James Bond: licence to . . . redesign

Vancouver’s Dennis Gassner has given ‘Quantum of Solace’ a major makeover

by Jaime Weinman on Monday, November 17, 2008 12:00am - 3 Comments

licence to redesign

Who let a Canadian set designer loose on the new James Bond film? For the last 25 years, every Bond adventure except one had sets created by Peter Lamont, who had been in the series’ art department since Goldfinger; even as 2006’s Casino Royale gave the series a new grittiness and a new Bond, the producers kept Lamont. But shortly before the filming of Quantum of Solace (opening on Nov. 14), Lamont was replaced by Dennis Gassner, a Vancouver native who has mostly worked on offbeat movies, including six by the Coen brothers. This may well be a bigger change than the switch from Pierce Brosnan to Daniel Craig, because in 007’s world, the sets are as important as the guy in front of them.

From the first James Bond movie in 1962, this has always been a series where moviegoers came in part to gape at the scenery. Ken Adam (Dr. Strangelove), who designed most of the Bond films in the ’60s and ’70s, created an ultra-modern, stylized, spacious look that gave every room the appearance of belonging to a world that’s a little cooler than our own. It’s one where villains and heroes alike live in huge rooms with angular furniture. “It’s heightened reality,” Gassner explains of the Bond style. “We’re going for a post-geometric kind of modernist feeling.”

But if all the Bond movies share that basic larger-than-life look, why bring in a different designer? Lamont was once expected to handle Quantum of Solace, and in 2007 he was talking to a French James Bond fansite about plans for the film. But when Marc Forster (Finding Neverland) was brought in as director, he may have thought that the series needed a new look to match the new tone of Casino Royale. “I think Marc felt that in the last film, Daniel brought a new energy to it, but it still held onto a lot of the old feeling of the previous films,” Gassner says. “When Marc came in, he said, ‘I think we should change that.’ ” While Casino Royale featured Lamont’s plush, beautiful-looking settings, Quantum of Solace goes for a style that parallels the darker tone of the Craig films. Gassner and Forster abandoned some sets that had been standing for years: “I got to redesign MI6, a totally new look for Judi Dench. I thought she was a bit tired in the last film, so I thought, let’s bring her into a new world.”

There’s an obvious reason why the producers would want to make sure the sets are as spectacular and interesting as possible: for Bond films, great sets are actually a form of insurance against script problems. Many a weak Bond movie has been saved by great design; the script and casting problems of You Only Live Twice didn’t seem to matter once the world saw Adam’s famous hollowed-out volcano set for the villain’s hideout (a set that has been parodied in Austin Powers and many other films). Quantum of Solace is getting good notices for its writing, but Gassner notes that his design work predated a decent script. “We had a thin script that was going to be worked on. But I said to Marc, ‘what we have is Daniel.’ ” Writing may be important, but in a Bond movie, it’s not as important as finding an appropriately craggy setting for what Gassner calls Craig’s “great angular, textured face and wonderful blue eyes.”

It’s particularly essential that Quantum of Solace knock us out with its sets, because Bond films have lost their ability to surprise us with much else. Michael Apted, who directed 1999’s Tomorrow Never Dies, said on a DVD commentary that it’s hard to find real locations that hadn’t already been used in a Bond movie, and Casino Royale used a location (the Bahamas) that had already turned up in Thunderball. Gassner, who also selects locations outside the studio, says that he tried to make sure that Bond visited some new places, like Chile. But unless the audience is really astonished to see Bond go to Italy again, it’s the set design that will provide “unusual things that haven’t been done before.”

If the look of Quantum of Solace catches on, Gassner might get to define the look of Bond for a generation, the way Adam and Lamont did before him. There’s already been a moment where Gassner seemed to become an heir to the Bond tradition, when Ken Adam came to visit the studio near the end of shooting. “It was the last set that we built for the film, and there was a domed roof very much like one of his sets on the island in Dr. No.” And though he wasn’t intentionally copying Adam, Gassner is proud of the resemblance. “We all have those memories, and we want to honour those. You want the audience to have the sense of a Bond movie.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Don

    Quantum of Solace, in my opinion is one of the worst Bond adventures ever. It appears the franchise owners wanted to cash in on the brillant production…Casino Royale. Paul Haggis has a sterling reputation of some great writing….this is far from his best with a convuluted script that was made worse by being filmed badly.

    The shaky camera style lost the viewer and did no justice to stunts that filmed prperly… may have been spectacular. What a loss.

    The color was just above black and white which didn’t display the different countries with the beauty and detail they deserve.

    The producers had it right with Casino and this film will make millions but only because of Casino Royale. The viewers are flocking to the show only to be hughly disappointed….just listen to their comments on leaving the theatre.

    Nice try but no martini here.

  • Stamper

    I agree, this movie is a travesty. The designer cannot see the difference between Ken Adam and Ikea. The director doesn’t know how to tell a tale, as of the writers, they aren’t responsible. I mean when a director take the opening scene from your script, and put it at the end of the movie, you know something is seriously wrong with the filmmaker…
    Quantum Of Soulless, oh yeah. Craig looks like he is acting in another movie because he probably was going according to the script, which was another movie.

  • J.E.

    Why change a winning concept?? Lamont is one of the best things that has happened to Bond. The only thing that is really good with Quantum is the music, I really think that Arnold did a fantastic job considering that he had no real theme song to work with.. Let´s pray that they never change Arnold and bring Lamont and Lindy Hemming back!! And please let Arnold write the next theme song in collaboration with the next artist.

From Macleans