Notes on a crisis: Who will save the Liberals from themselves?

by Andrew Coyne on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 12:16pm - 114 Comments

Who will save the Liberals from themselves?

So, just to review the bidding: If the coalition has its way, we would be governed by a party that won 26% of the vote barely six weeks ago, that has just a quarter of the seats in the Commons, that is a minority within its own coalition. It would be led by a man who, however massively he may have been rejected by the public at large, has even less support within his own party; who was in the process of being given the bum’s rush, but who will now pause, on his way out the door, to govern the country — for six months. The cabinet he convenes will be absent two of its most prominent members, either de jure or de facto, as they tour the country campaigning to succeed him.

It will, however, contain six New Democrats, whose job will be to push as hard as they can for as much as they can in the short time the coalition is likely to last. It will be similarly beholden to the Bloc for its survival, serving at their pleasure, vulnerable to a Bloc decision to withdraw its support every single day of the week.

And he will be powerless to resist either of them. He will have no legitimacy, no authority, no base of support. His party could not possibly endure another election, even with public funds; theirs could. His sole job will be to pay them ransom, in regular installments, until the whole thing collapses of its own weight — probably in a matter of weeks. It isn’t just that the coalition is made up of parties with wholly incompatible agendas. At some point, somebody will miscalculate, push too hard, overplay their hand. Or, most likely, either the NDP or the Bloc — possibly both — will decide, once they have milked the Liberals dry, that it would be better to provoke an election in the spring, while Dion is still leader, than wait until May, and the arrival of another, presumably more popular Liberal leader. (Oh, but it could not happen, Dion replies: he has a piece of paper. Please. Whipping up “betrayals,” is the Bloc’s life’s work. They do that sort of thing in their sleep: “This is not what we signed onto. The Liberals have not lived up to their end of the bargain. etc. etc.” The 18 month “commitment” is meaningless. It’s an agreement to support the government until they don’t.)

I know a good many Liberals who are utterly aghast at where this is taking their party. Simply put, Dion is driving them off a cliff. If Harper overplayed his hand at the start of this fiasco, Dion has returned the favour. That picture of Dion, Duceppe and Layton together on the podium will be featured in every Tory attack ad from here to kingdom come. It will burn its way into the public mind. At one stroke, Dion has legitimized the NDP as a party of government, marginalized his own party as a party of the left, and delivered the government of Canada into the trembling hands of the Bloc. To all intents and purposes, this will be an NDP-Bloc government. The Liberals are simply the front, propped up in the shop window to give the thing respectability.

That, at any rate, will be the perception. And it is one that can only lead to the ruin of the Liberal party: when, not if, the coalition collapses, it will be the Liberals who will be consumed in the fires that will then rage. So the question becomes: When will the grown-ups in the party take charge? Already we are seeing some cracks in the Liberals’ resolve. Quietly, through surrogates, Michael Ignatieff has let his discomfort with the arrangement be known. A couple of the Liberal “wise men” who supposedly were to guide the coalition’s economic policies have publicly disowned the idea.

But if the party is to be preserved from the abyss towards which it is hurtling, somebody is going to have to grab the wheel. It’s not enough to hope that the Governor General will dissolve Parliament before then, or that Harper will prorogue Parliament. The first is unlikely, and the second only postpones the inevitable. Somebody needs to speak out, now.

Bookmark and Share
  • Sam

    100% of Canadians would like to kick Patrick and Sean in the balls for continually whinging that nobody understands parliamentary rules in every damn post over the past week.

  • Terry

    So largely the people who say 62% of people didn’t vote for Harper are also ignorant of their Grade 9 social studies, yes?

    At the end of the day, this policy seems to be scorched earth for the Liberals and the NDP west of Manitoba, where the majority of the votes are. I doubt if the 18 months in government is going to be used to make amends to the Western voters who have found their MP removed from government in an extraordinary (even if it isn’t a traitorous or unconstitutional) way. Some gerrymandering to get some more NDP seats out of urban Saskatchewan might be a possibility, but that doesn’t really benefit the Liberal party in the long term.

    They Liberal strategists have to know this, so their terror over having to finance their own campaigns from their own pockets must be far greater than their ambitions to ever form a majority government with MP’s from every province of Canada again.

  • Jonathan

    Fun question: Who benefits more from this coalition – the Liberals or the NDP?

    I don’t agree with all the points that Andrew is making here, but it seems obvious to me that the greatest benificiary is the NDP – being legitimized as a potential governing party while the Liberals are at their lowest level of popular support in ages – and that long-term, this could hurt the Liberals as a result.

  • john g

    A couple of the Liberal “wise men” who supposedly were to guide the coalition’s economic policies have publicly disowned the idea.

    And apparently Romanow doesn’t know anything about it either.

