Notes on a crisis: Who will save the Liberals from themselves?

by Andrew Coyne on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 12:16pm - 114 Comments

Who will save the Liberals from themselves?

So, just to review the bidding: If the coalition has its way, we would be governed by a party that won 26% of the vote barely six weeks ago, that has just a quarter of the seats in the Commons, that is a minority within its own coalition. It would be led by a man who, however massively he may have been rejected by the public at large, has even less support within his own party; who was in the process of being given the bum’s rush, but who will now pause, on his way out the door, to govern the country — for six months. The cabinet he convenes will be absent two of its most prominent members, either de jure or de facto, as they tour the country campaigning to succeed him.

It will, however, contain six New Democrats, whose job will be to push as hard as they can for as much as they can in the short time the coalition is likely to last. It will be similarly beholden to the Bloc for its survival, serving at their pleasure, vulnerable to a Bloc decision to withdraw its support every single day of the week.

And he will be powerless to resist either of them. He will have no legitimacy, no authority, no base of support. His party could not possibly endure another election, even with public funds; theirs could. His sole job will be to pay them ransom, in regular installments, until the whole thing collapses of its own weight — probably in a matter of weeks. It isn’t just that the coalition is made up of parties with wholly incompatible agendas. At some point, somebody will miscalculate, push too hard, overplay their hand. Or, most likely, either the NDP or the Bloc — possibly both — will decide, once they have milked the Liberals dry, that it would be better to provoke an election in the spring, while Dion is still leader, than wait until May, and the arrival of another, presumably more popular Liberal leader. (Oh, but it could not happen, Dion replies: he has a piece of paper. Please. Whipping up “betrayals,” is the Bloc’s life’s work. They do that sort of thing in their sleep: “This is not what we signed onto. The Liberals have not lived up to their end of the bargain. etc. etc.” The 18 month “commitment” is meaningless. It’s an agreement to support the government until they don’t.)

I know a good many Liberals who are utterly aghast at where this is taking their party. Simply put, Dion is driving them off a cliff. If Harper overplayed his hand at the start of this fiasco, Dion has returned the favour. That picture of Dion, Duceppe and Layton together on the podium will be featured in every Tory attack ad from here to kingdom come. It will burn its way into the public mind. At one stroke, Dion has legitimized the NDP as a party of government, marginalized his own party as a party of the left, and delivered the government of Canada into the trembling hands of the Bloc. To all intents and purposes, this will be an NDP-Bloc government. The Liberals are simply the front, propped up in the shop window to give the thing respectability.

That, at any rate, will be the perception. And it is one that can only lead to the ruin of the Liberal party: when, not if, the coalition collapses, it will be the Liberals who will be consumed in the fires that will then rage. So the question becomes: When will the grown-ups in the party take charge? Already we are seeing some cracks in the Liberals’ resolve. Quietly, through surrogates, Michael Ignatieff has let his discomfort with the arrangement be known. A couple of the Liberal “wise men” who supposedly were to guide the coalition’s economic policies have publicly disowned the idea.

But if the party is to be preserved from the abyss towards which it is hurtling, somebody is going to have to grab the wheel. It’s not enough to hope that the Governor General will dissolve Parliament before then, or that Harper will prorogue Parliament. The first is unlikely, and the second only postpones the inevitable. Somebody needs to speak out, now.

Bookmark and Share
  • Michael L.

    As a long-time citizen of what had been the Liberal-infatuated Toronto area, I think Andrew Coyne’s analysis is right on the mark. I think this current parliamentary fiasco threatens to rob us of the most precious commodity in Canadian democracy – meaningful choice beyond zero-sum, extreme left or extreme right government.

    My greatest fear is that the kind of desperate, polarizing behaviour and rhetoric on the part of both the coalitionists and the Conservatives could, if unchecked, ultimately re-contour our political landscape into a US-style, binary political universe of only left and right extremes. Anything that ‘unites the left’ so irreversibly, as will this ill-conceived coalition should it succeed in governing for even a few weeks or months, could so dilute the Liberal brand that our 3 (or more) national party system will eventually disappear along with the flexibility and creativity it affords us in designing effective public policy, good government programs and meaningful political discourse and choice during federal elections.

    We need epiphanies of wisdom and the gift of second-thought to descend upon the Hill on both sides of the aisle lest we find ourselves at the bottom of this slippery slope of left-right and/or east-west national political alienation. Deliver us, please, from the extreme dead-lock partisan politics that are creeping across the border and poisoning our political.

    Mr. Dion, this clay-footed coalition will damage both your party and our country beyond anyone’s imagination. Have the courage to step back from the abyss and think about those that will follow your brief tenure. Put this coalition to a vote before the people if you want to prove yourself a real man of integrity concerned for the good of a unified Canada.

    Mr. Layton, wipe the smile off your face as you savour watching the Liberals drive themselves off the cliff. You may enjoy your ill-gotten gains for a season, but you will damage your integrity and weaken all that you profess to stand for on behalf of ‘ordinary Canadians’ who love this country from coast to coast.

    And Mr. Harper, if you cannot learn to build consensus rather than consolidating your own power base during minority rule, step aside and let a more reasonable person lead your party. Your tactics of late are inexcusable for a man of your intelligence and instinct. It’s time for you to renounce autocratic rule and involve others more in leading your party and this country. Deliver the economic goods and get back to governing without undo provocation.

  • Peter Jay

    T. Thwim — “Heh. It would be only too funny to see the western vote split once again between the Conservatives and a separation party.”

    Hilarious. Once proud Canadians so embittered that they would rather separate than stay. That’s awesome!

