UPDATED: At what point does a series of isolated incidents constitute a pattern?

by kadyomalley on Monday, October 6, 2008 7:26am - 71 Comments

UPDATE: Mystery solved! Turns out that it was Docksteader himself who wrote the speeches, and borrowed from his own work. According to his website, he was working for Canadian Alliance MP David Anderson at the time.

—-

Because we now have a third allegation of prime ministerial pre-prime ministerial plagiarism, courtesy of j-rad.ca and Bouquets of Gray.

Hot off the National Newswatch aggregwire:

Only days after j-rad.ca’s revelation of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s apparent cribbing of Mike Harris’s notes, a new case of plagiarism from Harper’s stint as Leader of the Opposition has come to light, this time involving the writings of a prolific right-wing policy analyst.

The speech in question was delivered by Harper in the House of Commons in support of a motion calling for the dissolution of the Canadian Wheat Board. It contains passages that appear to be heavily copied from two columns authored by former director of the Centre for Prairie Agriculture Craig Docksteader and published in the organization’s online newsletter. (The Centre for Prairie Agriculture is now known as the Prairie Policy Centre; Dockstead is currently Operations Manager for another right-wing think tank, the Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.)

That makes three in just under a week – two of which surfaced only after the Liberals revealed that an “overzealous” former staffer had cut and pasted more than 800 words from a speech delivered by former Australian Prime Minister John Howard into his then-boss’ “eloquent” argument in favour of signing on with the Iraq coalition. Whether that same staffer – who has already been forced to resign from the Conservative campaign – will once again take the blame for putting someone else’s words into Stephen Harper’s mouth is, as yet, not known, but at this point, it’s hard not to wonder how many other examples of inadvertant lipsynching are out there, waiting to be discovered.

Bookmark and Share
  • john g

    Jerad, other than in university and those who publish material for profit (e.g. reporters, authors, etc.), I have absolutely no problem with using material from other sources. It happens every single day in every single industry.

    Stephen Taylor has a fine example of showing that it probably happens to every Leader of the Opposition too.

    For the record, I couldn’t care less about the example Taylor raises either; but I bet it won’t make any news outlets, other than Bourque and maybe National Newswatch.

    And I bet the Liberal supporters on this board that are bashing Harper for plagiarism will probably find a way to excuse it…and Dion’s copying of the Suzuki foundation…and the stealing of the Green Shift trademark.

  • seaandthemountains

    “Whether that same staffer – who has already been forced to resign from the Conservative campaign – will once again take the blame for putting someone else’s words into Stephen Harper’s mouth is, as yet, not known”

    Just to be clear that Lippert’s penalty is returning to his, presumably, better paying staffer job to Ms Oda.

  • http://j-rad.ca Jerad

    John G – Interesting how you framed your latest comments so that anyone disagreeing with you is now a “Liberal supporter”. You probably think my site is a “Liberal blog” too — it’s not, but I’m sure that thinking it is makes it easier to pretend plagiarism isn’t a real issue.

    The Suzuki example was fixed within 48 hours, if I recall correctly. Dion admitted there was a footnote was omitted, and the reference was added. The Green Shift issue was also resolved. Note how Dion made efforts to fix these problems. Harper? Well, let’s wait and see.

  • john g

    Jerad, those are easy things to “fix” in a report after you’ve been caught. I would also note that it took the threat of an 8.5M lawsuit to get the Liberals to fix the Green Shift issue; they had no intention of fixing it otherwise.

    But I’m curious Jerad…how do you fix a speech? Will Dion demand accountability and fire his speechwriter? Or was he aware of the report he was plagiarizing?

    Or is it simply not an issue?

  • Jenn

    Per John G: “Have any of you who work with documents in your workplace never lifted material from another external document when preparing a report of some kind when the material was relevant? Of course you have; because if you didn’t your boss would ask what the hell you where thinking reinventing something from scratch.”

    I have never lifted material VERBATIM from another external document. I resent the accusation. Did you not get that part in grade 8 (or was it grade 6) where the teacher says, “put the thoughts INTO YOUR OWN WORDS.” It’s hardly hard. Very occasionally will you come across a sentence that can’t be turned around, or a different word choice used (kids instead of children, for example).

    Having said that, if no cases of plagiarism are found from when Harper was Prime Minister, I shall assume the problem has been solved. This doesn’t mean it’s okay, just that something wrong has been fixed. I’m perfectly prepared to accept Harper IF he said, “there was obviously a problem back then, for which I apologize. The good news is, it’s been fixed now”. Is that really so difficult?

