Tories: Economic union by 2010

by Andrew Coyne on Wednesday, October 8, 2008 12:17am - 36 Comments

The Conservative platform is mostly a damp squib, more or less by design. Or at any rate they’re trapped: if they were to put more in it at this late date, they open themselves to charges of panicking, making it up as they go along etc. — the very thing they’re trying to hang on the opposition.

Much of it is old news, having been unveiled already in the course of the campaign (or indeed announced in previous budgets). Some of it is wildly wrong — adding yet another regional development agency, pouring yet more subsidies into the auto and aerospace sinkholes, banning bulk water exports — and lots else is just unspeakably trivial: banning fees for unsolicited text messages, cracking down on tampering with gas pumps, and of course, “setting a minimum package size for cigarillos.” 

But amidst all the familiar micro-promises and useless chaff, there are a couple of gems. I love the pledge to abolish tariffs on imported machinery and equipment — timely, useful and a much more market-friendly way to help manufacturers than subsidies. And naturally I’m excited about this:

A re-elected Conservative Government led by Stephen Harper will work to eliminate barriers that restrict or impair trade, investment or labour mobility between provinces and territories by 2010. In 2007, the government announced that it was prepared to use the federal trade and commerce power to strengthen the Canadian economic union. Since that time, we have seen progress among the provinces and territories in strengthening the existing Agreement on Internal Trade. We hope to see further progress, but are prepared to intervene by exercising federal authority if barriers to trade, investment and mobility remain by 2010. [Emphasis added.]

I have not seen them attach a deadline to this promise before. This makes concrete and real what had previously only been a statement of intent. It’s the single most significant thing in the platform, and if acted upon, could be the Harper government’s most important legacy.

MORE: Other likes and dislikes…

Like:
- Senate reform: somebody has to take the lead on this
- “Ending insider loans to political candidates”: the biggest remaining loophole in the campaign finance laws – aside from the public funding the Tories once promised to abolish
- Expanding RESPs
- looser foreign investment rules: but why only airlines and uranium, why only 49%, and why only with reciprocal access granted by other countries?
- pursuing free trade deals with other countries: but why no mention of the European Union?

Dislike:
- gas tax transfer: in case you didn’t think municipal governments were unaccountable enough
- subsidies for all: not only for manufacturing, but mining, forestry, farming…
- subsidies for biofuels, wind, solar etc
- “Charter of Open Federalism”: I don’t know what it is, but I don’t like the smell of it
- the children’s artistic tax credit: the inevitable companion piece to the children’s fitness tax credit. I can only quote Andrew Potter’s plaintive lament: What about the fat, lazy talentless kids?
- the diesel tax cut: costly and enviro-nuts
- enriching the old age tax credit: a universal program, its policy rationale remains a mystery. Why should we pay people for being old? The Liberals have a better idea: enriching the income-tested Guaranteed Income Supplement.
- a $75-million government-run venture capital fund: is there a more obvious contradiction in terms?

Bookmark and Share
  • madeyoulook

    Quebec federalists to start posturing as separatists over this “trampling over the choice of les québécois to determine notre propre destin,” you’re missing your queue! Quick! Les micros vous attendent…

  • madeyoulook

    Bloody voice recognition software (yeah, yeah, the organic within-skull software): You’re missing your cue…

  • Ti-Guy

    I think you had right the first time.

  • madeyoulook

    If they COULD pull this off, it would give Canada a bit more credibility in the “we are the (free trade) world” huge-arrific idea you spoke about a few weeks back.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Yeah, this would be great! All parties should adopt it. Good for the Tories for including something of substance, though as MYL says it’s sort of a red flag to a blue-eyed Maoist bull.

    No no, MYL, I like queue better! Much more descriptive of federal-provincial relations these days.

  • Jack Mitchell

    “…the “we are the (free trade) world” huge-arrific idea you spoke about a few weeks back.”

    Yeah, what the hell happened to that? Why didn’t anybody pick up on it in the campaign? Tell me it wasn’t a dream… MYL saw it too…

  • Mike T.

    A policy with a built in fail-by date! Bad for the proposer! Good for anyone who wants to make fun of proposee in the future!

    I mean, imagine if they’d put a date on all those new day-care spaces that tax-incentive was supposed to create.

