep points about this situation with Nigel and Amanda.

    The first is how equipped the Canadian government is to handle this situation. My observations at face value; the Canadian Government has made mess of it. Is the silence (lack of information) around this situation in Canada an attempt to keep the light off our own government’s inability to operate on the world stage and to keep its own citizens safe? We (Canada) don’t seem to have a strategy on how to handle these type of events consistently (The recent release of the CBC Reporter Mellissa Fung) and effectively.

    The second is more personal. I judge myself a friend of Amanda. Early on, right after her kidnapping I shared information about Amanda with the Toronto Star, and have published a few pictures of her with friends in a restaurant on my facebook page. Some agreed with my words and enjoyed seeing the pictures of Amanda happy (months before her abduction). Others accused me of potentially ‘getting Amanda killed’, by sharing what little information I did about her.

    What is the right course of action?

    Is saying nothing and potentially having her forgotten letting her fade into the dust that is Somalia… is this right?
    Is saying something, and potentially creating publicity and a stage for the voice of her captors political/religious doctrine… is this right?

    - Being a man of words, how can I keep them to myself and not feel guilty for my silence, for my inaction.
    - Being a man of conscience, how can I speak and not feel guilty if my words contribute to Amanda’s pain.

    Amanda and Nigel are both journalist. Both have used sources to tell a story that they felt needed to be said. Knowing this I feel we should error on the side of information. But that is just my opinion. I felt your article was well researched, and answered questions a great many people needed answered.

    I hope when Amanda sleeps… her dreams take her to a place where she can hear our prayers… so she knows she is not alone.

  • Monica

    I met Amanda last summer in Afghanistan and we stayed in the same hotel in Kabul. After spending two months with her, I must say she clearly knew what she was getting herself into when she went to Baghdad and Somalia. I resent the authors’ depiction of Amanda as a naive, uninformed person who traveled to dangerous destinations on a whim. If they had spent time with her in such places, they would know this themselves. She was strongly motivated to telling people’s stories and reporting from the frontlines and not the kind of person who is easily frightened. This is why she went to Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia.

  • http://gerard-white.com Gerard White

    When I posted my last comment on this site my best friend was being held for ransom in Mog. She and her colleague were kidnapped in the Ogaden region they were released on Jan 8th. Throughout their abduction I tracked reports of Amanda and Nigel as they were taken a month earlier and I expected to get some inclination of the fate of my friend from developments with Amanda and Nigel.
    The question no is how did they manage to get my friend out and yet still are unable to retrieve Amanda and Nigel? I heard from the head of security involved in negotiating the release of my friend that the difficulty with the case of Amanda and Nigel is that the two governments involved cannot agree strategy.

    Nothing should be done without the consent of Amanda and Nigel’s family, if they consent then people might want to hire an independent specialist, someone not connected to either government who can investigate, negotiate and report directly the the families. I would recomend a lady by the name of Sue Williams, she is ex head of Scotland Yard hostage unit and is personally responsible for negotiating the safe release of over 200 hostages. She can be contacted through an organisation by the name of hostage uk.

    For the friends of Amanda and Nigel who want to write something I suggest you write about what the respective governments are doing or more to the point what they are not doing. If this can be done without putting the names of Amanda or Nigel on the internet any more than they are already it can only help.
    I hope they are released soon.

  • Dano

    I've read plenty of views on what should be done with this situation. One side seems to think that we as Canadians should simply turn a blind eye, blaming Amanda herself for the situation in which she now finds herself. There is an element of truth about this, as she was warned beforehand. But this does not preclude us from doing something to secure her release.

    Ask yourself the question: Does Canada endorse capital punishment? Here in Canada a child killer gets about 20 years….. OK OK they can be held longer…. but do they suffer the ultimate penalty? I would agree that Amanda was probably foolish or even stupid to go there despite all of the warnings. But foolishness or even stupidity isn’t a crime. If we as a society are unwilling to put even our worst criminals to death then why the hell wouldn’t we try to secure Amanda’s release, a person who has committed no crime, her only fault being that she foolishly thought she could change the world?
    She is facing death.

    Secure her release and love her as a Canadian, then take away her passport.

  • Mitchell

    The lack of gratitude and total disrespect shown to Canada by the likes of James Loney has not helped her cause I am sure.

  • Omar Jamal

    I did use media and constant phone negotiation to release 10 Nigerian hostages held for almost a year. You dont pick and choose, you do whatever it takes to release the hostages.
    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bf2c5dae-5ce4-11de-9d42…
    read the areticle above published on June 19, 2009 by the FT in UK

From Macleans