<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;It was incredible to watch&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael S</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53628</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53628</guid>
		<description>A decent human being in Parliament should not be considered an exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decent human being in Parliament should not be considered an exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53627</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53627</guid>
		<description>&quot;some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus&quot;

Oh my</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh my</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: had enough</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53626</link>
		<dc:creator>had enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53626</guid>
		<description>&quot;In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.&quot;

This is a good thing?  The Conservatives delivered a supposedly disastrous economic statement and the opposition parties were celebrating?

Seriously ...celebrating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a good thing?  The Conservatives delivered a supposedly disastrous economic statement and the opposition parties were celebrating?</p>
<p>Seriously &#8230;celebrating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan in van</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53625</link>
		<dc:creator>dan in van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53625</guid>
		<description>Hey Stephen, then I suppose you filed your utter disgust with your own so-called Leader&#039;s explicit agreement, noted in a letter signed to GG Adrienne Clarkson, some 4 years ago? Because that&#039;s exactly what Harper had in mind, if only his attempt to buy a vote -- he apparently still doesn&#039;t know the cost of one -- had panned out.
What ever way this turns out, I&#039;d say Harper&#039;s entering his final act.
Darth Vader? Nay, The Nixon analogy seems quite apropos now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Stephen, then I suppose you filed your utter disgust with your own so-called Leader&#8217;s explicit agreement, noted in a letter signed to GG Adrienne Clarkson, some 4 years ago? Because that&#8217;s exactly what Harper had in mind, if only his attempt to buy a vote &#8212; he apparently still doesn&#8217;t know the cost of one &#8212; had panned out.<br />
What ever way this turns out, I&#8217;d say Harper&#8217;s entering his final act.<br />
Darth Vader? Nay, The Nixon analogy seems quite apropos now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53624</guid>
		<description>Stephen: &quot;There is no accomodation here, he [Duceppe] will extract a price because support isnt free&quot;

No doubt, but at the same time why would he want an election?  He&#039;s supporting the Coalition mainly in order to avoid his party&#039;s getting bankrupted by the FU gambit.  He&#039;s not going to hand the reins back to Harper in two months, and Quebeckers won&#039;t be that keen on a third election in six months.  He&#039;ll do what he always does: sulk, vote strategically, and hold lots of wild-eyed news conferences.  Why change a winning formula?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen: &#8220;There is no accomodation here, he [Duceppe] will extract a price because support isnt free&#8221;</p>
<p>No doubt, but at the same time why would he want an election?  He&#8217;s supporting the Coalition mainly in order to avoid his party&#8217;s getting bankrupted by the FU gambit.  He&#8217;s not going to hand the reins back to Harper in two months, and Quebeckers won&#8217;t be that keen on a third election in six months.  He&#8217;ll do what he always does: sulk, vote strategically, and hold lots of wild-eyed news conferences.  Why change a winning formula?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A reader</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53623</link>
		<dc:creator>A reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53623</guid>
		<description>&quot;I stayed to watch Brison’s speech before returning to the bureau to write.&quot;

Then you missed the three best speeches of that afternoon.  To wit, I hope after this week, the media will stop thinking that just covering the Conservatives and Liberals is sufficient to cover the whole story on the Hill any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I stayed to watch Brison’s speech before returning to the bureau to write.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then you missed the three best speeches of that afternoon.  To wit, I hope after this week, the media will stop thinking that just covering the Conservatives and Liberals is sufficient to cover the whole story on the Hill any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-53622</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53622</guid>
		<description>BTW the reference to Stockholm syndrome is that Quebecers all have to live in that environment, so learn to get along.   The rules and attitude that enables that disappear once you leave the province, some would say once you leave Montreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW the reference to Stockholm syndrome is that Quebecers all have to live in that environment, so learn to get along.   The rules and attitude that enables that disappear once you leave the province, some would say once you leave Montreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53621</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53621</guid>
		<description>You misunderstand me.    I am saying the type and ferocity of reaction you are going to get, not saying I advocate it, just the reaction of a formal coalition with the BQ is going to light heck of a fire.

This is not about demonizing Seperatists, it is about recognizing how unpopular a deal with them will be.   People arent stupid, support comes at a price, what is the price the BQ extracted.  I am not anti Quebec, my wife is from Quebec, I have family in Quebec, my kids are in French Immersion.  I am saying a formal coalition with BQ that goes through the GG and not an election is going to set off something, and the discourse will be very ugly.    It is about legitimacy and being tainted as owing the BQ anything for your continued support is a kiss of death.  Only an election solves the question.

