Searching for democracy on a Sunday night – Liveblogging an Ottawa Centre all candidates' debate

by kadyomalley on Sunday, September 28, 2008 6:08pm - 71 Comments

Check back at 7pm for full coverage of the Ottawa Centre Federal Candidates Forum, hosted by community associations representing Hampton-Iona, Hintonburg, Westboro, Westboro Beach and West Wellington, and moderated by CBC Radio’s Rita Celli. 

The candidates are:  NDP incumbent Paul Dewar, Penny Collenette (Liberal), Jennifer Hunter (Green Party), Brian McGarry (Conservative) and two independents: Pierre Soubliere and John Akpata. 

Full riding profile available here, courtesy of Pundits’ Guide. 

6:43:37 PM
Greetings from the Churchill Community Centre, y’all! Are you ready for some hot local-candidate-on-candidate debating action? I hope so, because we’ve sacrificed a night of lounging on the couch watching Alan Ball’s surreal take on Southern vampire culture to venture deep into the heart of Westboro Village to cover the latest skirmish in the Battle of Ottawa Centre. If you’re not up on the latest twists and turns, check the link above for a full riding profile, courtesy of the Pundit Guide.
First impressions – which I’ll try to squeeze in before the debate gets underway – the crowd is actually pretty damned impressive for a Sunday night — I don’t think there’s an empty seat in the room. More importantly, most of the people here seem to be actual voters, which is always refreshing to see, although along the opposite wall from where the media have set up camp, there are tables full of propaganda from each of the five campaigns on the scene tonight.

With less than ten minutes to go, the incumbent, Paul Dewar, looks surprisingly relaxed; he’s chatting with supporters who keep flocking to the front of the room. All five candidates seem to be in their seats already – the two women, Liberal Penny Collenette and the Greens’ Jen Hunter sandwiched in between Dewar and his Tory rival, Brian McGarry.

Best of all, from ITQ’s perspective, that is, though, is the fact that not just one but both independents are here. Oh, please let one of them be crazy — or at least eccentric. Is that so much to ask from democracy, really?

Okay, the string quartet over the loudspeaker was a good idea in theory, but y’all, it’s just deafening – and that was before the feedback sent us all into catatonic shock.

6:57:03 PM
The organizer is now apologizing for the lack of space — apparently they were serious when they said seating would be limited, because there are still people waiting outside. She assures the crowd that there will be more debates, so don’t despair if you can’t make it to this one.

6:59:47 PM
Ooh, with less than a minute to go, those sneaky candidates have swapped chairs on me. Curses! Thankfully, unlike committee members, they’re not so interchangeable as to be unidentifiable without nameplates (which they have, but I can’t see from this angle) – now McGarry is on the far right (literally, not figuratively), with Dewar to his immediate left, followed by John Akpata, Penny Dewar, Jen Hunter and Pierre Soubliere.

Meanwhile, beside me, a man without any identifiable buttonry is looking over a list of “our’ questions – who, exactly, the “us” of this “our” might be isn’t clear, but the questions have to do with land use.

I wonder just how many times tonight the candidates are going to have to apologetically explain that someone’s pet issue – parking meters, litter, those cryptofascist cat-leash laws – are, sadly, not under federal jurisdiction. My guess is at least once each, but we’ll see.

7:04:55 PM
Ooh, we’re on – and just so you don’t worry that this will turn into a committee meeting, with endless filibustering by loquacious candidates instead of Tory MPs, the organizers are armed with flourescent warning paddles – one of which denotes 20 seconds left, the other that time’s up – which, I’m assuming, can also be used to suppress those unwilling to shut up.

7:07:13 PM
Okay, here’s the format: each of the community associations involved in organizing the event get two questions, which they can put to whatever candidate they like, and the rest of the forum will be dedicated to questions from the audience. If the candidates go over the allotted time, the mic gets cut.

Ooh, so it’s Ethics committee rules. Harsh.

7:10:59 PM
And with that, it’s on.

7:12:20 PM
The first one-minute opening statement goes to Pierre Soubliere, who isn’t, in fact, an independent – he’s running for the Marxist-Leninist Party. Oh, I didn’t even dare hope that I’d be this lucky. A vote for the Marxist Leninist Party, you’ll be interested to know, is a vote to give power to the people. Yeeeaaahhhh!!

Polite smattering of applause, and over to Greenie Jen Hunter, who is wearing the cutest gingham skirt, and has exactly the sort of blonde mane that you’d expect. She touts the balanced platform her party offers – from the environment to the economy to social justice – and gets a distinctly more enthusiastic reaction.