  • madeyoulook

    Jack, not only did I see it, I tried to resuscitate it during PW’s English lesson tonight. No takers.

  • Don Mitchell

    About interprovincial trade barriers. I brought this up during a all candidates meeting in Victoria tonight (Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca). The Tory, Liberal and Green candidates were for reduced barriers, the NDP gave it lukewarm support then went off on a tangent about immigrants getting professional designations. I support quicker quals for immigrant professionals but reducing interprovincial barriers is a higher priority.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Re: lack of discussion among pols, if not among ourselves, I know the details aren’t getting released until after the election (if there are any details to be released), but still, is there an unwritten agreement not to talk about it or have the campaigns just not noticed? Perhaps it’s in everybody’s best interest to pretend it isn’t happening. At least we know what the next election is going to be about.

  • madeyoulook

    I dunno Jack, this campaign has been so chock-full of really meaty issues (pardon me while I attempt a solo Heimlich) that it just crowded out some other deserving stuff, like international trade…

  • Jack Mitchell

    You are obviously not from Ontario, MYL, Our last provincial campaign turned solely & exclusively on whether or not to fund minority religious schools. Not that that wasn’t a no-brainer, but it swept everything else aside.

  • madeyoulook

    Well thank heavens trifles like the lawless zone west of Hamilton didn’t preoccupy anyone during the Ontario election campaign.

    Similarly, it seems “a federal election is no time to discuss any issues in any detail,” only Ms. Campbell has taught us you can’t actually say it.

  • Jack Mitchell

    That was one wise woman, in retrospect. Talk about “speaking truth to avoid power.”

  • madeyoulook

    Andrew, were we separated at birth? How old are you? Notwithstanding your inexcusable willingness to participate in news discussion panels at the Mother Corp, it’s like you’re reading my mind here, especially with the “More” details. It’s quite spooky.

  • quebecois separatiste

    Clearly Coyne doesn’t think saving the environment is important.

  • http://myblahg.com Robert McClelland

    A re-elected Conservative Government led by Stephen Harper will work to eliminate barriers that restrict or impair trade, investment or labour mobility between provinces and territories by 2010.

    I keep hearing about these barriers but I never hear what they are. Do they exist in reality?

  • http://myblahg.com Robert McClelland

    By the way, is this true. I heard that when the Conservatives were passing the plan out to reporters they were asking if if they’d like it in single or 2-ply.

  • http://cork2toronto.blogspot.com Mark Dowling

    “why only with reciprocal access granted by other countries?”

    Why not Andrew? What’s so bad about reciprocity? It links quite nicely with the free-trade-in-Canada riff.

  • http://andrewcoyne.com Andrew Coyne

    We shouldn’t have to wait until other countries stop exploiting their consumers to stop exploiting ours.

  • Wascally Wabbit

    Funny…eliminate interprovincial trade barriers…so – when is the scheduled date for the meeting with the Premiers to kick this off?
    Not scheduled yet? Hm!
    Excuse me for harping on a recursive theme…but the PM has overlooked mention of negotiating a Free Trade Agreement with the European Union…and the date for THAT is FIXED – 3 days after the election…

    Hm – Suspicious…condescending….Harper doesn’t want to breath anything about this during the election…

    Hm – well – suppose it leaks out now…won’t make him look good, I’m pretty sure!

  • Geiseric the Lame

    “We shouldn’t have to wait until other countries stop exploiting their consumers to stop exploiting ours.”

    Agreement with the sentiment aside, I honestly don’t see how a good stern talking to from Ottawa is going to solve anything.

  • http://prairiewrangler.wordpress.com/ Olaf

    Look at it the other way though Andrew: why should other countries get to exploit their consumers if we can’t exploit ours? Er, wait…

  • Tim

    We are in the middle of “maybe” the worst financial blunders in history. That should be Canada’s only mission right now. Our leader needs to lead. we need to stop … drop and roll.. postpone the election and focus on the economy.

    that has to happen ..

  • http://cork2toronto.blogspot.com Mark Dowling

    Andrew – yes, but the flip side of that is that once you get a few countries to sign on, this puts the holdouts at a disadvantage. The only rationale for non-reciprocal lifting of trade barriers, in my view, is for critical products which can’t be sourced from partners which we are freetrading with.

From Macleans