None dare call it a desperate scramble to the lowest possible moral ground to stay in power!

by kadyomalley on Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:08pm - 202 Comments

Oh wait – I guess ITQ just did, huh?

From the virtual desk of the Prime Minister, courtesy of the press gallery listserv, comes the following missive – which, under normal circumstances, would seem to the kind of potentially incendiary info dump that a party wouldn’t want to put out directly, but would instead farm out to a friendly media outlet, a sympathetic blogger or some other officially unaffiliated conduit:

from Gallery-Tribune <pressres2@parl.gc.ca>
date Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:32 PM
subject NDP Caucus transcript – secret deal
mailed-by parl.gc.ca
NDP Conference Call: Part 1 – and

NDP Conference Call – Part 2

Karine Leroux

Office of the Prime Minister / Cabinet du Premier ministre
Deputy Press Secretary / Attachée de presse adjointe

I’ll have more to say about this later this afternoon, most likely, once the NDP has had the chance to respond to the allegations, and I’ve gotten my head around the idea of PMO being okay with the notion of recording another party’s caucus conference call.  In the meantime, here’s the full text of the Secret NDP Caucus Call That May Indeed Change Everything, But Possibly Not How PMO Might Have Hoped after the jump:

(emphasis in the original)

NDP Conference Call: Part 1 –

Judy:  Judy, and when I hear the beep stopping, I’m going to start the meeting.

Hello?

Judy: Hang on everybody, you don’t even need to give your name yet, I’m going to do a check in a second.

Hello?

Judy: Hi there, it’s okay, it’s Judy, we’re all set.

Okay Judy.

Jack: Hi Judy, we’re all, we got a bunch of caucus members here, we’ll just wait for your instructions, we’ll leave it on mute in the meantime.

Judy: Okay.  Alright, I think I’ll start, uhm, it’s Judy, we’ve got exactly one hour and no more.  We’re going to run this meeting very tight.  I want everyone to put your phones on mute, also please do not anytime during this call, put your line on hold, because that causes a noise for everybody.  We’re going to give an update, an over view from Jack, a report on what’s happening procedurally from the House, generally from Libby, and then thirdly a overview on the issue of platform and policy, from Kathleen, and then a chance for each caucus member to give a very succinct and brief point to indicate their concerns or issues that they would like to see raised by our team as we prepare any further documents.  So, as you all know, we have our next meeting as our regular meeting Monday at ten o’clock, in Ottawa, we will have a chance there to have a more extensive roundtable that in through the week, so please don’t feel you have all the time for questions and concerns, but we will deal with that on Monday, so without further ado, let me call on Jack who must be very tired and going non-stop for the last three days, we appreciate what you’re doing Jack, and I think we’re all excited to get an update.  Thanks, Jack.

Jack: Thank you very much, uh, keep the myth alive that I’m exhausted and working incredibly hard (laughter)  I appreciate you relaying that, I was asleep by ten o’clock last night, and had a very good night, a very good sleep, and that was my Friday night.  So, an update on where we are, the, uh, we’re in the middle of a very historic time, and we’re playing a key role in it, in some ways a catalytic role actually, because as we think back, we’ll realize that nobody really imagined that it would be possible for the Bloc Quebecois, the Liberal party of Canada ever to enter into any kind of a discussion around the future of the country and  it turned out that we were the glue, and spotted and prepared for the opportunity, and had taken the steps that were required so that when that opportunity arose, which was when Mr. Harper made his disastrous strategic error, by not providing stimulus to the economy, and instead playing political games, we were able to move, and things began to move very quickly, however, many obstacles remain in our way, and so we’re in a real battle now.  The negotiating process, I am, by the way in very very regular touch with the leader of the Liberal party, and the leader of the Bloc, frequently every day.  At the same time, negotiation processes are underway, and in fact as we speak, our negotiating team that I’ve named to meet with the Liberal negotiating team are discussing the mechanics of a coalition government, and the form that it would take, the structure of cabinet, the way in which the logistics of a coalition government with the Liberals and the New Democrats would work, the key roles, and dispute resolution mechanisms, timelines, et cetera.

