<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-1/#comment-48924</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48924</guid>
		<description>One last thing to add to my previous reply:
Quote: &quot;and yet no one has the gutts to point it out&quot; -- Most ridiculous sentence I&#039;ve read in this page. The tabloids and almost every Aniston fan on the Internet have been trashing and attacking Angelina since she got together with Brad, The name calling for her is endless and the lies keep selling every week on tabloids. That means having guts to you? I call it bulls***. People know nothing about what really happened between Brad &amp; Aniston, and still, 5 years later they keep whining and defending someone who doesn&#039;t even ask for it. And yet they dare to talk about what is &quot;classy&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last thing to add to my previous reply:<br />
Quote: &quot;and yet no one has the gutts to point it out&quot; &#8212; Most ridiculous sentence I&#039;ve read in this page. The tabloids and almost every Aniston fan on the Internet have been trashing and attacking Angelina since she got together with Brad, The name calling for her is endless and the lies keep selling every week on tabloids. That means having guts to you? I call it bulls***. People know nothing about what really happened between Brad &amp; Aniston, and still, 5 years later they keep whining and defending someone who doesn&#039;t even ask for it. And yet they dare to talk about what is &quot;classy&quot;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-1/#comment-48923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48923</guid>
		<description>She had the choice to say &quot;no comment&quot; everytime she was asked. That&#039;s what Nicole Kidman (real classy lady) did after her equally publicized divorce. Aniston should learn something from her.
Angelina didn&#039;t steal anything. Brad is not a purse or private property that can be &quot;stolen&quot;. All three are grown up people who are perfectly able to make their own choices. Jennifer said there was no cheating, even Courtnex Cox said it too, there was no evidence or pictures like in other nasty divorces, it was an amicable split according to both parties and they&#039;ve all moved on...what else people want?? If their marriage was as perfect as some people want to think, no one would have been able to &quot;break it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She had the choice to say &quot;no comment&quot; everytime she was asked. That&#039;s what Nicole Kidman (real classy lady) did after her equally publicized divorce. Aniston should learn something from her.<br />
Angelina didn&#039;t steal anything. Brad is not a purse or private property that can be &quot;stolen&quot;. All three are grown up people who are perfectly able to make their own choices. Jennifer said there was no cheating, even Courtnex Cox said it too, there was no evidence or pictures like in other nasty divorces, it was an amicable split according to both parties and they&#039;ve all moved on&#8230;what else people want?? If their marriage was as perfect as some people want to think, no one would have been able to &quot;break it&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48922</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48922</guid>
		<description>AMEN!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janice</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48921</link>
		<dc:creator>janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48921</guid>
		<description>j scrilla if i wanted to waste my grammar and pure english on trashy idol worshipping americans or the trashy canadians i would not be on this forum. are you here to teach and preach like a schoole teacher . the woman here that can praise a homewrecker and try to justify her by stating that pitts marraige was on the rocks one question where you living with this couple that you can truthfully say this or is it all just gossip picked up by trashy american and canadian magazines to sell for the mighty dollar. i apologise to the honest and decent americans and canadians but these others that seem to justify adultery and disgracefull behaviour from pitt and jolie, as my sirname is dos santos what do you think teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>j scrilla if i wanted to waste my grammar and pure english on trashy idol worshipping americans or the trashy canadians i would not be on this forum. are you here to teach and preach like a schoole teacher . the woman here that can praise a homewrecker and try to justify her by stating that pitts marraige was on the rocks one question where you living with this couple that you can truthfully say this or is it all just gossip picked up by trashy american and canadian magazines to sell for the mighty dollar. i apologise to the honest and decent americans and canadians but these others that seem to justify adultery and disgracefull behaviour from pitt and jolie, as my sirname is dos santos what do you think teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KENDALL</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48920</link>
		<dc:creator>KENDALL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48920</guid>
		<description>OMG YOU PEOPLE ARE SO STUCK UP!! GET YOUR  HEAD OUT OF YOU&#039;RE BUTTS....SHE WAS AND STILL IS AMERICAS SWEETHEART FOR A REASON ONE THAT MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE SCUMB!! HOW DARE YOU TRY AND PUT DOWN SOMEONE BETTER THAN YOURSELF ONLY BECAUSE YOU ARNT HER!!! GET A LIFE YOU SUCK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG YOU PEOPLE ARE SO STUCK UP!! GET YOUR  HEAD OUT OF YOU&#8217;RE BUTTS&#8230;.SHE WAS AND STILL IS AMERICAS SWEETHEART FOR A REASON ONE THAT MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE SCUMB!! HOW DARE YOU TRY AND PUT DOWN SOMEONE BETTER THAN YOURSELF ONLY BECAUSE YOU ARNT HER!!! GET A LIFE YOU SUCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48919</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48919</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ms. Harrington - Jennifer is shallow and talentless.  I&#039;m tired of people blaming Jolie for the break-up - did we forget Brad&#039;s part in this?  Maybe if Jennifer paid a little more attention to their marriage they would have still been married .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ms. Harrington &#8211; Jennifer is shallow and talentless.  I&#8217;m tired of people blaming Jolie for the break-up &#8211; did we forget Brad&#8217;s part in this?  Maybe if Jennifer paid a little more attention to their marriage they would have still been married &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48918</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48918</guid>
		<description>Hey..I guess she has to do what she has to do. She will NEVER be a big movie star so I guess she has to pose semi nude now. PATHETIC Jen..oh wait..you are a serious actress!  HA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey..I guess she has to do what she has to do. She will NEVER be a big movie star so I guess she has to pose semi nude now. PATHETIC Jen..oh wait..you are a serious actress!  HA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wingo</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48917</link>
		<dc:creator>Wingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48917</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous and sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous and sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48916</guid>
		<description>Anne Kingston should spend her time writing articles that actually matter. Waste of paper and waste of ink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Kingston should spend her time writing articles that actually matter. Waste of paper and waste of ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48915</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48915</guid>
		<description>Comparing Jennifer to Angelina is like comparing apples to oranges or vegeburger to filet mignon.

Jennifer is a shallow, untalented, self-centered moron who casts aside her own mother over her ex-mother-in-law to weep to about her problems.  Could you possibly get more pathetic than that?

Angelina is a wordly, beautiful woman who deeply mourned the loss of her mother and views the world in the &quot;big picture.&quot;  Her beauty comes naturally from within.

Angelina doesn&#039;t have to stand in front of a mirror and reassure herself that she&#039;s beautiful.  It comes naturally.