7:15:29 PM
Penny Collenette tells us that Stephane Dion has a plan, and reminds the crowd that this election is only happening because the PM “broke his own election law”, and then – oh, can life really be this perfect? – John Akpata takes the floor and introduces himself as a third-time candidate with the Marijuana Party. “Don’t do what doesn’t make sense” is the upshot of his opener, which is right up there with “Don’t do what Johnny Don’t Does” as far as catchy slogans, and then it’s time for Paul Dewar to dare the crowd to put him on the spot, and Brian McGarry to tell us how much the Conservatives have done in just 36 months.

7:18:46 PM
Okay, the crowd loved McGarry – biggest round of applause of the night, which makes me wonder, cynic that I am, if that means he was most successful in stacking the room with supporters. (Yes I’d say that regardless of which candidate inspired such a lively response.)

7:19:48 PM
And a question from the Hampton Community Group about the Civic Hospital; McGarry agrees that it is “ludicrous” to move the hospital out of the West End — is someone proposing that? huh — which seems to be the right answer, as far as the audience is concerned.

The audio system, on the other hand, is clearly not impressed; the microphones keep producing earbleedingly shrill flashes of feedback.

Dewar, the Marijuana Party and Penny Collenette also agree that it is absurd to even consider moving the Civic, although Collenette notes that this is one of the few instances where she might support using greenbelt land — in this case, land across the street from the existing building – in order to keep the hospital here.

Jen Hunter stresses the need to preserve green space, and Soubliere, the Marxist-Leninist, bemoans how health care is seen as a cost, not a right.

7:25:15 PM
And now, the first question from the audience! After a gentle warning from Celli to be succinct – only a minute per question, no exceptions – the co-founder of Grandmothers for Africa asks whether McGarry and Collenette support Canada meeting the 0.7% goal for foreign aid – and if so, how they plan on achieving that.

McGarry begins by basically disassociating himself and his party from the last forty years — “you remember who has been in power,” he says. “We’re a new party.” – and the gist of his response is — give us a stronger mandate — ideally a four year mandate — and we’ll see what we can do.

Penny Collenette, meanwhile, reminds the crowd that it was Lester B. Pearson who got the ball rolling, and points to commitments to increasing foreign aid in the Liberal platform.

Oh, and Soubliere pops in to remind everyone that the Conservatives have a “twisted’ idea of foreign aid, and that we’re in Afghanistan “illegally.” Which produces a range of responses, from applause to boos.

7:30:16 PM
A tricky question from the audience – small and medium-sized enterprises bidding on federal contracts – gets an enthusiastic, if entirely vague response from McGarry, who insists that he will stand up for small business – if anyone will, he will. “Whooooo!” yell his supporters.

Dewar, meanwhile, rolls his eyes at the chest-thumpery, and points to various million dollar contracts that have flowed outside the local economy. “Shame on the Conservatives for letting this file get out of their hands,” he says, to wild applause.

In response, McGarry would rather condemn the NDP platform for reimposing various corporate taxes. “Good plan, Jack,” he snarls.

7:33:51 PM
Another question for McGarry and Dewar – who seem to be seen as the main contenders here, interestingly, although the Conservative candidate came a distant third in the last election – on infrastructure, which seems to be a backhanded attack on the NDP. Dewar is ready for it, though, and rhymes off some of the spending plans from the party’s platform. Meanwhile, McGarry, who is weirdly complacent considering that he’s a challenger, once again goes after Dewar for the NDP’s tax plan. “This isn’t the party of Ed Broadbent,” he says “this is the party of Jack Layton”. He then delivers a rousing defence of corporate welfare bums – a Broadbentism, ironically – who, we’re to understand, are being given an unfair rap by those Laytonian socialists.

I have to say this is a weird tack for McGarry to take in front of this particular audience.

7:37:32 PM
Dewar, not surprisingly, takes issue with the suggestion that he’s out to get “small business”, and notes that Ed Broadbent is a member of the party to this day, and supports the platform.

Penny Collenette, meanwhile, wants us all to know that the Liberals “get it” – on cities, on small businesses, on municipal funding; you name it.

Marijuana Party candidate Akpata – whose name I cannot, for some reason, remember – commiserates; he’s from Windsor, where small business has been hit hard too – and he doesn’t believe politicians who claim to care about the community either — not without proof. Lots of nodding and cheering at that. 