    There is no advisory council. They are lying about being guided by these 4 “Wise Men”. They made up the story out of thin air to try and lend credibility to their little social science experiment.

    Paging Ti-Guy…your new government is already lying to you before they even take over.

  • ti-guy

    The voices! The voices! I keep hearing voices! Why do things keep moving in the house and I don’t remember moving them? Oh, Dear Gaia! Where did I get that Stockwell Day button! I’m sooo confused.

  • Ti-Guy

    The voices! The voices! I keep hearing voices! Why do things keep moving in the house and I don’t remember moving them? Oh, Dear Gaia! Where did I get that Stockwell Day button! I’m sooo confused.

  • Frank L.

    Coyne is right on the mark. Once again, we witness Jack Layton and the NDP playing Dion and the Liberals like a bad fiddle, for Layton’s own lust for power. Please, Liberals, please get someone in to lead, immediately, who will no longer be used by Layton and the NDP for their lust for power. As a once former proud Liberal, it is absolutely painful to watch Dion flush this once great party down the toilet. Please do something, and soon. Rae is tainted beyond return now. Dion was done like dinner long ago.
    Ignatieff simply must fill the void for all Canadians, not just Liberals, so wanting and needing leadership. Somebody somewhere please convice Ignatieff to immediately distance himself, or better still – denounce, this so-called “coalition”, which everyone except the NDP, unions, and the Bloc see as a power grab, and nothing else.

  • http://csriess@shaw.ca C. Riess

    Great column Andrew Coyne, finally something written that is honest and intelligent. And now we hear that Jaques Parizeau has publicly endorsed the coalition!! You know, the radical separatist who blamed the referendum loss on the ethnic vote. If Parizeau likes the coalition that tells me that it is toxix to the rest of Canada. Can someone explain to me how allowing Socialists to have cabinet seats when we are facing economic uncertainty and a financial meltdown globally is a good idea. As Liberal MP Keith Martin has stated before “the NDP always drive the economy into the ground”. In a democracy shouldn’t voters decide who the PM is?

  • http://prairiewrangler.wordpress.com/ Olaf

    So the question becomes: When will the grown-ups in the party take charge?

    Precisely. I’m curious as to why Chretien didn’t kibosh this whole thing from the start. Usually he’s smarter at playing the long game.

  • stewacide

    I wouldn’t have thought it was possible that *ALL* the parties in the House could self-destruct SIMULTANEOUSLY, but here we are. The only possible winner out of this mess is the NDP.

  • Jack Mitchell

    I dunno, Olaf, I think anything that frazzles the Tories as badly as this can’t hurt the Liberals. They were already at rock bottom, and even if this doesn’t help them it doesn’t hurt them.

    For one thing, I’d say that a lot of Canada’s disgust with Dion was the spectacle of his rolling over and playing dead in front of big bad Harper for his whole first year as leader. Now he doesn’t look like such a wimp. Also Harper may be given the axe by the Tories, and they have no one with anything like his political skills ready to take over.

  • Windy

    Bang on the mark Coyne.

    This crazy stunt will mark the end of the Liberal Party. As they say in the TV business, this is where they jumped the shark.

  • Ryan

    By Conservative logic, anything they support is smart, and anything they don’t, isn’t. Then they proceed to namecall those that disagree, and this seems to be quite a normal trait I’ve noticed, across many different newspaper comment sections.

    Can you please stop calling this a coup when it is 100% legal? Coups aren’t legal. But whatever, I suppose you need to keep up the propaganda in hopes that those without the best of knowledges about how our parliament works support you. Just keep saying 2+2=5 if that’s what you need to do to win I suppose!

  • http://prairiewrangler.wordpress.com/ Olaf

    Jack,

    I dunno, Olaf, I think anything that frazzles the Tories as badly as this can’t hurt the Liberals.

    I have to admit that I didn’t include the “frazzle factor” in my otherwise flawless calculus. :)

  • this is madness

    As someone who is absolutely not enjoying this mess, I keep hoping, HOPING, for a grownup to appear. Harper took the so-called offensive items off the table, as if that was the real reason for this mess. Now it’s up to the Liberals. It won’t be Dion. He long ago decided he was the smartest guy in the Liberal Party and didn’t need to listen to anyone. I sincerely believe that the Liberal Party is finished if they proceed with this.

  • Grass Roots Protest Forming

    The Liberals are toast no matter who leads them.-next general election is pay back time. This party sold out to the separatists in a closed backroom deal that is so good that Jacques parizeau had this to say: in an interview with the Journal de Montreal published Wednesday, Mr. Parizeau praises Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe for his “impressive victory,” in prying enough concessions out of the coalition of the New Democratic Party and Liberals to agree to back them.

    Clearly the coalition is miising one necessary component for poitical balance-a leader from a western separatist party. This may be the only way in which the West can get it’s fair share of bribe money and political influence.

