<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A note on the stakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Step To The Right &#187; A note on the stakes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34559</link>
		<dc:creator>A Step To The Right &#187; A note on the stakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34559</guid>
		<description>[...] ht and ht [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ht and ht [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34558</link>
		<dc:creator>jwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34558</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long wondered what guidelines do journos follow when editing pols, and maybe others, words to make them sound coherent before they appear in print. Pols always sound fluent when they are quoted in msm but in real life they are far from it. It&#039;s like the journos are quoting what the pol meant to say, not what was actually said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long wondered what guidelines do journos follow when editing pols, and maybe others, words to make them sound coherent before they appear in print. Pols always sound fluent when they are quoted in msm but in real life they are far from it. It&#8217;s like the journos are quoting what the pol meant to say, not what was actually said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldfarmer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34557</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldfarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34557</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s right. This is a starking choice. You can vote Conservative and keep the country together or you can vote for one of the others and watch it go down the drain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s right. This is a starking choice. You can vote Conservative and keep the country together or you can vote for one of the others and watch it go down the drain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanD</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34556</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34556</guid>
		<description>&quot;Have you ever been to Saskatchaplace?&quot;

Saskatchewan? Boring?! Are you kidding me?! I&#039;m from Montreal and I live near Toronto but the best year of my life was in Saskatoon! Nobody knows a good time like Prairie boys (and girls)!

By the way, can someone remind me how we got to the &quot;boring provinces talk&quot;? Sorry MYL I really do want to talk about policy too but I can&#039;t let slags against my favourite province go unanswered!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have you ever been to Saskatchaplace?&#8221;</p>
<p>Saskatchewan? Boring?! Are you kidding me?! I&#8217;m from Montreal and I live near Toronto but the best year of my life was in Saskatoon! Nobody knows a good time like Prairie boys (and girls)!</p>
<p>By the way, can someone remind me how we got to the &#8220;boring provinces talk&#8221;? Sorry MYL I really do want to talk about policy too but I can&#8217;t let slags against my favourite province go unanswered!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Like You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; National Post endorses Harper Majority!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34555</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Like You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; National Post endorses Harper Majority!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34555</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion on the survival of our mutual economies where every word and nuance is vital, and the need to be clearly understood is paramount.  Posted in Federal Election, MSM bias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion on the survival of our mutual economies where every word and nuance is vital, and the need to be clearly understood is paramount.  Posted in Federal Election, MSM bias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34554</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34554</guid>
		<description>Rona Ambrose and Julie Cuillard MUD-WRESTLING!!
Theres a political contest I could get exited over! Oui?Non?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rona Ambrose and Julie Cuillard MUD-WRESTLING!!<br />
Theres a political contest I could get exited over! Oui?Non?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34553</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34553</guid>
		<description>Stark(ing) choice indeed.

Talking to my Liberal friends, they have to chose between NPD and Green. Stark indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stark(ing) choice indeed.</p>
<p>Talking to my Liberal friends, they have to chose between NPD and Green. Stark indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hosertohoosier</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34552</link>
		<dc:creator>hosertohoosier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34552</guid>
		<description>Dion for Star king!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dion for Star king!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34551</guid>
		<description>&quot;Have you ever been to Saskatchaplace?&quot;

SK isn&#039;t boring at all.  It&#039;s full of the nicest starking people in the country.  And there&#039;s a lot happening in Regina and Saskatoon.  Dude, get your boring provinces straight why dontcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have you ever been to Saskatchaplace?&#8221;</p>
<p>SK isn&#8217;t boring at all.  It&#8217;s full of the nicest starking people in the country.  And there&#8217;s a lot happening in Regina and Saskatoon.  Dude, get your boring provinces straight why dontcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34550</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34550</guid>
		<description>(Awakens, heart racing and sweating +++ from the paranoid conspiracy dream):  I get it now, you clever evil Liberal plant, Paul.

The population was not sufficiently outraged at the Tory &quot;not a leader&quot; hit and the puffin poop.  The Libs are desperate for an exaggerated and unfair smear, à la distorted Chretien face.  Play up the minor second-language tongue slip, in the hopes of attracting voting-public sympathy back to the natural governing party.  It&#039;s really pretty clever, until Con-bot 2008-MYL exposed your evil plans.