And as far as Debbie Reynolds and Liz Taylor - Liz was villified for the Eddie Fisher thing - but in the end, Liz showed true talent while Debbie Reynolds was just a big &quot;has been.&quot;

Angie&#039;s Camp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing Jennifer to Angelina is like comparing apples to oranges or vegeburger to filet mignon.</p>
<p>Jennifer is a shallow, untalented, self-centered moron who casts aside her own mother over her ex-mother-in-law to weep to about her problems.  Could you possibly get more pathetic than that?</p>
<p>Angelina is a wordly, beautiful woman who deeply mourned the loss of her mother and views the world in the &#8220;big picture.&#8221;  Her beauty comes naturally from within.</p>
<p>Angelina doesn&#8217;t have to stand in front of a mirror and reassure herself that she&#8217;s beautiful.  It comes naturally.</p>
<p>And as far as Debbie Reynolds and Liz Taylor &#8211; Liz was villified for the Eddie Fisher thing &#8211; but in the end, Liz showed true talent while Debbie Reynolds was just a big &#8220;has been.&#8221;</p>
<p>Angie&#8217;s Camp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48914</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48914</guid>
		<description>[...]  Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen Vogue editor Anna Wintour knows how to sell magazines, which explains the “What Angelina Did Was Very Uncool” line [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen Vogue editor Anna Wintour knows how to sell magazines, which explains the “What Angelina Did Was Very Uncool” line [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRIGHTON</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48913</link>
		<dc:creator>BRIGHTON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48913</guid>
		<description>Jennifer Aniston is a disgrace to strong women who were left by their husband or lover.   I am one of those women,I have two kids and my husband left me for another woman.   Too bad I don&#039;t have a career that pays me millions and I don&#039;t have $110 million in my bank account like Aniston.  I am too busy to feel sorry for myself because I work two jobs, working 14 hours a day, getting paid  12 dolllars an hour.
   Tell me why should I pity her?  I feel sorry for thousands of women like me who has children to support and get minimum wage.  I bet Ms. Aniston, judging from her tan and and gorgeous hair doesn&#039;t have to worry about anything else except her appearance which I&#039;m not impressed anyway. I don&#039;t understand why people feel sorry for her and why blame Angelina Jolie...why not blame Brad Pitt?  He was the one who left her, didn&#039;t he?  It takes two to make and break a marriage.  Do we really know what happened?  What we know is what the media tells us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer Aniston is a disgrace to strong women who were left by their husband or lover.   I am one of those women,I have two kids and my husband left me for another woman.   Too bad I don&#8217;t have a career that pays me millions and I don&#8217;t have $110 million in my bank account like Aniston.  I am too busy to feel sorry for myself because I work two jobs, working 14 hours a day, getting paid  12 dolllars an hour.<br />
   Tell me why should I pity her?  I feel sorry for thousands of women like me who has children to support and get minimum wage.  I bet Ms. Aniston, judging from her tan and and gorgeous hair doesn&#8217;t have to worry about anything else except her appearance which I&#8217;m not impressed anyway. I don&#8217;t understand why people feel sorry for her and why blame Angelina Jolie&#8230;why not blame Brad Pitt?  He was the one who left her, didn&#8217;t he?  It takes two to make and break a marriage.  Do we really know what happened?  What we know is what the media tells us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Team "Uncool"</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48912</link>
		<dc:creator>Team "Uncool"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48912</guid>
		<description>To ECfan:  Excellent post.  You said it all.

Of all the tiresome, boring creatures on the planet, this woman takes the cake.  Whine, whine, whine.  Damn, chica, get over it, will you?!  Listen to her talking about the dissolution of her marriage in Vanity Fair: &quot;I was shocked!  The world was shocked!&quot;  Well excuse me, lady, but it&#039;s not all about you.  The world has a great many more substantial things to be shocked about than your crappy marriage imploding.  And then she goes on to accept &quot;maybe 2% of the blame&quot; for her marriage breaking up.  Give me a break.  If she had been a better wife to Pitt, she might still be married to him.

I am sick and tired of this loser.  She acts like she&#039;s sixteen years old.  She needs to grow the hell up, admit her share in the failure of her marriage and move on already.  No wonder she can&#039;t hold a man with all the emotional baggage she drags around behind her.

It never ceases to amaze me that there are so many bitter, angry, lonely people who have resurrected an altar to their patron saint of scorned women.  Too bad they will never know what it&#039;s like to be on a winning team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To ECfan:  Excellent post.  You said it all.</p>
<p>Of all the tiresome, boring creatures on the planet, this woman takes the cake.  Whine, whine, whine.  Damn, chica, get over it, will you?!  Listen to her talking about the dissolution of her marriage in Vanity Fair: &#8220;I was shocked!  The world was shocked!&#8221;  Well excuse me, lady, but it&#8217;s not all about you.  The world has a great many more substantial things to be shocked about than your crappy marriage imploding.  And then she goes on to accept &#8220;maybe 2% of the blame&#8221; for her marriage breaking up.  Give me a break.  If she had been a better wife to Pitt, she might still be married to him.</p>
<p>I am sick and tired of this loser.  She acts like she&#8217;s sixteen years old.  She needs to grow the hell up, admit her share in the failure of her marriage and move on already.  No wonder she can&#8217;t hold a man with all the emotional baggage she drags around behind her.</p>
<p>It never ceases to amaze me that there are so many bitter, angry, lonely people who have resurrected an altar to their patron saint of scorned women.  Too bad they will never know what it&#8217;s like to be on a winning team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queen bee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48911</link>
		<dc:creator>queen bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48911</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU.......FOR THIS BRILLIANT ARTICLE!!!....AND FOR SAYING WHAT THE REST OF US ARE THINKING!...

Jennifer Aniston is the most overated star in hollywood.  Millions of insecure women are living vicariously through her and therefore, demonizing Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. It&#039;s truly pathetic..

