A midwife crisis

Not enough doctors, not enough midwives: it’s a bad time to have a baby in Canada

by Lianne George on Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:00am - 38 Comments

A midwife crisis

Joanne Jacyk, a 31-year-old Toronto-based environmental engineer, was all of five weeks pregnant with her first child when she picked up the phone to call a midwife—only to find that she was too late. “They were already full for my due date,” she says. “I thought, ‘I just got my blood test!’ I basically called as fast as I could.” Anxious, Jacyk got online, found a list of every midwifery clinic in the Greater Toronto Area, and phoned them all. “When I started getting calls back saying, ‘We can’t take you,’ I got really upset,” she says. “I didn’t realize how badly I wanted a midwife until I thought the option wasn’t there.”

There’s a joke circulating among the new-mommy set in Ontario, one of seven provinces where midwifery services are now or will soon be publicly funded: if you think you might be pregnant, first you call the midwife, then you pee on the stick. Jacyk, now the mother of a healthy three-month-old boy, was one of the lucky ones. Eventually, persistence and fortuitous planetary alignment landed her a placement. But last year in Ontario, 40 per cent of pregnant women who sought out midwifery care—roughly 6,000 of them—were turned away. Demand has so outstripped supply that in some parts of the province, finding a midwife is harder than securing the kid a spot in a decent daycare.

For many people, the word “midwife” still evokes patchouli incense and homemade yogourt. But midwives’ growing popularity, fuelled almost entirely by word of mouth, reflects the mainstream’s rapidly changing perception of their profession. “We generally have waiting lists every month,” says Andrea Lennox, a registered practitioner at Kensington Midwives in Toronto and vice-president of the College of Midwives of Ontario.

Because there are only 400 registered midwives to serve the entire province, savvy mothers-to-be have taken to “strategizing” to secure a coveted spot, says Raquel Parra, the clinic’s office administrator. For instance, if they don’t live within the clinic’s catchment area, they’ll lie about their address. They’ll lie about their intention to have a home birth (which well-informed women know places them higher up on the waiting list). And from time to time, they’ll fudge their due dates. “There are months in the year that you’re more likely to get a midwife,” says Parra. “December is really difficult because of the holidays. They know this so they’ll call me and give me a date several weeks earlier, and we’ll find out later when they do an ultrasound.” For midwives themselves, the impossibility of helping everyone who wants help can be stressful. “I know some midwives, when they’re going to parties, they lie and say they do something else for a living,” says Lennox, “because they just get bombarded.”

More than anything, midwife-mania is the product of deeply rooted problems within the larger maternity care system. With each passing year, the shortage of maternity care providers in Canada is becoming more pronounced. According to the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, there are currently only 1,650 OB/GYNs practising in this country, an estimated 500 of whom have shifted their practices away from deliveries, choosing instead to focus on gynecology, fertility and family planning. Moreover, roughly 34 per cent of the OB/GYNs now working are set to retire in the next five years.

At the same time, fewer family physicians are delivering babies—13 per cent in 2004, down from 36 per cent in 1990. In five years, reports estimate that up to 10,000 women in Ontario alone will not find access to a maternity care provider of any kind—not a midwife, not a physician, not anyone, until the day they find themselves doubled over with contractions in an emergency ward.

Compared with what is currently available in traditional medicine, midwifery is felt by many to be infinitely more personal. Instead of five-minute appointments with an obstetrician, clients get roughly 45 minutes with their midwife during each visit. Midwives have a policy of placing mothers-to-be at the heart of the decision-making process. They care for their clients through the entire labour process, and after the birth make home visits for the first 10 days to help families adjust to nursing and life with an infant.

In part, midwives say the surge in demand is a rejection of the “too-posh-to-push” school of maternity, whereby childbirth can be pencilled in like a reiki appointment—and tied to a broader social trend toward pared-down, natural living. Women who seek out the service are generally those with low-risk pregnancies who are looking for a de-medicalized experience—whether via a natural birth (midwives can’t administer epidurals, for instance) or, increasingly, a home birth—though midwifery offers, in many cases, the best of both worlds: approximately 75 per cent of midwife-assisted births in Ontario take place in a hospital so that, in case of an emergency, care can be swiftly transferred to an MD.

