Meanwhile, in Winnipeg … and Laval

by kadyomalley on Friday, October 10, 2008 12:03am - 0 Comments

Earlier this evening, Colleague Geddes gave us his impressions on how the Conservative campaign reacted to that now-maybe-soon-to-be-infamous-or-possibly-forgotten-by-Saturday Mike Duffy Live segment:

In Winnipeg, the Tory campaign went a little weird with glee over Stéphane Dion’s awkward interview moment. They rolled out a TV to show tape of Duffy’s treatment of the episode to the media on the tour. Stephen Harper came out to do a quick scrum on the subject. And, holy cow, Kory Teneycke even announced that the usual rigid rules with respect to asking the PM questions would be lifted for this very, very special event.

And now, the National Post’s Don Martin has weighed in, as only he can:

Giddy Conservatives delayed their campaign jet’s departure from Winnipeg, declared the encounter worthy of a Saturday Night Live skit without having seen it and hauled out a television so a cluster of reporters could view the puzzled expression on Mr. Dion’s face as he tried to fathom the question.

Aside from the questionable ethics of CTV airing a segment when both Mr. Dion and interviewer Steve Murphy twice agreed to restart the interview to clarify the question, this is a damning insight into how desperate the Conservatives have become in their battle to belittle a Liberal leader they never dreamed could pose a threat to their government. [...]

To use his first spontaneous media appearance of the campaign to declare Mr. Dion the most unworthy of the two candidates for prime minister based on a minute of misunderstanding is not the most flattering reaction for the prime minister.

In the end the incident they hoped to use to define Mr. Dion as a confused ditherer may actually provide more telling insight into the character of Stephen Harper.

Finally, Colleague Wherry reports back from the Dion campaign:

And while all of this is happening—as Dion appears only to be raging against the proverbial dying of the proverbial light—messages from the beyond are coming in. People with access to television have seen the clip. And the consensus has turned entirely. Now it is not so much the pivotal, pathetic pratfall of a clumsy candidate who was doomed from the moment he appeared. Now it is a low point in the history of journalism. Cross words and unflattering adjectives are being swapped.

Back on the bus, someone pulls up the clip on a laptop. Those who see tell those who haven’t what they saw. Interpretations vary. There is some debate over who said and heard what and how. More messages from afar. The Prime Minister has reacted. Indeed, the Conservative tour delayed its departure from wherever it was so that he might.

On the bus and then on the plane, the discussion continues—who said what and why and what, whatever the answer to those questions, this means for the fortunes of the two men who seek to lead the country.

Bookmark and Share
  • Geiseric the Lame

    “Now, that is a telling comment.”

    Indeed.

  • Geiseric the Lame

    from the ToeStar…

    “French reporters pointed out that Harper himself had used the incorrect word in French for trillion.”

    hear that? that’s the door slamming shut in Quebec.

  • Tom

    I saw the clip. Mr. Dion made sure he understood the question before he was satisfied to answer. It took him a couple tries to ensure he knew exactly what was being asked. The flurry over this is sickening, it reminds me of the abuse my francophone grandfather endured through his life in southern Ontario at the hands of the WASPs he worked for. They took glee in belittling him because his English was not very good. What is the reaction in Quebec with this showboating of Dion’s “gaffe”? And does Harper really think francophone voters across the country will be amused by people making fun of a guy who’s English is not perfect and checks to be sure he understands exactly what is said? It wasn’t that long ago in our history WASPs celebrated the hanging of Riel by MacDonald, with outrage boiling in Quebec. After that event, the Liberal party (anti-MacDonald) was the only party Quebecers voted for until the 1980′s.

  • from the boonies

    I just watched the Youtube version that shows the interview only to the beginning of the third attempt at the question.
    I thought that Dion’s attempts to have the question clarified were justified. The interviewer did, whose first language is, apparently, English, mixed ‘now’ with ‘had been’ not once , but both times he asked the question. I think anyone would have been right to ask for a clarification.

    The news announcer’s rationale for showing the entire interview from the start was just a tad smarmy…CTV News, in the interests of…yeah, right!

  • TobyornotToby

    Dion’s mistake was in trying to answer the question rather than just taking his cue to start talking about his platform. Journalists claim they are bored with talking points, but too many of them don’t even expect answers, just want to turn the camera on and collect a clip. What passes for skepticism is really just cynicism.

    And if they want to show out takes, let’s see Duffy’s mistakes too. And since the Conservatives are so quick to pounce, how many takes were needed to nail the sweater ad? Let’s roll out the bloopers and off camera comments while that precious bit of television treacle was being filmed, too.

  • http://sovereigntyenanglais.blogspot.com Eric Grenier

    I understand Dion’s difficulty with the question, Murphy was asking what he would have done if he were PM today. Dion didn’t understand if he meant what would he do today or what he would’ve done before.

    I’m a sovereigntist and no friend to the Liberals, but this really upset me. Dion merely misunderstood the question because of his linguistic difficulties. Harper’s French is as bad as Dion’s English, if not worse, but Quebecers have tolerated it and even found it endearing. Are English Canadians unable to do the same?

    If Harper can run a bilingual country while butchering one of those languages, Dion can do the same.

    Can you imagine the francophone media making fun of one of the candidates this way? May, for example, has horrible French but no one mentioned it as a campaign gaffe. Harper and Layton both make mistakes and missteps, but they are ignored.

    Dion, rather than giving an answer to a question he didn’t understand, was honestly trying to understand in order to give the best answer possible.

    I think it is very, very sad that this is an issue, and CTV should be ashamed of themselves.

  • Pingback: The present perfect « rjjago.wordpress.com

From Macleans