Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

The toll

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:45pm - 2 Comments

There was a rather remarkable report on the Afghanistan mission by Brian Stewart on last night’s edition of the National. The particularly astounding quote from one analyst: “General Hillier, the Martin government and the Harper government will leave the Canadian army in a worse shape than they found it in.”

That is, of course, an idea that directly contradicts conventional wisdom, at least in terms of the first and third parties. Hillier is roundly celebrated as a great Canadian hero. The Harper government has made rebuilding the military and “supporting our troops” central to its pitch. The charge here is essentially two-fold: that the Afghanistan mission has been mismanaged and the Canadian public has been misled as to its relative success, conduct and consequences.

The least interesting complaint in this regard is that Stephen Harper is Bush-style war-monger. True, he supported the mission in Iraq, a relevant and telling point. But since he becoming Prime Minister he’s demonstrated regularly that political ramifications are foremost in his mind, often at the expense of personal principle. And, in this case, the argument is probably far more subtle and complex than the hawks and doves would like it to be.

Still, it is this government that made the military a question of patriotism. And used that as a tool to bludgeon its opponents. So one imagines it will be hard for its critics not to turn any failure in this regard into an equally savage indictment of Harper and his government.

Full video of CBC’s report here.

Bookmark and Share
  • madeyoulook

    I will watch this piece later tonight. Brian Stewart has usually been fair and non-partisan in the reports I have seen; he especially stands out over there at the Corp. To what extent “worse shape” comes from operational exhaustion, poor morale, or continued under-equipping (is that a word?), or some of each, I will look for in Stewart’s report.

    But is any “failure” in Afghanistan due to poor civilian leadership of our military since Harper took over, or rather NATO partners who just can’t get on the same page to actually succeed? The “don’t insult our fine troops” line has been over the top in some cases, and spot on in others. But I disagree that this government is “making” the military about patriotism. Call me old-fashioned, but will you allow that maybe, just maybe, the Canadian people themselves can feel justifiable national pride in our armed forces without the suits in Ottawa telling us to? The crowds who gather outside the fence to honour the return of a fallen soldier, and the crowds who greet the procession along the Highway of Heroes: these people are not a government-managed creation.

  • T. Thwim

    Wait, wait, wait.. “the expense of personal principle”? I was unaware he had such, please elaborate, because the only consistent principle I’ve seen displayed is the seeking of power.

    And no, the government isn’t making the military about patriotism, but it certainly has been making the military’s current mission about patriotism. So if it turns out that it is this mission that is harming our troops, then the government should definitely be subject to a savage indictment of it.

From Macleans