Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

State of play

by Paul Wells on Sunday, November 30, 2008 12:10pm - 33 Comments

The band — covers from the 60s, 70s, 80s and whatever — was really quite good in front of the big Bill Reid sculpture at the Museum of Civilization in Gatineau as the usual Parliament Hill suspects convened for the annual Press Gallery Dinner last night. The speeches — none from any political leader; the prime minister’s boycott of the event has proved contagious, and the shorter event is a blessing — were funny and brief. The attempts at comedy were really bad. The real fun came before dinner, between courses and long after, as journalists, politicians, and former journalists and politicians (i.e. lobbyists) gossipped about the week’s news. Here’s an attempt to tease consensus and narrative out of the jumble:

  • Nobody serious pretends to know how this will end. The task facing the opposition is complex and daunting. Opposition politicians acknowledge that, simply by delaying the vote by a week, Stephen Harper has given them two kinds of opportunity: a chance to get their act together, and a chance for their ramshackle coalition to fall apart. A minority of the Liberals I spoke to expect this attempt to fail.
  • Jean Chrétien is in Florida but he took his cell phone and the numbers of key Liberals and New Democrats. He is in this at Ed Broadbent’s request, because the NDP sees no coherent Liberal leadership capable of delivering the whole party into any deal. Many Liberals deny Chrétien has an active role. But they take his calls.
  • Some Liberals say the Bloc will not accept Michael Ignatieff as PM and that the Bloc insists on Dion, who will do less damage to their long-term chances. Some Liberals say the NDP will not accept Bob Rae as PM. I spoke to an NDP negotiator who said the party does not care who serves as PM. “The Liberal leader will be PM. The Liberals get to decide who their leader is.” The Bloc does not expect cabinet seats. I’ve heard one report that the Bloc is insisting on a French-only requirement for public-service employees in Quebec. This was news to a Bloquiste I quizzed. The NDP does expect cabinet seats; a deal like the 1985 accord in Ontario, which sealed NDP cooperation for a Liberal-only cabinet, is unacceptable to the NDP, who see this as a chance to groom a young generation of New Democrats who are used to the compromises and disciplines of actually governing.
  • I spoke to one of Stephen Harper’s closest collaborators and to several Conservatives more distant from the boss. They were unanimous in acknowledging that, one way or another, the fall economic and fiscal update constituted a misstep of some kind. Where they differ is on what, precisely, the mistake was, and how to recover now.
  • Some Conservatives are very angry with Harper. He called an early election seeking a calmer Parliament in which he could govern without serious interference for a while. Now, at a bare minimum, he’s lost that calm. The bitter, acrimonious autumn he wanted to avoid is here in spades, and according to some in his own party, he’s to blame.
  • He is getting conflicting advice on what to do next. His options, broadly, are Fight or Contrite. Fight is the path he chose on Friday: put every obstacle in the way of the rival coalition, decry its legitimacy, appeal to Canadians. Even prorogue Parliament (Nobody knew whether to believe that theory; one Liberal called it “pulling the fire alarm before your final exam”). Even more. The Conservatives have booked an airplane and campaign buses in the event of an election call. Not because they expect one but because they want to be ready for anything.
  • Contrite looks a little like John Baird cancelling the party-financing stuff on Saturday, but would now have to go much further than that. (Incidentally, I talked to a former cabinet minister and a former senior staffer to a finance minister, from different parties. Both were astonished that a transport minister would be selected to disown part of a finance minister’s fiscal update two days after it was delivered. They saw this as a serious blow to Jim Flaherty’s legitimacy as a minister.) Harper is being advised, not by everyone around him but by some, to take back all of his fall update — pay equity, union-busting, the whole nine yards — fire somebody significant (Flaherty? Guy Giorno?), and promise to better, quickly.
  • But most of his closest advisors would much rather Fight than Contrite.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://badredapple.blogspot.com Michael S

    Stephen Harper is folding like the playground bully he is.

    This is exactly the behavior bullies exhibit when people stand up to them.

  • http://demosthenes.blogspot.com Demosthenes

    But that’s neither here nor there because my point is that the private sector creates wealth while the public sector spends it.

    Well, this certainly isn’t the most ignorant statement on economics I’ve read today.

    (And I read the Wall Street Journal’s Op-Ed page.)

  • Jenn

    I’m not sure, Demosthenes, I thought jwl’s assertion that self-employed, by the nature of being self-employed, pay more taxes than others was pretty ignorant.