  • Huge Jazz

    I’m afraid, Mr Michael L., these men have no integrity. Pure, almost rage-like, partisanship in the midst of the greater issues of the day is beyond contemptable. It’s insanity for insanity sake.

  • T. Thwim

    Once proud? Which western separatists have you been talking to? The ones I know are still embittered from a policy that ended over 20 years ago that had no effect on their economy that the price of oil didn’t.

    And it’d be funny because in that split, they’d effectively remove any chance they had of forming power in Ottawa. You’d have the Bloc, the Western Bloc, and the Conservatives in perpetual opposition.

  • Terry86

    Great column Andrew. If Iggy sits on the sidelines now he loses a lot of credibility, especially if the coalition fails. Character is often revealed in a crisis. Unfortunately all I have seen from Iggy is spokespeople trying to play both sides of the fence.

  • Terry86

    Kubota M95

  • Ryan

    “At one stroke, Dion has legitimized the NDP as a party of government, marginalized his own party as a party of the left, and delivered the government of Canada into the trembling hands of the Bloc.”

    Don’t forget ensuring that all parties wear the coming deficit, which could have been the issue that ensured a genuine Liberal election victory next year with the new leader.

    Also Andrew, I disagree with your gloomy (or is that optimistic?) outlook on the length of this coalition. I see only two things that can end it: high Liberal polling numbers, or the Bloc seizing on/manufacturing some contrived “humiliation” to dramatically break from the government and attempt to re-ignite the separatist powder keg.

  • stewacide

    If the Conservatives are going to profit from this coalition actually becoming government, that will require a Conservative leader willing and capable of wooing centrist Liberals no longer comfortable in the leftist Liberals. Does anyone thing Harper is that leader?

    Harper seems more interested in throwing red-meat to the base, than in broadening his clearly too-narrow coalition (as evidence by his minority status)

  • BDJ

    People, people, people…….

    First of all, the difference between a coalition government in the Netherlands and one in Canada is that the Netherlands has a PR system with approximately 10 parties. Each party represents a different political ideology from left to right. The United Kingdom hasn’t had many coalition governments, and in fact I believe the last election saw Tony Blair and the Labour Party win with only 35% of the vote.

    If all of this coalition were to come out and say they were going to implement electoral reform then I’d take those who yelp about how “62% of people didn’t vote for Harper” seriously. However their is no indication that we’ll have a different electoral system after this. If the election does happen soon afterwards then the result will likely be dependent on a 2% voter swing.

    Second, most people were taken back by this simply due to the fact that we’ve never had a coalition at the federal level before, and more or less the idea that the Bloc will be the power broker.

    While I realize many people hate Stephen Harper, my view is that the best thing for all parties to do is wait until the actual budget. Keith Martin [Liberal MP] has openly stated that their should be an avenue for compromise between the opposition and government, so far it doesn’t look like either side will budge.

  • Terry

    The only thing that would make the west split off and form a new party would be to become disillusioned when they have supported the governing party and yet not see any of their policy goals met and their interests ignored. The west is the politics of protest after all.

    However, the Liberals and the NDP have just given a lot of Tory MP’s in the west a lot of job security. Outside of Ralph Goodale who has the riding of government employees of Regina-Wascana, I don’t expect there will be any liberal red on the prairies any time soon.

    Too bad, before this, there was plenty of discontent for the way Harper’s Tories were spending and who they were giving that money to. If the Liberals had bothered, they might have begun with a few acts of contrition for their past screwjobs begun to develop a party base in the west again, which might have paid off in a decade or so.

  • Terry

    Stewicide> What read meat? I mean sure he kicks Liberal politicians in the balls once and awhile, but he hasn’t actually delivered much that matters.

  • stewacide

    I agree there’s hasn’t been much red-meat, but ideally there should be none since hard-right policies are political poison in Canada. The kids-in-prison, imaginary arts cuts followed by a real jabs at artists, and this most recent attack on public party financing are the most obvious examples. Each backfired badly. At least the pay-off on the other side of the party financial issue is notable for the Conservatives. They threw away their majority on issues they don’t even care about.

  • Richard Wareing

    I’m really, REALLY tired of people constantly trying to persuade us the Conservative (not HARPER) Gov’t is somehow illegitimate due to “only” getting 38% of the vote. In fact there have been only TWO times in Canadian history (once by Diefenbaker and once by Trudeau) where a party has gotten more than 50% of the vote. Take in 2000 for example Chrieten got a whopping 172 seats with only 40.2% (go ahead and check for yourself).

    Liberals cannot decide to play buy the first past the post system and then simply throw the rule book out the window when it no longer suits them. Try another argument…this once is dead once and for all.

  • derek

    6 months from now the Liberals will be reading the headlines: “Liberal Government Budget. First Deficit Budget in xx Years”.

    Their very worthy and valuable brand as fiscally responsible will be gone.

    Liberals are signing their death warrants. I suspect the notion is floating into view through the fog of potential power. I don’t think the government will fall next monday.

    This situation has people very mad and watching. The moment a deficit budget is brought forward, whoever brings it is finished.

    Canadians are a bit dense at times, but remember clearly the difficulty and pain involved in getting rid of deficit budgets.

    What is really funny is I read somewhere last week about Rae’s hard learned wisdom on what not to do with budgets and deficits and recessions. Now he’s going to be tied to a government that is going to do exactly what he did in Ontario, with the same results. How do one’s toes look through the sights of a gun before you blow them off?

    Any budget of any sort that Harper brought forward without deficit (the real word for stimulus) was going to fail in the house. Now the Liberals have the choice of having their name on it.

    Derek

From Macleans