Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Where the elite meet to greet

by Paul Wells on Wednesday, October 8, 2008 4:39pm - 71 Comments

UPDATE: Commenter Austin So found video of the shout chorus at the end of Dion’s speech.

Stéphane Dion spoke at the Economic Empire Gridiron Niblick Participle Club today, or whatever it’s called, at the Royal York. The crowd, assorted Toronto swells with a substantial concentration of card-carrying Liberals (Ottawa being inhospitable, many have fetched up on Bay Street) was about one-third the size of the crowd for Stephen Harper yesterday. I know this because I received three emails while Dion was talking, all from the Conservative war room, all on the theme that the crowd was about one-third the size of the crowd for Harper.

Those three were only a small fraction of the total number of emails I received from the Conservative war room while I was trying to listen to Dion’s speech. You know how sometimes you go three minutes without getting an email? The Conservatives are working hard to make sure we don’t feel that horrible lonely feeling.

But I digress. Dion’s speech comes at an odd moment, a day after Harper spoke to an audience approximately three times as big as this one — three times! — to release the Conservative platform and to tell an audience approximately three times as big as Dion’s audience that Noah was an excellent financial planner. Now Dion had to persuade an audience merely one-third the size of Harper’s that he, Dion, can manage an economy, or talk about managing one. Basically Dion had to look prime ministerial.

I won’t go into great detail, but I should note that the tiny, plucky crowd seemed quite taken with Dion’s speech. That the crowd rose twice to give enthusiastic standing ovations, one of them in response to the line: “I may not speak English as well as Stephen Harper, but I speak the language of truth better than him, in English or in French.”

There was a long off-script I-Love-Canada bit at the end that was quite simple and powerful, and just about everybody leaving the room was talking about that part of the speech. But what struck me even more was the populist and province-friendly notes Dion struck. We are through the looking glass when the Liberal leader is able to elbow Harper aside on “cares about people like you” and “can work with the provinces.” And yet here he was at least attempting to do just that.

Harper is “completely out of touch” with the impact of the recent unpleasantness “on the lives of everyday Canadians,” Dion said. “There is no time to waste, we need shovels in the ground.” Shovels in the ground? Shades of Chrétien ’93. The crowd, which I feel compelled to tell you was only about one-third the size of the crowd for Harper, ate it up.

Then there was this: “We Liberals understand that we need to work with the Premiers, not against them. Unlike Stephen Harper I will meet with first ministers… He has chosen not to hold a formal First Ministers meeting. Jim Flaherty, his Finance Minister, attacked this province…”

The emerging and interesting theme of this campaign is that Stephen Harper, who some bloggers were calling Everyman as recently as Saturday, and who had all the gleaming apparatus of modern electioneering — legions of brain-in-a-jar strategic geniuses, a fundraising armada, gleaming suburban election suites, purpose-built teevee studios, the Legendary Guy Giorno Himself! as chief of staff (fun question: could anyone find Guy Giorno with teams of bloodhounds this week?) — and who had no stronger claim to legitimacy than his preoccupation for the concerns of ordinary folks and his willingness to play nice with the provinces — has managed to let himself get pushed off those dimes by Snooty French-Educated Clarity-Bill Guy. Peter Van Loan was standing at the back of the room, looking a mite less cocky than when he was lecturing me on The Real Concerns of Ordinary Folk in Quebec City in August. Now I know I’m a Perrier-sipping rich-gala-attending MSM leftard, but here’s the thing, Peter: I grew up in Sarnia and I went to public school with all my neighbours, and the ordinary folk I grew up with don’t like jerks.

The Liberals I spoke to are keenly aware that this week’s change in mood is coming perilously late for them. They know the Conservatives have stronger organization in many parts of the country. They’re not entirely sure how Canadians will react when they realize Harper could actually lose. My own feeling is that a Conservative government after Oct. 14 is still likelier than a Liberal government.