...In the end, Jen jen has done more harm to her persona than good......while I was indifferent to her as a person, but enjoyed her on friends......at the present time I am absolutely sick of her passive aggressive attitude and the way she uses the press for he advantage, while bemoaning the fact that she is &#039;above it all&#039;....yeah right!  She&#039;s milked Brad Pitts popularity and the divorce for all its worth, and I AM COMPLETLY SICK OF HER.   As I said.....I cant stand her, and will definitely not go to see a movie of hers at the boxoffice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU&#8230;&#8230;.FOR THIS BRILLIANT ARTICLE!!!&#8230;.AND FOR SAYING WHAT THE REST OF US ARE THINKING!&#8230;</p>
<p>Jennifer Aniston is the most overated star in hollywood.  Millions of insecure women are living vicariously through her and therefore, demonizing Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. It&#8217;s truly pathetic..</p>
<p>&#8230;In the end, Jen jen has done more harm to her persona than good&#8230;&#8230;while I was indifferent to her as a person, but enjoyed her on friends&#8230;&#8230;at the present time I am absolutely sick of her passive aggressive attitude and the way she uses the press for he advantage, while bemoaning the fact that she is &#8216;above it all&#8217;&#8230;.yeah right!  She&#8217;s milked Brad Pitts popularity and the divorce for all its worth, and I AM COMPLETLY SICK OF HER.   As I said&#8230;..I cant stand her, and will definitely not go to see a movie of hers at the boxoffice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48910</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48910</guid>
		<description>thats so unfair to her</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats so unfair to her</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsPerfect</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48909</link>
		<dc:creator>MsPerfect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48909</guid>
		<description>Man.  We can really get worked up over something so trivial as someone else&#039;s love life.  We don&#039;t even know these people personally.  All we really know is what we&#039;re told through the mouth of the media, and we all know what that&#039;s worth, don&#039;t we?  Think Rock Hudson, think Lindsay Lohan, think the Olsen twins.
Come on.  There are more important things to discuss...like how we&#039;re going to save poor, innocent Katie from that crazy, Scientology crusader, Tom Cruise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man.  We can really get worked up over something so trivial as someone else&#8217;s love life.  We don&#8217;t even know these people personally.  All we really know is what we&#8217;re told through the mouth of the media, and we all know what that&#8217;s worth, don&#8217;t we?  Think Rock Hudson, think Lindsay Lohan, think the Olsen twins.<br />
Come on.  There are more important things to discuss&#8230;like how we&#8217;re going to save poor, innocent Katie from that crazy, Scientology crusader, Tom Cruise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boskaba</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48908</link>
		<dc:creator>Boskaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48908</guid>
		<description>&quot;How did Macleans, once Canada’s news magazine, morph into a tabloid rag?&quot;

My sentiments exactly.

On the other hand, it is a reliable indicator of the dip the quality of a publication takes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How did Macleans, once Canada’s news magazine, morph into a tabloid rag?&#8221;</p>
<p>My sentiments exactly.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it is a reliable indicator of the dip the quality of a publication takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lana</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48907</link>
		<dc:creator>lana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48907</guid>
		<description>ECFan

What a fantastic  post!

Thank you for setting the record straight!

The true &#039;fans&#039; of Jennifer Aniston should remember all that she said and did during her time with Mr. Pitt.

Some of these people who speak out on her behalf, as she continues to &quot;whine&quot; incessantly about her loss, or what was allegedly &quot;stolen&quot; from her, either have selective memory disease or are PAID Huvane bloggers trying, desperately, to keep her &quot;relevant&quot; while she is being &#039;eclipsed by a Supernova.&#039;

Mr. and Mrs. Jolie-Pitt  never include the ex&#039;s name in their conversations. The ex does NOT inhabit their world or their thoughts.

It is past time for Aniston to move on. Take responsibility for your OWN part in the dissolution of your marriage and quit trying to place blame where it does NOT belong.

You do not and cannot blame Brad because you KNOW he never cheated on you, and your hatred towards Angelina is irrational and unwarranted.

Call off your &#039;attack&#039; dogs......; Stop trying to paint Angelina as your nemesis. This dog will no longer hunt and you are beginning to look very foolish.

Angelina never did anything to you to deserve your negative comments and you KNOW that as well, and the sooner you admit that to yourself and to everyone else, the sooner you will find the true happiness that you have found and will continue to find -  so elusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ECFan</p>
<p>What a fantastic  post!</p>
<p>Thank you for setting the record straight!</p>
<p>The true &#8216;fans&#8217; of Jennifer Aniston should remember all that she said and did during her time with Mr. Pitt.</p>
<p>Some of these people who speak out on her behalf, as she continues to &#8220;whine&#8221; incessantly about her loss, or what was allegedly &#8220;stolen&#8221; from her, either have selective memory disease or are PAID Huvane bloggers trying, desperately, to keep her &#8220;relevant&#8221; while she is being &#8216;eclipsed by a Supernova.&#8217;</p>
<p>Mr. and Mrs. Jolie-Pitt  never include the ex&#8217;s name in their conversations. The ex does NOT inhabit their world or their thoughts.</p>
<p>It is past time for Aniston to move on. Take responsibility for your OWN part in the dissolution of your marriage and quit trying to place blame where it does NOT belong.</p>
<p>You do not and cannot blame Brad because you KNOW he never cheated on you, and your hatred towards Angelina is irrational and unwarranted.</p>
<p>Call off your &#8216;attack&#8217; dogs&#8230;&#8230;; Stop trying to paint Angelina as your nemesis. This dog will no longer hunt and you are beginning to look very foolish.</p>
<p>Angelina never did anything to you to deserve your negative comments and you KNOW that as well, and the sooner you admit that to yourself and to everyone else, the sooner you will find the true happiness that you have found and will continue to find &#8211;  so elusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48906</link>
		<dc:creator>carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48906</guid>
		<description>I Love Jennifer Aniston, I think your article is a load of crap. Jennifer is 100% better then that
ho- Angelia Jolie.....
Macleans has Jolie as a saint....OMG!!! I cant believe this magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Love Jennifer Aniston, I think your article is a load of crap. Jennifer is 100% better then that<br />
ho- Angelia Jolie&#8230;..<br />
Macleans has Jolie as a saint&#8230;.OMG!!! I cant believe this magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j scrila</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48905</link>
		<dc:creator>j scrila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48905</guid>
		<description>Janice, good use of grammar.  I take it English is not your first language? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janice, good use of grammar.  I take it English is not your first language? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECFan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48904</link>
		<dc:creator>ECFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48904</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always amazed at the number of Aniston fans who forget that her marriage to Pitt was on the brink of divorce for almost 2 years BEFORE he ever met Jolie. Angelina Jolie DID NOT cause the rift between Pitt and Aniston. It already existed when she met him.

Have Aniston&#039;s fans really forgotten about how the tabloids spent 2 years asking why the couple spent so much time apart? A sane person doesn&#039;t put much credence in the tabloids, so bear in mind that everything I&#039;m about to say are STATEMENTS THEY MADE TO LEGITIMATE NEWS AGENCIES AND MAGAZINES, NOT TABLOID STORIES. These are items from interviews with Barbara Walters, Diane Sawyer, Vanity Fair, Vogue, GQ, Esquire and Rolling Stone.

