Maclean’s Interview: Roland Fryer

Economist Roland Fryer talks to Kate Fillion about blacks, whites, Obama and the persistence of inequality

by Kate Fillion on Monday, December 8, 2008 1:00am - 5 Comments

Q: By high school, how big is the achievement gap?

A: Huge. Graduation rates are wildly different; in urban areas, around 50 per cent of our kids are graduating, and when you look just at black males, the percentages are even less. And in the SATs, essentially the entrance exam to our elite universities, there’s barely any overlapping distribution of scores. It’s a little over one standard deviation difference between blacks and whites.

Q: In a study that looked at more than 90,000 kids, you found that black kids who get good grades are less likely to be popular than their same-race peers who get middling grades. Why is there social punishment for what you call “acting white”?

A: Scientifically, I don’t know the answer, but my hunch is that it stems back to the fact that in the ’50s, all the successful blacks—the lawyers, doctors, dentists—lived in the same neighbourhood [as less successful blacks did] because unfortunately, there weren’t that many other opportunities. With civil rights and the Fair Housing Act, you start to see successful blacks move out of the neighbourhood, so education became a predictor of whether or not you were going to be around. I think there’s just been this “Are you with us or against us?” kind of mentality, and I don’t think we’ve fully gotten beyond that. If you go to all-black schools in places like Harlem, for example, you don’t find this “acting white” effect [where high-achieving students are less popular]. Where there’s integration, that’s where we find “acting white” to be most salient.

Q: So do black kids do better overall in all-black schools? Or is it just that you don’t see this “acting white” effect, so kids with good grades are popular?

A: Exactly, you don’t see this effect. Very important distinction, because people have taken my work and argued for segregation, and that was not my intention! Unfortunately, the typical all-black school is also a more impoverished school, so we don’t know, all else equal, if having same-race kids together is a good idea. It would be a wonderful thing to test.

Q: Did you ever experience social repercussions for doing well academically?

A: Of course. I was a football player, and the coaches used to come through and ask all the players, “Hey, how you doing on your grades?” In Texas, as well as many other states now, if you didn’t pass your courses, you couldn’t play. I remember the coach coming around one time in high school and saying, “I know your grades are okay” and he went on to ask someone else. I told him, “Hey, don’t single me out!” I tried to be an athlete and kind of a class clown, to try to take away from the academics. I can also remember accusing people of acting white not only because of education but the clothes they wore, the music they listened to—I mean, if you listened to country music, you were definitely acting white in our high school—which I’m not proud of but it’s true.

Bookmark and Share
  • John

    I find it somewhat disturbing that the interviewee starts out the interview by commenting how unrealistic a concept race is by using the one-drop analogy, then moving on to a discussion based upon race. Are the advantages of race more prevalence as the percentage of ‘black genes’ drops?

    Geneticists have pretty well disproven the concept of race as a biological entity. By leaving it as a social construct, it remains the field of racism. Recent studies have also that poverty has an effect on brain development similar to stroke. http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2008/12/081203092429.htm

  • Frank

    After reading your very disappointing and at times revolting interview with Roland Fryer on race inequality, what bothered me the most was that Macleans would publish such an article. From it I understood that Roland has found a way to create a multi-million dollar research firm and perhaps profit from it considerably, while satisfying the investors with market research information masking it as education research. I found great irony in his comparison to Nike’s and other coorporations’ attempt at appealing to youth, when asked about his firm. Fryer’s responses were for the most part incomplete, empty and at times down right insulting, as if from a disconnected elitist’s point of view looking down on his subjects. I don’t believe that society needs any more of that, even if disguised by someone who proclaims to have “street-credentials”.
    How can someone who’s area of study is economics possibly be an expert researcher on education and race?

    Not dissapointed by the man, only that his useless self-promotion made it to your mazanine.

  • Pingback: Community Children » Blog Archive » Native Students Meet with Strahl

  • Pingback: Community Children » Blog Archive » Innonative Ways to Help Children Succeed

  • Gladys

    I know I am commenting late but I just came across this article.

    The truth hurts and I think Mr. Fryer is finally getting down to business. There is a terrible education crisis in this country and it can not be ignored anymore. It is survival for the fittest and for some reason African-Americans are falling by the way side.

    I agree that genes have nothing to do with gaps in test scores. If you look at the amount of African (black immigrants coming in from Africa) you will see that their achievement is higher or equal to that of whites.

    I believe that it is socio-culture that is holding the African-American community down. I am looking forward to the results of the incentives experiment.

From Macleans