John Parisella

John Parisella

John Parisella writes about U.S. politics from his vantage point as the former Delegate-General in New York City for Quebec. Follow John on Twitter:  @JohnParisella

Obama is well-tested

by John Parisella on Saturday, October 25, 2008 10:39pm - 28 Comments

This blog has never hidden its preference for Barack Obama in the Democratic primaries and the belief he was qualified to be president. It has always been my conviction that his time was now or never. He would not get a second chance. He was up against an outstanding crop of candidates–with Hillary Clinton undoubtedly the most formidable. Back then, I argued Obama had to be tested and had to win on merit. Hillary certainly made him earn it and, in so doing, made the Illinois senator a far better candidate. She bested him in most of the debates but he became a smarter and stronger debater in the process. We observed this as he won all three debates against McCain according to post debate polls.

All along I believed that McCain was by far the best Republican challenger because of his appeal to independents and the fact that he was so different from Bush. The fact that McCain’s campaign has been less than spectacular should not take away from Obama’s carefully executed campaign strategy. Through it all–highs and lows, victories and setbacks–Obama has shown a coolness and a grace under pressure that is now resonating with the electorate.

This has been a very long and arduous campaign. It is far from over and the votes still have not been counted. But Obama has probably conducted the best campaign in American history. It’s important to consider where he was when he first announced his intent to run back in February 2007 and the obstacles associated with being the first African-American to seriously challenge for the presidency. Obama also found himself running against the vaunted Clinton organization, as well as the Republican attack machine. And yet, he now finds himself leading in national polls and nearly all the battleground states. It is fair to conclude that Obama has been tested–and he passed it.

Bookmark and Share
  • Ian2

    Archangel,

    I’ve spent a lot of time listening to Obama. He is an extraordinary orator and has drawn enormous crowds to his events with his main message of Hope and Change (that one’s for you Jack!). I’m very impressed with his organizing prowess.

    Conservatives bleat about his record in office – recording “present” for so many votes. Without understanding all of the complexities of the local issues, I find this “mercurial” in that I’m unsure whether he is sending a message to his fellow legislators or simply dodging something he doesn’t want on his record.

    The party platform, like so many we’ve seen from politicians (Red Book, The latest fashions from sweater-wearers etc.) doesn’t mean much to me. I’m more interested in the man and what he really intends to do with the levers of power.

    Events will shape an Obama presidency (Bush & 9/11) – how will he respond? Will his policies and decisions be a positive for us here in Canada?

    Whatever happens, he will be fascinating to watch.

  • Terry

    I couldn’t agree more that this was Obama’s year, as he is the one who was bet fit to meet the demand for change, maybe Hillary’s year could’ve would’ve and should’ve been 2004.

    However I must disagree on John McCain being the best fit republican candidate, as I believe someone like Mitt Romney would’ve been much more of a viable candidate even more than Obama concerning the economy, and let’s not forget being a former republican governor in Massachussets he’s more in the middle than McCain. Even Rudy Giuliani would’ve been a tougher challenger, as the state of New York would probably have been a swing state, and he would also have posted great numbers among catholics, and wouldn’t fit the profile of a typical 90% of the time pro-Bush voter.

    It’s just that Giuliani, Romney and Huckabee were known for their good and efficient policies within their constituencies whereas McCain was known across the country, thus he won by default.

  • bob loblaw

    To many of you to name:

    Georgie “Boy” Bush has the most relevant experience; he was the Governor of Texas and has actually had the President’s job for two terms. It doesn’t appear to make him qualified for the job. Thank all that is holy that there are term limits!

From Macleans