What&#039;s that, Paul?  Well... do you think you really &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; a lawyer?  Why would that be?  If you simply plead out I&#039;ll put in a good word for you with the Crown...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Awakens, heart racing and sweating +++ from the paranoid conspiracy dream):  I get it now, you clever evil Liberal plant, Paul.</p>
<p>The population was not sufficiently outraged at the Tory &#8220;not a leader&#8221; hit and the puffin poop.  The Libs are desperate for an exaggerated and unfair smear, à la distorted Chretien face.  Play up the minor second-language tongue slip, in the hopes of attracting voting-public sympathy back to the natural governing party.  It&#8217;s really pretty clever, until Con-bot 2008-MYL exposed your evil plans.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that, Paul?  Well&#8230; do you think you really <i>need</i> a lawyer?  Why would that be?  If you simply plead out I&#8217;ll put in a good word for you with the Crown&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34549</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34549</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Which is weird because it’s easily the boringest province of the ten.&lt;/i&gt;

Have you ever been to Saskatchaplace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Which is weird because it’s easily the boringest province of the ten.</i></p>
<p>Have you ever been to Saskatchaplace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Littlejohn</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34548</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Littlejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34548</guid>
		<description>Mr. Wells,

You have dropped below your usual standards with this comment. As a fan, I expect more from you. But the campaign trail  can be exhausting and even the best people can slip up sometimes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Wells,</p>
<p>You have dropped below your usual standards with this comment. As a fan, I expect more from you. But the campaign trail  can be exhausting and even the best people can slip up sometimes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Cents</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34547</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34547</guid>
		<description>I could happily live with Manley vs Prentice. Either would be fine with me.

Unfortunately our choice is Harper or Dion. The sociologist still has not convinced me he&#039;s up to the job. Harper is beginning to leave doubts in my mind regarding his ability as a campaigner, but his record as PM is much better.

Now that voters may actually believe we have a choice perhaps they will look at Dion with a more discerning eye. If they do, Harper wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could happily live with Manley vs Prentice. Either would be fine with me.</p>
<p>Unfortunately our choice is Harper or Dion. The sociologist still has not convinced me he&#8217;s up to the job. Harper is beginning to leave doubts in my mind regarding his ability as a campaigner, but his record as PM is much better.</p>
<p>Now that voters may actually believe we have a choice perhaps they will look at Dion with a more discerning eye. If they do, Harper wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caffeine Free</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34546</link>
		<dc:creator>Caffeine Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34546</guid>
		<description>Does anybody see the Tory trend reminiscent of the Peterson flame out in 1990 in Ontario?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody see the Tory trend reminiscent of the Peterson flame out in 1990 in Ontario?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horseface</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34545</link>
		<dc:creator>Horseface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34545</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I&#039;m a horrible, devoted ideologue, but I&#039;d switch my vote to the party whose leader just ONCE said &quot;Eehh, you know, this election isn&#039;t even close to being the most important in the history of the country. It&#039;s like 17th. Middling importance.&quot;

That&#039;s all I ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#8217;m a horrible, devoted ideologue, but I&#8217;d switch my vote to the party whose leader just ONCE said &#8220;Eehh, you know, this election isn&#8217;t even close to being the most important in the history of the country. It&#8217;s like 17th. Middling importance.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all I ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34544</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34544</guid>
		<description>&quot;I remember correctly, Paul Martin made it his campaign theme “mark my words, we are really, really, really, really, really, different”.&quot;