05:23 –

All of the logistics issues that you would expect would be a part of such a discussion are being negotiated now we hope that that part of the negotiations would be completed today.  Our negotiating team consists of Brian Topp, who negotiated as a senior member of the Romano team in Saskatchewan, negotiating a similar coalition with the Liberal party there, and of course you know Brian is our campaign co-chair director.  Ann McGrath, in her chief of staff role, she’s also wearing the president of the party hat still, and so she’s got several hats on at the moment.  Ed Broadbent, Alan Blakely, Dawn Black, as a member of caucus I’ve selected to participate in this process, someone that I happen to know is also respected and trusted by key Liberals, Tom Mulcair, as our Quebec lieutenant, and Carl Belanger.  Tom and Carl are the negotiating team with the Bloc team, and Brian and Dawn Black are negotiating with the Liberal team.  We’re starting with two party talks, this will resolve itself into a tripartite conversation before the weekend is up, and the goal is to produce by the end of the weekend, an agreement on the machinery of the coalition, which would be signed off, particularly by the NDP and Liberals, but endorsed by the Bloc, and an agreement on policy program for the coalition, that would have three party agreement.  I can’t go into the details on all of this stuff, particularly the machinery, but it’s in the process of negotiation, and we could consume an awful lot of time speculating about it, so I don’t propose that we spend that time today on this particular matter of question.  But instead, there’s a golden opportunity today, for you to provide input on the policy matters, you can be assured that we have looked at our program, we’ve looked at our platform, we’ve looked at what I’ve been saying about economic stimulus, we’ve been in close consultations with the leadership of the labour movement around some of their key ideas and they’ve been providing terrific support, including at a high-level early morning meeting this morning, so much of what you would have want to see, it’s probably already there, you’ll hear a bit more about it later, but there’s an opportunity to touch base with all of you, because in the end, you’re going to be intimately a part of the delivery of all of this, and so that’s why we’re having this meeting at this point in time.

08:32 –

NDP Conference Call – Part 2

62:59

Jack: I made a list Judy, so I’ll take a whack and you’ll say if I’ve missed any…

Judy: Ya. Meetings, confidentiality, what can be said. Go ahead.

Jack: First, do MP’s have to be in Ottawa until we have a better sense of the potential confidence motion stakes. You have to remain agile. And with Ottawa being the base. Uh, and so when you’re organising your community meetings make sure there’s a speaker phone facility, or a webcam. Secondly, I believe that we should get immediately into the driver’s seats on organizing these community meetings, you have people who worked on your campaign who are exactly the kind of people, whether in labour movements, labour councils, uh, childcare groups, environmental groups, these are people that need to be pulled together.  You get them together, and then they’ll take it from there, it doesn’t have to be your meeting, it shouldn’t be your meeting, but of course you’ll be there as the MP, and you’re part of the coalition, and you’re consulting with the community to make sure they’re open, so if anyone wants to come and protest and say it’s a bad idea, be there to make a real news event out of it, the youth comes with the emotion in favour of the coalition and an action plan coming from Thursday night, particularly focused on the weekend, with petitioning, and phone in shows, and god knows what else, a letter writing, one of the goals here is to of course, recruit as many names, addresses, emails, phone numbers as possibly can, because this coalition will need the support of these people, and then we will need their support when we get an election.  Now, will there be an independent NDP caucus, yes.  BQ stability issues, worry about BQ potentially being off-side, we’re taking that very much into account.  We have numerous strategies designed to deal with it, I actually believe they’re the least of our problems, but in case I’m wrong, let’s just say we have strategies, this whole thing would not have happened if the moves hadn’t have been made with the Bloc to lock them in early, because you couldn’t put three people together in one, in three hours.  The first part was done a long time ago, I won’t go into details, and the managing expectations, lists from groups, actually, the wisest people in the groups are already coming to the conclusion, some of them are in direct contact, saying probably wouldn’t be too helpful if we had long lists of stuff, right?  What we really want is just to get Harper out and get the new group in because it’s going to be a hell of a lot better for everything we believe in, correct?  Correct.  So let’s stay on that track, and not start debating whether or not it’s twenty five percent change or fifteen percent change over here, let’s get them out, on the basis of unity not the basis of division.  Somebody asked about Bill Casey, absolutely, in the game, uh, on confidentiality, we now have to get out and defend the idea of the coalition.  This is not a secret that it’s been discussed, the various elements that are in it, you can say it’s all about getting the economy going, and transforming the economy for the twenty first century, use everything that you’ve seen in my speeches up until now, that you’ve all been using so well particularly when I’ve seen you on panels, and by the way, our team on panels, everybody, staff and MPs, rocking, absolutely rocking doing us proud, so yes, there is a coalition, we’re fighting for it, we’re trying to make it happen, we think it’s a good idea for Canada, the majority of Canadians voted to go in a different direction than Harper’s taking us, you can’t trust him, no matter anything, throw him out.  What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?  He was given a minority, and he refused to work with the other parties, he had 38% of the vote and he’s trying to govern like he had 100% of the power, he’s the one who’s got democracy wrong, not us.  So do not be defensive, to work among what we are doing is to give effect to the wishes of the majority of Canadians, have no doubt about that. The coalition for Canada, I love the idea, it could be a deal-breaker for the Bloc (laughter) so if we don’t go, we call it “The Coalition for Canada and Quebec,” (lots of laughter).  Well, welcome to the real world of….that’s not funny