7:41:42 PM
Holy crap, there is a line of questioners that is, quite literally, out the door – and at the head right now is a gorgeous, and righteously outraged woman who is eviscerating McGarry over the cuts to arts funding. McGarry reminds her that – oh, man that was really bad – he reminded her that under the Conservative plan, she can take time off to have a baby, and be covered by maternity leave. Her lip curls, and her eyebrow goes up; the room titters at the exquisite inappropriateness of his response. Yes, the young, independent artist and entrepreneur really wanted to hear that she can get help from the government if she has a baby, and wants to stay home for a year to take care of it. (AFTERNOTE: He also points out that she would be eligible for employment insurance, which, I’m sure, is just what an idealistic young artist wants to hear.) 

Akpata, on the other hand, congratulates her for being an artist, praises the Canada Council, and just generally gives a barnstormer of a response. He even gets off a crowdpleaser line about the newly approved porn channel. Penny Collenette pokes her head into the audience-Akpata love-in to remind everyone that the Liberals would double funding for the Canada Council.

Oh, and then McGarry tries to do damage control by shaking his fist at the crowd and reminding them that not all artists grub for money from the government.

Wow. This guy – wow. I’m kind of stunned by how politically tone deaf he seems to be. When the Marijuana Party candidate is killing you on audience reaction, you have a serious problem reading the crowd.

7:48:11 PM
And now, a painfully dull question from a community association that has something to do with funding, and is far too specific for a meeting like this.

Everyone gives carefully generic answers, except for Akpata, who goes on a rant about the operational secrecy of the NCC, and predicts that if they don’t do something soon, the Rochester Fields “will turn into condos” – Isn’t that what always happens?

Paul Dewar declares himself a protector of Rochester Fields, but McGarry isn’t willing to go that far, but he admits that he doesn’t always see eye to eye with the NCC.

7:53:49 PM
And a question about the possibility of a coalition between the NDP and the Liberals: the answer, from both Dewar and Collenette, is no – although Dewar does bring up the whole “well, we wouldn’t close the door to working with other parties once elected to goverment” line. “Are you satisfied?” Celli asks the questioner. “Satisfied-ish,” he says.

7:56:47 PM
After a long, rambling question about water quality, Collenette leaps at the chance to once again tout past examples of her leader’s commitment to the environment – she’s just so eager, it’s hard not to give her the points for effort – and Dewar points out that his party brought in private members’ bills to deal with tailing ponds – I think that’s how you spell it – in Alberta, but also stresses the need for a clean water act. Don’t we have one of those? At least one? I’m sure I’ve sat through endless House debates over it.

8:01:10 PM
Sewage question – I missed the beginning, but it appears to have been mostly related to matters of not-federal-jurisdiction, although Dewar seizes the chance to brag about the fact that he was all over the toxic dumping before John Baird even knew what was happening with the Ottawa River. Brian McGarry reminds us that every single problem isn’t the fault of the Conservatives – “who have only been in power for two years,” and implores the audience to show a little love for his “brand new government.” What about all the good things they’ve been doing in the North, huh? What about that? Why all the blame? Not, he adds hastily, after suddenly realizing that he’s basically picking a fight with a random voter, that the questioner was doing that.

Does he really think going on the defensive is a good tactic? Because – it really, really isn’t.

Penny Collenette says something immediately forgettable about the Liberals, and then John Akpata gives a wildly entertaining mini-lecture on pigs, and how toxic they are, yet how tasty and delicious. He veers into crazyland with an aside on the evils of flouride in our drinking water, mistakes a supportive giggle from Green Jen as mocking laughter, and generally continues to make this entire debate worth sitting through.

Green Jen assures him she was laughing with him, not at him, and then the Marxist Leninist – who has been left out for the last half hour or so – reminds us that we can never forget who is taking advantage of our “natural wealth”. The running dog capitalists, that’s who! (Note: that was me, not him. But I’m sure it was the right answer.)

8:09:23 PM
Ahh, the inevitable question on proportional representation, and the futility of “participatory democracy” in a first-past-the-post system. Penny Collenette gamely takes first crack at answering it, and reminds the questioner that it was debated at the provincial level last year. She admits that she’s not yet convinced it’s the way to go, but says that if elected, she’ll make it the subject of her first “conversation” with constituents.