This emphasis on one-on-one care is something that Canada’s wildly overburdened obstetricians are simply unable to provide. Already they have an unusually demanding lifestyle. “Time-wise, they have to be on call on weekends and at night,” says Dr. André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the society, “whereas in family medicine they have fewer emergencies.” Moreover, in the last five years, he says, the society has witnessed a “feminization” of the specialty. “Now 80 to 85 per cent of new graduates in obstetrics are women,” he says, “and, rightly so, they want to have children of their own and family life, so they’re not going to do 250 to 300 deliveries a year. We have some people doing 450 or 500 deliveries a year. That’s not going to happen. They want to work reasonable hours.”

Bookmark and Share
  • http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=691995552&k=55G34ZQZS3YMYCGGTAX6T Emma Kwasnica

    If we want change in our maternity care system, we need to realise that it is going to have to come from us women. “We, the consumer”. But until WE demand it, I’m afraid nothing will ever change.

    As women, I believe the notion of ‘informed choice’ is right at the crux of the matter here – a notion embraced by the midwifery model of care. If Canadian women truly knew and understood the risks/benefits of each and every medical intervention routinely used/offered in pregnancy and in birth, we wouldn’t be sitting here in this sorry maternity mess we find ourselves in today.

    It’s high time we stood up and demanded a better level of care for ourselves… and for our babies ! Do your reasearch. Look into all your options. Make informed decisions based on sound, scientific evidence (and with the ‘information age’, we no longer have any excuse *not* to…). Work on losing the fear that surrounds birth in our culture, in large part by empowering yourself with KNOWLEDGE.

    And most of all, do not simply accept that birth *needs* to be a medicalized procedure, at every step of the way. Because it doesn’t. A safe, joyous birth experience awaits you and your unborn baby.

    But we must first be willing to seek it…

  • Emily Gillard

    I read the Macleans article with interest, being a full-time midwife in Ontario where I deliver about 40 babies per year both at home and in hospital.

    What can we do about the maternity care crisis? Clearly, more maternity care providers are needed so that every woman can receive adequate prenatal care, a trained birth attendant, and appropriate post-natal care for herself and her baby.

    I understand how Andre LaLonde could suggest that midwives may be able to triple their number of deliveries to be comparable, apparantly, with midwives practicing in the US and Europe. I could triple my caseload if my focus was on delivering babies, rather than providing comprehensive care throughout pregnancy and the first 6 weeks postpartum as well as being on-call (basically 24-7) to provide the intrapartum care normally provided by both doctor and nurse. However, womens’ increased satisfaction with care, lowered intervention rates, increased parental confidence, and increased rates of initiating and maintaining breastfeeding result from the whole package of care I provide, not just the way I assist the baby to be born. I believe the work I do should be the gold standard for maternity care, not just because women like longer appointments and having their decisions respected, but because the way I work increases the health of women and their babies, and costs our medical system considerably less than conventional care.

    I know many Ontario midwives would like to help relieve maternity care crises in their communities but are prevented by being refused hospital privileges. Others, after having privileges granted are not permitted to work within their full-scope (e.g. managing epidurals, managing inductions of labour) which thereby increases the chance that doctors and nurses would need to take over care of that woman. An ideal situation would be midwives working within our full-scope as outlined by the College of Midwives of Ontario providing care to all low-risk healthy women, with OB-GYNs providing the medical and surgical care that higher risk cases and emergencies require. Currently, the numbers aren’t there.
    There aren’t enough midwives, and fee-for-service pay structure for OB-GYNs makes this structure understandably unattractive to them. We need creative thinking to revolutionize our current system to the satisfaction of the professionals involved (midwives, doctors and nurses) and to make Canada a leader in excellent maternity care provision.

    • Margaret

      Your “ideal situation” seems to have completely neglected the role of the family physician in providing prenatal and intrapartum care.

  • Heather

    I am happy to see that more and more women are looking into midwifery and seeing that it has advantages to many different kinds of women, not just hard-core hippies! The discussion this article has inspired is also interesting.

    I would like to point out, as an earlier post mentioned, that doctors (at least here in Saskatchewan) also cannot administer epidurals. That is the job of the anesthesiologist.

    Here we are a bit behind the times, with midwifery still not really implemented and up and running. But from my experience with 3 midwives who I had the priviledge of receiving care from during my pregnancies, it was clear that they knew quite a lot about how to deal with the side effects of medical intervention. The effect of epidurals and intraveneous fluids on the success of breastfeeding was discussed and watched for. The midwives I have met in my life seem to share the philosophy that the less intervention a woman receives the less side effects of that intervention you will have to deal with later.

    All women have a different set of expectations and desires for our pregnancy and birth plans. That is the beauty of midwives, that you can choose someone who shares your vision and will help you achieve it. I know from experience that just having someone “get you through it” without caring about your vision is demoralizing and detrimental to bonding with a new baby, and for the new family as a whole.