Jack: And let me come to, I know it’s complicated, so let’s just be wise about how we put this thing together.  I think that there were many good comments that were developed from this, right from Aboriginal, which was on our mind, right through to many of these other suggestions and we will do our very best to put this together.  And I’ll just say one other thing about the issue of the Bloc:  nothing could be better for our country, than to have the fifty members who’ve been elected to separate Quebec to actually helping to make Canada a better place.  I think we just approach it on that basis, and say we’re willing to make Canada happen, here’s other things that we’re going to be investing in and transforming together, they’re willing to work with us, we’ll accept that offer.  What will be important to point out is that this will be an NDP-Liberal coalition, which is supported by the Bloc, with policy ideas that the coalition is bringing forward.  Okay?  And that’s going to be helpful to you in your dealing with those that have concerns, because they, you can see where Harper’s going here, he’s going to say it’s the socialists and the separatists and the opportunists getting together.  You know?  Those are their talking points, and so we just need to push back.  I want to thank everybody for the input, I would get going this weekend on getting groups together, start talking about organizing those Thursday meetings, act as the catalyst to make it happen, and then just let it go, it’ll roar, and it’ll be very exciting.  If you’re in a larger city, and there’s several of you, or if you’re in the largest city and you’re on your own, act as the catalyst anyway, chances are there’s a bunch of Liberals in the other ridings on whom we want pressure placed, as I mentioned at the outset of the conversation.  I guess we’re at the end.

Judy: I just want to add one thing, and that is so the major thing is here that the message we’re focused on the message, so that’s not confidential, what’s confidential is strategy, the discussion, details, the speculation about the other parties and their motivation and what they will or they won’t do, we should not talk at all about war rooms, or campaigns in that sense.  We’re building, trying to create a coalition government that will be a Liberal-NDP coalition that will be supported by the Bloc and that’s the message that we want to get out, nothing about the discussions in the background, and when in doubt, call, probably Brad, and Brad on that issue and on the whole issue of the campaign, and organizing meetings, people will want to reach you quickly, what’s the best way?

Jack Harris:  Judy, Jack Harris here, I know it’s a structure question, but I’m at a loss at this point to know whether we’re talking about a short-term, quick economic stimulus coalition, or are we talking about something that could last two or three years, this is kind of important in our own minds, as well because aside from economic stimulus of course, this coalition will have to govern on every part of the government, of the legislative of the –

Judy:  Okay, let me ask Jack to answer that and then Brad, you give the best contact information.

Jack Layton: Longer term.  Not short term.

Judy: Now, Brad, you’re going to be in demand, what’s the best way to get to you quickly?

Brad: For folks that are going to be holding panels that we’re setting up, we’re going to be briefing you and your media office, for your press secretaries, the press secretaries have been divided into thirds, so every member of caucus has been assigned, so those folks are going to be available to you, and working very closely with me, and I discourage anyone from phoning me, the smartest move would be to give me as much heads-up as possible, I’m on a panel in two minutes, is highly unhelpful, and I will fail you miserably, and I know some times that situation has to happen and it’s understandable, but obviously calling me on my cell is the fastest way or by sending me an email, at [redacted].

Judy: Alright, and is it you, not just on panels, organizing meetings, events, here at the grassroots level, who’s the best person?

