A midwife crisis

Not enough doctors, not enough midwives: it’s a bad time to have a baby in Canada

by Lianne George on Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:00am - 38 Comments

A midwife crisis

Joanne Jacyk, a 31-year-old Toronto-based environmental engineer, was all of five weeks pregnant with her first child when she picked up the phone to call a midwife—only to find that she was too late. “They were already full for my due date,” she says. “I thought, ‘I just got my blood test!’ I basically called as fast as I could.” Anxious, Jacyk got online, found a list of every midwifery clinic in the Greater Toronto Area, and phoned them all. “When I started getting calls back saying, ‘We can’t take you,’ I got really upset,” she says. “I didn’t realize how badly I wanted a midwife until I thought the option wasn’t there.”

There’s a joke circulating among the new-mommy set in Ontario, one of seven provinces where midwifery services are now or will soon be publicly funded: if you think you might be pregnant, first you call the midwife, then you pee on the stick. Jacyk, now the mother of a healthy three-month-old boy, was one of the lucky ones. Eventually, persistence and fortuitous planetary alignment landed her a placement. But last year in Ontario, 40 per cent of pregnant women who sought out midwifery care—roughly 6,000 of them—were turned away. Demand has so outstripped supply that in some parts of the province, finding a midwife is harder than securing the kid a spot in a decent daycare.

For many people, the word “midwife” still evokes patchouli incense and homemade yogourt. But midwives’ growing popularity, fuelled almost entirely by word of mouth, reflects the mainstream’s rapidly changing perception of their profession. “We generally have waiting lists every month,” says Andrea Lennox, a registered practitioner at Kensington Midwives in Toronto and vice-president of the College of Midwives of Ontario.

Because there are only 400 registered midwives to serve the entire province, savvy mothers-to-be have taken to “strategizing” to secure a coveted spot, says Raquel Parra, the clinic’s office administrator. For instance, if they don’t live within the clinic’s catchment area, they’ll lie about their address. They’ll lie about their intention to have a home birth (which well-informed women know places them higher up on the waiting list). And from time to time, they’ll fudge their due dates. “There are months in the year that you’re more likely to get a midwife,” says Parra. “December is really difficult because of the holidays. They know this so they’ll call me and give me a date several weeks earlier, and we’ll find out later when they do an ultrasound.” For midwives themselves, the impossibility of helping everyone who wants help can be stressful. “I know some midwives, when they’re going to parties, they lie and say they do something else for a living,” says Lennox, “because they just get bombarded.”

More than anything, midwife-mania is the product of deeply rooted problems within the larger maternity care system. With each passing year, the shortage of maternity care providers in Canada is becoming more pronounced. According to the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, there are currently only 1,650 OB/GYNs practising in this country, an estimated 500 of whom have shifted their practices away from deliveries, choosing instead to focus on gynecology, fertility and family planning. Moreover, roughly 34 per cent of the OB/GYNs now working are set to retire in the next five years.

At the same time, fewer family physicians are delivering babies—13 per cent in 2004, down from 36 per cent in 1990. In five years, reports estimate that up to 10,000 women in Ontario alone will not find access to a maternity care provider of any kind—not a midwife, not a physician, not anyone, until the day they find themselves doubled over with contractions in an emergency ward.

Compared with what is currently available in traditional medicine, midwifery is felt by many to be infinitely more personal. Instead of five-minute appointments with an obstetrician, clients get roughly 45 minutes with their midwife during each visit. Midwives have a policy of placing mothers-to-be at the heart of the decision-making process. They care for their clients through the entire labour process, and after the birth make home visits for the first 10 days to help families adjust to nursing and life with an infant.

In part, midwives say the surge in demand is a rejection of the “too-posh-to-push” school of maternity, whereby childbirth can be pencilled in like a reiki appointment—and tied to a broader social trend toward pared-down, natural living. Women who seek out the service are generally those with low-risk pregnancies who are looking for a de-medicalized experience—whether via a natural birth (midwives can’t administer epidurals, for instance) or, increasingly, a home birth—though midwifery offers, in many cases, the best of both worlds: approximately 75 per cent of midwife-assisted births in Ontario take place in a hospital so that, in case of an emergency, care can be swiftly transferred to an MD.