For instance - what about when Aniston accidentally on purpose forgot to thank Pitt when she won a Golden Globe? If you&#039;ve never seen the tape of this go to YouTube and look it up. And then there&#039;s - Why Aniston keep saying they were working on kids, but none ever came? Why Aniston proclaimed in a TV interview that Pitt was &quot;NOT the love of my life, but certainly A LOVE.&quot;? Or Pitt&#039;s referring to their marriage as &quot;a merger&quot; and &quot;I&#039;m not sure two people are meant to be together forever&quot; and &quot;Let&#039;s see how far THIS THING takes us?&quot; Or Pitt&#039;s statement that he was sick of Aniston kicking him out of his own house and then telling all their personal business to her gaggle of girlfriends she calls her &quot;Goddess Circle&quot;? Aniston&#039;s own FATHER said Pitt was, &quot;Certainly in no hurry to get to the alter.&quot;

Or how about before their marriage when Pitt said he and Aniston had a common love of modern and contemporary furniture...only after the marriage Aniston claimed Pitt&#039;s desire to furnish their Beverly Hills home with modern furniture was stupid because the furniture was &quot;uncomfortable&quot;? When Pitt left the country for nearly 6 months to film Troy in 2003 she only visited him TWICE. What woman who doesn&#039;t have to CHOOSES to leave her husband alone in foreign countries for 6 months? This was during a time when &quot;Friends&quot; had wrapped for the season, but instead of going to Malta to be with Pitt she signed on to do a movie instead. This is during a time that many industry insiders were saying the two were having a trial separtion. I&#039;m talking about EARLY 2003, NOT 2004! That&#039;s a full year before Pitt worked with Jolie. With Pitt out of the country Aniston then told an interviewer she was &quot;...glad he&#039;s gone...&quot; and that because he was she &quot;...can now furnish the house with comfortable furniture...&quot; At which point she proceeded to fill the house that Pitt had had labored 2 years to remodel (in a modernist style, mind you), doing a lot of the work himself, with chitz and Laura Ashley-type furniture and Pitt didn&#039;t find out until he got back to the States.

And on the subject of children Aniston stated that Pitt wanted &quot;...at least seven&quot; and then commented, &quot;HE&#039;LL BE LUCKY IF HE GETS TWO.&quot; Lucky? IF? Are these REALLY the actions and words of a couple in a harmonious marriage? If you think so, then your idea of marriage and mine are polar opposites. Theirs was a marriage on the brink of collapse for over 2 years before Jolie even met Pitt. The fact that she came along when she did is moot. Jolie, Pitt and Aniston have all said there was no sexual affair. Aniston herself admitted to Harper&#039;s Bazaar that she knew the marriage was over by the summer of 2004. The M&amp;MS shoot lasted off-and-on well into March 2005. Pitt even told an Indian television interviewer that he missed some world news in the spring of 2005 because he was, &quot;too busy CHASING ANGELINA.&quot; Yeah, that&#039;s right - she resisted getting involved in what was sure to be a sh#t storm. HE did the chasing...yet SHE gets painted as the bad guy. That says a lot about how our society devalues women and absolves men of their own actions. And that&#039;s pretty damned sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always amazed at the number of Aniston fans who forget that her marriage to Pitt was on the brink of divorce for almost 2 years BEFORE he ever met Jolie. Angelina Jolie DID NOT cause the rift between Pitt and Aniston. It already existed when she met him.</p>
<p>Have Aniston&#8217;s fans really forgotten about how the tabloids spent 2 years asking why the couple spent so much time apart? A sane person doesn&#8217;t put much credence in the tabloids, so bear in mind that everything I&#8217;m about to say are STATEMENTS THEY MADE TO LEGITIMATE NEWS AGENCIES AND MAGAZINES, NOT TABLOID STORIES. These are items from interviews with Barbara Walters, Diane Sawyer, Vanity Fair, Vogue, GQ, Esquire and Rolling Stone.</p>
<p>For instance &#8211; what about when Aniston accidentally on purpose forgot to thank Pitt when she won a Golden Globe? If you&#8217;ve never seen the tape of this go to YouTube and look it up. And then there&#8217;s &#8211; Why Aniston keep saying they were working on kids, but none ever came? Why Aniston proclaimed in a TV interview that Pitt was &#8220;NOT the love of my life, but certainly A LOVE.&#8221;? Or Pitt&#8217;s referring to their marriage as &#8220;a merger&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure two people are meant to be together forever&#8221; and &#8220;Let&#8217;s see how far THIS THING takes us?&#8221; Or Pitt&#8217;s statement that he was sick of Aniston kicking him out of his own house and then telling all their personal business to her gaggle of girlfriends she calls her &#8220;Goddess Circle&#8221;? Aniston&#8217;s own FATHER said Pitt was, &#8220;Certainly in no hurry to get to the alter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or how about before their marriage when Pitt said he and Aniston had a common love of modern and contemporary furniture&#8230;only after the marriage Aniston claimed Pitt&#8217;s desire to furnish their Beverly Hills home with modern furniture was stupid because the furniture was &#8220;uncomfortable&#8221;? When Pitt left the country for nearly 6 months to film Troy in 2003 she only visited him TWICE. What woman who doesn&#8217;t have to CHOOSES to leave her husband alone in foreign countries for 6 months? This was during a time when &#8220;Friends&#8221; had wrapped for the season, but instead of going to Malta to be with Pitt she signed on to do a movie instead. This is during a time that many industry insiders were saying the two were having a trial separtion. I&#8217;m talking about EARLY 2003, NOT 2004! That&#8217;s a full year before Pitt worked with Jolie. With Pitt out of the country Aniston then told an interviewer she was &#8220;&#8230;glad he&#8217;s gone&#8230;&#8221; and that because he was she &#8220;&#8230;can now furnish the house with comfortable furniture&#8230;&#8221; At which point she proceeded to fill the house that Pitt had had labored 2 years to remodel (in a modernist style, mind you), doing a lot of the work himself, with chitz and Laura Ashley-type furniture and Pitt didn&#8217;t find out until he got back to the States.</p>
<p>And on the subject of children Aniston stated that Pitt wanted &#8220;&#8230;at least seven&#8221; and then commented, &#8220;HE&#8217;LL BE LUCKY IF HE GETS TWO.&#8221; Lucky? IF? Are these REALLY the actions and words of a couple in a harmonious marriage? If you think so, then your idea of marriage and mine are polar opposites. Theirs was a marriage on the brink of collapse for over 2 years before Jolie even met Pitt. The fact that she came along when she did is moot. Jolie, Pitt and Aniston have all said there was no sexual affair. Aniston herself admitted to Harper&#8217;s Bazaar that she knew the marriage was over by the summer of 2004. The M&amp;MS shoot lasted off-and-on well into March 2005. Pitt even told an Indian television interviewer that he missed some world news in the spring of 2005 because he was, &#8220;too busy CHASING ANGELINA.&#8221; Yeah, that&#8217;s right &#8211; she resisted getting involved in what was sure to be a sh#t storm. HE did the chasing&#8230;yet SHE gets painted as the bad guy. That says a lot about how our society devalues women and absolves men of their own actions. And that&#8217;s pretty damned sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48903</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe this publication presented an article like this. You wonder why women struggle with self-esteem issues. Even &quot;news magazines&quot; attack us from all sides. Jennifer Aniston is not pathetic, but this article certainly is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe this publication presented an article like this. You wonder why women struggle with self-esteem issues. Even &#8220;news magazines&#8221; attack us from all sides. Jennifer Aniston is not pathetic, but this article certainly is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laila</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48902</link>
		<dc:creator>laila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48902</guid>
		<description>For some reason, the previous box that allowed comments was much smaller than this one, and I could not see that several portions I had edited out, still  showed up in the post. I apologize for the length and errors. The first sentence should read:

I am  disgusted that such a misogynistic piece of crap is coming from a Canadian source, and from a magazine that purports to be a  a news magazine, not a tabloid of the worst kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, the previous box that allowed comments was much smaller than this one, and I could not see that several portions I had edited out, still  showed up in the post. I apologize for the length and errors. The first sentence should read:</p>
<p>I am  disgusted that such a misogynistic piece of crap is coming from a Canadian source, and from a magazine that purports to be a  a news magazine, not a tabloid of the worst kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laila</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48901</link>
		<dc:creator>laila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48901</guid>
		<description>I am so disgusted that such a misogynistic piece of crap is coming from a Canadian source, and from a magazine that purports to be a seeing the truth about the press maumors were spread by her then husband anews magazine, not a tabloid of the worst kind. To Alissa, and all the other supporters of the Brandgelina child collecting PR machine, Aniston did not ask to be involved in their disgraceful lifestyle, and she is merely commenting on comments made recently by Jolie. After keeping quiet about her husband&#039;s affair for the last three years, not four, Jolie has started telling anyone who will listen about falling in love with Aniston&#039;s husband while they were still married. A new article released today in the UK, has her saying &quot;their family&quot; started during the filming, as her son Maddox was there. It is Jolie that will not stop bragging about her she acquired Pitt (just in time as she had filmed only flops in years) .Aniston was asked her opinion on Jolie&#039;s comments, and she said they were &quot;uncool&quot;, the understatement of the decade in most people&#039;s views.
It never fails to astound me how this couple, who have thrown a &quot;family&quot; of six children together  in three years, several months of those while Pitt was married, only to sell their privacy to the highest bidder and then drag them around the world constantly, denying them friends or stability, are praised. Meanwhile a woman whose husband betrayed her in a cruel and public way  including allowing his girlfriend to spread malicious lies that she would not have children, is the one who is mocked while the adulterers continue to discuss her whenever either one has a movie to promote one of the cruelest and baffling things I have ever witnessed. I am really ashamed that it is a Canadian news magazine attacking this woman, while the rest of the world is finally waking up to the constant taunts of Jolie towards her babydaddy&#039;s ex, and saying they have had enough. In case MacLean&#039;s hasn&#039;t noticed, Jolie has proven she can&#039;t act and Pitt has aged twenty years in the last three, Aniston is the one who has a broader fan base, and she has re-established a production company after leaving Plan B  with her divorce. St. Jolie would never have been considered for A Mighty Heart if Aniston had not acquired it to produce. She easily trumps Jolie in brains, talents and looks and her future looks much brighter than Brandgelina&#039;s. Keep to news, MacLean&#039;s, you don&#039;t have a clue about popular culture. I hope you are proud of the spiteful and stupid women you have brought to your site. They are not welcome in many places anymore, and reading their deluded hate rants should tell you why. Jolie has repeatedly said that the affair started during filming, and they are still denying it. Congratulations on attracting the bottom feeders of the internet. I will ensure that your magazine and all affiliated productions are boycotted by myself and extended family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so disgusted that such a misogynistic piece of crap is coming from a Canadian source, and from a magazine that purports to be a seeing the truth about the press maumors were spread by her then husband anews magazine, not a tabloid of the worst kind. To Alissa, and all the other supporters of the Brandgelina child collecting PR machine, Aniston did not ask to be involved in their disgraceful lifestyle, and she is merely commenting on comments made recently by Jolie. After keeping quiet about her husband&#8217;s affair for the last three years, not four, Jolie has started telling anyone who will listen about falling in love with Aniston&#8217;s husband while they were still married. A new article released today in the UK, has her saying &#8220;their family&#8221; started during the filming, as her son Maddox was there. It is Jolie that will not stop bragging about her she acquired Pitt (just in time as she had filmed only flops in years) .Aniston was asked her opinion on Jolie&#8217;s comments, and she said they were &#8220;uncool&#8221;, the understatement of the decade in most people&#8217;s views.<br />
It never fails to astound me how this couple, who have thrown a &#8220;family&#8221; of six children together  in three years, several months of those while Pitt was married, only to sell their privacy to the highest bidder and then drag them around the world constantly, denying them friends or stability, are praised. Meanwhile a woman whose husband betrayed her in a cruel and public way  including allowing his girlfriend to spread malicious lies that she would not have children, is the one who is mocked while the adulterers continue to discuss her whenever either one has a movie to promote one of the cruelest and baffling things I have ever witnessed. I am really ashamed that it is a Canadian news magazine attacking this woman, while the rest of the world is finally waking up to the constant taunts of Jolie towards her babydaddy&#8217;s ex, and saying they have had enough. In case MacLean&#8217;s hasn&#8217;t noticed, Jolie has proven she can&#8217;t act and Pitt has aged twenty years in the last three, Aniston is the one who has a broader fan base, and she has re-established a production company after leaving Plan B  with her divorce. St. Jolie would never have been considered for A Mighty Heart if Aniston had not acquired it to produce. She easily trumps Jolie in brains, talents and looks and her future looks much brighter than Brandgelina&#8217;s. Keep to news, MacLean&#8217;s, you don&#8217;t have a clue about popular culture. I hope you are proud of the spiteful and stupid women you have brought to your site. They are not welcome in many places anymore, and reading their deluded hate rants should tell you why. Jolie has repeatedly said that the affair started during filming, and they are still denying it. Congratulations on attracting the bottom feeders of the internet. I will ensure that your magazine and all affiliated productions are boycotted by myself and extended family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janice</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-3/#comment-48900</link>
		<dc:creator>janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48900</guid>
		<description>alissa. she passed a comment about and article that was just a few weeks ago . and she has moved on with a younger and hotter guy. but flapperlips and pirr have not and bring her name up at all the movies when they want pr. so don.t blame the ex for their behaviour please be honest as you are a woman and i am sure you would be much more bitchy if this happened to you and your ex and his mistress lied about you every change they got. as for the beautiful family there are parents longong for those adopted kids she took instead of helping those people get their lives back and helping them keep their kids that is a true and pure helper of people. people should question and not just acept what people that blow their own trumpets when ever they do good but live the most decadent and wasteful lives in castles and buy the most redicules furniture and have six nannies because they are to busy to look after their own kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alissa. she passed a comment about and article that was just a few weeks ago . and she has moved on with a younger and hotter guy. but flapperlips and pirr have not and bring her name up at all the movies when they want pr. so don.t blame the ex for their behaviour please be honest as you are a woman and i am sure you would be much more bitchy if this happened to you and your ex and his mistress lied about you every change they got. as for the beautiful family there are parents longong for those adopted kids she took instead of helping those people get their lives back and helping them keep their kids that is a true and pure helper of people. people should question and not just acept what people that blow their own trumpets when ever they do good but live the most decadent and wasteful lives in castles and buy the most redicules furniture and have six nannies because they are to busy to look after their own kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48899</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48899</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Jennifer Aniston should stop complaining about Angelia Jolie and Brad Pitt.   They have clearly moved on with their beautiful family.    She&#039;s whining about something that happened years ago.
Jen - SHUT UP and go away already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Jennifer Aniston should stop complaining about Angelia Jolie and Brad Pitt.   They have clearly moved on with their beautiful family.    She&#8217;s whining about something that happened years ago.<br />
Jen &#8211; SHUT UP and go away already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janice</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48898</link>
		<dc:creator>janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48898</guid>
		<description>are you people like meg and the elkes of the lets bash a woman with class and dignity and praise a woman who has no shame of breaking up a marriage and having kids without the marriage all such losers that you praise a woman like jolie. they sell their children to the mags and their private and sick family photos are out there for all the world to see. brad the balless male who has no personality and not selfworth was luck y to have a woman like aniston in his life she at least did not show the world what a stupid and brainless man he is. and to the person that says woman that are dumped use her as there idol get a life and some brains  woman are strong and can overcome anything if they have the right upbringing by strong and healthy parents who have morals and a belief in god. jolie will always be known as a homewrecker and pitt as a balless manny. aniston is still famous as she was before pitt and will after him., and will always be classy and a woman with strong morals by woman and men with a brain that can see through your idols decayed life styles and pr. as for the writer of this article woman like you are dime a dozen and i pray another woman does not take your partner so you can be called sprinster and needy as well as any other name by people that gloat about pitt and jolieflapperlips . just remember what you do to others bites you in the ass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you people like meg and the elkes of the lets bash a woman with class and dignity and praise a woman who has no shame of breaking up a marriage and having kids without the marriage all such losers that you praise a woman like jolie. they sell their children to the mags and their private and sick family photos are out there for all the world to see. brad the balless male who has no personality and not selfworth was luck y to have a woman like aniston in his life she at least did not show the world what a stupid and brainless man he is. and to the person that says woman that are dumped use her as there idol get a life and some brains  woman are strong and can overcome anything if they have the right upbringing by strong and healthy parents who have morals and a belief in god. jolie will always be known as a homewrecker and pitt as a balless manny. aniston is still famous as she was before pitt and will after him., and will always be classy and a woman with strong morals by woman and men with a brain that can see through your idols decayed life styles and pr. as for the writer of this article woman like you are dime a dozen and i pray another woman does not take your partner so you can be called sprinster and needy as well as any other name by people that gloat about pitt and jolieflapperlips . just remember what you do to others bites you in the ass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48897</guid>
		<description>Adultery??  Who said there was adultery?  when did falling in love with, become attracted to your married co-worker become adultery?

