<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Final Days: Laval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinB</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36738</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36738</guid>
		<description>From wikipedia:

Dion has said that his involvement as &quot;an activist for the separatist cause&quot; ended during a five-hour, rum-and-Coke fuelled discussion with a federalist household while he was going door-to-door for the PQ, but he did not openly commit to federalism until much later. At the time of the 1980 referendum, his sentiments were neutral. In his own words, the &#039;no&#039; victory left him &quot;neither moved nor outraged. To tell the truth, I felt no particular feeling.&quot; (Moi, je ne me sentais ni ému ni révolté. À vrai dire, je n&#039;éprouvais aucun sentiment particulier.)

Yes, that&#039;s a real Canadian speaking. No wonder he won&#039;t give up his French citizenship. If Stephen Harper had dual US-Canadian citizenship, the media would crucify him. Double standard, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From wikipedia:</p>
<p>Dion has said that his involvement as &#8220;an activist for the separatist cause&#8221; ended during a five-hour, rum-and-Coke fuelled discussion with a federalist household while he was going door-to-door for the PQ, but he did not openly commit to federalism until much later. At the time of the 1980 referendum, his sentiments were neutral. In his own words, the &#8216;no&#8217; victory left him &#8220;neither moved nor outraged. To tell the truth, I felt no particular feeling.&#8221; (Moi, je ne me sentais ni ému ni révolté. À vrai dire, je n&#8217;éprouvais aucun sentiment particulier.)</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s a real Canadian speaking. No wonder he won&#8217;t give up his French citizenship. If Stephen Harper had dual US-Canadian citizenship, the media would crucify him. Double standard, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36737</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36737</guid>
		<description>This sorry episode is now 24 hours old.  I have yet to hear any Liberal official/candidate actually provide an answer to the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sorry episode is now 24 hours old.  I have yet to hear any Liberal official/candidate actually provide an answer to the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Smith</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36736</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36736</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Would you shut, you troll? You’ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.
comment by Ti-Guy on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 12:34 am&lt;/i&gt;

I wouldn&#039;t normally get drawn into troll wars, but aren&#039;t you are the king of Canadian political internet trolls? I remember seeing you comment on bigcitylib&#039;s site that Libloggers should join you in launching a troll attack on the Maclean&#039;s blogs. You should really take your own advice and get a new hobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Would you shut, you troll? You’ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.<br />
comment by Ti-Guy on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 12:34 am</i></p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t normally get drawn into troll wars, but aren&#8217;t you are the king of Canadian political internet trolls? I remember seeing you comment on bigcitylib&#8217;s site that Libloggers should join you in launching a troll attack on the Maclean&#8217;s blogs. You should really take your own advice and get a new hobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warwick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36735</link>
		<dc:creator>Warwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36735</guid>
		<description>If Aaron wants to be a liberal shill, join the campaign.   You are not a journalist.

I guess I&#039;m wondering why you&#039;d chose to be the lickspittle of a failure like Dion?

As far as the fairness of the media in airing this: you lot have hidden enough liberal gaffes.  If this was Harper, it would lead every 14 milliseconds.

In fact, Palin=Dion.  Media&#039;s coverage is what is not equal (and I refer to the CDN media&#039;s coverage.)

Low point in journalist?  Try rare breaze.  It won&#039;t waft away the stink but it&#039;s a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Aaron wants to be a liberal shill, join the campaign.   You are not a journalist.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m wondering why you&#8217;d chose to be the lickspittle of a failure like Dion?</p>
<p>As far as the fairness of the media in airing this: you lot have hidden enough liberal gaffes.  If this was Harper, it would lead every 14 milliseconds.</p>
<p>In fact, Palin=Dion.  Media&#8217;s coverage is what is not equal (and I refer to the CDN media&#8217;s coverage.)</p>
<p>Low point in journalist?  Try rare breaze.  It won&#8217;t waft away the stink but it&#8217;s a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36734</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36734</guid>
		<description>Breaking News, August 2009 - The G7 meeting in London today ground to a hault.  Frustrated heads of state emerged to complain that after rephrasing comments and questions over 1000 times so that the Canadian PM, Dion, could understand them, time ran out and no progress was made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking News, August 2009 &#8211; The G7 meeting in London today ground to a hault.  Frustrated heads of state emerged to complain that after rephrasing comments and questions over 1000 times so that the Canadian PM, Dion, could understand them, time ran out and no progress was made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark peters</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36733</link>
		<dc:creator>mark peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36733</guid>
		<description>I have a hard time believing the media would be as generous if Harper&#039;s command of the French language was as abysmal as Dion&#039;s grasp of English.

