Hallelujah! (UPDATE: Damnation!)

by Andrew Coyne on Thursday, December 11, 2008 11:08pm - 130 Comments

121208_coyne

Auto industry bailout dies in Senate

Thursday December 11, 10:49 pm ET

By John Crawley and Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate failed on Thursday night to reach a last-ditch compromise to bail out automakers, effectively killing any chance of congressional action this year.

Republican-brokered talks faltered, leaving the chamber at a dead end on an approach for extending $14 billion in loans to avert a threatened collapse of one or more automakers, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in remarks on the floor.

“It’s over with,” Reid said.

And with that dies any last lingering justification for governments in Canada spending billions of dollars they don’t have to prop up Detroit’s tottering Canadian transplants. I’d make the case for refusing a bailout even if the Americans had agreed to one — the willingness of other countries with deeper pockets than ours to subsidize industry makes any attempt to play beggar-thy-neighbour on our part not just ill-advised, but futile — but if Washington is not willing to blow its brains out, then certainly there’s no reason we should.

Amazing what a difference it makes having a few genuine free-marketers in the legislature, isn’t it?

MORE:

WASHINGTON (AP) – A $14 billion emergency bailout for U.S. automakers collapsed in the Senate Thursday night after the United Auto Workers refused to accede to Republican demands for swift wage cuts.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he was “terribly disappointed” about the demise of an emerging bipartisan deal to rescue Detroit’s Big Three.

He spoke shortly after Republicans left a closed-door meeting where they balked at giving the automakers federal aid unless their powerful union agreed to slash wages next year to bring them into line with those of Japanese carmakers.

By saying no to Detroit, the feds will be in a better situation to say no to all the other supplicants lining up outside their door: Nortel, Big Oil, the tech sector, the Atlantic premiers, the western premiers, the Ontario and Quebec premiers, etc etc. Whereas if they shell out for Big Auto, it will be open season…

Not that it isn’t already.

MOREOVER: We should be clear who the biggest winners are from this. It isn’t the taxpayer — although taxpayers will indeed be winners. It’s workers and firms in every other industry, who will not now see capital investment and consumer dollars diverted into staving off bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler that might have been available to them. There never was a good reason to favour autos over other industries. And subsidizing everybody in the name of equal treatment is even sillier. You can’t redistribute from everybody to everybody…

ARGH:

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — The Bush administration dropped its opposition to using the $700 billion bank bailout to provide financing for U.S. automakers, after the Senate yesterday failed to approve emergency loans.

“Because Congress failed to act, we will stand ready to prevent an imminent failure until Congress reconvenes and acts to address the long-term viability of the industry,” Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said in an e-mailed statement.

The Treasury has used all but about $15 billion of the first half of the Troubled Asset Relief Program’s funds since the plan was enacted Oct. 3. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has until today repeatedly resisted calls to use the program to aid the automakers.

Sooo-eeee!!!!

Bookmark and Share
  • DianeG

    Mike makes an excellent point about the way North American investors expect (ed) higher and higher returns on their investments. Publicly traded companies (not only the auto sector but other major sectors as well) become focussed on the short term, rather than the long term. Those at the top were rewarded with obscene bonuses for decisions that would ultimately lead to catastrophe. Leveraged buyouts became legal. Huge trades in totally rotten commercail paper, etc. etc. Greed!

  • Dale Mullen

    It’s still not clear why workers in the auto industry are so much more important than other struggling Canadian workers. To provide (or even consider) any kind of bailout or relief to the auto industry (or any other big business or big union group) is an insulting affront to every private business or private worker in Canada.
    As a private business person who has watched business drop 80% over the last year (most in the last few months), it’s very difficult to feel sorry for companies and workers who thrive on building an overpriced product which many Canadian do not want. And now we are being forced to pay for this arrogance?
    What are we thinking? Are we thinking?
    Dale

  • Dale Mullen

    If (when) we waste huge amounts of money bailing out the American/Canadian auto industry, what do you think will happen in 6 months to a year’s time? Of course, they’ll be right back at the trough demanding more money…
    If they could not make enough money to function in the good times, what makes us think they will be able to do better in these difficult times?

    Dale

  • Peter King

    Subsequent to my Dec 12th blog I want to point out that failures in the automotive industry are not new. I am originally from England and recall that many longstanding car manufacturers have failed since I bought my first car in 1958 despite great styling. The reasons were – high insurance rates, emmissions and safety inspections, very poor quality (rust and electrical problems) and production costs pricing cars beyond demand. Tooling up requires time and great expense but, more important, is the need to guess what the future market will be.
    Most of the English manufacturers were absorbed and ultimately became owned by quality manufacturers. I presently own two “foreign” cars produced under Ford ownership and they are the most reliable I have ever owned out of 23 vehicles over 50 years. The secret is non-union wage rates and tighter quality control. If America is the “land of the free”, that implies the right to fail and the Big 3 should be allowed to do so. A leaner industry would result and the supporting parts industries would still be required.

  • Brian B. Wolf

    Sean Stokholm – thank you for re-quoting some of my prolific work!

    I lived in the East for 14 years of my life. They hated all that were non-muslims. Their holy book says that they have to kill all infidels….if you happen to be non-muslim, you’re fucked!

    So if you care to debate me about Auto Industry/Unions or Muslims, I would be happy to. My only request is….please do some due diligence and research before you accept my offer. Don’t use knowledge/information that is hear say or media slants….”if you come to a gunfight with a knife in your hand, you are gonna get killed!”…anytime pardner!

From Macleans