Would feeling hate sufficient to fantasize about  slapping your boss in the face and kicking his groin constitute assault and harm?  No??

Then there was no adultery though Brad and Angelina may have been attracted to each other and fell in love with each other.

And oh, BTW, don&#039;t forget, the filming of M&amp;MS went waaaayyyy over schedule - right until March 2005 just before the premiere and long after Jennifer Aniston herself said she knew her marriage was over in Summer of 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adultery??  Who said there was adultery?  when did falling in love with, become attracted to your married co-worker become adultery?</p>
<p>Would feeling hate sufficient to fantasize about  slapping your boss in the face and kicking his groin constitute assault and harm?  No??</p>
<p>Then there was no adultery though Brad and Angelina may have been attracted to each other and fell in love with each other.</p>
<p>And oh, BTW, don&#8217;t forget, the filming of M&amp;MS went waaaayyyy over schedule &#8211; right until March 2005 just before the premiere and long after Jennifer Aniston herself said she knew her marriage was over in Summer of 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j scrilla</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48896</link>
		<dc:creator>j scrilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48896</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of speculation concerning the very personal event between two married people that happen to be famous celebrities.  Brad known for his against-the-grain roles, and jen for her looks and ability to be dumb and attractive simultaneously in a fun loving way.  I&#039;ve never been a huge fan of jen&#039;s acting (Anyone ever seen The Good Girl? Horrible! Accent was totally off as well....) but I guess I was a fan of who I imagined her to be like the characters in The Office or Friends.

Nevertheless I think it&#039;s f*cked up what Angelina did. Yes, brad allowed himself to be tempted by her and left a marriage.  But it was too easy.  Angelina is gorgeous, hot, strange.....and if brad was bored or looking for something deeper...more layers in a person......it would seem to me that Angelina would present that. I&#039;m going out on a limb here since I don&#039;t know what happened, but it&#039;s like offering someone a hamburger from Mc Donald&#039;s or a sirloin from some expensive steakhouse.  What are they going to take?  The normal mass-produced crap or the one-time-made-fresh stuff?  The sad thing about this is that it was too easy.  It was too easy for beautiful Angelina to be single during Mr. and Mrs. Smith and sweep him off his feet. But although gorgeous and mysterious....Jolie hasn&#039;t always been Hollywood&#039;s favorite.  It&#039;s not until she cleaned up her act and started adopting a bunch of kids and acting important that people started respecting her.  How was Jolie able to come out of her non-popular category and rise to AMAZING status category?  A few years ago she was getting tattoos of old dudes (billy) on her body, talking about screwing him in the lemo on the way to an event on camera, kissing her brother (gross!), and doing a lot of drugs while wearing a vial of blood and bragging about it.  She was quoted in an interview saying &quot;I&#039;m so glad I adopted Maddox because now when there&#039;s something wrong I can&#039;t just go pick up a drink.&quot; WTF lady!  You are the last person who should be watching kids.  They are not a cure for addiction.  That statement makes her sound more self-involved than I thought originally.

Brad has dated several of the hollywood hotties from Gwen Paltrow, to Jen (the normal one), to now being married  and having 409845098 children with the weird hot one.