Nevertheless, this interview is important not because of supposed language problems but because it demonstrably shows that Dion has nothing except invective as it relates to the economy.

Seriously where are Dion&#039;s handlers?  Did they not prepare him to answer this very direct question about what he&#039;d do if he was Prime Minister?  Heck, John Doe on the street can give you a canned answer on things near and dear to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a hard time believing the media would be as generous if Harper&#8217;s command of the French language was as abysmal as Dion&#8217;s grasp of English.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, this interview is important not because of supposed language problems but because it demonstrably shows that Dion has nothing except invective as it relates to the economy.</p>
<p>Seriously where are Dion&#8217;s handlers?  Did they not prepare him to answer this very direct question about what he&#8217;d do if he was Prime Minister?  Heck, John Doe on the street can give you a canned answer on things near and dear to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36732</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36732</guid>
		<description>On the CBC interview, Dion was asked by a Calgary pilot how the Greenshift would effect his business, Dion&#039;s responsed by promoting airplanes built in his riding, when asked again, he had no response.  The media talks about Harper not relating to the common man, has Dion ever worked a minute beside a common man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the CBC interview, Dion was asked by a Calgary pilot how the Greenshift would effect his business, Dion&#8217;s responsed by promoting airplanes built in his riding, when asked again, he had no response.  The media talks about Harper not relating to the common man, has Dion ever worked a minute beside a common man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ldd</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36731</link>
		<dc:creator>ldd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36731</guid>
		<description>And how come the &#039;sky is falling crowed tends to vote liberal?

Seriously,  g-l-o-b-a-l  w-a-r-m-i-n-g...gees!

Yes we are pollution good ole Terra Ferma but CHANGE the weather?  Really?
Humans think themselves quite important eh?

Tell me this... should we suddenly discover that the ice age is coming in 5 years, could we stop it with excess gas emissions?
...yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how come the &#8216;sky is falling crowed tends to vote liberal?</p>
<p>Seriously,  g-l-o-b-a-l  w-a-r-m-i-n-g&#8230;gees!</p>
<p>Yes we are pollution good ole Terra Ferma but CHANGE the weather?  Really?<br />
Humans think themselves quite important eh?</p>
<p>Tell me this&#8230; should we suddenly discover that the ice age is coming in 5 years, could we stop it with excess gas emissions?<br />
&#8230;yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ldd</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36730</link>
		<dc:creator>ldd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36730</guid>
		<description>and the next article that macleans does, was noting but propaganda, shill for the libs...

Cut off the comments eh?

Sninkers.
No wonder I refuse to renew my subscription.

Any one who doesn&#039;t want a majority for Canada instead of another few years of minority, and yet another early election...blah blah blah well then vote for the one who didn&#039;t even bother to learn English, at least Harper&#039;s French is 10 times better than Dion&#039;s English.

Lets let the other side have a chance, besides we need this country to be strong, hasn&#039;t been and the kids are lost...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the next article that macleans does, was noting but propaganda, shill for the libs&#8230;</p>
<p>Cut off the comments eh?</p>
<p>Sninkers.<br />
No wonder I refuse to renew my subscription.</p>
<p>Any one who doesn&#8217;t want a majority for Canada instead of another few years of minority, and yet another early election&#8230;blah blah blah well then vote for the one who didn&#8217;t even bother to learn English, at least Harper&#8217;s French is 10 times better than Dion&#8217;s English.</p>
<p>Lets let the other side have a chance, besides we need this country to be strong, hasn&#8217;t been and the kids are lost&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36729</link>
		<dc:creator>neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36729</guid>
		<description>*
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Would you shut, you troll? You’ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;comment by Ti-Guy on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 12:34 am&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

unlike your &lt;a href=&quot;http://hallsofmacadamia.blogspot.com/2007/08/noble-stewards-of-mother-earth.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;lily-white self&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, huh ti-guy?

*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*<br />
<i>&#8220;Would you shut, you troll? You’ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.&#8221;<br />
<b>comment by Ti-Guy on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 12:34 am</b></i></p>
<p>unlike your <a href="http://hallsofmacadamia.blogspot.com/2007/08/noble-stewards-of-mother-earth.html" rel="nofollow"><i><b>lily-white self</b></i></a>, huh ti-guy?</p>
<p>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManitobaMan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36728</link>
		<dc:creator>ManitobaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36728</guid>
		<description>It matters! It matters a lot! If this was a Tory blowing the interview we all know the feeding frenzy from the parasites in the media....and of course the Liberals would be all over it!!! ALL OVER IT! Don&#039;t pretend it would be otherwise.