But let it be noted that as this campaign entered its home stretch, the accidental leader peddling a tax increase is getting crowds to their feet in North Bay and Bay Street, while the crack team assembled by the guy who’s spent the last three years playing three-dimensional Vulcan chess was reduced to crowd counts.

Bookmark and Share
  • Peter

    Wells, are you deliberately obtuse, or just generally thick? “Peter’s right, which is why it’s really urgent to clean out the economics departments of our universities. I think I can find a list of 230 economists who don’t even understand the massive threat a carbon tax poses.”

    I know, I know that isn’t fair. But I am not speaking in the same terms as an ivory tower economist, because they say a carbon tax is good policy in terms of an overriding need to reduce GHG emissions, not about whether or not to stay rich. Do you get that? I am concerned about economic devastation of our industrial base in the next two years, they are concerned about us all dying from a theory in a hundred years. Don’t get me wrong it may well happen, but it is not the same thing. Ask the same 230 economists if it means the end of the pulp and paper industry in Canada, and they will tell you yes, but that is desirable in the fight against climate change. Frame the question this way: Is a carbon tax going to reduce the standard of living of this northern, vast, resource dependent, bitterly cold country over the next 2-10 years? Different answer.

  • Sophie-Marie

    Jack-
    Now why didn’t I think of that?

    probably because I am an elitist communist humourless bleeding heart. (Is it possible to be elitis whilst making minimum wage?)

  • Jack Mitchell

    “Incredible how little you have to offer, Jack, when the more subtle,yet overly important aspects of this campaing need to be looked at. ”

    What can I say? That I have great insight into the financial turmoil? I try to steer clear of issues I know nothing about, like climate change, the economy, etc. Sadly I’m no trend-setter on that score.

    I am however wise enough to see that neither the PM, nor Dion, nor Layton has the first clue what this is all about. And I don’t trust bankers about the future of their own banks, or ex-bankers about the future of their own political parties. I’m naive that way.

    But accusations of media distortion are another matter. With a few exceptions like FOX News and, oh, Keith Olbermann, the media are not biased, they’re just trying to be numero uno about the story of the day, which the Zeitgeist or the Invisible Hand or Santa Claus or whoever delivers to us all. To think anything else is bizarre and paranoid. The salutary response to paranoia is ridicule, which is all my empty cupboard can contribute on issues like this.

    Perhaps you didn’t try my “Brian” experiment, though? It really does work, it’s really quite funny.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Sophie-Marie: “(Is it possible to be elitist whilst making minimum wage?)”

    According to various conbots around here, the less you make the more elitist you are. Tory populism starts at $25/hour!

  • Sophie-Marie

    It all makes so much more sense, now…

  • Brent

    Brian:

    1. If the premise is that we should raise taxes on things we don’t, why don’t we set the taxes on crime, car accidents and cancer at 100%?

    I’m pretty sure that we have put a tax on crime. I believe it is referred to as “jail”.

    If, as in the case of a carbon tax, you are using tax as a deterrent, I think you can probably see why they are not required for car accidents or cancer.

  • Style

    Good points Brent. But you missed Brian’s other question: why isn’t there a law against criminals? Any ideas?

  • Francien Verhoeven

    Peter,

    about the economists (and each are entitled to an opinion): the economist might have a point, by saying that shifting taxes is a good shift, but they leave the most important part of a four point strategy off the table. That forth part strategy is the presence of international market forces and the introduction of tariffs.

    Buy exculsively Canadian-made goods and the scheme might work. But you cannot introduce part of a plan and then expect it to work properly. Yet, that forth part of the plan is not spoken about by Dion, or any other Liberal partisan for that matter.

    When Bali was attended, the Conservatives were chastised for bringing the wider world picture into view. The Liberals know they must also include the worldly part but simply ignore it, although it is written about within the Green Shift pamphlet. I quess it would be highly ‘unethical’ to go back all the way to Bali to restate a position, so the Liberals will do it through deception and backdoor trading schemes. So much for ‘hidden agendas’.

  • Francien Verhoeven

    Jack,

    “What can I say? That I have great insight into the financial turmoil?”