Brian McGarry, who is getting cranky, agrees that “we don’t want Toronto running the country” but doesn’t seem to have anything else to say on the subject, other than acknowledge that there is an imbalance.
John Akpata, who may, in fact, actually be Wikipedia wandering the earth disguised in human form, reels off a bunch of stats about who does and doesn’t vote, and how so many people vote for parties other than the main six. Finally, Comrade Soubliere seems to concur on the basic unfairness of it all.

8:13:47 PM
And now, a transparent attack on the NDP from a Tory plant, who excoriates Dewar for its support of the infamous Durban conference on anti-racism – “which turned into a gongshow” – and then quotes Warren Kinsella’s blog to back up whatever it is he’s trying to allege, which seems to be that the NDP supports gongshows, even those of an anti-semitic bent.

Dewar reminds him that Canada is one of only two countries to pull out of the “prepcon” for the upcoming conference – Durban II – completely, and gives a fairly measured explanation of what, exactly, he and his party have recommended.

McGarry, meanwhile, says he’s “damned proud” that Canada isn’t going to the conference. He also notes that he’s “just become aware” of a disturbing statistic — that a group representing just 1% of the population suffers from more than 20% of the abuse. Of course, he doesn’t say what that group is, so the whole line just hangs there sounding — odd. I mean, I’m assuming he’s talking about anti-semitic incidents, but he doesn’t actually say that. He just gives his line and scowls. 

8:18:14 PM
And a plant for Akpata with a question about Health Canada’s track record on providing medicinal marijuana – Collenette admits she isn’t well briefed on the issue, McGarry grumbles, Akpata offers to brief everyone, Green Jen is cute as a button and has a mom who has benefited from medicinal marijuana, and then Akpata gets his moment to rant on his favourite subject.

8:20:13 PM
Well, that’s sweet – a questioner just offered an open invitation to two of the candidates to clarify something in their respective party’s platform that has been misrepresented in the media. Green Jen takes on the controversy over “strategic voting”, which – she says – her leader never endorsed; Penny Collenette wants everyone to know that her party won’t spend the country into deficit.

8:22:21 PM
Ooh, a wee troublemaker at the mic – she demands to know why Dewar’s campaign website lists one of his achievements as “keeping the portrait gallery in Ottawa” – which is by no means a sure thing. Dewar explains that he was the one who filed the ATI requet that revealed the secret backroom machinations that would otherwise have resulted in the decision going ahead without the bidding process.

McGarry also wants the gallery to stay here, but dismisses the rallies and other efforts by the community to keep it here – “this gallery won’t be kept here by photo ops or skating up the canal” – the only way, he says, is by electing him to government, which produces open snickers from the crowd. He then delivers a rousing defence of Calgary, unwisely attempts to employ sarcasm, and then is mercifully cut off by the Time Paddle. Penny Collenette gives a rah-rah for the gallery, and that’s about it.

8:29:26 PM
If there’s one thing that the whole panel can agree on – and actually, there may only be this one thing – it is that the National Capital Commission is a shadowy and very probably sinister organization, and no good can come of its nefarious backroom dealmaking.

Penny Collenette, brightly, suggests looking at the enabling act itself to see if it could use some tweaking, since it hasn’t been amended since original drafting, back in the 1950s, and doesn’t even include the concept of “green space.”

8:32:13 PM
Awesomely, Comrade Soubliere just disproved my above point by defending the NCC. Go state!

8:33:21 PM
Our latest questioner has a dilemna – he wants to vote for Penny, because he loves the Green Shift, but he also has a soft spot for Paul Dewar. What is he to do? Penny sweetly says it’s too bad they aren’t running together – I can hear the howls of horror from the respective war rooms from here – but humbly suggests that he vote for her, because even though she can’t promise she’ll be at the cabinet table, like McGarry – who, I fear, may be headed for crushing disappointment on the off-chance that he pulls off a win in this riding. Dewar suggests abolishing the Senate, which isn’t actually as non sequiteurial as it sounds, since the question was about proportional representation and democratic reform.

8:36:50 PM
Oh, this is going to be fun: a question for McGarry on decriminalization of marijuana, and he once again goes on the defensive, and snarls that he doesn’t support it, period. The questioner then reveals that she has epilepsy, and looks forward to being put in jail for seeking out effective treatment for her condition. Oh, and to not voting for Brian McGarry, but that part probably wasn’t sarcastic.

Akpata gives the usual streets-paved-with-hempbased-gold speech on how our GDP would quintuple if only the ganja was legalized – to snickers from the audience – but doesn’t seem fussed by the sceptics.