  • hosertohoosier

    “As someone who is absolutely not enjoying this mess, I keep hoping, HOPING, for a grownup to appear. Harper took the so-called offensive items off the table, as if that was the real reason for this mess. Now it’s up to the Liberals. It won’t be Dion. He long ago decided he was the smartest guy in the Liberal Party and didn’t need to listen to anyone. I sincerely believe that the Liberal Party is finished if they proceed with this.”

    Canada needs a gang of 14, MP’s from every party, but I think Iggy liberals are the most likely, to band together and form a third bloc with the following demands.

    1. Some (smaller) stimulus
    2. Retain public financing of parties
    3. Possibly Harper’s resignation

    Otherwise they will vote no confidence.

    The problem with the coalition is that they have offered no amendments and no compromises – nor did they give any warning of this. Frankly they want power more than they want effective government (just like Harper).

  • http://politicalstaples.com Political Staples

    Small point, but you can’t criticize Andrew Coyne’s reporting skills. He is not a reporter, he is a columnist and, as such, he is paid to provide his opinion.

  • ron in kelowna

    McGuinty may be the one to get to the grownups, Ignatief .

    McGuinty says he works well with PMSH. McGuinty wants auto help quickly. He knows Quebec will be running this coalition – absolutely.

    He knows Quebec has been jealous of Ontario’s giant auto sector since the Auto Pact with the US was signed in 1965.

    McGuinty knows that aid will flow to Quebec first under a Duceppe-Dion-Layton coalition.

    Mike Duffy had one exliberal Ontario MP on his show – blasted any thought of a coalition. Duffy said other Liberal MPs had similar views but are reluctant to come on his show, ( but do not want to be first ?).

    McGuinty also knows ‘green’ ideolgy would decimate the Industrial Heartland as much as the energy economies of Sask, Alta, BC, NS, NFLD. Not much left, eh ? Where will PQ get it equalization.

    The LPC has two choices.
    1) Loose now and survive to win another day.
    2) Win a coalition but loose the LPC AND the country .

    Because those with financial security are the ones who will actually go ahead with separation first. Your call Iggy.

  • Peter Michael

    Everyone now needs to save face. To save the country, my suggestion would be for the PC to dump Harper as leader. This would resolve the personality conflict for everyone. He is not a good leader. The PC Party could remain in power with someone in charge who can get along with the opposition. His vitrol against Quebec in Parliament will make it impossible for him to govern. We need an Obama like person here.

  • Grass Roots Protest Forming

    Ed Stelmach

    There is growing concern on the streets, in online forums and on radio call-in shows that a Liberal-NDP coalition government may fan the flames of Western alienation, and even separation, in Alberta. “We’ve certainly been hearing it,” said Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach, a staunch federalist, adding that often separation talk in Alberta is based “straight out of frustration.”

    He wants federal politicians to “park their egos” and at least give the Tories a chance to deliver a budget early next year. The provincial government has been bombarded with calls and messages about a possible coalition government, and Mr. Stelmach said he can’t recall another issue that has “drawn such an angry response from Albertans.” (Source: Katherine O’Neill)

  • dave

    the silliest comment people make about coalitions is that “they are common in Europe, so why not here?”.

    sure, it’s true, but European countries are “states”, and are small, with a concentrated population.

    and they don’t contain “separatists”.

    big difference.

    the “coalition” in Canada tries this at their peril.

  • Huge Jazz

    We’re being lead by the 3 Stooges and the Grinch. And that’s an insult to the aformentioned. I say let them call another campaign. Dion is just giving a majority to Harper on a silver platter. I wouldn’t want that bumbling academic egghead as the leader of a church pot luck.

    It may be simplistic but I think the Liberals just don’t know how to be the minority opposition. Grasping at straws and paper promises fromm the likes of the Bloc smells of such desperation it’s hard to fathom.

  • T. Thwim

    Heh. It would be only too funny to see the western vote split once again between the Conservatives and a separation party.

  • Peter Jay

    Bang on, Andrew. I don’t know what Ignatieff was thinking when he agreed to this. He had (has?) nothing to gain by this. The Liberal brand will be soiled beyond all recognition in Western Canada and rural Ontario. Did people not see that in many ridings out west, the Liberals were not even coming in secord or third? This will seal that for a generation.

    Bob Rae had something to gain here by muddying up the waters — it’s a desperation play, and moved at a stunning pace by the old Power Corp crew (Chretien and bro John) behind the scenes.

    Ignatieff, as the frontrunner, had nothing to gain but a polluted Liberal brand, and yes, maybe a short bit as the PM. But it would be nasty, acromonius, short and then done for his political life. He should have pushed back and hard. I think, for his sake, he should still. His best chance at a better result would be to push back now. Find a reason, and do it.

From Macleans