This emphasis on one-on-one care is something that Canada’s wildly overburdened obstetricians are simply unable to provide. Already they have an unusually demanding lifestyle. “Time-wise, they have to be on call on weekends and at night,” says Dr. André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the society, “whereas in family medicine they have fewer emergencies.” Moreover, in the last five years, he says, the society has witnessed a “feminization” of the specialty. “Now 80 to 85 per cent of new graduates in obstetrics are women,” he says, “and, rightly so, they want to have children of their own and family life, so they’re not going to do 250 to 300 deliveries a year. We have some people doing 450 or 500 deliveries a year. That’s not going to happen. They want to work reasonable hours.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Mélanie Guérin

    I totally agree that we need to work differently as maternay care providers. This issue will not go away and, as explained in this article, will only get worse. I’m a solo midwife in a remote community and work side by side with a FP….we share an office together and we take each others calls whenever one is not available for a certain amount of time. He’s just down the hall for consults and he’ll send me a client of his if he needs a second opinion. We are a great example of midwives and doctors working and supporting each other….not only because we have to, but because we want to. He realized a few years back, through an obstetrical emergency course, that midwives are very competent in maternity care and was a great asset when I decided to return to practice midwifery in my hometown.
    However, the fee for service system does not work since it does not attract doctors to work with midwives. Major changes to the way doctors and midwives are paid need to happen if we eventually want collaborative maternity care, and midwifery care across the country. There also needs to be changes to the midwives’ scope of practice so that doctors and not “bothered” for a simple procedure such as administering antibiotics or narcotics in labour. And believe me, we really do not enjoy having to do that!
    I’m not sure that midwives in Canada are willing to do 120 births a year since it could potentially decrease the quality of care that they bring to their clients i.e. 45 min visits etc. and also decrease their, already altered, quality of life. But I agree that midwives can occupy the spots for low risk clients and that OB’s can perform what they were trained to do i.e. high risk pregnancies and deliveries. I sincerely hope that doctors and midwives across the country can learn to work together to provide the best maternity care possible to Canadian women. I think that it’s beginning to be quite obvious that that’s what we’ll need to do.

  • Luciane L.

    Canada has a vast ocean of doctors driving cabs and delivering pizza, unable to perform what they did for years in their country of origin. If the government won’t interfere in the old school protected society, that grants them the recognition of their credentials, don’t expect to have this and many other Canadian problems solved in a short to medium term…

  • Jasmine Chatelain

    I am an Ontario midiwfery student.

    I am pleased to see a national magazine focusing on this issue.

    I would like to make two small comments. While midwives cannot “administer” epidurals,, it is within our College’s scope of practice to monitor and maintain labour care with epidural administration. Some hospitals in Ontario extend this scope to midwives and some do not. Where they do, like at the Hopital Montfort in Ottawa, the aneasthiologist administers the epidural while the midwife continues to care for the woman and the baby. OBs do not admisniter epidurals either.

    Also, while some midiwfery clients may have their babies in the hospital due to indication (a medical reason why they need to be in hospital during labour and birth), many women have their babies in hospital with a midwife because they choose to.

    Having made ethese comments I would llike to affirm that part of the reason we are so popular is because our principles: non-alarmist, low intervention birth with continuity of carer, shared decision making and choice of birthplace (with strong support for homebirth) evoked through a caring relationship is sound practice and works. Clinical outcomes associated with lower interventions, less pharmacological pain relief, better breastfeeding rates, and higher maternal satisfaction are associated with this type of practice.

    Thanks,
    Jasmine Chatelain

  • http://www.truemuse.wordpress.com truemuse

    Jasmine,
    I know when I had an epidural I labour stopped along with my active participation in it, effectively making me ‘the patient etherized upon the table’ like in the famous poem by T.S. Eliot. Also, my belly became dotted with electronic monitering devices to keep tabs on my baby’s heart. There are two in the delivery and a baby’s health is impacted by the use the epidural. Are midwives sufficiently medically trained to handle the emergency outcomes that may arise from epidural use (for both mother and baby)? I know that the intravenous I had to go on concurrent with taking the epidural caused some problems breastfeeding (that is, I got edema of the aureola which made it hard for the baby to latch). There was no support for these problems in the hospital, where I had to remain for two days since they plunged the epidural needle in too far taking out some spinal fluid necessitating an epidural patch, and the epidural caused a loss of sensation during delivery resulting in a bad tear. Can midwives sew up a bad tear, advise which complications to expect from it, monitor a baby for effects of epidural use during and after birth?