“Laugh away – it’s true, you can look it up.”

8:40:08 PM
A copyright question – usual digital rights management umbrella query – and Dewar comes out strongly in favour of user rights. Penny Collenette agrees that “balance” is important, but agrees with Dewar that the now-all-but-dead bill introduced by the Conservatives during the last session isn’t the answer.

8:41:25 PM
Another question from our community association sponsors – this time, on substance abuse prevention and treatment, particularly in Hintonberg, and adding alcohol as a treatable substance. Akpata condemns the practice of criminalizing abusers – and says that we need to change the programs, not just keep doing the same.

Brian McGarry, you will be shocked to learn, doesn’t support safe injection sites, but agrees that alcohol is a problem too. “Just ask Senatoer Marjorie Lebreton about that,” he suggests. Uh. He probably should have given some context to that comment, if the reaction of the girl sitting next to me is any indication of the lack of understanding amongst the audience, which has a lot of youngish people.

8:47:22 PM
A followup question on addiction and crime – sorry, falling behind here – which produces the by now predictable answers from the candidates – Akpata blames criminalization of behaviour, Green Jen wants to invest in programs and hug people, Penny Collenette is delighted by her party’s commitment to spent more on treatment.

8:49:22 PM
A man who appears on the verge of losing faith in democracy implores all candidates to commit to working together, even if there is a minority government, and not turn it into a dysfunctional snakepit like the last one. Penny Collenette meekly suggests that she’ll do her best, and McGarry mistakes the question for an attack — specifically for breaking the “fixed election date” law – and turns into David Tilson. Seriously. Totally cranky and only tangentially on topic.

8:52:50 PM
A gotcha moment – a questioner who tells the panel that she likes both the Greens and the Liberals, but can’t help but notice that the only candidate with a reusable water bottle is Paul Dewar. What gives?

The two of them both cop to bad optics – although each does her best to assure this is entirely uncharacteristic; Green Jen reuses glasses, bottles, you name it; Penny Collenette carries one with her everywhere she goes, but left it in her car.

Brian McGarry, meanwhile, would like to interject the fact that both he and his wife drive hybrids; they plant over a thousand trees a year, and you know those “green funerals” you may have heard of? Well, stay tuned.

8:56:44 PM
An admittedly long, rambly and hard to follow tirade/question on air pollution, and why neither the Liberals or the Tories have taken action to reduce the cancerous effects of diesel fuel, and McGarry manages to insult the questioner yet again when he says that he’s “not as well versed on the subject as [the questioner] is, because I’m a small business owner.”

He then blames the Liberals for doing nothing, and reminds everyone that cancer has struck his family three times. I’m sure somewhere in there he talked about the Conservatives’ Turning the Corner plan, but I probably missed it.

9:01:03 PM
“Two years is not a long time for a government,” McGarry begins what may be his final answer of the night, to a question that I couldn’t actually here, but I suspect that I won’t be able to figure out from the context, given McGarry’s now familiar style.

In those two years, though, his party has reduced taxes and the debt. The Liberals are “not the party of Lester B. Pearson,” Jack Layton “scoffs at free enterprise,” and I haven’t the slightest idea what the question actually was, because the answer is so weird, aggressive and — random.

9:03:52 PM
And – last question, I’m thinking, on the collapse of the US economy, and its effect on Canada. The questioner is sceptical of the PM’s statement that there isn’t likely to be a “spillover” effect on Canada, and McGarry picks a fight with him over the quote. “That’s not what he said,” he insists. “He said there might be a spillover.” After a few seconds, It becomes clear that this is what Harper apparently told McGarry, personally, when he ‘sat down with him’ and talked about it, so “don’t quote from the Globe and Mail” – quite frankly, he doesn’t care about it, even though I’m not sure how he thinks the rest of us are supposed to know what the PM did or didn’t say when he “sat down with the man.”  McGarry goes on along those lines for the rest of the allotted time, at which point the host steps in to thank the audience, and the candidates, and especially the radiant Rita Celli – and that’s it.

Wow. I think I have a crush on democracy. This was awesome. But now – I think I hear the sweet sounds of the True Blood theme music calling my name. Til tomorrow!

Bookmark and Share
  • http://queerthoughts.blogspot.com/ Ricky Barnes

    Paul

    thank you for this. It was interesting and fun. I have kept a few folks entertained here over a fabulous beef fondue dinner with your writings!

    cheers

  • Archangel

    Oh Gawd–the motherlode of inspira-a-a-a-tion! Let me take a breath! (I still have a beer left from the last rant I posted–yeah it was a McCain “Canadian” brown from Denver.)