I want to be proud of my Prime Minister. I want somebody who understands the question the first time. Someone who won&#039;t embarass the entire country on the world stage. Not an intellectual lighweight. Maybe the interviewer should have spoken S-L-O-W-E-R!

These times call for leadership and intelligence, not a buffoon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It matters! It matters a lot! If this was a Tory blowing the interview we all know the feeding frenzy from the parasites in the media&#8230;.and of course the Liberals would be all over it!!! ALL OVER IT! Don&#8217;t pretend it would be otherwise.</p>
<p>I want to be proud of my Prime Minister. I want somebody who understands the question the first time. Someone who won&#8217;t embarass the entire country on the world stage. Not an intellectual lighweight. Maybe the interviewer should have spoken S-L-O-W-E-R!</p>
<p>These times call for leadership and intelligence, not a buffoon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveND</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36727</link>
		<dc:creator>daveND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36727</guid>
		<description>Re:  Comment by seaandthemountains on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 2:32 am:

I have no issue with a legitimate political zinger and I would say that is what the sweater jokes are.

Do Nothing Dion - is not just rhetoric it is fact 43 times it is factually accurate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Comment by seaandthemountains on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 2:32 am:</p>
<p>I have no issue with a legitimate political zinger and I would say that is what the sweater jokes are.</p>
<p>Do Nothing Dion &#8211; is not just rhetoric it is fact 43 times it is factually accurate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; On the Duffy/Dion thing, but moreso on Harper. Scott&#8217;s DiaTribes: My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36726</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; On the Duffy/Dion thing, but moreso on Harper. Scott&#8217;s DiaTribes: My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36726</guid>
		<description>[...] interviewed, and see how that looks and how they did on national TV. As for Duffy, the fact that several of his media colleagues at Macleans called him out on it speaks for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interviewed, and see how that looks and how they did on national TV. As for Duffy, the fact that several of his media colleagues at Macleans called him out on it speaks for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldfarmer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36725</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldfarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36725</guid>
		<description>The interviewer shoulda drew a picture for Dion. He might have been able to figure that out. Dosent matter anyways. When Dion did answer the question nobody could make sense of that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interviewer shoulda drew a picture for Dion. He might have been able to figure that out. Dosent matter anyways. When Dion did answer the question nobody could make sense of that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zog</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36724</link>
		<dc:creator>Zog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36724</guid>
		<description>crf at 1:32 AM

&quot;The entire journalistic class is an utter disgrace this election for refusing to cover Canada’s climate change position,...&quot;

Actually, the global warming &quot;crisis&quot; (it stopped nine years ago) was a media creation. Now they are bored and tired of it and have more interesting rabbits to hunt. Even CBCSuzuki has been able to do three consecutive newscasts (I&#039;ve been keeping track) without bringing up the AGW shibboleth in some weird context.

If you think that the pusuit of Weaver&#039;s and Hansen&#039;s computerized moonbeams is actually more important than the prospect of a worldwide economic depression that would destroy the lives of hundreds of millions, you&#039;re not merely out of touch with reality, you are a heartless ideologue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crf at 1:32 AM</p>
<p>&#8220;The entire journalistic class is an utter disgrace this election for refusing to cover Canada’s climate change position,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, the global warming &#8220;crisis&#8221; (it stopped nine years ago) was a media creation. Now they are bored and tired of it and have more interesting rabbits to hunt. Even CBCSuzuki has been able to do three consecutive newscasts (I&#8217;ve been keeping track) without bringing up the AGW shibboleth in some weird context.</p>
<p>If you think that the pusuit of Weaver&#8217;s and Hansen&#8217;s computerized moonbeams is actually more important than the prospect of a worldwide economic depression that would destroy the lives of hundreds of millions, you&#8217;re not merely out of touch with reality, you are a heartless ideologue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seaandthemountains</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36723</link>
		<dc:creator>seaandthemountains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36723</guid>
		<description>john manley too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john manley too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revnant Dream</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36722</link>
		<dc:creator>Revnant Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36722</guid>
		<description>Who would have thought Dion could be our very own Chancie? This whole Saga could be called &quot;Sea Change&quot; or &quot;Dion Revealed&quot;.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtDLPsKrL9M&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would have thought Dion could be our very own Chancie? This whole Saga could be called &#8220;Sea Change&#8221; or &#8220;Dion Revealed&#8221;.</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/BtDLPsKrL9M/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seaandthemountains</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36721</link>
		<dc:creator>seaandthemountains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36721</guid>
		<description>DaveND

I agree that the spirit of the election is pretty dismal but I think your claim to the moral high ground is overstated...