I think Duceppe is a smart guy, I think he is pretty straight up, and he has been straight up about what his intentions are.    There is no accomodation here, he will extract a price because support isnt free, and his worst/best case scenario is he gets to point to the confusion and say &quot;you want to be part of this?&quot;

This is third rail stuff, like Charlottetown, looks like it, smells like it and will get the same result. Rumours are now Ignatieff is going to drink from his self named poisened chalice, wow he wants to be PM that bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You misunderstand me.    I am saying the type and ferocity of reaction you are going to get, not saying I advocate it, just the reaction of a formal coalition with the BQ is going to light heck of a fire.</p>
<p>This is not about demonizing Seperatists, it is about recognizing how unpopular a deal with them will be.   People arent stupid, support comes at a price, what is the price the BQ extracted.  I am not anti Quebec, my wife is from Quebec, I have family in Quebec, my kids are in French Immersion.  I am saying a formal coalition with BQ that goes through the GG and not an election is going to set off something, and the discourse will be very ugly.    It is about legitimacy and being tainted as owing the BQ anything for your continued support is a kiss of death.  Only an election solves the question.</p>
<p>I think Duceppe is a smart guy, I think he is pretty straight up, and he has been straight up about what his intentions are.    There is no accomodation here, he will extract a price because support isnt free, and his worst/best case scenario is he gets to point to the confusion and say &#8220;you want to be part of this?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is third rail stuff, like Charlottetown, looks like it, smells like it and will get the same result. Rumours are now Ignatieff is going to drink from his self named poisened chalice, wow he wants to be PM that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53620</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53620</guid>
		<description>Shawn,
As an anglo small-town Ontario native currently studying in MTL, whose previous roomie was a semi-sovereigntist from Rimouski, I couldn&#039;t agree more re: the sovereigntists not being the other. So many federalist Canadians have admired Gilles Duceppe already despite the fact he wants to rip Canada apart- and now we have the chance to see how Bloquistes are fighting For Quebec, not against Canada.

Stephen- I haven&#039;t been kidnapped. My anglo West Island friends who love Quebec and respect sovereigntists haven&#039;t either. This has nothing to do with Stockholm syndrome. Have you ever lived in QC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn,<br />
As an anglo small-town Ontario native currently studying in MTL, whose previous roomie was a semi-sovereigntist from Rimouski, I couldn&#8217;t agree more re: the sovereigntists not being the other. So many federalist Canadians have admired Gilles Duceppe already despite the fact he wants to rip Canada apart- and now we have the chance to see how Bloquistes are fighting For Quebec, not against Canada.</p>
<p>Stephen- I haven&#8217;t been kidnapped. My anglo West Island friends who love Quebec and respect sovereigntists haven&#8217;t either. This has nothing to do with Stockholm syndrome. Have you ever lived in QC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53619</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53619</guid>
		<description>We will see in 6 months how stable things are if this thing is jammed through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see in 6 months how stable things are if this thing is jammed through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53618</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53618</guid>
		<description>Jody  my dear their is nothing to get upset about. I would be the first to say that Iggy is going to hang on with Liberals but this is not how it will play out. He has nothing to gain in this scenario. If Dion were serious he would have named Iggy interim leader right after the Elections. Iggy does not have a brother working for Powercorp as Bob Rae does so if the best he can hope for is some second tier position with LIberals he can get that job with Conservatives as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jody  my dear their is nothing to get upset about. I would be the first to say that Iggy is going to hang on with Liberals but this is not how it will play out. He has nothing to gain in this scenario. If Dion were serious he would have named Iggy interim leader right after the Elections. Iggy does not have a brother working for Powercorp as Bob Rae does so if the best he can hope for is some second tier position with LIberals he can get that job with Conservatives as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francien Verhoeven</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53617</link>
		<dc:creator>Francien Verhoeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53617</guid>
		<description>&quot;Jack: I stayed to watch Brison’s speech before returning to the bureau to write. I didn’t think to make note of it at the time, but I do seem to recall Jim Prentice sticking around for the Liberal response.&quot;

This does not only seem surreal; it is surreal: reporters making up the news.