    “Okay, the string quartet over the loudspeaker was a good idea in theory, but y’all, it’s just deafening – and that was before the feedback sent us all into catatonic shock.”

    Kady; catatonia is never shocking, it just isn’t.

  • Archangel

    Aw Shucks Kady, you’re such a kinda girl leprechaun…how could anyone miss that smile?

  • Archangel

    Miss as in “fail to notice”. Helen sank a thousand ships with a look. Kady’s smile goes–and the entire Canadian blogosphere mourns.

  • http://queerthoughts.blogspot.com/ Ricky Barnes

    best line of the night is “that not all artists grub for money from the government.”

    I almost can’t believe after all the duct tape sent to handlers of the conservative party candidates that they ran out of it tonight!

    ROTFL

  • Two Cents

    McGarry doesn’t need to win over the room. He just needs more votes than any of the other candidates once all the votes are counted And, I believe he can do that given the split among the left in Ottawa Centre.

    On proportional rep why didn’t any of the candidates just note that we’ve had at least three provincial referenda in the past few years (PEI, BC and Ontario) and that the voters have turned it down. Why is this still an issue?

  • Archangel

    Oh CRAP! Can’t resist. ABC RULES!

    I hear Warren Buffet has dispatched the paparazzi to Ottawa with instructions to snap a photo of Steve when he realizes the Conservatives have lost the election.

    Not because he cares about our Canadian election–only because he can’t buy Edvard Munch’s “The Scream” and he’s angling for second best.

  • Tim

    Noticed that McGarry snuck out the back door. Says a lot about his campaign, IMHO. His reaction to the woman with epilepsy was disgusting.

  • Archangel

    Two Cents:

    “On proportional rep why didn’t any of the candidates just note that we’ve had at least three provincial referenda in the past few years (PEI, BC and Ontario) and that the voters have turned it down. Why is this still an issue?”

    I dunno. Could it be because you insist on adding your Two Cents?

  • Archangel

    Two Cents:

    I can’t resist. Here’s my Two Cents:

    McGarry, McCullough, McDuff
    You think being Scottish is rough?
    Try being Stephane

    Had enough?

  • anon

    Was this videotaped? I would be curious to see some of the segments on the news.

  • SERENDIPPITTYDOODOO

    Great coverage, Kady. I hope you’ll do more of these. I take it the Polymorph Conservative Reform Party candidate didn’t impress many.(if any)I find the, “we’ll make things better, if we have to kill you to do it,” philosophy doesn’t impress. Incidentally, was he wearing a ‘flysticka’ on his brown shirt? I looked at the Tru Blood intro; Interesting contrast between the religious fundamentalists and the baaaad, baaaad, hedonistic crowd. I’m more into “Thirty Helens Agree,” myself.

    [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDTZcj8Xink] [0 :34] 30 Helens Agree

    L8R

  • http://www.iheartmusic.net matthew

    McGarry doesn’t need to win over the room. He just needs more votes than any of the other candidates once all the votes are counted And, I believe he can do that given the split among the left in Ottawa Centre.

    The split that made the Conservatives finish an extremely distant third in 2006? Is that the split you’re talking about? There’s no way McGarry comes close in this riding. It’s between Collenette and Dewar, and it’s going to be extremely close.

    And thanks for the live-blog, Kady! I was disappointed I had to miss this, even thought it was down the street from my house, so this made up for it!

  • Jenn

    We may have huge voter apathy, but it seems the voters who want to be engaged want strongly to be engaged. At my riding’s debate (fortunately for me, televised) the room was also too small for the number of people wishing to attend. Again, the line of questioners far out-paced the time allotted.

    Someone here a while back had the brilliant idea of each of us live-blogging our riding debates. I know my excuse was a lack of a blackberry, but what about everybody else?

  • cam

    I too would like to see the video, particularly when the Conservative candidate recommended childbirth over a career in the Arts.

  • http://www.marijuanaparty.ca/article.php3?id_article=230 John Akpata

    Thanks for the kind words.
    Here are some statistics:

    99.5% of canadians who file their taxes make zero contributions to political parties. This means that .5% of the taxpayers pay for 100% of the politics that we get.

    38% of eligible voters do not vote.
    50% of males 18 – 24 do not vote.
    75% of females 18 – 24 do not vote.