Layton has had bouts of name calling and pls explain to me how the &#039;sweater jokes&#039; are substantive. Heck even your post contains the same kinda rhetoric e.g., &quot;Do-nothing Dion said they wouldn’t stand up for hard pressed Canadian families... frankly BS. You might not like the things he is proposing but a dramatic remaking of the tax systems is not &#039;nothing&#039;.


but you are right that we def need some veterans of parliament back... seeing B.Blakie go right now is doubly depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveND</p>
<p>I agree that the spirit of the election is pretty dismal but I think your claim to the moral high ground is overstated&#8230;</p>
<p>Layton has had bouts of name calling and pls explain to me how the &#8216;sweater jokes&#8217; are substantive. Heck even your post contains the same kinda rhetoric e.g., &#8220;Do-nothing Dion said they wouldn’t stand up for hard pressed Canadian families&#8230; frankly BS. You might not like the things he is proposing but a dramatic remaking of the tax systems is not &#8216;nothing&#8217;.</p>
<p>but you are right that we def need some veterans of parliament back&#8230; seeing B.Blakie go right now is doubly depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36720</link>
		<dc:creator>crf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36720</guid>
		<description>So, when are the media, like Paul Wells, going to ask Harper, Dion and the rest of the candidates, what they is going to do in Copenhagen in 2009? This is getting ridiculous.  How do you choose which problems you are going to ignore (the hard, long term ones, like global warming-- which are going to horribly constrain the life and ambitions of all of humanity) and which ones you are going to cover (this financial crisis of the moment)?

The entire journalistic class is an utter disgrace this election for refusing to cover Canada&#039;s climate change position, despite the fact that the next government will negotiate the only climate treaty the world has left to avoid a truly horrible situation.

At the last climate change conference, our well educated Prime Minister decided to utterly ignore all of Canada&#039;s expert scientists. And I mean that he did not even ask for advice only to later ignore it. By the way, this is par for the course for Mr. Harper government, in all areas of Canada&#039;s science policy -- something the media is also incapable of informing the public of.

Why don&#039;t you try to redeem yourselves the next few days Paul Wells. And pass this message along to your friends.

http://www.cop15.dk/en

Do you remember the Brain drain that occurred in after Mulroney, the beginning Chretien years, and when Harris came to power in Ontario? Do you know how hard it is has been to build up Canada&#039;s reputation and expertise in Science in the intervening years of good government, that actually cared about forming policy based on the best possible advice? Do you know how fragile the situation is now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when are the media, like Paul Wells, going to ask Harper, Dion and the rest of the candidates, what they is going to do in Copenhagen in 2009? This is getting ridiculous.  How do you choose which problems you are going to ignore (the hard, long term ones, like global warming&#8211; which are going to horribly constrain the life and ambitions of all of humanity) and which ones you are going to cover (this financial crisis of the moment)?</p>
<p>The entire journalistic class is an utter disgrace this election for refusing to cover Canada&#8217;s climate change position, despite the fact that the next government will negotiate the only climate treaty the world has left to avoid a truly horrible situation.</p>
<p>At the last climate change conference, our well educated Prime Minister decided to utterly ignore all of Canada&#8217;s expert scientists. And I mean that he did not even ask for advice only to later ignore it. By the way, this is par for the course for Mr. Harper government, in all areas of Canada&#8217;s science policy &#8212; something the media is also incapable of informing the public of.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you try to redeem yourselves the next few days Paul Wells. And pass this message along to your friends.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cop15.dk/en" rel="nofollow">http://www.cop15.dk/en</a></p>
<p>Do you remember the Brain drain that occurred in after Mulroney, the beginning Chretien years, and when Harris came to power in Ontario? Do you know how hard it is has been to build up Canada&#8217;s reputation and expertise in Science in the intervening years of good government, that actually cared about forming policy based on the best possible advice? Do you know how fragile the situation is now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36719</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36719</guid>
		<description>As I recall they made terrible fun of Stockwell Day&#039;s French, (and his religion) and we&#039;re gearing up to crucify another Westerner before they found that Harper could actually speak French quite well (but he&#039;s still a scary Christian).  But that&#039;s just how I recall it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall they made terrible fun of Stockwell Day&#8217;s French, (and his religion) and we&#8217;re gearing up to crucify another Westerner before they found that Harper could actually speak French quite well (but he&#8217;s still a scary Christian).  But that&#8217;s just how I recall it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36718</link>
		<dc:creator>andycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36718</guid>
		<description>You’ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.
-----
So Maclean&#039;s is a Liberal blog?