  • Andrew

    “Jerad, other than in university and those who publish material for profit (e.g. reporters, authors, etc.), I have absolutely no problem with using material from other sources. It happens every single day in every single industry.”

    I think it’s fair to say that politicians are selling their words for profit. Not just monetary, but in terms of power as well.

  • Andrew

    Jenn: Harper is obviously completely unwilling to own up to it. It is part of a pattern of sticking to his ground even when it it highly damaging.

  • http://www.abandonedstuff.com/ saskboy

    Yeah, as Crispus said, if you don’t discover the plagiarism yourself, you can’t talk about it. So there :-P

    I really wonder what drives otherwise sane people to defend a cheater, an alleged briber, and election law breaking criminal like Stephen Harper. I can just see the B&E experts appearing in court in blue sweater vests in order to get off scott free.

  • http://www.abandonedstuff.com/ saskboy

    “and Dion’s copying of the Suzuki foundation…and the stealing of the Green Shift trademark.”

    John, didn’t David give Stephane a free pass? I have no doubt the same will be done for this latest instance of Harper-cheater-gate. Although there is a large difference between using a word for a different meaning, and copying dozens of words and ideas to advance the same agenda as an unelected and offensive organization of mucky mucks.

  • Wascally Wabbit

    It’s like midges dancing in the sunlight…playing with these ConBots…
    they don’t actually move anywhere…just jump up and down in the air…and they sure don’t have any sting to speak of…
    I just love batting my hands through them – they move like smoke – and then come back to exactly the same spot to continue their little dance…

  • Pingback: Abandoned Stuff by Saskboy :: Can’t a Cheater Catch a Break?

  • http://demosthenes.blogspot.com Demosthenes

    Hey, here’s a thought:

    Are any of the papers he wrote to get that Econ Masters of his available?

    If I learned anything from sensational reports of plagiarism in the media, it’s that it starts real, real early.

  • http://demosthenes.blogspot.com Demosthenes

    Oh, and a quick tip for that aspiring spinner john g. up there:

    If you’ve hit the “it’s not a big deal, everybody does it” stage, you’ve already lost. Give up.

  • john g

    Hey look everyone…

    More Dion plagiarism

    At what point does a series of isolated incidents constitute a pattern?(1)

    (1) – Used without permission from Kady O’Malley

  • David

    The Green Shift trademark lady claimed at one point to have invented the phrase.

    At one point.

  • http://demosthenes.blogspot.com Demosthenes

    oh, john. That’s the best you guys can do?

    Dion using the common phrase “the world must deal with climate change now or pay a much higher price later”, and noting that “unchecked environmental damage could leave half the world’s population without adequate drinking water”?

    (Should he have used a synonym for “adequate” or something?)

    In any case, I really, really wouldn’t pursue it. Trying to “he-said, she-said” this when it was your guy who was caught with his pants down isn’t going to help. It might help rally the true believers, but it’s not helping with anybody else.

    (And do you REALLY want people reading Dion argue passionately about climate change? Half the reason the Rae thing was so damaging was because it reminded people how gung-ho your boss was about going to Iraq. Are you really so dense as to not realize that?)

    I honestly hope that john isn’t actually part of the conservative war room. At this point he’s just embarrassing. Their Republican teachers would be humiliated.

  • john g

    Demosthenes, have you noticed that every occurrance of Dion plagiarism that has surfaced since the Howard speech has been in the environmental area?

    Could it be that Dion just doesn’t have a freaking clue about the environment, and just shamelessly pilfers his entire policy platform from whatever he can cobble together? Hell, even the Green Shift itself was borrowed from Elizabeth May; she took credit for it in the English debate.

    Or could it be that when putting speeches and reports and policies together people research and regularly make use of content that has appeared before, and it’s just not a big deal, no matter who does it?

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    Demosthenes, you forgot the most damning aspect of this foul act of plagiarism. Dion has the unmitigated gall to actually acknowledge the existence of the OECD report before he quotes from its findings, which he fails to indicate are a direct citation, and not a paraphrase:

    And also last week – it was a busy week! – the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released its environmental outlook report that shows that the world must deal with climate change now or pay a much higher price later. In two decades, unchecked environmental damage could leave half the world’s population without adequate drinking water.

    Lock. Him. Up.

  • Ken
  • Steph C

    Ay carumba! Another “mea culpa.”

  • Michael

    A pattern all right. Not even bothering to contact the fellow who was allegedly plagiarized before proclaiming a persistent pattern that trumps particulars.

    What next? Editorializing before even the most basic reporting seems to be a persistent pattern. Just sayin’

From Macleans