I don&#039;t know what to think of this article except that I do see how Jen&#039;s allure has definitely slipped.  She was the average girl who got her hot man stolen by the way better looking girl and now this Average Loveable Girl can&#039;t get any men.  She was definitely dumped by Mayer according to various magazines so I don&#039;t see how going so public w/ the on again/off again relationship can help Jen&#039;s status.  John Mayer seems like a retard, anyone who dates Jessica Simpson and calls themselves an artist disqualifies themselves from having anything meaningful to say. In like five minutes you could probably hear everything Simpson had to say about every topic that&#039;s ever crossed her mind in her entire life.  She was retarded for dumping Lashey (sp?) thinking she could land on her &quot;blossoming&quot; acting and singing &quot;career&quot; when she can&#039;t act for sh*t and her voice could break windows.  Too bad they don&#039;t have jobs for D size tits because then she wouldn&#039;t be out of work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of speculation concerning the very personal event between two married people that happen to be famous celebrities.  Brad known for his against-the-grain roles, and jen for her looks and ability to be dumb and attractive simultaneously in a fun loving way.  I&#8217;ve never been a huge fan of jen&#8217;s acting (Anyone ever seen The Good Girl? Horrible! Accent was totally off as well&#8230;.) but I guess I was a fan of who I imagined her to be like the characters in The Office or Friends.</p>
<p>Nevertheless I think it&#8217;s f*cked up what Angelina did. Yes, brad allowed himself to be tempted by her and left a marriage.  But it was too easy.  Angelina is gorgeous, hot, strange&#8230;..and if brad was bored or looking for something deeper&#8230;more layers in a person&#8230;&#8230;it would seem to me that Angelina would present that. I&#8217;m going out on a limb here since I don&#8217;t know what happened, but it&#8217;s like offering someone a hamburger from Mc Donald&#8217;s or a sirloin from some expensive steakhouse.  What are they going to take?  The normal mass-produced crap or the one-time-made-fresh stuff?  The sad thing about this is that it was too easy.  It was too easy for beautiful Angelina to be single during Mr. and Mrs. Smith and sweep him off his feet. But although gorgeous and mysterious&#8230;.Jolie hasn&#8217;t always been Hollywood&#8217;s favorite.  It&#8217;s not until she cleaned up her act and started adopting a bunch of kids and acting important that people started respecting her.  How was Jolie able to come out of her non-popular category and rise to AMAZING status category?  A few years ago she was getting tattoos of old dudes (billy) on her body, talking about screwing him in the lemo on the way to an event on camera, kissing her brother (gross!), and doing a lot of drugs while wearing a vial of blood and bragging about it.  She was quoted in an interview saying &#8220;I&#8217;m so glad I adopted Maddox because now when there&#8217;s something wrong I can&#8217;t just go pick up a drink.&#8221; WTF lady!  You are the last person who should be watching kids.  They are not a cure for addiction.  That statement makes her sound more self-involved than I thought originally.</p>
<p>Brad has dated several of the hollywood hotties from Gwen Paltrow, to Jen (the normal one), to now being married  and having 409845098 children with the weird hot one.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to think of this article except that I do see how Jen&#8217;s allure has definitely slipped.  She was the average girl who got her hot man stolen by the way better looking girl and now this Average Loveable Girl can&#8217;t get any men.  She was definitely dumped by Mayer according to various magazines so I don&#8217;t see how going so public w/ the on again/off again relationship can help Jen&#8217;s status.  John Mayer seems like a retard, anyone who dates Jessica Simpson and calls themselves an artist disqualifies themselves from having anything meaningful to say. In like five minutes you could probably hear everything Simpson had to say about every topic that&#8217;s ever crossed her mind in her entire life.  She was retarded for dumping Lashey (sp?) thinking she could land on her &#8220;blossoming&#8221; acting and singing &#8220;career&#8221; when she can&#8217;t act for sh*t and her voice could break windows.  Too bad they don&#8217;t have jobs for D size tits because then she wouldn&#8217;t be out of work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenhags</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenhags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48895</guid>
		<description>Your article is bullseye regarding Jen&#039;s Pity Party.    I think she&#039;ll   have a hard time getting over Brad.  Gwyneth P.  admitted in one of her interviews that it took her 5 years to get over Brad Pitt, how long will  Jen get over  Brad..... hmmm  i guess as long as she breath !!! Pity party forever bwahahahahah!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is bullseye regarding Jen&#8217;s Pity Party.    I think she&#8217;ll   have a hard time getting over Brad.  Gwyneth P.  admitted in one of her interviews that it took her 5 years to get over Brad Pitt, how long will  Jen get over  Brad&#8230;.. hmmm  i guess as long as she breath !!! Pity party forever bwahahahahah!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48894</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48894</guid>
		<description>BTW Jenfraud is a relative of Jolies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Jenfraud is a relative of Jolies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48893</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48893</guid>
		<description>She is beautiful and looks very happy.  It&#039;s so sad the media continues to generate negative publicity for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is beautiful and looks very happy.  It&#8217;s so sad the media continues to generate negative publicity for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48892</link>
		<dc:creator>Marl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48892</guid>
		<description>Spinster? Spinster? A woman who uses the word spinster in this day and age has some problems of her own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spinster? Spinster? A woman who uses the word spinster in this day and age has some problems of her own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48891</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a man so what do I know, but it seems to me she&#039;s got a great niche carved out as the avatar of single women over 30 -- as witness her latest film, &lt;i&gt;Management&lt;/i&gt;, in which she essentially plays herself: a single, career-oriented woman over 30 from a medium-sized American city who finds true love etc.  And actually I found her very convincing in the role.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a man so what do I know, but it seems to me she&#8217;s got a great niche carved out as the avatar of single women over 30 &#8212; as witness her latest film, <i>Management</i>, in which she essentially plays herself: a single, career-oriented woman over 30 from a medium-sized American city who finds true love etc.  And actually I found her very convincing in the role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48890</link>
		<dc:creator>Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48890</guid>
		<description>Absolutely brilliant article.  We have been inundated with Poor Jen stories for four years and we read the poor, poor Vanity Fair article where she cried copious tears and moaned about her life followed by yearly visits to Oprah for loving support about that mean, mean, Angelina.  So, anyone who says that she has never spoken about her marriage is either clueless or a liar.  She has used this situation to further her career and she has loved being America&#039;s most famous dumpee.  She has dated several men since her divorce yet she has not moved on. He has publicly become a father six times over and still she clings to him.  Every public event for Brangelina is followed by a sighting, story, or new relationship for Aniston and she plays the press as beautifully as her nemesis.  And for the last time it is not possible to steal a man from another woman. A real woman would acknowledge that her relationship was in trouble (as had been reported for about two years prior to their divorce) and she would have looked stronger for it (see Uma Thurman for instructions.)  Instead her team decided to portray her as the wronged woman again and again only now more and more people are sick of the story.  And in the long run it is not making anyone go see her crappy movies it only makes those women who relate to her boring nothingness feel better about their own lives while stoking their own insecurities and venting their rage on the &quot;other&quot; woman.  They say over and over that Jen is a girl&#039;s girl yet they all ignore the fact that she heaps praise upon her ex while dumping on the &quot;other&quot; woman.  Not a lot of female solidarity.  Jen, you&#039;re almost 40 years old, it&#039;s time to grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely brilliant article.  We have been inundated with Poor Jen stories for four years and we read the poor, poor Vanity Fair article where she cried copious tears and moaned about her life followed by yearly visits to Oprah for loving support about that mean, mean, Angelina.  So, anyone who says that she has never spoken about her marriage is either clueless or a liar.  She has used this situation to further her career and she has loved being America&#8217;s most famous dumpee.  She has dated several men since her divorce yet she has not moved on. He has publicly become a father six times over and still she clings to him.  Every public event for Brangelina is followed by a sighting, story, or new relationship for Aniston and she plays the press as beautifully as her nemesis.  And for the last time it is not possible to steal a man from another woman. A real woman would acknowledge that her relationship was in trouble (as had been reported for about two years prior to their divorce) and she would have looked stronger for it (see Uma Thurman for instructions.)  Instead her team decided to portray her as the wronged woman again and again only now more and more people are sick of the story.  And in the long run it is not making anyone go see her crappy movies it only makes those women who relate to her boring nothingness feel better about their own lives while stoking their own insecurities and venting their rage on the &#8220;other&#8221; woman.  They say over and over that Jen is a girl&#8217;s girl yet they all ignore the fact that she heaps praise upon her ex while dumping on the &#8220;other&#8221; woman.  Not a lot of female solidarity.  Jen, you&#8217;re almost 40 years old, it&#8217;s time to grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48889</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48889</guid>
		<description>And when did Maclean&#039;s, Canada&#039;s news magazine, morph into the lowest form of supermarket check out tabloid crap? Just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And when did Maclean&#8217;s, Canada&#8217;s news magazine, morph into the lowest form of supermarket check out tabloid crap? Just wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48888</link>
		<dc:creator>sh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48888</guid>
		<description>she just wants the spot light, she doesnt  care what  you say about her, as long as you are talking about her, she may have millions of dollars, but she is not happy,  she is taking advantage of her fans, she is unattractive, and a terrible actress, what have she done to deserve all the attention? but she is always seeking out  the cameras like Paris Hilton,  i can&#039;t blame her, if people are dumb enough to fall it, why not.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she just wants the spot light, she doesnt  care what  you say about her, as long as you are talking about her, she may have millions of dollars, but she is not happy,  she is taking advantage of her fans, she is unattractive, and a terrible actress, what have she done to deserve all the attention? but she is always seeking out  the cameras like Paris Hilton,  i can&#8217;t blame her, if people are dumb enough to fall it, why not.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: like that matters</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48887</link>
		<dc:creator>like that matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48887</guid>
		<description>Passive.