    It is my opinion that a mid-wife is a specialized nurse but cannot replace the services of doctors when those are needed. I would like to see doctors and midwives work together to keep births as natural as possible and to do education throughout pregnancy to help women be full participants in their births. I would like to see doctors who specialize in birth and work in birthing centres along with midwives. I don’t think there should be an expectation that the person you work with during your pregnancy must be available for birth. This is totally impracticle given the expense of assistance for high-quality births. The birthing centre (be it in a hospital or stand-alone) needs to liase with healthcare professionals that serve women and babies before and after birth. Doctors and midwives should be able to assist in home births and have hospital / birthing centre priviledges, and I think that every GP should do births for part of his/her career if they also look after women.

    This country has some very strange ways when it comes to serving women for pregnancy and birth. This country likes abortion better than birth.

    • AB Mama

      The epidural was the first mistake.
      I am not a midwife, but I support them fully. It irritates me when women like yourself have complications from the procedures that the DOCTOR preformed on you, by your consent, and then turn around and say that the doctor "saved" you or somehow "helped" in your birth.
      Let me tell you. He didn't.
      OB/GYNs are surgeons. They specialize in surgery. Not Birth. Midwives spend 4+ years training in normal birth and the complications that arise from that.
      Please educate yourself on what midwives are trained for before you spout your rhetoric.

  • jim wickstrom

    Adding more spots for educational purposes is obviously badly needed to increase the number of midwives. Increased numbers will assist the medics and prevent many future over-medicalized birthing procedures.
    I am a Chiro. and if I might suggest something to you midwives that in delayed and difficult births a Chiropractor can help tremendously by aligning the pelvis . Also, for those of you who didn’t know, this procedure of un-twisting the pelvis enhances fertility! Sounds amazing and it is amazing. Results are often rapid and anecdotal evidence exists confirming this little known fact.

    • Margaret

      Anecdotes are not evidence and do not make their subject a fact, little known or otherwise.

  • http://www.truemuse.wordpress.com truemuse

    Women should know how to align their own pelvises long before the day! I wish more Chiropractors knew the <a href=”http://www.orionbooks.co.uk/MP-20780/The-Alexander-Principle.htm”Alexander Principle.

  • http://www.naturalmothering.ca Danielle Arnold

    The crisis situation within the childbirth industry has reached horrendous proportions, and as the article states, will only get far worse. I am natural childbirth advocate and an active member of several online communities that support mothers. Not a week goes by that I don’t hear the plight of several mothers that are desperately seeking to find a midwife to deliver their babies. …from all over Canada!

    When I lived in the interior of BC, I desperately searched for a midwife myself, and actually considered driving 2.5 hour to Kelowna to get one. But being due in February, and pregnant with my third child, we decided that the drive would of been reckless. And so I had an OB and a hospital birth….and a cesarean section!! I still mourn our decision not to make the long drive through the snow covered highways!!

    Until the Hospitals and Doctors start working WITH the midwifery groups, allowing hospital privileges, and not interfering with the way that midwives do their jobs, the crises in the childbirth sector will only get worse and the ones that will suffer will be the mothers and babies.

  • Erin Guard

    I am about to graduate from the midwifery program at Ryerson University in the spring. I want to mention something missing in this article is an explanation of our education. Midwives receive a four-year bachelor of health sciences in midwifery. The first year and a half is spent on campus taking classes such as pharmacology, reproductive physiology, anatomy and life sciences. Our last two and a half years are spent in the field, working with midwives and attending classes. This leads to 70-80 hour work weeks and pretty much your every waking thought midwifery. Two and a half years of learning about pregnancy and childbirth leave you extremely knowledgeable.