And gee, Scott, what&#039;s your traffic like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
So Maclean&#8217;s is a Liberal blog?</p>
<p>And gee, Scott, what&#8217;s your traffic like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-2/#comment-36717</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36717</guid>
		<description>As I recall, in the last election&#039;s French dedate, Stephen harper missed answering a question completely because he couldn&#039;t follow along. I don&#039;t think the liberals even mentioned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, in the last election&#8217;s French dedate, Stephen harper missed answering a question completely because he couldn&#8217;t follow along. I don&#8217;t think the liberals even mentioned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36716</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36716</guid>
		<description>It seems like a reasonable question that anyone trying out for the top job would have been able to answer right off, but no.  Another bit of bad news for Mr Dion: The Globe and Mail endorses Harper.  The Liberal&#039;s loss is Canada&#039;s gain.  A tough pill to swallow for the Cheerleaders of Doom [you know who you are].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a reasonable question that anyone trying out for the top job would have been able to answer right off, but no.  Another bit of bad news for Mr Dion: The Globe and Mail endorses Harper.  The Liberal&#8217;s loss is Canada&#8217;s gain.  A tough pill to swallow for the Cheerleaders of Doom [you know who you are].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36715</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36715</guid>
		<description>Too bad the question wasn&#039;t also in French.  It would have made Dion&#039;s face a deeper shade of red.

Not only did Dion understand the question he realized that standard Liberal boilerplate didn&#039;t provide him an answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad the question wasn&#8217;t also in French.  It would have made Dion&#8217;s face a deeper shade of red.</p>
<p>Not only did Dion understand the question he realized that standard Liberal boilerplate didn&#8217;t provide him an answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanBC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36714</link>
		<dc:creator>DanBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36714</guid>
		<description>Jack Layton&#039;s policies would have us all in double digit unemployment, higher interest rates, and higher taxes.

BC and Ontario have suffered too much from past NDP reigns of error. No problem though, Taliban Jack&#039;s popularity will never be more than 20%. The more he panders, the more he reminds me of a pirate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Layton&#8217;s policies would have us all in double digit unemployment, higher interest rates, and higher taxes.</p>
<p>BC and Ontario have suffered too much from past NDP reigns of error. No problem though, Taliban Jack&#8217;s popularity will never be more than 20%. The more he panders, the more he reminds me of a pirate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kady O'Malley</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36713</link>
		<dc:creator>Kady O'Malley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36713</guid>
		<description>DaveND: We could use more Joe Comartins in every party, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveND: We could use more Joe Comartins in every party, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry86</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36712</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36712</guid>
		<description>When Stockwell Day, stumbled, the Liberal attack dogs were on him instantly.  Now we seem to have a different set of rules being applied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Stockwell Day, stumbled, the Liberal attack dogs were on him instantly.  Now we seem to have a different set of rules being applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36711</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36711</guid>
		<description>ti-guy, I swear to god the day you say something useful, something that actually adds to the conversation, I will topple dead of heart failure.  You&#039;ve been trolling every blog after blog shouting &quot;shut up! shut up! shut up!  I have degrees!  I speak languages!  I&#039;m intelligent!  Really I am.&quot;  It&#039;s just kinda sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ti-guy, I swear to god the day you say something useful, something that actually adds to the conversation, I will topple dead of heart failure.  You&#8217;ve been trolling every blog after blog shouting &#8220;shut up! shut up! shut up!  I have degrees!  I speak languages!  I&#8217;m intelligent!  Really I am.&#8221;  It&#8217;s just kinda sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveND</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36710</link>
		<dc:creator>daveND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36710</guid>
		<description>Oh they are both completely mad. Dion flubbed the question - not a hearing problem, maybe a bit of a language problem made worse by being tired. Harper was an idiot to make a big deal of it. He should have just stayed his course and answered it at his next regular media avail. Either way SHUT UP

Today we found out that the Liberal/Conservative Afghan war is not only unwinnable (that was yesterday&#039;s headline) but it is massively over the estimate costs and we can&#039;t even be sure if $18 Billion is the ceiling on this misadventure.

Today Canadians were left wondering why their banks didn&#039;t pass on to the the full interest rate cut given them by the Central bank and laissez faire Harper and Do-nothing Dion said they wouldn&#039;t stand up for hard pressed Canadian families.

Given the global economic crisis engulfing the world is this really what Canadians want us to be talking about for the next five days?

