Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

The Commons: A cold and miserable day

by Aaron Wherry on Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:43pm - 44 Comments

081203_harper41

The Prime Minister arrived promptly at 9:30am. Stepping out of the car, he waved to the reporters assembled 70 metres away and then strode through the back door of Rideau Hall. His staff followed behind.

Half a dozen news trucks idled in the Governor-General’s driveway. A dozen television cameras lined up by the fountain, aimed at her front door. Madame Jean’s staff had set out coffee and, though lukewarm, it eventually became necessary.

Thus, the wait began. Two and a half hours of chilly anticipation.

***

So how did we get here? The answer depends on your perspective.

In a simplistic reading, our present situation is a direct result of what happened last Thursday. That day, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty stood in the House of Commons and delivered his government’s fiscal and economic update. Presented as a national plan at a time of profound economic crisis, it included promises to eliminate subsidies to political parties, tamper with the public service’s right to strike, and fiddle with the system through which women are able to seek equal pay for their work.

It seemed designed only to corner the opposition. So challenged, the Liberals, NDP and Bloc Quebecois found themselves with common cause and interest. Enter the coalition. And under threat of forced exit, the Prime Minister retreated to Rideau in search of reprieve.

That is the short version.

In the longview, it is the latest chapter in what is now an epic and troubling story.

In-and-Out. Chuck Cadman. Afghanistan. Torture. Linda Keen. Arthur Carty. Marc Mayrand. Dalton McGuinty. InSite. Listeriosis. Crime. Science. Academia. Elections Canada. Omar Khadr. Gordon O’Connor. Maxime Bernier. Canadian soldiers. The Military Police Complaints Commission. The ethics committee. The press gallery. CAIRS. Access to information. Notaleader.ca. The federal budget. The economy. The recession.

The emblem of this government has become a furious male face screaming indignation in the arena of our democracy. At every turn, the response has been to obfuscate, manipulate and demonize. Everything has been opportunity to divide. Truth has been tangential. Ethics and morals have been deemed quaint. The Game has superseded all. Short-term political advantage is all that’s mattered. Nothing worth doing if it is not in one’s own personal interest.

Each time, it was possible to believe it wouldn’t happen again. But inevitably there was another low. And while individually these moments might seem relatively minor—at least when compared with the great political and human challenges of our time—taken together it is a dispiriting collage.

I confess, at this point, that I have never before observed a government from this vantage point. Perhaps this is typical. Perhaps Stephen Harper’s government is no worse than any other. For sure, every administration commits its sins, some maybe in greater number and severity. But then even if this government is in line with the norm, I’m not sure that doesn’t just make this all the more crushing. I’d like to believe we’re better than this. I’d like to believe they’re better than this.

There should though be no separating this from that. What happened today was not singular, except maybe in the historical sense. It is merely an extension of all we’ve seen and heard this past year. Having exploited all else, Mr. Harper has now bent democracy to his will. A dangerous precedent has been set. The country is divided. But his desire for power has been requited.

***

A few dozen demonstrators had gathered at the gates of Rideau, awaiting the Prime Minister’s arrival. They waved signs and chanted slogans in his support. Reporters identified several of them as staffers in his government.

Reporters stood and waited and gossiped and joked. TV correspondents sent back dispatches to their networks on the complete lack of identifiable developments. The front doors of Rideau were opened, raising expectations, then closed. The Governor-General’s photographer stepped out to snap a few shots of the mob. The sun came out, brightening, if not warming, the scene.

Then the doors opened once more. The tarp was pulled off the wood podium and the podium wheeled into place. A man brought out a glass of water on a small silver platter and placed it at the stand. The microphones were duly checked. One of the Prime Minister’s aides deemed the spotlights too bright and had them adjusted. Another aide appeared to explain that reporters would be allowed four questions—two in English, two in French.

In the moments before the Prime Minister arrived, the skies clouded over. It began to snow, then hail. Mr. Harper appeared in a long black coat and maroon scarf, but no gloves. As he spoke, white pellets bounced off his shoulders and collected in his hair. Every so often the storm would gust, the wind rumbling over the Prime Minister’s microphone.

He announced Parliament to be closed. He appealed to mystical public opinion. He made promises. His answers were long and periodically pleading. He did not yell and scream. But he was hardly contrite. If there was any kind of apology contained therein, it was hardly explicit.

All stood and watched and listened in the cold and hail. Everyone and everything looked miserable.

Bookmark and Share
  • TJ Cook

    Aaron: a well-expressed indictment of Harper’s record.

    His strategy and tactics have been Nixonian. Un-Canadian.

    And as Bob Rae described it, the atmosphere finally snapped. Harper’s Cons have brought us to this, a deep, American-style chasm between Canadians. Our political representatives are at each others’ throats while the economy collapses, and Harper will wear this shame forever.

  • Blues Clair

    Acer, did Tin Pot Harper send you out to court the women vote?

  • http://caiti-online.blogspot.com/ Transcanada

    This is a Pyrrhic victory for the CONs.

    I’ve been on the road listening to the radio the past few hours and Canadians are in disbelief and outraged at Harper and the Conservatives.

    What has Harper won?

  • Jonathan

    Funny thing Aaron – the more I watch Harper perform, the more I’m reminded of the same desperate, often hypocritical stance taken by Paul Martin and his government during its dying days.

    That doesn’t make Harper’s decisions any less reprehensible, but I think it’s at least somewhat amusing that you didn’t see Martin in the same way.