    I believe that you actually cannot see the irony I tried pointing out to you. Understanding the irony has absolutely nothing to do with understanding economics or climate change. I believe you are not able to catch the turn-around which happened, namely that a banker’s word is discredited by an ex-banker who’s word will then be taken as truth. You don’t see what’s happening there? Are we now to believe McCullum (the ex-banker), who just pointed out that bankers CANNOT be trusted? How far do you think McCullum can go with pulling this wool over our eyes?

    Think about it for a while and the rest of this bygone election parade might come into focus. 20/20, now there’s a great view.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Francien, as a chronic irony user (“irony-head” if you want to get all “hep”), I may have overlooked your irony, but only because by now it takes a very potent irony to get me “high.” These days I’ve got a line on some “finger sarcasm” (basically highly concentrated irony) which is basically the best, I can get you some if you want to try it.

    “You don’t see what’s happening there? Are we now to believe McCullum (the ex-banker), who just pointed out that bankers CANNOT be trusted? How far do you think McCullum can go with pulling this wool over our eyes?”

    In logic I think they call this the “Cretan banker” paradox, after the Cretan banker who claimed that all Cretan bankers are liars.

    So you’re saying that McCullum can’t be trusted. But isn’t that exactly what he was saying? I think you should be in total agreement with him.

  • Brent

    I figured we would leave that one as self-evident Style.

    Paul, hope you got a chance to try ‘The Snack’ while you were in Iqaluit. I saw Stephane Saturday night here and was impressed.

  • Liz

    Someone’s crying, Lord, Kumbaya.

    Let me be clear, I think Stephen Harper and his sycophants who’ve been cruising for a bruising for some while are about to get a righteous smackdown.

    And if the Lord doesn’t see fit to save HarperCo, they should pick up their balls and run on home. Run to a Harper/Bush commune/bunker type deal, and snipe-hunt from there.

    And whatever they do, don’t leave their women and children behind!

  • Francien Verhoeven

    Liz,

    believe me, there are days I wish I could think like you.

  • Jack Mitchell

    I just watched that Dion video that Austin found, in the UPDATE at top – Wow, it rocks! I’ve never seen Dion doing that before, owning the moment like that. “Good for your WALLET and good for the PLANET!” A great campaign speech and he looked most primeministerial. If you’re not a violent Tory, check it out!

  • kenneth

    Francien,

    There was some great reporting on the parties carbon plans in the Ottawa Citizen. It was the kind of reporting that we should be seeing a lot more of.

  • Pingback: » Ever read something where you think to yourself, “well said”? Scott’s DiaTribes: My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.

  • Big Daddy

    GIORONO FOUND!!

    On Wednesday in Victoria, where Harper made some similarly minor health announcements, tempers flared repeatedly as Conservative campaign staff loudly snapped at journalists over their reporting. Tory partisans also jeered media questions during a news conference with the prime minister.

    Guy Giorno, the prime minister’s chief of staff, accused a reporter of accosting him merely for placing a hand on his shoulder to keep Giorno from rocking in and out of a camera sightline.

  • Gilmore

    Francien: I didn’t mean to imply that only Liberals love Canada or that all true Canadians are Liberals. I find those sorts of lines offensive and I apologize if it sounded that way.

    All I meant to say is that M. Dion has proven time and again that Canada means something to him (and has received abuse for his patriotism) and I’m still not sure how M. Harper feels about his country. Of course, I stand to be corrected.

  • Pingback: BREAKING! GiornoWatch Special Edition: Oh, there he is - working his magic with the media, even. : Capital Read : Inside the Queensway : Macleans.ca Blog Central

  • stephen

    Gilmore,

    Said in true Canadian passive aggressive tradition.

    Why would you want to be Prime Minister of a country that you dont care about? Forget the conspiracy theory answers. Honestly, to insinuate that ANY of the leaders, with the exception of Duceppe, arent patriotic is ridiculous.

  • bob steward

    i was in an ice storm

From Macleans