    1 of 6 canadians voted for the conservatives.
    2 of 6 canadians did not vote at all.
    3 of 6 canadians split their votes between 15 other parties.
    5 of 6 canadians did not vote conservative.

    much respect to everyone who participated. many thanks to the organizers and volunteers.
    peace
    john akpata

  • Dr Riff

    great statistics john akpata and it’s only right and proper that canadians generally make no political contributions (voluntarily). blood sucking leeches

  • http://www.rata.ca Russell Barth

    why is it that the conservatives – and NO other party – gets compared to the nazis? Why is that? Maybe because they are the only party that spews toughguy rhetoric and orwellian doublespeak. No other party is doing that – only the Harperites….

  • Inmate

    “And a question from the Hampton Community Group about the Civic Hospital; McGarry agrees that it is “ludicrous” to move the hospital out of the West End — is someone proposing that? huh — which seems to be the right answer, as far as the audience is concerned.”

    - yes, Kady. Moving the Civic Hospital is on the table. No, the room did not appreciate McGarry’s ignorance. Next time, Macleans might send a blogger who understands the issues facing the communities in question. Expecting leash law questions in Kitchissippi displays a stunning lack of respect for the political engagement in these communities.

    What I didn’t get from this squib was any substantive analysis, at all, about where the candidates fall on the issues that dominated the evening: the NCC, the arts, and the environment.

    Either blogging a debate just won’t work, or Maclean’s sent the wrong writer. Frustrating.

  • bob ward

    great coverage Cady.
    in 2 hours of debate Mr. McGarry according to your “non biased” coverage, never answered a question correctly with any substance.

    This is getting laughable
    (you are being paid to be “unbiased” but you are far from it).

    P.S. get your name in quick for communications adviser for elected Lieberal MP’s. I hear there are only 22 positions available

  • Just visiting

    Inmate, this blog is all about national politics, mostly for people with a keen interest in the subject, particularly the insider side of politics. That’s why it’s called “Inside the Queensway.”

    Anyway, if you’re looking for coverage of local issues, you might be better off reading a local newspaper than this particular blog.

    - JV

  • Inmate

    Thanks, Visiting. Clearly O’Malley is more comfortable covering the Hill, but Macleans could have done our communities a great service by offering another view of the debate than that provided by the local papers. It’s a lost opportunity. As for “insider”, I’m not even sure the writer has any sense of riding history or politics. What’s McGarry getting out of running? Clearly this is Dipper/Liberal territory. The Tories have for several years run earnest and well-meaning candidates in Ottawa-Centre who don’t have much to lose by running. I think Guzzo was the last guy with any profile. Why are they running McGarry? The poor guy slit his own throat last night. If O’Malley is an insider, at least give me some insight as to what reward awaits him. With respect to the NCC, which was absolutely predictable as a dominant theme given the Civic Hospital question as well as ongoing resident concerns about the beach, the greenspace etc., why didn’t O’Malley point out that Collenette did not once talk about Mahoney’s work on that front?

    I honestly don’t think O’Malley has any clue what’s going on “inside the Queensway” except for what’s going on “inside the area from the Canal to Bank. St. north of Cooper”. Sending her to a community-association-sponsored debate just seems to underscore how out of touch the Press Gallery is with what Canadians are really concerned about.

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    Inmate – I’m sorry; I’m really not up on all the local issues, and though I’ll try to do a better job when I go to my next all-candidates’ debate, I very much doubt I’m going to be able to give you the detailed, thorough analysis that you like. I’m mostly doing these to give people a sense of what it’s like on the floor for those who aren’t there, but who enjoy the cut and thrust of political debate, even when they’re not necessarily familiar with the subject at hand.

    As for riding history and politics – that’s for another post, and one I’d love to write, if I can find the time – not something to be squeezed into a liveblog, which by its very nature requires the writer to follow an event in realtime. If there’d been a break in a proceeding, I would have been able to explore the “Why this guy?” question, but there just wasn’t.

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    Oh, and on your specific complaints – that you didn’t get an idea of where the candidates stood on the NCC, the arts and the environment:

    On the NCC:
    8:29:26 PM
    If there’s one thing that the whole panel can agree on – and actually, there may only be this one thing – it is that the National Capital Commission is a shadowy and very probably sinister organization, and no good can come of its nefarious backroom dealmaking.