    Jwl, you pay more CPP, having to cover both sides of it, but that is (theoretically) going to come back to you anyway. Do you, by chance, expense your gas and depreciate your car, for example?

  • Northern PoV

    “ever since Harper has been PM there has been one crisis after another”
    Sandi: this drama started when Harper stole the “Conservative” brand.

  • http://ragingranter.blogspot.com Raging Ranter

    Nobody can predict what will happen. But Harper’s biggest mistake, far from creating this whole circus this week, will be the furious back-pedaling he’s done this weekend. He reminds me of a cop who sneaks back to the crime scene to plant a “drop” gun on the suspect he just shot… and gets caught doing so. He’d have been better off just leaving the corpse there and filing his report about the incident, making his best case for shooting him.

    Can someone tell me why Conservatives would be so scared of sitting in Opposition again for awhile? If the current Opposition is so completely off base with their economic retardedness (they are) why not let them at the controls for awhile? How long would it take before everyone can clearly see that their rushed-through stimulus has fallen flat on its face? Just like in every other country, at every other period in history when it’s been tried since WWII. If the Conservatives fear that some sort of economic stimulus package might work, then they are just as economically brain-dead as the other parties, and we’d be no worse off with Jack Layton as Fin Min.

    That’s just the economic angle. The political angle is even more farcical. Even under a best-case scenario, under competent leadership, how long could a coalition like that possibly last? A Bloc-supported coalition, with 1/3 NDP cabinet ministers, with…… Bob Rae or Michael Ignatiaff ready to assume the PM’s position in the spring. Only a month ago we were watching the beginnings of a Liberal leadership race that couldn’t attract flies. Manley and McKenna, the only two qualified leadership heavyweights, took scarcely a week to count themselves out. Now the Tories seem genuinely scared of them. Talk about losing nerve.

    The only thing I can think of that has Harper this rattled is the return, however temporary and fleeting, of Jean Chretien. Chretien is the only politician that is perhaps more wiley, more ruthless and more cunning than Harper. Guys like that recognize each other. They can spot a worthy nemesis from a mile away. And seeing Chretien wandering the hallways of Parliament would send shivers up any Conservative spine. The Paul Martin “Juggernaut” was a sad, pathetic joke compared to even the most compromised half-effort that Chretien could put forward. Maybe Harper had nightmares about Chretien swooping in to rescue the progressive forces in this country, and riding off into the sunset next May with a hero’s send-off, having vanquished the evil Neocon Straussian menace that had hijacked the party of John A. MacDonald.

  • Anon

    CTV has a Bob “No Facts” Fife story on a NDP-Bloc coalition before this week.

    The bigger story there is that Mr. Layton’s discussion with his caucus was TAPED by a Conservative MP.

    Boy, there are so many ways this could be bad.

  • whyshouldIsellyourwheat

    Harper’s problem is that he has destroyed any possibility for trust in him by the Opposition Partie. They have to defeat Harper. If they don’t, then they know Harper will destroy them in the future. They can’t let Harper off the hook. Harper went “all-in” with ace high, while the Opposition holds a pair of deuces. They have to call.

    The Conservatives just have to put a new face on their minority. Harper and Flaherty have to fall on their swords, and step aside for a new PM and a new finance minister to seek the confidence of Parliament.

    That is the best option for everybody, including the country.

  • http://demosthenes.blogspot.com Demosthenes

    RR, you are possibly the only person on the planet–aside from maybe jwl–who still thinks that stimulus is somehow “retarded”.

    (But then again, your economic illiteracy was established in that other thread, where you contradicted pretty much every economist out there by claiming that Gordon Brown’s reforms are somehow a bad thing. And you apparently draw your political analogies from 80′s cop movies. So let’s move on.)

    You asked “Can someone tell me why Conservatives would be so scared of sitting in Opposition again for awhile?”

    And the answer? Because Harper’s made a lot of promises he can’t fulfill. The only thing that has kept the otherwise-fractious Conservative coalition together is the promise of the near-dictatorial power that a Canadian Prime Minister enjoys under a majority government. The whole reason he was lifted to power over McKay and the rest by the TheoCons was because of this tacit understanding.

    Now it’s quite likely that he’s not going to be able to deliver; either because he’s climbing down so thoroughly that they no longer trust him, or because he’s simply going to lose power. They may withdraw their support. How long do you think he’ll be able to stave off the ambitions of a Peter McKay or Jim Prentice without it?

    He’s not that wily.

From Macleans