I don&#039;t think so and I know that isn&#039;t what Jack Layton thinks. I watched that bizarre panel on Duffy and Joe Comartin brought it right back to the issues of the day. Than Brad Lavigne, someone I have seen deliver great political zingers, he stayed focused on the important issues and he stayed focused on Harper just as his leader has done.

I am a partisan New Dem and I have never been prouder of my party.  Leave the petty school yard antics to the other parties and keep doing what you are doing, talking about what is really on the minds of Canadians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh they are both completely mad. Dion flubbed the question &#8211; not a hearing problem, maybe a bit of a language problem made worse by being tired. Harper was an idiot to make a big deal of it. He should have just stayed his course and answered it at his next regular media avail. Either way SHUT UP</p>
<p>Today we found out that the Liberal/Conservative Afghan war is not only unwinnable (that was yesterday&#8217;s headline) but it is massively over the estimate costs and we can&#8217;t even be sure if $18 Billion is the ceiling on this misadventure.</p>
<p>Today Canadians were left wondering why their banks didn&#8217;t pass on to the the full interest rate cut given them by the Central bank and laissez faire Harper and Do-nothing Dion said they wouldn&#8217;t stand up for hard pressed Canadian families.</p>
<p>Given the global economic crisis engulfing the world is this really what Canadians want us to be talking about for the next five days?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so and I know that isn&#8217;t what Jack Layton thinks. I watched that bizarre panel on Duffy and Joe Comartin brought it right back to the issues of the day. Than Brad Lavigne, someone I have seen deliver great political zingers, he stayed focused on the important issues and he stayed focused on Harper just as his leader has done.</p>
<p>I am a partisan New Dem and I have never been prouder of my party.  Leave the petty school yard antics to the other parties and keep doing what you are doing, talking about what is really on the minds of Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ti-Guy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36709</link>
		<dc:creator>Ti-Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36709</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I know all you grammatically perfect Liberals have trouble with the common tongue...&lt;/i&gt;

Would you shut, you troll?  You&#039;ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I know all you grammatically perfect Liberals have trouble with the common tongue&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Would you shut, you troll?  You&#8217;ve trolled Liberal blogs for two years now and one would think a sane person would have found something better to do by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanBC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36708</link>
		<dc:creator>DanBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36708</guid>
		<description>If this had happened to Harper, you Liberal hypocrites would be setting your hair on fire.

Face it, your Emperor has no clothes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this had happened to Harper, you Liberal hypocrites would be setting your hair on fire.</p>
<p>Face it, your Emperor has no clothes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanBC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36707</link>
		<dc:creator>DanBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36707</guid>
		<description>It is not an &#039;odd question&#039;!

If that question were asked to anybody on the street, there would be an answer. Most of them, of course, would be stupid answers, but there would be an answer.

Dion? He was clueless! That&#039;s leadership? He wants to be the boss? And he had no opinion?

Careful of the whooshing sound, Stephie......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not an &#8216;odd question&#8217;!</p>
<p>If that question were asked to anybody on the street, there would be an answer. Most of them, of course, would be stupid answers, but there would be an answer.</p>
<p>Dion? He was clueless! That&#8217;s leadership? He wants to be the boss? And he had no opinion?</p>
<p>Careful of the whooshing sound, Stephie&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36706</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36706</guid>
		<description>I watched the interview and even as an anglo I found the questioning totally confusing. He seemed to be asking &quot;what would you have done differently had you been elected prime minister in the last election?&quot;

I don&#039;t understand why the journalist didn&#039;t rephrase the question to make it clear to Dion, especially since he is francophone and has a hearing problem.

People who are trying to make something of this are just looking for something negative they can say about Dion. Posting the clip shows clear bias on the part of the media. Most people will be able to see this for what it is. Those who can&#039;t are free to make their decision based on nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the interview and even as an anglo I found the questioning totally confusing. He seemed to be asking &#8220;what would you have done differently had you been elected prime minister in the last election?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the journalist didn&#8217;t rephrase the question to make it clear to Dion, especially since he is francophone and has a hearing problem.</p>
<p>People who are trying to make something of this are just looking for something negative they can say about Dion. Posting the clip shows clear bias on the part of the media. Most people will be able to see this for what it is. Those who can&#8217;t are free to make their decision based on nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36705</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36705</guid>
		<description>Only, that’s not the question. The question was, “what _would_ _you_ _have_ done about the economy and this crisis that Mr. Harper has not done?”