    To answer some questions:

    Truemuse
    1) Although I hold nurses in the utmost respect, and work at a hospital were the nursing staff is wonderful, I have to point out that we are not just a specialized nurse. We consult with doctors when pregnancy, labour or birth creep outside the limits of normal. While it is true that we can’t replace doctors when forceps, vacuum or cesarean section are warranted, they cannot replace our home births, labour support, home visits or prenatal education.

    2) Yes, midwives are fully trained to monitor an epidural and the potential risks. We have extensive emergency skills certification in everything from postpartum hemorrhage to shoulder dystocia to undiagnosed twin and breech deliveries. We are also re-certified in neonatal resuscitation annually.

    3) Yes, we are trained to repair vaginal and perineal lacerations, also called 1st and 2nd degree tears. Unfortunately as of now we are unable to suture tears that involve the sphincter, but of course we know exactly how to tell women to care for it and what to expect. In fact, midwives are especially good at preventing these types of tears through slow delivery of the head.

    4) Yes, we provide excellent breastfeeding support. That is why midwives see their clients on days 1,3,5 at home. Aside form learning through our mentors, many of us have done time training with lactation consultants and have taken breastfeeding support instruction classes. We are knowledgeable in breastfeeding and latching difficulties and our clients tend to breastfeed their babies much longer than obstetric clients.

    Our clients are fully informed, and are full participants in their pregnancy and birth. We do in-depth prenatal teaching and every decision is made by the client.

    Jim Wickstrom:
    We love chiropractors, accupuncturists, naturopathic doctors, homeopathic doctors, massage therapists, all alternative medicine practitioners. We often refer our clients to them. In fact, the clinic where I work has an in-house chiropractor.

    I encourage everyone to become more acquainted with what a midwife is. Our governing body, the College of Midwives of Ontario (CMO) has an amazing website that describes our scope of practice, and ethical guidelines as well as who is eligible for our care.

    Cheers, and I hope I have provided some further insight into what a midwife is.

  • Josee P

    Although I have great respect for midwives, I also am at a loss as to why your article is titled Midwife crisis. Physicians have as much if not greater training to provide prenatal and obstetrical care. It is the current public health care system that is at fault. If all pregnant women were to be under the care of midwives, it would put a tremendous financial strain on the medical health care. Presently, they have a quota of 40 pregnancy and delivery a year and provide 45 minutes consultation/prenatal appointments. A physician simply cannot afford to have a roster of only 40 patients. I once knew a family physician who regularly provided prenatal care and obstetrical care and who jokingly stated that she should become a midwife as her roster would be smaller, she’s be able to spend more time with patients, have less overhead and perhaps even have a greater take home pay. I fail to see why the current system glorifies the midwives and penalises the physician who would like to provide similar care.

  • http://www.hamiltondoula.com HamiltonDoula

    Another thing missing from this article is that doulas will have an increasingly more vital role to play in providing continuity of care and informational support to women who may have decreased access to quality prenatal support. Without stepping into the clinical realm, doulas will be able to give women lots of hands on support that is already missing from all mainstream OB lead births. Doula use is associated with amazing clinical outcomes such as 50% less c-sections and 40% less need for pitocin.

    I agree with all, however, that we need more midwives handling low risk pregnancy and birth, with the caveat that these low risk patients be encouraged to birth at home, thereby reducing the strain on L&D wards and health funds.

  • Pingback: Macleans for Dummies? « The Maclean’s Review

  • http://www.3dultrasoundvancouver.com Jane O’reilley

    I think its too bad that so many OBGYN’s have been moving over to General Practice. I spoke with my GP, who was fortunately and OBGYN before moving over, but she said that the insurance rates are just to high these days to practice gynecology. This is putting a lot of pressure on today’s Midwives to educate expectant parents on what OBGYN’s could be doing.