You would be really, really different too if you noticed that every issue is very, very, very important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I remember correctly, Paul Martin made it his campaign theme “mark my words, we are really, really, really, really, really, different”.&#8221;</p>
<p>You would be really, really different too if you noticed that every issue is very, very, very important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Krisfalusi</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-2/#comment-34543</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Krisfalusi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34543</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starking my future on the Greens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starking my future on the Greens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34542</link>
		<dc:creator>sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34542</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there has ever been an election where the leaders do not say there are huge fundamental differences between the front-runners.  In fact, if I remember correctly, Paul Martin made it his campaign theme &quot;mark my words, we are really, really, really, really, really, different&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there has ever been an election where the leaders do not say there are huge fundamental differences between the front-runners.  In fact, if I remember correctly, Paul Martin made it his campaign theme &#8220;mark my words, we are really, really, really, really, really, different&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34541</guid>
		<description>Starkin&#039;-A right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starkin&#8217;-A right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34540</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34540</guid>
		<description>And just when I thought the &quot;You think it&#039;s easy...&quot; jokes were about to stop being consistently and uniformly hilarious, Brammer comes in with that witty offering, and I find myself eating it up with a spoon.  Cough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just when I thought the &#8220;You think it&#8217;s easy&#8230;&#8221; jokes were about to stop being consistently and uniformly hilarious, Brammer comes in with that witty offering, and I find myself eating it up with a spoon.  Cough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brammer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34539</link>
		<dc:creator>Brammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34539</guid>
		<description>You think it&#039;s easy to make starking choices...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think it&#8217;s easy to make starking choices&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34538</link>
		<dc:creator>tc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34538</guid>
		<description>&quot;Which is weird because it’s easily the boringest province of the ten.&quot;

seems a perfect fit.

i like manley vs prentice.  no lose situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Which is weird because it’s easily the boringest province of the ten.&#8221;</p>
<p>seems a perfect fit.</p>
<p>i like manley vs prentice.  no lose situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geiseric the Lame</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34537</link>
		<dc:creator>Geiseric the Lame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34537</guid>
		<description>I know he doesn&#039;t drink rum but that sounds like bay talk to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know he doesn&#8217;t drink rum but that sounds like bay talk to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew E</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34536</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34536</guid>
		<description>I like to live in the alternate universe in which Frank McKenna won the Liberal leadership.

Also, what if both parties replace their leaders, and we get McKenna in charge of the Libs and Lord in charge of the Cons?  New Brunswick is Canada!  Which is weird because it&#039;s easily the boringest province of the ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to live in the alternate universe in which Frank McKenna won the Liberal leadership.</p>
<p>Also, what if both parties replace their leaders, and we get McKenna in charge of the Libs and Lord in charge of the Cons?  New Brunswick is Canada!  Which is weird because it&#8217;s easily the boringest province of the ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Krisfalusi</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34535</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Krisfalusi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34535</guid>
		<description>The note on the stake reads:  &quot;Oh look the polls are touching as they kiss&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The note on the stake reads:  &#8220;Oh look the polls are touching as they kiss&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34534</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34534</guid>
		<description>That reminds me, here&#039;s a real question regarding the Metric system.

Does the Security &amp; Prosperity Partnership (remember that?  talk about a non-election issue!) mean that the US will adopt it in the name of simplifying trade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me, here&#8217;s a real question regarding the Metric system.</p>
<p>Does the Security &amp; Prosperity Partnership (remember that?  talk about a non-election issue!) mean that the US will adopt it in the name of simplifying trade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irritated</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34533</link>
		<dc:creator>Irritated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34533</guid>
		<description>Seriously? This has been a day with the Conservative &quot;platform&quot; launch and some pretty serious issues to discuss. Picking on someone&#039;s language skills is pretty lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? This has been a day with the Conservative &#8220;platform&#8221; launch and some pretty serious issues to discuss. Picking on someone&#8217;s language skills is pretty lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34532</guid>
		<description>Hey!  Can we have a Joe Clark write-in ballot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  Can we have a Joe Clark write-in ballot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34531</guid>
		<description>I agree with madeyoulook, although I&#039;ll add that I love the fact that I live in a two-language country.  I only wish I spoke and understood the other one.  I would love nothing more than doing like Justin T and speak three words, then switch.

Sadly, I can&#039;t even figure out a telephone number in French without taking the time to un, deux, trois . . .nobody recites a phone number that slow.

