Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

UPDATED: The secret revealed — a happy day

by Paul Wells on Saturday, November 8, 2008 2:27pm - 50 Comments

Dear reader, there is something we have not been telling you. For weeks now, most reporters on Parliament Hill have known, but not reported, that our friend and colleague, CBC television reporter Melissa Fung, was being held captive by kidnappers in Afghanistan. In order to increase the likelihood of her safe return, we had all agreed to keep Melissa’s kidnapping a secret.

Now we can tell you, because now she is free. The Prime Minister is about to have a news conference. I’ll have more in about an hour.

UPDATE: ITQ has brief details from the Prime Minister’s press conference. I’ll have video up inside a half hour. The CBC will hold its own news conference at 3:30 p.m. Eastern.

The prime minister’s answers on questions regarding ransom seem, to my untotored ear, to have been categorical: he says there was none. He left other questions unanswered, sometimes for obvious security reasons and at other times because there probably is no knowable answer.

More soon.

UPDATE: John Cruickshank, the CBC “publisher,” just finished a news conference. Much relief, few new details. Cruickshank, too, says there was no ransom. He emphasized that Melissa was on her second tour in Afghanistan. The trip to Kabul, with a fixer but no military escort, will be debated endlessly by assignment editors. (Every reporter in Afghanistan has a big decision to make, every day they’re there: stay with soldiers, accept their protection along with their extremely limited freedom of movement, in exchange for a better understanding of their task and its limitations — or go out, alone and essentially unprotected, to get closer to ordinary Afghans? There is never a right answer. The tension between the two paths is constant.)

UPDATE: here’s the video.

Bookmark and Share
  • Caper

    Less is more when it comes to reporting this type of problem. Hope she is OK!

  • Pingback: Macleans.ca - Thank goodness.

  • Mike514

    This is a great strategy. Kidnapping is used as a tool to gain news exposure, world headlines, let the kidnapper’s demands be known, etc. By denying them a soapbox to proclaim their views, the likelihood of another kidnapping diminishes.

    Forgive me for being cynical, but why doesn’t the media do this for all kidnappings, and not only for their fellow media colleagues? Do they care more for their fellow journalists and care less for everyone else? Again, forgive me for my bluntness…

  • john g

    I hope this incident will cause the Canadian media to reconsider the role they’ve adopted as mouthpiece for the Taliban.

    Just as this kidnapping was not reported, there is no reason that the Canadian media should be reporting on Taliban “demands” that Canadian soldiers withdraw from Afghanistan. For our media to give them the soap box that they want for their propaganda campaign in general, but to withdraw their soap box only when one of their own is threatened saddens me. They are an enemy of Canada, and it’s high time that the Canadian media remember that.

  • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

    You stay classy, John G. BTW, not that it matters, but she wasn’t being held by Taliban members – her captors were “unaffiliated bandits”, according to CBC. But don’t let that stop you from smearing the integrity and judgment of journalists like Melissa Fung who willingly risk their lives to keep all of us informed on the situation in Afghanistan.

  • Brent Fullard

    Did the decision to NOT reveal this kidnapping of a CBC journalist, which occurred on October 12th have anything to do with the fact that there was an election on October 14th?

  • Paul Wells

    The possibility that this news could affect the election had never occurred to me or been mentioned by my colleagues during our conversations as recently as last night, Brent. I found out about Melissa’s kidnapping several days after the election.

  • http://kitchenersown.blogspot.com/ Lord Kitchener’s Own

    I wonder, re: Brent’s comment just how such news would have affected the election, if at all.

    My own perspective is that for every voter who’d look at such news and say “Afghanistan is a complete mess, we should leave there now” there’d be another equally sincere voter saying “Afghanistan is a complete mess, we can’t leave there now“.

  • john g

    Kady, I think you may have misunderstand my point, so let me be clearer…I’m not talking about or objecting to Melissa’s, or any other journalist’s, presence in Afghanistan, and I’m gratified that she’s OK.

    I’m talking about the media (like I often see in the Globe and Mail) who regularly quote “a Taliban spokesman” when reporting on whatever bit of propaganda the Taliban want Canadians to be told. I’m talking about those media who never seem to be able to report on the successes of the mission, like getting schools opened, but perk up only when there is a Canadian soldier dead or injured.

    Our media have been too friendly with the Taliban, and I’m not talking about the ones on the ground; I’m talking about those who make the editorial decisions back home. Hope that clarifies things.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Great news. Gotta admire the courage of these reporters. When she’s recovered, she should write a piece for Maclean’s about the ordeal!

    Incidentally, since the country seems to be awash in unaffiliated bandits, couldn’t news organisations spring for a few tribal bodyguards for their reporters, Great Game-style? They can’t cost that much, I’d have thought — though of course it would be limited protection at best, and I guess you’d have to hope your own unaffiliated bandits weren’t in league with other unaffiliated bandits.

  • Jack Mitchell

    john g, why is it an either-or thing on reporting what the Taliban says vs. coverage of our troops? I don’t see how it can hurt to hear what the Taliban is saying. Canadians surely know enough to take Taliban statements with a bucket of salt.

    In terms of the lack of coverage, Harper’s government has a lot to answer for. They know (or suppose) that the public isn’t keen on Afghanistan, and my understanding was that they had a policy of discouraging close coverage. I have found Graeme Smith’s reporting a bit anti-war, though, I must say.

  • JK

    Glad she is ok, a good ending is always good.

    Have to tip my cap, some of the chances journalist take to infom the public of issue’s like war, just blows my mind.

    Good day for the Candian media.

  • Brent Fullard

    Lord Kitchener observed:

    “I wonder, re: Brent’s comment just how such news would have affected the election, if at all.