  • http://www.3dultrasoundvancouver.com Jane O’reilley

    My sister has a website that many expectant mothers go to to book 3D ultrasounds. Danielle, I notice that awareness & availability in BC seems to be an issue (for more than just me), do you think we should cover this as a story? it would be on this webpage:

    http://www.3dultrasoundvancouver.com

    All the best,

    Jane

  • Mélanie Guérin

    To Josée P,
    the physician must have said that he/she should become a midwife in a jokingly manner since a midwifery preceptor of mine actually calculated her rate per hour to be approximately 5$/hr….especially in smaller practices where you might have to do your own administration because we can’t afford an administrator, attend every meeting and be on-call basically all the time. We only do 40 births a year because we spend on average 44 hours with each client….frequently 18-20 hours for births and early postpartum period alone!
    As I mentioned earlier, the fee for service system doesn’t work because it causes too much competition between doctors and midwives. OB’s, specialized in high risk pregnancies can’t survive financially if they only did high risk pregnancies….not in smaller centres anyways (unless there was only one and had to be on-call all the time…which is totally unreasonable). So they do 200, 400 low risk clients instead and then are exhausted because they are, obviously, overworked. If we increase the number of midwives to look after low risk pregnancies and deliveries, that decreases the load on the OB’s…but also their pay! So we need to figure out a way that docs can decrease their workload for the same pay and make room for more midwives. Wether it’s returning to a salaried system or something similar, something needs to be done a quickly because the midwifery crisis AND physician crisis is increasing at an alarming rate.

  • Pingback: A midwife crisis « Pregnancy News

  • Lana Vugteveen

    I have to wonder if the issue of shrinking midwifes across Canada is due to lack of education options. If the system is indeed working away from the idea of education through apprenticeships and more towards the 4 year bachelor degree, I feel like we are going to miss out on gaining more possible midwives.

    Its more difficult to commit to a 4 year, full time program (which seems to be the only prominent option in BC) especially when you are beyond your young twenties and don’t necessarily have the freedom (usually due to family life) or finances to go into schooling for that period of time.

  • momtobe

    Truemuse,

    While I understand your point- that you want a midwife to be able to care for the complications that may arise during labour and delivery- I must challenge the tone of your email. Your delivery team of doctors, nurses and aneasthiologist- created the complications you had through their practice and care. The very nature of midwifery philosophy of care, would not have created the complications you endured.

  • A.Evans

    I think in all areas of healthcare there needs to be more of a team effort to ensure the best patient care, and respect the patient’s wishes.

    So many professionals think that their knowledge trumps another professional’s. But I think there’s so much to learn from each other, why not look at it as a learning opportunity rather than another chance to butt heads. Many doctors enjoy working with midwives, but I know there is some resistance still.

    I think there is also a severe lack of programs across Canada. It’s off on a tangent a bit, but I want to go to University to pursue a medical degree. I can’t gain acceptance into any U. in Ontario because I don’t have the proper grade 12 credits. I’ve been in college, but I still need those grade 12 credits, even though I’m 30. I got accepted to University of Michigan for Molecular Biology/ Biotechnology with the same credentials.
    I don’t understand what it is about Canada – we have all these professionals and people who are trained or want to pursue these in-demand careers, but they just won’t give the funding for the extra seats in these programs or to license these doctors.

  • http://www.macleansreview.wordpress.com Karen Krisfalusi

    I agree that health policy should be developed under the larger umbrella of parliamentary authority. The idea that one lobby group, the SOGC, can set a birthing strategy for Canada is quite short-sighted. I know that politicians like Carolyn Bennett have signed on to it. It would be nice to see issues like this become election issues in the next go-aroung.

  • thewiz

    Truemuse,
    More people might actually read your posts and not skip over them if your tone improved.You seem to have adopted an abrasive writing style.

  • http://www.truemuse.wordpress.com truemuse

    The wiz, 700 people have clicked my blog to read more of my tonalities. Sorry you don’t like it but writing aside, when something makes me smile my smile is bright! Grin and bear it until things are good, wait it out til things are really good, til you’re authentically happy. Then smile.

  • http://www.truemuse.wordpress.com truemuse

    oh i see you’re picking up from momtobe above. i think i’m not especially abrasive. but if any website could bring it out in me it’s this one! “The Government Sucks or it Blows”….now that’s why we all keep coming here isn’t it???

  • thewiz

    Truemuse,
    I went to the link connected to your ‘truemuse’ and while I cannot find where it states the number of hits, it still appears that not one person has commented.

  • http://www.truemuse.wordpress.com truemuse

    I’m not sure what your deal is, but I posted my website stats for you with a small explanation.

  • Pingback: Macleans for Dummies? « MACLEAN’S for DUMMIES

From Macleans