    Penny Collenette, brightly, suggests looking at the enabling act itself to see if it could use some tweaking, since it hasn’t been amended since original drafting, back in the 1950s, and doesn’t even include the concept of “green space.”

    8:32:13 PM
    Awesomely, Comrade Soubliere just disproved my above point by defending the NCC. Go state!

    On arts funding:
    7:41:42 PM
    Holy crap, there is a line of questioners that is, quite literally, out the door – and at the head right now is a gorgeous, and righteously outraged woman who is eviscerating McGarry over the cuts to arts funding. McGarry reminds her that – oh, man that was really bad – he reminded her that under the Conservative plan, she can take time off to have a baby, and be covered by maternity leave. Her lip curls, and her eyebrow goes up; the room titters at the exquisite inappropriateness of his response. Yes, the young, independent artist and entrepreneur really wanted to hear that she can get help from the government if she has a baby, and wants to stay home for a year to take care of it. (AFTERNOTE: He also points out that she would be eligible for employment insurance, which, I’m sure, is just what an idealistic young artist wants to hear.)

    Akpata, on the other hand, congratulates her for being an artist, praises the Canada Council, and just generally gives a barnstormer of a response. He even gets off a crowdpleaser line about the newly approved porn channel. Penny Collenette pokes her head into the audience-Akpata love-in to remind everyone that the Liberals would double funding for the Canada Council.

    Oh, and then McGarry tries to do damage control by shaking his fist at the crowd and reminding them that not all artists grub for money from the government.

    On the environment:
    8:01:10 PM
    Sewage question – I missed the beginning, but it appears to have been mostly related to matters of not-federal-jurisdiction, although Dewar seizes the chance to brag about the fact that he was all over the toxic dumping before John Baird even knew what was happening with the Ottawa River. Brian McGarry reminds us that every single problem isn’t the fault of the Conservatives – “who have only been in power for two years,” and implores the audience to show a little love for his “brand new government.” What about all the good things they’ve been doing in the North, huh? What about that? Why all the blame? Not, he adds hastily, after suddenly realizing that he’s basically picking a fight with a random voter, that the questioner was doing that.

    Does he really think going on the defensive is a good tactic? Because – it really, really isn’t.

    Penny Collenette says something immediately forgettable about the Liberals, and then John Akpata gives a wildly entertaining mini-lecture on pigs, and how toxic they are, yet how tasty and delicious. He veers into crazyland with an aside on the evils of flouride in our drinking water, mistakes a supportive giggle from Green Jen as mocking laughter, and generally continues to make this entire debate worth sitting through.

    Green Jen assures him she was laughing with him, not at him, and then the Marxist Leninist – who has been left out for the last half hour or so – reminds us that we can never forget who is taking advantage of our “natural wealth”. The running dog capitalists, that’s who! (Note: that was me, not him. But I’m sure it was the right answer.)

    [...]

    8:52:50 PM
    A gotcha moment – a questioner who tells the panel that she likes both the Greens and the Liberals, but can’t help but notice that the only candidate with a reusable water bottle is Paul Dewar. What gives?

    The two of them both cop to bad optics – although each does her best to assure this is entirely uncharacteristic; Green Jen reuses glasses, bottles, you name it; Penny Collenette carries one with her everywhere she goes, but left it in her car.

    Brian McGarry, meanwhile, would like to interject the fact that both he and his wife drive hybrids; they plant over a thousand trees a year, and you know those “green funerals” you may have heard of? Well, stay tuned.

    If you want to know more, however, I’d suggest you check out the candidates’ webpages, since that will have all the information you could ever want on their respective positions.

  • Inmate

    Thanks, Kady. I guess it’s a question of degree – hard for you, I’m sure, given that only Collenette seemed to have any concrete proposals (double CCA funding, $40 million to drug treatment, legislative changes to improve NCC). Leaning toward Dewar simply on the basis that Kitchissippi hasn’t had effective constituency people at all three levels of government for probably 20 years until just the past two years, and no one wants to rock that boat, I was very impressed with Collenette’s responses on the basis of what she said – not whether someone arched an eyebrow or not.

    I also enjoyed the cut-and-thrust, and loved reading this piece. It was very well written and in parts hilarious. But, ultimately voters deserve a more substantive treatment. Unfortunately, the trend of big media is to concentrate more on politics as theatre and gossip, and it;s left to people to try to muddle through the grunt work of analysis on their own.

    Again, thanks, Kady. I’ll read your posts in the spirit in which they were intended from now on.

From Macleans