 &quot;Make of that what you will.&quot;

Don&#039;t worry, you&#039;ve already managed to do that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jack: I stayed to watch Brison’s speech before returning to the bureau to write. I didn’t think to make note of it at the time, but I do seem to recall Jim Prentice sticking around for the Liberal response.&#8221;</p>
<p>This does not only seem surreal; it is surreal: reporters making up the news.</p>
<p> &#8220;Make of that what you will.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, you&#8217;ve already managed to do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn in Montreal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53616</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn in Montreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53616</guid>
		<description>Yep, bye Stephen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, bye Stephen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53615</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53615</guid>
		<description>Stephen: Ontarians. Not Ontarions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen: Ontarians. Not Ontarions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOL</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53614</link>
		<dc:creator>KOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53614</guid>
		<description>Of course Iggy will support the deal.  He has no choice if he wants to be elected leader of the Liberal Party.

I&#039;m glad Dion negotiated without consulting Iggy.  Iggy&#039;s supporters have been undermining Dion since the day he won the leadership.  I hope Dion enjoyed the sight of them twisting in the wind as much as I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Iggy will support the deal.  He has no choice if he wants to be elected leader of the Liberal Party.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad Dion negotiated without consulting Iggy.  Iggy&#8217;s supporters have been undermining Dion since the day he won the leadership.  I hope Dion enjoyed the sight of them twisting in the wind as much as I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53613</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53613</guid>
		<description>Shawn,Its called Stockholm syndrome.

The wind that will be whip up from this is an ill one.   Sorry shawn, you dont realize what has been started....I know many as well and they arent demons, I also know Ontarions outside the 416 and lots of Westerners.

This is not going to go well at all.  So federalists in Quebec better ask their Sovereigntest co workers to shut their ears and close their eyes because what is about to happen next wont be pretty,  and Gilles Duceppe knows it....too bad  Layton and Dion dont, the problem with being &quot;true believers&quot;, and neither has the credibility to contain the reaction.

Bye Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn,Its called Stockholm syndrome.</p>
<p>The wind that will be whip up from this is an ill one.   Sorry shawn, you dont realize what has been started&#8230;.I know many as well and they arent demons, I also know Ontarions outside the 416 and lots of Westerners.</p>
<p>This is not going to go well at all.  So federalists in Quebec better ask their Sovereigntest co workers to shut their ears and close their eyes because what is about to happen next wont be pretty,  and Gilles Duceppe knows it&#8230;.too bad  Layton and Dion dont, the problem with being &#8220;true believers&#8221;, and neither has the credibility to contain the reaction.</p>
<p>Bye Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53612</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Aaron, that&#039;s very interesting to know.  (Thanks for the link to Pearson&#039;s blog, too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Aaron, that&#8217;s very interesting to know.  (Thanks for the link to Pearson&#8217;s blog, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Wherry</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53611</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53611</guid>
		<description>Jack: I stayed to watch Brison&#039;s speech before returning to the bureau to write. I didn&#039;t think to make note of it at the time, but I do seem to recall Jim Prentice sticking around for the Liberal response. Make of that what you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack: I stayed to watch Brison&#8217;s speech before returning to the bureau to write. I didn&#8217;t think to make note of it at the time, but I do seem to recall Jim Prentice sticking around for the Liberal response. Make of that what you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Ranter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53610</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Ranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53610</guid>
		<description>Ooops. That double post was an accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops. That double post was an accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Ranter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53609</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Ranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53609</guid>
		<description>We will see how that, &quot;Let&#039;s all work together for progressive ideals!&quot; enthusiasm is holding up in about six months time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see how that, &#8220;Let&#8217;s all work together for progressive ideals!&#8221; enthusiasm is holding up in about six months time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53607</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53607</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder how many of these trolls are actually the same person, who just swaps aliases from time to time. Hopefully our gracious hosts track these things to whatever extent is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder how many of these trolls are actually the same person, who just swaps aliases from time to time. Hopefully our gracious hosts track these things to whatever extent is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Ranter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53606</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Ranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53606</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.&lt;/i&gt;

That doesn&#039;t surprise me in the least. For the first time ever, the Bloc and the NDP will be making decisions about running the country. (Well OK, the NDP were doing it from &#039;72 to &#039;74, but most of them won&#039;t remember that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.</i></p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least. For the first time ever, the Bloc and the NDP will be making decisions about running the country. (Well OK, the NDP were doing it from &#8217;72 to &#8217;74, but most of them won&#8217;t remember that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Ranter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53608</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Ranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53608</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.&lt;/i&gt;