    Thanks for publishing this article and allowing a forum for discussion.

    Heather
    Regina, SK

  • http://mompowered.com Kareen

    I’d like to thank Emma Kwasnica for her post because I could not agree with her more! I am very thankful to have been enlightened through KNOWLEDGE about how to take responsibility for my births. Too many women don’t realize what a huge difference it can make to the medical system and the midwifery care system. I don’t think that we would be in this crisis if we would invest in educating women on the fact that normal birth can be the rule, not the exception! Most women, myself included, do need to be assisted in the birthing process. In Ontario, I’ve had one hospital birth with an OB in 2000 and 2 homebirths with midwives (one was a twin birth with 5 midwives) in 2003 and 2004, and in Quebec, one final birth at a woman-centered hospital with a family physician and a doula in 2006 (only because it’s absolutely IMPOSSIBLE to have a midwife in Quebec). Although I could never do this, the present crisis would be even worst if there were no unassisted births in this country. It is not something to be scared about or frowned upon since it occurs all over the world. Complications can occur in all cases. In other words, the medicalization of birth hasn’t made it safer for women, therefore, “informed choice” should include a discussion on unassisted birthing as a viable option. Many women have it in them and many more could given the proper KNOWLEDGE! As they say, KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!

  • Pingback: A conversational crisis « MACLEAN’S for DUMMIES

  • http://fullcircledoula.ca Tammy Crawley

    The content of Lianne George’s article regarding the lack of midwives in Canada sadly came as no surprise to me. Most women would be able to relate in their desire to have a midwife only to find out there are none with openings available at their projected due date.
    What the writer did not discuss is that there is an additional professional that women can approach when they desire the services of a midwife but cannot acquire one, or when delivering with an OB/GYN. This option is to obtain the services of a birth doula.

    Birth doulas are dedicated to support pregnant women and their families. Although not medically trained, doulas are professionally trained in pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. They are also experienced in the physiology of labour and birth, the medical procedures surrounding labour and birth, and all of the risks and benefits therein.

    Note that a birth doula is not intended to take the place of an OB/GYN or midwife. Rather, a doula’s role is to provide the emotional and physical support that a labouring woman and her partner needs during the prenatal, labour, birth and the postpartum period, while the attending doctor or midwife performs their duties for the delivering woman either in the hospital or chosen birthing facility.

    Birth doulas are becoming more widespread in numbers and as a result have great availability. I would seriously recommend for any delivering woman to research birth doulas and how they can help provide the birth experience the mother and partner desire.

    Tammy Crawley,
    Full Circle Doula Services, Barrie, ON

  • Kerri

    Whether you have the money or time to study midwifery in BC or not, the sad reality is that UBC (the only midwifery progam in Western Canada) takes only 10 students per year from an applicant pool of about 400 per year. How CAN things improve at this rate? I am moving my entire family (husband and 4 kids) overseas to study midwifery in January and it will cost about the same as studying at UBC. No waiting list. Something is wrong when we are in such desperate need for caregivers and we seem to have no way to actually train them here.

  • Francien Verhoeven

    The report seems to be focusing in entirely on a medical problem (doctors, hours, midwives, cost, etc) whereas the problem exists with the women (and society) themselves. Pregnancy and delivery are not diseases; they are normal life experiences. The trend is wanting to be in control of absolutely everything, and such expectations are unrealistic. The sooner we get over the trend, the sooner the medical difficulties surrounding childbirth will be overcome.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/medical_secrets/eFile.htm Malcolm Everett

    My wife was declared as having met with ‘brain death criteria’, within only a few hours following her transfer from Kirkland Lake to Sudbury, while under the care of Drs. Sauve and Adegbite. Withholding life sustaining treatment from an “undiagnosed” patient with concurrent hyperglycemia, hypokalemia and electrolyte abnormalities in combination with a severely paralysed motor function and who is under the influence of sedative hypnotic and tranquilizing agents is of questionable legality. For the record, many conditions may falsely mimic brainstem death clinically upon examination, but without excluding them you will KILL a person by homicide, or criminal negligence, despite the reversibility of brain damage.

    http://www.geocities.com/target_injustice/forum-topix-TF4261.html

  • Serafina

    there is a shortage of midwives because of the abuse student midwives are experiencing from Senior midwives. I believe that if you are truly a jealous and heartless bitch who feels threatened by the young and up and coming student midwives then you really have no place in the industry.

From Macleans