I pick Joe Clark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with madeyoulook, although I&#8217;ll add that I love the fact that I live in a two-language country.  I only wish I spoke and understood the other one.  I would love nothing more than doing like Justin T and speak three words, then switch.</p>
<p>Sadly, I can&#8217;t even figure out a telephone number in French without taking the time to un, deux, trois . . .nobody recites a phone number that slow.</p>
<p>I pick Joe Clark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34530</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34530</guid>
		<description>*I* wanted Joe Clark.  Yes, that Joe Clark.

Waah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*I* wanted Joe Clark.  Yes, that Joe Clark.</p>
<p>Waah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34529</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34529</guid>
		<description>Maybe he was speaking in local North Bay vernacular. What a chameleon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he was speaking in local North Bay vernacular. What a chameleon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34528</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34528</guid>
		<description>Mike:  &quot;will have posed.&quot;  Please read the whole sentence, it&#039;s not that long.

If we must spend the evening dissecting grammar.  Yeesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  &#8220;will have posed.&#8221;  Please read the whole sentence, it&#8217;s not that long.</p>
<p>If we must spend the evening dissecting grammar.  Yeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike514</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike514</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34527</guid>
		<description>Has anyone picked up on the &quot;will&quot; part?

He didn&#039;t say &quot;Never &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; an election.&quot; He said &quot;Never &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; an election...&quot;

Personally I think this is a great weight off my shoulders. I&#039;m glad there will never be an election with such a starking choice again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone picked up on the &#8220;will&#8221; part?</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t say &#8220;Never <i>has</i> an election.&#8221; He said &#8220;Never <i>will</i> an election&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally I think this is a great weight off my shoulders. I&#8217;m glad there will never be an election with such a starking choice again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrainDrainXP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34526</link>
		<dc:creator>BrainDrainXP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34526</guid>
		<description>DON CHERRY FOR PM!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON CHERRY FOR PM!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34525</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34525</guid>
		<description>ROB ANDERS FOR LEADER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROB ANDERS FOR LEADER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34524</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34524</guid>
		<description>Who called the fun police?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who called the fun police?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Thwim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34523</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Thwim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34523</guid>
		<description>No, not really kody. I very specifically do not want Harper. I&#039;d take McKay over Harper even. Or even May if that&#039;s what it took.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not really kody. I very specifically do not want Harper. I&#8217;d take McKay over Harper even. Or even May if that&#8217;s what it took.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34522</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34522</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, folks, we wouldn&#039;t have a country worth having if all we did was mock each other&#039;s second language skills.  This country is better than that.

POLICY!  Can we please oh pretty please have at it on POLICY??!??!

Uh-oh, they&#039;re coming for my con-bot badge...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, folks, we wouldn&#8217;t have a country worth having if all we did was mock each other&#8217;s second language skills.  This country is better than that.</p>
<p>POLICY!  Can we please oh pretty please have at it on POLICY??!??!</p>
<p>Uh-oh, they&#8217;re coming for my con-bot badge&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kody</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34521</link>
		<dc:creator>kody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34521</guid>
		<description>One thing is certain,

the &quot;anybody but Harper&quot; vote to stop a Harper majority is a facade.

From today on, folks will have to decide, not only if they don&#039;t want Harper, but if they do want Dion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is certain,</p>
<p>the &#8220;anybody but Harper&#8221; vote to stop a Harper majority is a facade.</p>
<p>From today on, folks will have to decide, not only if they don&#8217;t want Harper, but if they do want Dion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34520</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34520</guid>
		<description>I just &lt;i&gt;hate&lt;/i&gt; starking choices, I almost always flub those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just <i>hate</i> starking choices, I almost always flub those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wascally Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34519</link>
		<dc:creator>Wascally Wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34519</guid>
		<description>Mr. Wells - were you being starkastic there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Wells &#8211; were you being starkastic there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles H</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/07/a-note-on-the-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-34518</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=11847#comment-34518</guid>
		<description>&quot;So starking&quot;, or &quot;so stark a&quot;?

I&#039;m curious as to whether it got mangled by his accent or by his English skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So starking&#8221;, or &#8220;so stark a&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to whether it got mangled by his accent or by his English skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