Brad: It will not be me, I will not be able to assist with your meetings on the Thursday night, we will assign a member of the team to that.

Bookmark and Share
  • Lyndie

    I’d say someone was not happy with what the NDP/Bloc/Liberals were up to, so they invited a conservative to listen in…….BINGO tape recording of the whole meeting.

    Did I read that 700 billion in tax cuts to Quebec????? Payment for what!!!!

    NDP/Bloc had no intention of working with the minority Harper government. The GG had better have her eyes open to this and not allow the coalition gov’t.

    Let the Harper gov’t get on with the job at hand.

  • Karol

    Jack, I said that taxation is more effective in stealing profits from private enterprise than outright nationalisation and It was you who confused stealing of profits with stifling private enterprise.
    If you nationalise industry you have to manage it and if you do not know how to manage it profits disappear and you have to run it for a loss and subsidise it from other business that you nationalised that still generates profit (you did not mismanaged it yet to a point of nonprofitability). If you keep on taxing business you do not have to manage business you tax and you do not risk any loss in case it fails. What is so difficult to understand?? Even communist China walked away from outright ownership and switched to taxation.

  • Bruno Hildebrando

    Hi Kady,

    the fact that the Tories did listen in the NDP`s conference call is not unusual. What`s odd on this is the Tories have let the story spread out . For sure it`s your job to publish what you have find out, but it`s not the first time – and won`t be the last, I`m sure – that a party spy on other one. That happens more often than the average of us can imagine. For sure now it`s time to investigate and look for the responsible for this.
    But still it`s funny seeing Liberals and NDP inviting the Bloc to form a Canadian government. At the top of it, 90% of the Bloc`s budget is financed by… the Federal government!
    I thought principles should be in first place rather than ideology or political interest.
    You`re absolutelly right – in a parliamentary system, oposition parties talk all the time about bringing down the government. There`s nothing against democracy. However, there`s still a concern about legitimacy – Stephane Dion lost the election and the Liberals got fewer seats than ever before. Legally a coalition can be formed – as far as I understood – but the leader of the Oposition Party doesn`t have the support from voters, what makes us thinking “what`s about us, who vote and pay taxes? Should we have a voice on this matter?”
    By the way, was the financial plan so bad that the Liberals + NDP couldn`t support? Or that would be the cuts on funding the political parties? Now that Harper withdrew this motion, what`s next? Will the Libs + NDP give up the idea of inviting the separatists to form a federal government? (separatists running the federal government…. hmm…).
    Political instability is not a wise option in the middle of a economic crisis.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Karol, if you nationalise private enterprise you take away all the profits from the owners, not only from the current owners’ point of view (since they are forced to sell) but, practically speaking, from the future owners too (i.e. the government) since state enterprise hasn’t been good at profits.

    I’m abandoning the field to you and your imaginary friend.

  • Karol

    Jack, I was just warming up; you twisted my statements regarding stealing of profits thru taxation, you did not explain properly value theory in socialist experiment and now you want to take a hike just like your socialist expert friend.
    That is how you carry a discussion with lefties.
    I will make it easy for you; what determines value of a product in capitalist economy??

  • baldygirl

    What I find ridiculous is the notion that this was at all a ‘secret deal.’

    It’s so back-room and seamy, THE NOTION OF AMICABLE COOPERATION AMONG MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT.

    Cripes.

  • Pat

    Maybe, just maybe, a Dipper or Liberal made the invite as they saw that this disgusting Commie/Socialist power grab might just work and they had compassion for the country.

    Jack is just another nutz commie trying to install his brand of “Goodness” into Canada…and I did say into.

    Pat

  • baldygirl

    Pat

    Commie/Socialist?

    Commie? Really?

    . . . did you finish high school?

  • Anonymous

    What’s this business about Bill Casey? Could they be trying to draw him into the coalition as well? If so, good move.

  • don

    did not check/but how many times has any party got a majority ? if the results are always a govt. without more than 50% of the seats,and how could a party get that many with the separatists of quebec getting 40-50 of the seats. this type of coalition fiddling could go on time after time. with no govt running anything for more than a couple of months,what a way to run a country!

