BUMPED – ONLY 11 HOURS LEFT: So it's come to this … a seat projection thread.

Welcome to the First-and-Hopefully-Last-For-At-Least-A-Few-Months Official ITQ Seat Projection Thread! …
Amaze your friends!
Aggravate your

by kadyomalley on Monday, October 13, 2008 9:50am - 0 Comments

Welcome to the First-and-Hopefully-Last-For-At-Least-A-Few-Months Official ITQ Seat Projection Thread!

Amaze your friends!

Aggravate your enemies!

The rules are simple:

  • Predictions can be posted anytime before Monday night at 6p.m.
  • If you normally use Anon as a handle, add a number or some other sort of modifier so your prescience can be celebrated, if warranted.
  • If your final projection includes Independents, you must specify the name of riding/candidate
  • Please try to avoid hijacking the projection thread for endless partisan back-and-forth – there are plenty of other places on macleans.ca for that
  • Oh, and this is strictly for seat projections, not guesses on the share of the popular vote, or the spread – sorry, Kody.

The winner(s) will be determined by some sort of complex formula that I’ll let someone else figure out, since I’m not a math person, and the prize will be bragging rights, or something from Colleague Feschuk’s seemingly bottomless drawer of random stuff, if he feels like sharing.

With that … let the guessing game begin!

NOTE TO READERS: This was originally posted way back on Thursday night, but due to operator error, it never made it to ITQ, and wound up spending the last two days in macleans.ca limbo. Sorry about that.

UPDATE: In case y’all are curious about the press gallery’s collective wisdom, here’s a breakdown of the entries in the legendary Hot Room seat projection pool, courtesy of CanWest’s David Akin – who is a very, very brave man for posting his entry, and as such, inspired ITQ to do the same in his comment thread.  (I do, however, reserve the right to tweak those numbers ever so slightly, if necessary, when I finally post my best guess here.)

PREDICTION TIP IN UPDATE FORMAT:

A tip, for those of you still mulling over your choices: I just checked the spreadsheet for last year’s Hot Room pool, and the two most accurate prediction sites were Democratic Space and the Election Prediction Project. Democratic Space was just four seats over the final count for the Conservatives – 128 predicted versus 124 actual) but underestimated the Liberal result by nine seats – 84 predicted, 103 won.

The Election Prediction Project, on the other hand, was nearly bang on for the Liberals with a prediction of 104 seats, although that did include David Emerson’s seat. Honestly, though, who could have seen that coming? Anyway, its prediction was also six seats shy of the final Conservative number, so it might be helpful to keep all that in mind this time around.

UPDATE: And we’re closed for business … as of 9 p.m. Good luck to all! I’ll post an update on the formula for determining a winner tomorrow, and I promise it will be fairer, richer, gree- wait, cancel that. It will be fair, anyway. Happy election eve, all!

Bookmark and Share
  • Kyle

    Con: 118
    Lib: 94
    NDP: 40
    Bloc: 53
    Green: 1
    Ind: 2 (Arthur, Casey)

  • ernie

    Cons 124

    Libs 92

    NDP 38

    Bloc 52

    Ind 2 (Casey & Arthur)

  • Yoyo

    Con 137
    Lib 77
    Bloc 52
    NDP 40
    Ind 2 (Arthur, Casey)

  • DLF

    Asshats – 125
    Sages – 88
    Destroyers of the Economy – 41
    Destroyers of the Country – 54
    Elizabeth May – 1

  • DLF

    Er, that should be “Destroyers of the Economy – 40″

    not 41.

    Sorry.

  • CdnInBos

    Paranoid Liars 1 (+123 yes-men)
    Hapless Nerds 1 (+94 backstabbers)
    Economic and Environmental Sabotageurs 36
    Eternal Whiners 51
    Others 2 (Arthur, Casey)

  • bud

    Cons – 175

    Libs – 56

    Bloc – 53

    Ndp – 22

    Ind – 2
    Green – 0

  • A reader

    Pr___C___L___N___B__G__I
    ————————
    NL___1___4___2__________
    PE___2___2______________
    NS___2___5___3______0__1
    NB___7___2___1__________
    QC___7__11___4__52_____1
    ON__45__34__27__________
    MB___9___1___4__________
    SK__10___1___3__________
    AB__27_______1__________
    BC__18___2__16__________
    NU___________1__________
    NT___________1__________
    YT_______1______________
    ————————
    CA_128__63__63__52__0__2

    Con: 126
    Lib: 63
    NDP: 63
    BlQ: 52
    Grn: 0
    Ind: 2 – Casey, Arthur

    The Liberals are going to lose seats in Ontario that all the prediction models don’t catch, I believe.

    Numbers like these would make for a very interesting Parliament …

  • Andrew the lesser

    CPC: 136
    LPC: 85
    NDP: 34
    BQ: 52
    GRN: 0
    Oth: 2

  • Andrew the lesser

    Woops that should be CPC: 135

  • A reader

    Con: 128 (not 126, that was a typo; the table stands)
    Lib: 63
    NDP: 63
    BlQ: 52
    Grn: 0
    Ind: 2 – Casey, Arthur

    Sorry about that.

  • Partisan non-partisan

    C – 127
    L – 75
    N – 52
    B – 52
    I – 1 (Arthur and Casey)

  • Partisan non-partisan

    Of course, I meant 2 indies

  • http://jasoncherniak.com Jason Cherniak

    Lib – 107
    Con – 105
    BQ – 55
    NDP – 39
    GRN – 1
    OTH – 1

  • Brendan Kane

    Atlantic
    Con 8
    Lib 18
    NDP 5
    Ind 1

    Quebec
    BQ 52
    Con 8
    Lib 13
    NDP 1
    Ind 1

    Ontario
    Con 48
    Lib 41
    NDP 17

    Prairies
    Con 48
    Lib 2
    NDP 6

    BC
    Con 23
    Lib 3
    NDP 10

    North
    Con 1
    Lib 1
    NDP 1

    Total
    Con 136
    Lib 78
    BQ 52
    NDP 40
    Ind 2 (Casey, Arthur)

  • http://www.calgarygrit.ca CalgaryGrit

    CPC 136
    Lib 84
    Bloc 49
    NDP 37
    Ind 2 (Bill Casey and Andre Arthur)

  • Wes

    Con gains in Ontario (4) & BC (6) are largely offset by losses in Saskatchewan (2 to NDP), Quebec (4 to BQ) & Maritimes (2 to NDP, 1 to Lib), while Libs lose seats to both Cons & NDP (only Lib gains are St. John’s South-Mount Pearl, Ahuntsic, Papineau, & Saanich-Gulf Islands).

    Con – 127
    Lib – 87
    BQ – 52
    NDP – 40
    Ind. – 2 (Casey & Arthur)

  • http://www.prairietopiary.blogspot.com/ Prairie Topiary

    Con 137
    Lib 80
    Bloc 49
    NDP 40
    Ind 2
    Green 0

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    Slightly tweaked from my gallery entry:

    129
    91
    53
    33
    2 (Arthur, Casey)

From Macleans