Agreesive.

Ms. Whiniston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passive.</p>
<p>Agreesive.</p>
<p>Ms. Whiniston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor Lisboa Gorgulho</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48886</link>
		<dc:creator>victor Lisboa Gorgulho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48886</guid>
		<description>you REALLY don&#039;t know what you are saying, do you ?
I mean, I&#039;m sure right now Aniston is somewhere living her fortunate life, while you are writing this piece of shit about her.. She must reaaaaally care. Oh,sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you REALLY don&#8217;t know what you are saying, do you ?<br />
I mean, I&#8217;m sure right now Aniston is somewhere living her fortunate life, while you are writing this piece of shit about her.. She must reaaaaally care. Oh,sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenfraud</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenfraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48885</guid>
		<description>Laura
Nov 22, 2008 13:2  Your comment REALLY proves the point the writer is making.  Fearful women afraid of being dumped, see Aniston as their Champion of Fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura<br />
Nov 22, 2008 13:2  Your comment REALLY proves the point the writer is making.  Fearful women afraid of being dumped, see Aniston as their Champion of Fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48884</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48884</guid>
		<description>You are the poor pathetic needy one! I do not understand how another woman could write such things and make assumptions about another woman that was left by her husband and cheated on.

You are a bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are the poor pathetic needy one! I do not understand how another woman could write such things and make assumptions about another woman that was left by her husband and cheated on.</p>
<p>You are a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48883</link>
		<dc:creator>tia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48883</guid>
		<description>ouch!

but so true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ouch!</p>
<p>but so true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenfraud</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenfraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48882</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU for this article!!  You are DEAD ON about this loser.   She has been posing as an &quot;America&#039;s Sweetheart&quot;, while she is far from the sweet innocent victim who was wronged.  She has thrown her marriage away long before Angelina showed up.  When Brad made that phone call after her &quot;uncool&quot; remark, look what she had to do on Oprah to BACKPEDAL!   She knows that HE KNOWS THE TRUTH, and can crush her to pieces at any time.   I really wish he buries her for her FRAUD for good.  The next time she opens her mouth blaming Angelina, Brad WILL crush her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU for this article!!  You are DEAD ON about this loser.   She has been posing as an &#8220;America&#8217;s Sweetheart&#8221;, while she is far from the sweet innocent victim who was wronged.  She has thrown her marriage away long before Angelina showed up.  When Brad made that phone call after her &#8220;uncool&#8221; remark, look what she had to do on Oprah to BACKPEDAL!   She knows that HE KNOWS THE TRUTH, and can crush her to pieces at any time.   I really wish he buries her for her FRAUD for good.  The next time she opens her mouth blaming Angelina, Brad WILL crush her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollywood Central &#187; Headline Of The Week Weak</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48881</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollywood Central &#187; Headline Of The Week Weak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48881</guid>
		<description>[...] Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen How did Jennifer Aniston, once America’s Sweetheart, morph into America’s Spinster? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen How did Jennifer Aniston, once America’s Sweetheart, morph into America’s Spinster? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: why god hates me » Headline Of The Week Weak</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/poor-needy-pathetic-desperate-jen/comment-page-2/#comment-48880</link>
		<dc:creator>why god hates me » Headline Of The Week Weak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=818#comment-48880</guid>
		<description>[...] Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen How did Jennifer Aniston, once America’s Sweetheart, morph into America’s Spinster? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Poor needy pathetic desperate Jen How did Jennifer Aniston, once America’s Sweetheart, morph into America’s Spinster? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