  • jim wilson

    This is nothing but a coup détat. The most detested party in english Canada and also the least successful in the western world teaming up with a bunch of racists and fascists from Quebec who are out to destroy Canada. You guys will be as popular as the feminist fascists that raped Ontario under the banner of the Ontario NDP. You could never form a government by actually getting people to vote for you.

  • Jack Mitchell

    I’m trying to figure out the Conbot reasoning here . . .

    I voted for the Tories = the Tories are the people’s party = the Tories won a plurality = the Tories won the election = the Tories have a mandate from Heaven

    Is that how it goes?

  • Just visiting

    I love all the Cold War, anti-communist rhetoric of the cons here. Shows that if you knock them off stride, they revert back to comfortable rhetorical battles of old, regardless of their irrelevance. Cold War rhetoric is like comfort food for right wingers.

  • GG

    Desperate scramble to the lowest moral ground? No, I call it sleazy. Did Stephen Harper get this idea from Richard Nixon? Maybe he’s hoping we all forgot about that Watergate thing.

  • ron

    Welcome to the end times! no right person would ever expect the NDP and Bloc to govern without takine care of thier interests. Jack Layton is so obsessed with Power its scary

    1. I agree with limiting funding or full elimination on the election funding. All these left wingers love Obama who said no to public financing, and won. why cant that happen in Canada? why should my money go to support those i do not believe in or who care less about Canada and only about power and self interest. If you want to support a party then donate, don’t ask CAnada and those of us who pay lots in taxes to pay for some Splinter group.

    2. auto industry. there are more union members out of worker in forestry in BC now than any potential lossess in Ontario. Giving huge bailout to industry who makes cars we don’t want to buy and pays almost twice as much as Japanese automakers, who have north american plants, is stupid. Why are we rewarding bad business with a bailout? Because of the unions. that is only reason. This will cause Huge western Alienation. But hey there in Ontario and Quebec and they always get what they want. maybe they should all get outside of the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal corridor and see what real people are facing.

    3. All this money the left wants to spend. where does it come from? those of us who work 60+ hours a week, who own our own business , who work to get ahead are having to pay for the social programs and ills of those who want life handed on a platter to them. Get real. Canada is a HAVE country and to hear some of the left talking about it they think we are in toliet. I volunteer in countries around the world 6-8 weeks per year and let me tell you we are pretty well off in canada. our standard of living is so good that we take for granted that a non elected group of people want to take over governing. This will be end of the Liberal party and good for that. It will show people what the Bloc really is which is a second rate spoilt brat. If your kids acted like the Bloc you would send them to thier room. they are like the kid at the checkout who when you give them one candy cry and throw a temper tantrum because they did not get all the candy. when is enough enough? As for the NDP? listen to the recording that was legally obtained and ask “Do you really want this person having anything to do with leading Canada?.” Layton is scary.

  • Michael Dorosh

    Did anyone actually read this in its entirety?

    What exactly did Mr. Layton offer the Bloc Quebecois? He never has the guts to admit to it. “I won’t go into details” he says. Something had to be offered – had to – but he doesn’t say what. He jokes about “Canada and Quebec” as if they are two different nations at one point. How much sovereignty is Mr. Layton willing to surrender in order to finally have a piece of the pie for himself?

  • john

    Does this mean the arrogant Baird will ride transit instead of the limo?

  • Cam

    I’m absolutely ticked off with all parties….Conservatives for calling an election, without any assurance they would gain a majority, then miscalculating the disastrous effects of the Financial forecast….Liberals for trying to regain power, despite having the handicap of a discredited leader…NDP for scheming to be the catalyst for a takeover…the Bloc for (naturally) going for the additional handouts to Quebec, and for the chance to become the effective balance of power.
    For the CPC to risk everything, and for the other parties to proceed with this at a time when we elected them to deal with the economic crisis engulfing the world, as it affects Canada, is absolutely reprehensible!
    Right now, I can’t help but wonder if a benevolent dictator wouldn’t be our best option. No way can I support any party – they are all irresponsible.

  • Michael Dorosh

    Cam, why blame the Conservatives for doing what they were elected to do – guard the public purse? The economy is holding steady and even increased however infinitesimally – compare that to the other nations in the world right now. Remember Layton’s concession speech on election night? I was really proud of him, when he said let’s put the politics behind us, work together, and all that. So why didn’t he mean it? Yet when PM Harper takes the lead in standing firm – which is what we need right now – the left calls it “bullying” and “dictatorship”? It’s unfortunate the $1.95 got conflated into the overall economy.

