Maclean’s Interview: Roland Fryer

Economist Roland Fryer talks to Kate Fillion about blacks, whites, Obama and the persistence of inequality

by Kate Fillion on Monday, December 8, 2008 1:00am - 5 Comments

Roland Fryer

Q: Every article and press release about you mentions that you’re 30, and the youngest African-American ever to get tenure at Harvard. And because of a magazine article a few years back, some really personal details—your parents’ failings, your own youthful drug dealing, your beloved great-aunt and uncle running a crack cocaine business—are now public. Do you wish that weren’t the case?

A: I’m so glad it’s out there. Obama did this as well. If you get it out there, I think the American public is . . . “forgiving” isn’t the right word, I don’t know if I need to be forgiven for anything, but now I don’t have to hide anything. And it actually makes me relate to the kids [I study] in inner-city schools in a real way; a lot of them are dealing with the issues, unfortunately, that my background describes.

Q: What do you make of the fact that Obama recently called himself a “mutt,” but is rarely referred to in the media as mixed-race?

A: Same thing with Tiger Woods. This has been happening in American media for many years, that if you’ve got a certain amount of black blood in you, you’re considered black. My grandfather on my mother’s side was, I believe, either mixed himself or a white man, and everyone calls me black. I think this is just what they called, back in the day, the one drop rule.

Q: In the U.S., the median black household income is about US$32,000, compared to about US$50,000 for whites. There’s an achievement gap, academically, between black and white kids. Young black men are more likely to be in prison than college, and on average, blacks die five years earlier than whites. Why does racial inequality persist?

A: That’s the million-dollar question. The truth is, we don’t know. Some will say it’s discrimination, some will say it’s the historical legacy of slavery, some will say it’s because of the culture and behaviour of people now. Genetics is another theory. I try not to make any large generalizations. What my research does is to put all these theories on the table and try to eliminate them, one by one. The scientific method allows the data to do the talking and our biases to be kept to a minimum.

Q: You’re an economist and the CEO of the new Education Innovation Laboratory at Harvard, which is all about scientific rigour and has attracted multi-millions in funding. It’s hard to believe a research and development agency for education didn’t already exist.

A: It’s funny you say that, because every other company that tries to appeal to 12- and 13-year-olds has huge buildings full of R & D people! Nike, Motorola, MTV—that’s basically where I got the idea from.

Bookmark and Share
  • John

    I find it somewhat disturbing that the interviewee starts out the interview by commenting how unrealistic a concept race is by using the one-drop analogy, then moving on to a discussion based upon race. Are the advantages of race more prevalence as the percentage of ‘black genes’ drops?

    Geneticists have pretty well disproven the concept of race as a biological entity. By leaving it as a social construct, it remains the field of racism. Recent studies have also that poverty has an effect on brain development similar to stroke. http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2008/12/081203092429.htm

  • Frank

    After reading your very disappointing and at times revolting interview with Roland Fryer on race inequality, what bothered me the most was that Macleans would publish such an article. From it I understood that Roland has found a way to create a multi-million dollar research firm and perhaps profit from it considerably, while satisfying the investors with market research information masking it as education research. I found great irony in his comparison to Nike’s and other coorporations’ attempt at appealing to youth, when asked about his firm. Fryer’s responses were for the most part incomplete, empty and at times down right insulting, as if from a disconnected elitist’s point of view looking down on his subjects. I don’t believe that society needs any more of that, even if disguised by someone who proclaims to have “street-credentials”.
    How can someone who’s area of study is economics possibly be an expert researcher on education and race?

    Not dissapointed by the man, only that his useless self-promotion made it to your mazanine.

  • Pingback: Community Children » Blog Archive » Native Students Meet with Strahl

  • Pingback: Community Children » Blog Archive » Innonative Ways to Help Children Succeed

  • Gladys

    I know I am commenting late but I just came across this article.

    The truth hurts and I think Mr. Fryer is finally getting down to business. There is a terrible education crisis in this country and it can not be ignored anymore. It is survival for the fittest and for some reason African-Americans are falling by the way side.

    I agree that genes have nothing to do with gaps in test scores. If you look at the amount of African (black immigrants coming in from Africa) you will see that their achievement is higher or equal to that of whites.

    I believe that it is socio-culture that is holding the African-American community down. I am looking forward to the results of the incentives experiment.

From Macleans