It’s an odd question. For one, it’s a hypothetical. For another, it follows this, “If you were Prime Minister now.”
________________________________________________

I know all you grammatically perfect Liberals have trouble with the common tongue but almost all of us mouth-breathing rednecks understood the question quite well.  In not so polite English it would go something like:

So what would YOU have done, smartypants?

But Dion couldn&#039;t answer it.  Was it because he didn&#039;t understand?  But he said he did understand in try #2.  Was it his hearing?  But we were told his hearing is bad in crowds and parties where the background buzz is too much.  Where was the crowd here?  Or was it just that Mr. Dion finds it easy to criticize, score the points, but when asked a simple question, &quot;what would you have done?&quot; he has nothing. He has nothing now except consult the wise men and the oracles, maybe divine the guts of sheep or two and he&#039;ll get back to us 30 days AFTER we elect him. THAT is the story and hopefully that is what will get reported, not the self-serving Liberal spin about poor Dion, Chretien&#039;s face, and the evil fat man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only, that’s not the question. The question was, “what _would_ _you_ _have_ done about the economy and this crisis that Mr. Harper has not done?”</p>
<p>It’s an odd question. For one, it’s a hypothetical. For another, it follows this, “If you were Prime Minister now.”<br />
________________________________________________</p>
<p>I know all you grammatically perfect Liberals have trouble with the common tongue but almost all of us mouth-breathing rednecks understood the question quite well.  In not so polite English it would go something like:</p>
<p>So what would YOU have done, smartypants?</p>
<p>But Dion couldn&#8217;t answer it.  Was it because he didn&#8217;t understand?  But he said he did understand in try #2.  Was it his hearing?  But we were told his hearing is bad in crowds and parties where the background buzz is too much.  Where was the crowd here?  Or was it just that Mr. Dion finds it easy to criticize, score the points, but when asked a simple question, &#8220;what would you have done?&#8221; he has nothing. He has nothing now except consult the wise men and the oracles, maybe divine the guts of sheep or two and he&#8217;ll get back to us 30 days AFTER we elect him. THAT is the story and hopefully that is what will get reported, not the self-serving Liberal spin about poor Dion, Chretien&#8217;s face, and the evil fat man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seaandthemountains</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36704</link>
		<dc:creator>seaandthemountains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36704</guid>
		<description>I think it matters is one way AW: With all that going on, and his government&#039;s supposedly in charge of all of it, PMSH delayed his flight to do  character assassination one more time.

SH is unfit to govern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it matters is one way AW: With all that going on, and his government&#8217;s supposedly in charge of all of it, PMSH delayed his flight to do  character assassination one more time.</p>
<p>SH is unfit to govern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fay</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36703</link>
		<dc:creator>Fay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36703</guid>
		<description>Canadians deserve better, you guys are promoting an empty shirt for Prime Minister. You should be thinking of what is best for Canada, not does it really matter if Dion is not up to the job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadians deserve better, you guys are promoting an empty shirt for Prime Minister. You should be thinking of what is best for Canada, not does it really matter if Dion is not up to the job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Tribe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36702</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Tribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36702</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised to see Kate show up - she&#039;s probably directed her frothy users from SDA to come and comment over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised to see Kate show up &#8211; she&#8217;s probably directed her frothy users from SDA to come and comment over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36701</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36701</guid>
		<description>Dave- well put. The questions were different each time. Perhaps he should have asked &#039;what is it that Mr. Harper should have been doing for the last two years?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave- well put. The questions were different each time. Perhaps he should have asked &#8216;what is it that Mr. Harper should have been doing for the last two years?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36700</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36700</guid>
		<description>Jarrid wrote:

&quot;Stephane Dion has been accusing the Prime Minister of doing nothing about the crisis in the market. When he is asked a simple question: what would you do about the crisis if you were the Prime Minister?&quot;

Only, that&#039;s not the question. The question was, &quot;what _would_ _you_ _have_ done about the economy and this crisis that Mr. Harper has not done?&quot;

It&#039;s an odd question. For one, it&#039;s a hypothetical. For another, it follows this, &quot;If you were Prime Minister now.&quot;

The setup is that Dion is the Prime Minister now, but the question is what would he have done in the past? What is this scenario? Is Dion being asked what he would have done up until now, if he had been elected in the 2006 election (in which, of course, he wasn&#039;t running for PM)?

Dion asks for clarification: &quot;If [I] would have been the Prime Minister two and a half years ago?&quot;

The response: &quot;If you were the Prime Minister right now.&quot;

After a slight pause, Dion begins to answer, as the interviewer adds, &quot;And had been for the past two years?&quot; trailing off towards the end.