  • bk

    we have a new “coalition” government usurping power from a duly-elected minority government – and all because the libs stood to lose public funding (don’t think for a moment its because these bastards care about the country; since when have the liberals cared about anything other than grasping after power?)

    we have a new “coalition” cobbled together of a discredited liberal party that mustered barely a quarter of the popular vote, a socialist party that can’t spend your tax dollars fast enough, and a party that wants to see the dissolution of the country

    and we’re getting down on the conservatives on these forums? C’mon, walk up people: you are basically being told by the opposition that election results really don’t count unless the liberals win

    stephan dion has been rejected by his own party (just like canadian voters roundly rejected his carbon tax, too) – AND NOW THE CLUELESS BASTARD IS GOING TO BECOME PRIME MINISTER WITHOUT AN ELECTION BEING CALLED?!?!?!?!?!?!

    this is sick

    now watch the toronto star try to spin this as harper not “being in touch” with the canadian people.

    bullshit

    I don’t recall a plebiscite asking canadians if they wanted a mega-billion dollar “stimulus package” – and I don’t recall canadians being asked if they really wanted a change of government at this critical point in time.

    its time for canadians to get angry – about political correctness, about beverly mclachlin and rosalie abella on the supreme court, about costly and mediocre universities, and about slimy, unprincipled politicians who tell us our votes don’t count

  • Francien Verhoeven

    “I’m trying to figure out the Conbot reasoning here . . .
    I voted for the Tories = the Tories are the people’s party = the Tories won a plurality = the Tories won the election = the Tories have a mandate from Heaven
    Is that how it goes?”

    Tjee, Jack Mitchell, if I were to strutt my stuff I wouldn’t go there!

  • T. Thwim

    Perhaps you weren’t aware, bk, but there was an election not too long ago, and I distinctly remeber a lot of cries for “ABC”

    Considering that the ABCs have more seats in the house, and more votes of the people, this is, in fact, politicians telling us that our votes do count. More importantly, it’s politicians telling each other that if the voters of Canada only afford you a minority government, you better damn well listen.

  • Sceptacular

    Why is anyone here bothering to post anymore? You’ve all obviously picked your sides long before any of this happened. No one’s gonna change their minds here. It’s sneaky criminal spies on one side and disingenuous, power-hungry sore losers on the other.

    At least some of the CPC supporters are pissed at Harper’s shenanigans. True to form, the LPCers aren’t giving an inch, falling back on their right-to-rule high horses.

  • John E

    This is hillarious. Half you guys are just sore because the other guys thought of having a go at a coaliton first. Why didn’t the cons think of it? Doh. Just another reason to punt Mr 2 minority gov’ts Harper.

  • Michael Dorosh

    The ABC cries were idiotic during the election and are idiotic now, because they don’t take into account several factors – chiefly that the Liberals and NDP are very diverse in their political outlook. They’re not the same party, and if they were, well, they wouldn’t be different parties. So the old lie that the parties represent the majority of Canadians is just that. And if one goes back through history, the party in power has almost never, ever represented a true majority of the popular vote. Even the majority governments of the last 50 years or so have always represented only a minority of the popular vote or the population at large due to the multi-party system, and low voter turnout.

    The lie gets worse, because at present, the Liberals are basically a regional party representing urban Toronto and Montreal, in the midst of a leadership crisis. The NDP have never in their history been a viable national party. Even combined, they don’t represent the will of Canadians, and now they need the support of the Bloc Quebecois – a separatist party whose only interest is the “nation of Quebec” – to keep their power. These words are from the lips of Gilles Duceppe in the press conference yesterday.

    So who represents best what Canadians want? No single party, not even the Conservatives, perhaps. Who represents best what they need? I don’t think we need to spend money on an economic crisis that doesn’t exist. I don’t think I need to give 2 dollars of tax money to the BQ every time someone in Quebec votes for them, to fund their advertising for the break-up of Canada. If someone wants to explain that one to me, I’m all ears. And if anyone can explain to me why words like “neo-Con” or “Conbot” keep entering the debate without anyone really understanding what they mean, I’d be interested in that too.

From Macleans