Vancouver South Recount: The Latest Intrigue – Plus Memories of Ballot Battles Past

by kadyomalley on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:25pm - 30 Comments

I wish I had more of an update, y’all, but this is turning out to be a fiendishly tricky tale to untangle. I wasn’t able to speak to Ray Leitch, who is now referring media inquiries to the national office in Ottawa — specifically, to Ryan Sparrow, who would only state that the party “is disappointed that not all the ballots were counted during the recount” and will “explore various options in the next few days” to make sure that happens. “Regardless of the results, all we would like to see is that every vote in Vancouver South has been counted.” But let’s look on the bright side for a moment – he replied to my email! Promptly, even!

Anyway, I’ll keep ferreting away, but in the meantime, this 2006 Ontario Supreme Court ruling will tell you more than you ever wanted to know about the process of conducting a judicial recount — seriously, it’s like you’re there, sipping the room temperature coffee and grumbling over how out of date the printer drivers are on the Elections Canada-issued laptop – and, as a bonus, includes a special guest appearance by a current Conservative cabinet minister.

Bookmark and Share
  • madeyoulook

    Kady, not surprised at all. I for one think even more highly of you (re bookmark).

    I get the spoiled ballot issue of avoiding double counting. I don’t get that we tolerate the risk of misfiling (whether by innocent mistake or sinister plot), as happened at least once in Sudbury’s recount last time. Just like the clerk rips up my spoiled credit card chit into forty pieces in front of me at the checkout cash, I would be more comfortable with the immediate public destruction of a spoiled ballot, rather than the keeping of a sealed envelope that runs the risk of hiding something that should not be kept hidden.

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    Well, if the shreds were then placed carefully into an envelope, and then sealed, that would seem to address the possibility of misfiling *and* preserve the evidence so that spoiled ballots don’t disappear into some sort of black hole; if there’s one thing that really seems to drive election officials wild, it’s missing ballots.

  • madeyoulook

    Deal.

    Glad we solved that problem. Shall you forward this discussion to the head of Elections Canada or shall I? Once he’s sure no one in the media got a photo of someone entering a polling atation wearing a veil, I am sure he’ll open his mail.

  • madeyoulook

    Bloody computer. Every single time I type the wrong key, it faithfully repeats the error. Please make “atation” (was that a Star Wars character?) “station.” Sorry.

  • MJH

    Canadians clearly need a public inquiry into this matter. It is critical we get to the bottom of it!

From Macleans