That doesn&#039;t surprise me in the least. For the first time ever, the Bloc and the NDP will be making decisions about running the country. (Well OK, the NDP were doing it from &#039;72 to &#039;74, but most of them won&#039;t remember that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.</i></p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least. For the first time ever, the Bloc and the NDP will be making decisions about running the country. (Well OK, the NDP were doing it from &#8217;72 to &#8217;74, but most of them won&#8217;t remember that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53605</guid>
		<description>Ignore Karol. Karol is a troll. Same pasted in comments in four threads, so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore Karol. Karol is a troll. Same pasted in comments in four threads, so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacKee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53604</link>
		<dc:creator>MacKee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53604</guid>
		<description>Ignatieff would never cross over and join the Conservatives but he might just abstain from voting AND get the 77 other MP&#039;s who support him to do the same thing, thus ending this coalition right in its tracks.
Just speculating but it could happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignatieff would never cross over and join the Conservatives but he might just abstain from voting AND get the 77 other MP&#8217;s who support him to do the same thing, thus ending this coalition right in its tracks.<br />
Just speculating but it could happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53603</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53603</guid>
		<description>Andrew,
I just wonder what will you say tomorrow when it turns out that ignatieff and eleven more decent Liberals crossed the floor and joined Conservatives??? What will you say about Liberal parisan hacks that will remain in a rump of Liberal Party??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
I just wonder what will you say tomorrow when it turns out that ignatieff and eleven more decent Liberals crossed the floor and joined Conservatives??? What will you say about Liberal parisan hacks that will remain in a rump of Liberal Party??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53602</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53602</guid>
		<description>Speaking of opposition and government lobbies, does this mean the Stephen Harper Portrait Gallery will have to be moved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of opposition and government lobbies, does this mean the Stephen Harper Portrait Gallery will have to be moved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53601</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53601</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Shawn: That is particularly true because many sovereignists on the anglo-internet can be of the nasty variety. Thus, many Canadians have formed negative impressions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Shawn: That is particularly true because many sovereignists on the anglo-internet can be of the nasty variety. Thus, many Canadians have formed negative impressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacKee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53600</link>
		<dc:creator>MacKee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53600</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s to everyone working together!! I wish I could be in the Opposition lobby to see these Members of Parliament looking forward to doing something for Canadians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s to everyone working together!! I wish I could be in the Opposition lobby to see these Members of Parliament looking forward to doing something for Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn in Montreal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53599</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn in Montreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53599</guid>
		<description>Well, thanks for that link. Incredible.

The image of high-fiving Bloc and NDP members -- while no doubt fleeting -- underscores what I see here, as a Quebecer.

Too many see the Bloc as &quot;traitors&quot; and warn against working with &quot;that bunch.&quot; But as a federalist Quebecer, I work with sovereignists &lt;i&gt;every day&lt;/i&gt;.

They&#039;re not some demonized Other -- unless, that is, you&#039;ve never actually met one (or met a particularly nasty one, but nasty folks come in all stripes).

Here, federalists and sovereignists sit across at kitchen tables, sleep in the same bed, come together at holidays, ride the bus, whatever.

We don&#039;t have the luxury of &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; working together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, thanks for that link. Incredible.</p>
<p>The image of high-fiving Bloc and NDP members &#8212; while no doubt fleeting &#8212; underscores what I see here, as a Quebecer.</p>
<p>Too many see the Bloc as &#8220;traitors&#8221; and warn against working with &#8220;that bunch.&#8221; But as a federalist Quebecer, I work with sovereignists <i>every day</i>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not some demonized Other &#8212; unless, that is, you&#8217;ve never actually met one (or met a particularly nasty one, but nasty folks come in all stripes).</p>
<p>Here, federalists and sovereignists sit across at kitchen tables, sleep in the same bed, come together at holidays, ride the bus, whatever.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have the luxury of <i>not</i> working together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53598</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to know which Conservative MP&#039;s stayed behind.  I&#039;d bet the next Tory leader was there among them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to know which Conservative MP&#8217;s stayed behind.  I&#8217;d bet the next Tory leader was there among them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/01/it-was-incredible-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-53597</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20962#comment-53597</guid>
		<description>I almost feel bad for some of the CPC MPs who don&#039;t deserve to be put through this. There are some partisan hacks that deserve to be hung out to dry, but there are some honourable, decent people in the Conservative caucus. Hopefully they can regain control of the party for the thugs that have been ruling it with an iron fist the last couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost feel bad for some of the CPC MPs who don&#8217;t deserve to be put through this. There are some partisan hacks that deserve to be hung out to dry, but there are some honourable, decent people in the Conservative caucus. Hopefully they can regain control of the party for the thugs that have been ruling it with an iron fist the last couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