  • Acer

    Ekos with a new poll showing Harper in majority territory:

    44-24-14. The people are with our leader. 44%. Higher than Chretien ever got in any election. The people aren’t with you Coalition. They are with our leader.

  • Chris B

    How do you know he didn’t see Martin in the same way?

  • Jonathan

    In other words, the same things that encouraged me to abandon the Liberals and vote for the Conservatives have moved me away from the Conservatives – and I’m not sure where to. Dion’s a desperate figure at this point, barely hanging on to a divided caucus and his successor has yet to be determined. Try as I will, I can’t take Jack Layton seriously, and Elizabeth May has destroyed whatever respect I had for the Greens.

    Bold prediction: turnout for the next election is even lower than the last one

  • Jonathan

    Chris B.:

    “I confess, at this point, that I have never before observed a government from this vantage point. Perhaps this is typical. Perhaps Stephen Harper’s government is no worse than any other. For sure, every administration commits its sins, some maybe in greater number and severity. But then even if this government is in line with the norm, I’m not sure that doesn’t just make this all the more crushing. I’d like to believe we’re better than this. I’d like to believe they’re better than this.”

  • Chris B

    Holy cow – check out Alberta in that EKOS poll!

    CPC – 75.1, LIB – 11.1, NDP – 7.1

  • ajb

    … EKOS goes on to say in conclusion:

    • The Conservatives are winning the initial public opinion war.
    • There seems, however, to be a modest night-to-night trend that favours the coalition on
    all measures (i.e., vote intention, three-partner coalition).
    • While too early to say, it may be that the public are digging into deep and irreconcilable
    differences on this issue.
    • What started as a political skirmish over the economy now has the potential to produce
    deep wounds to national unity.

    Sounds about right — initial public reaction being violently against something very new, but gradually warming a bit. But the bigger story is probably the deepening of divisions, like Aaron says.

  • Chris B

    … looking at the poll, I don’t know if Harper would be in majority territory. He would win 1 more seat in Alberta, maybe 2 more in BC, maybe 2 more in the Prairies, 10 more in Ontario, and lose some in Quebec and Eastern Canada. So I think he would have the potential to get a majority, but that Alberta Advantage ™ really skews the overall numbers

  • Diane

    acer: “menstruates in public”

    Offensive and misogynistic. Agree with Andrew’s blog, and am struck by “The emblem of this government has become a furious male face screaming indignation”. None of what I’ve seen this week is what I’d like to believe our elected reps should be doing. Wonder why women participate in such low numbers?

  • Ti-Guy

    Is that we’re going to get at Macleans now for the next six weeks? Results of polls posted by paid Conservative staffers?

    By the way, I couldn’t care less what Albertans think. They don’t even vote in their own elections, after all.

  • Sisyphus

    The polls do not matter. It’s not a popularity contest. It’s a matter of parliamentary procedure.

    Either that matters or it doesn’t. Be careful which way you choose.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Acer, what was that again about a Tory majority depending on Quebeckers and women? Did we just turn into a country of rude anglo males, or are your calculations a bit off?

  • Clarence Seunarine

    Aaron, please delete Acer’s vile and disgusting comment. I have tried the report abuse button but it is not working.

  • http://eugeneforseyliberal.blogspot.com Eugene Forsey Liberal

    Acer’s last misogynistic comment demonstrates why Wherry did so well to say “a furious male face screaming indignation” and why the Opposition and all non-die-hard Cons want this government gone. Now.

    I don’t want to give anyone nightmares, but imagine if they had a majority.

  • Acer

    “Sand in your vagina” is a south park joke, as is the menstruation thing. Christ you people need to get out more and stop taking yourselves so seriously.

  • Jack Mitchell

    EFL: “I don’t want to give anyone nightmares, but imagine if they had a majority.”

    Don’t worry, Harper has taken care of that. He now stands to lose 10 seats in Quebec, which means he’d need 21 more seats in the ROC. Something tells me it ain’t gonna happen — ever.

  • Ti-Guy

    Acer’s last misogynistic comment demonstrates why Wherry did so well to say “a furious male face screaming indignation”

    What else is new? We’ve all known that for a long time. Unfortunately most our media is run by wimpy milquetoasts, who, for the most part, get a vicarious thrill from it.

  • Blues Clair

    I wonder who shot these photo’s for Macleans today, they are brilliant.

  • Jonathan

    “Results of polls posted by paid Conservative staffers?”

    Aaron Wherry may be many thngs, but Conservative staffer he is not.

  • Dave Tarror

    An excellent article that highlights the extent to which the Conservatives have put their concern for power before public policy. The other parties have done the same, but when you are the governing party, and the PM, you are held to a higher standard. You have more responsibility to the nation. Time and time again, they were more concerned with optics than substance. They were bitterly partisan and mean spirited.

    Harper and the Conservatives have failed to convince Canadians that they are capable of being honest brokers in a divided body politic. As such, Harper will not lead them in another election if it is after 2009, and this will be remembered as the turning point when Harper overplayed his hand and showed how weak Conservative national support really is.

  • archangel

    “What started as a political skirmish over the economy now has the potential to produce
    deep wounds to national unity.”

    Resonates with me for sure, and I do blame Harper an his minions. I wish these Conservatives would take some cues from the Wizard of Oz and find some brains, some heart and some courage. It may be too much to ask, but I can hope.

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Well, whatever anyone may think of Martin, he stood up like a man and faced the vote. He didn’t create a constitutional crisis, he didn’t divide the country and he didn’t attack our democracy.

From Macleans