    My own perspective is that for every voter who’d look at such news and say “Afghanistan is a complete mess, we should leave there now” there’d be another equally sincere voter saying “Afghanistan is a complete mess, we can’t leave there now“.

    Two Points:

    (1) Whether it would have or would have not affected the election isn’t the point. The point is simply that I find it strange this information was withheld from the Canadian public, given there was an election in progress. That said, the holding of US hostages by Iran had an enormous impact on the 1980 US Presidential election involving Reagan and Carter……and ultimately the revelation of the Arms for Hostages that brought about their release.

    (2) I guess the days between October 12 (the day of the kidnapping) and October 14 (voting day) were being overwhelmed by far more important events of the media’s (not so self righteous) creation , namely CTV reneging on their promise not to air the out takes of the interview with Dion???

    The media in Canada has little to be proud of, in manipulating events to bring about some body else’s desired outcome. What other news is not being reported on by Canada’s media in real time? This is a form of censorship. I consider in unacceptable.

  • John D

    I wouldn’t have expected this thread to bring out the wacko-comments. Thank goodness she is OK, and I am impressed that the media did the right thing in keeping it quiet, it must have been a tough decision.

  • Mike T.

    john g
    Nov 8, 2008 16:00

    I hope this incident will cause the Canadian media to reconsider the role they’ve adopted as mouthpiece for the Taliban.

    ****

    grow up.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Brent Fullard: “The media in Canada has little to be proud of, in manipulating events to bring about some body else’s desired outcome. What other news is not being reported on by Canada’s media in real time? This is a form of censorship. I consider in unacceptable.”

    Dude, we are talking about a fellow Canadian’s life.

  • http://tigerinexile.wordpress.com Ben

    “Incidentally, since the country seems to be awash in unaffiliated bandits, couldn’t news organisations spring for a few tribal bodyguards for their reporters, Great Game-style? They can’t cost that much, I’d have thought — though of course it would be limited protection at best, and I guess you’d have to hope your own unaffiliated bandits weren’t in league with other unaffiliated bandits.”

    Answered your own question with your last thought — might be more trouble than it’s worth, or actually invite trouble where none yet exists.

  • Brent Fullard

    John D stated:

    “I wouldn’t have expected this thread to bring out the wacko-comments. Thank goodness she is OK, and I am impressed that the media did the right thing in keeping it quiet, it must have been a tough decision.”

    Two points:

    (1) Wacko comments? I guess that pretty much confirms John D’s pro-censorship mindset?

    (2) Tough decision by the media? Made by whom? The same media moguls who attempted to bar Elizabeth May from the leader’s debate?

    The media in Canada is quite pathetic indeed, with only limited exceptions.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Ben – right. And I guess having Western mercenary bodyguards with M16′s would sort of defeat the purpose of interacting with the population to get the straight story. All the more reason to admire reporters like Melissa Fung. The Canadian Association of Journalists should do something to acknowledge her courage, before and after — a moving example to the whole country.

  • Brent Fullard

    Jack Mitchell said: “Dude, we are talking about a fellow Canadian’s life”

    Correct. That point is not lost on me.

    Meanwhile I am questioning the reasons for why we are only learning about this now, and not when it happened.

    Dude, we are talking about fellow Canadians’ need to know……in real time.

    Since when did it become the Canadian media’s protocol to keep kidnappings secret? What else about this kidnapping and Melissa Fung’s successful release are we possibly not going to be told?

  • Jack Mitchell

    Well, here’s a few things we don’t and needn’t know:

    a) what route the next Canadian patrol is going to take out of our Kandahar base

    b) where President Karzai goes to get his regular Wednesday beard-trim

    c) where JTF2 is

    d) how desperate we are to have a kidnapped person’s life saved.

    In all cases it’s because this gives the people we’re at war with a distinct operational advantage, to be paid for in Canadian and allied lives. On the other side of the scale we have mere curiosity (“need to know . . . in real time” or whatever). In the case of Ms. Fung, the reasoning probably was that if we were seen to be moving heaven & earth then the kidnappers might do something irrational and unexpected, like killing her. Isn’t that fairly obvious? I’m sure there’s a good deal we don’t (yet) know about this, but then again I don’t know the launch codes to Russia’s nuclear arsenal either and, in the end, I can live with it.

  • Brian

    This is a good day for Canada. Seriously, how petty does one have to be to take this as an opportunity to smear the media? Melissa Fung is alive and free, after putting her life on the line in service to our country. Growing. F@cking. Up.

    Brent Fullard: before you go pondering about whether this hurt your electoral chances in Whitby — don’t bother. The good people in your riding knew a shameless coward when they seen one and voted accordingly.

    John G: some things are bigger than partisan nonesense. Here’s hoping that from now on, you will use your better judgement.

  • Mike514

    I am questioning the reasons for why we are only learning about this now, and not when it happened.

    Brent, you answered your own question above: Because someone’s life was at stake.

    It took a lot of discipline for the media not to report this story. Any reporter could have “broken” the story and had a scoop, but they didn’t. The media deserves a lot of credit for this.

    My question is: Will this become a general trend in the media? Will the media abstain from reporting all kidnappings, in the interest of the kidnappee’s lives? (follow-up question: Is ‘kidnappee’ a real word?)

  • Brent Fullard

    Brian said:

    “shameless coward”

    Huh?

  • seaandthemountains

    It is great news that she is safe(r, is she still in Afghanistan?), we owe Melissa Fung and other journos that go over, including you PW, an amazing debt of gratitude, to put themselves at a great risk to as the rest of us can better understand what is happening there. Highest regards Melissa.

    The In addition to PW’s post-tour recount, this walrus article is worth a read:

    http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2007.02-media-embedded-reporter/

From Macleans