I don&#039;t know if the interviewer was intending to be this confusing, but he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarrid wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Stephane Dion has been accusing the Prime Minister of doing nothing about the crisis in the market. When he is asked a simple question: what would you do about the crisis if you were the Prime Minister?&#8221;</p>
<p>Only, that&#8217;s not the question. The question was, &#8220;what _would_ _you_ _have_ done about the economy and this crisis that Mr. Harper has not done?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an odd question. For one, it&#8217;s a hypothetical. For another, it follows this, &#8220;If you were Prime Minister now.&#8221;</p>
<p>The setup is that Dion is the Prime Minister now, but the question is what would he have done in the past? What is this scenario? Is Dion being asked what he would have done up until now, if he had been elected in the 2006 election (in which, of course, he wasn&#8217;t running for PM)?</p>
<p>Dion asks for clarification: &#8220;If [I] would have been the Prime Minister two and a half years ago?&#8221;</p>
<p>The response: &#8220;If you were the Prime Minister right now.&#8221;</p>
<p>After a slight pause, Dion begins to answer, as the interviewer adds, &#8220;And had been for the past two years?&#8221; trailing off towards the end.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if the interviewer was intending to be this confusing, but he was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36699</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36699</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Now it is a low point in the history of journalism.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I feel like I&#039;ve lost my innocence or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Now it is a low point in the history of journalism.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I feel like I&#8217;ve lost my innocence or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36698</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36698</guid>
		<description>It matters because it shows your candidate to be a buffoon who can dish out negative attacks but can&#039;t answer a simple question on the most critical issue for Canadian voters.

Two things will happen this month that will make me happy: (i) Stephane Dion will vanish into obscurity; and (ii) my 52-issue subscription to the LPC newsletter will expire. (Sorry Coyne, I did it all for you.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It matters because it shows your candidate to be a buffoon who can dish out negative attacks but can&#8217;t answer a simple question on the most critical issue for Canadian voters.</p>
<p>Two things will happen this month that will make me happy: (i) Stephane Dion will vanish into obscurity; and (ii) my 52-issue subscription to the LPC newsletter will expire. (Sorry Coyne, I did it all for you.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blues Clair</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36697</link>
		<dc:creator>Blues Clair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36697</guid>
		<description>Yes the Media loves Dion.

Thus Spake the Globe and Mail (about Dion):

&lt;i&gt;&quot;But a leader he is not.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the Media loves Dion.</p>
<p>Thus Spake the Globe and Mail (about Dion):</p>
<p><i>&#8220;But a leader he is not.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36696</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36696</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jarrid, for completely making Mr. Wherry&#039;s point. A blank comment section was just too much to resist eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jarrid, for completely making Mr. Wherry&#8217;s point. A blank comment section was just too much to resist eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmett</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36695</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36695</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed. Amazed that you see this story and ask, &#039;why does this matter?&#039; Because I find myself thinking the same thing.

But I also find myself thinking, if this were a Harper flub, you probably wouldn&#039;t be asking that question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed. Amazed that you see this story and ask, &#8216;why does this matter?&#8217; Because I find myself thinking the same thing.</p>
<p>But I also find myself thinking, if this were a Harper flub, you probably wouldn&#8217;t be asking that question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrid</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/09/the-final-days-laval/comment-page-1/#comment-36694</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=12185#comment-36694</guid>
		<description>Stephane Dion has been accusing the Prime Minister of doing nothing about the crisis in the market.  When he is asked a simple question: what would you do about the crisis if you were the Prime Minister?  A simple enough question. A fair question considering the demagogic attacks by Dion ON THIS VERY ISSUE against Harper.

How does he respond.  He starts with his rambling I&#039;ll have a plan in 90 days or so.  Decides the answer is lame and so asks for another take.  Then asks a series of clarifications on what he knew was a pretty simple question.  He had no answer.

Dion the demagogue was outed.  And it wasn&#039;t a pretty sight.  Dion&#039;s media pals are not happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephane Dion has been accusing the Prime Minister of doing nothing about the crisis in the market.  When he is asked a simple question: what would you do about the crisis if you were the Prime Minister?  A simple enough question. A fair question considering the demagogic attacks by Dion ON THIS VERY ISSUE against Harper.</p>
<p>How does he respond.  He starts with his rambling I&#8217;ll have a plan in 90 days or so.  Decides the answer is lame and so asks for another take.  Then asks a series of clarifications on what he knew was a pretty simple question.  He had no answer.</p>
<p>Dion the demagogue was outed.  And it wasn&#8217;t a pretty sight.  Dion&#8217;s media pals are not happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

