Trail of terror

The horror in Mumbai is traced to a group with strong ties to al-Qaeda

by Michael Petrou on Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:00am - 5 Comments

It’s a sensible strategy, and one with a precedent. The December 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian parliament brought India and Pakistan to the brink of war, as each nation mobilized one million men for nearly a year. As the Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid notes in his recent book, Descent into Chaos, Pakistan was forced to move its troops away from the Afghan border to face the Indian army in the east. This allowed the Taliban and al-Qaeda escaping from Afghanistan to slip into Pakistan and establish a safe haven there.

Today, as in late 2001, the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and other radical Islamists on the Afghan-Pakistan frontier risk being squeezed between the Pakistani army—now acting with more resolve—and NATO and U.S. forces in Afghanistan. American unmanned Predator drones send Hellfire missiles into militants’ homes on the Pakistani side of the border, and Barack Obama’s pledge to send thousands of additional soldiers to Afghanistan will only increase the pressure. But were India and Pakistan to move to a war footing, this pressure would dissipate—Pakistani troops would withdraw, the Pakistani Taliban would take more territory, and al-Qaeda would likely be emboldened by its greater freedom.

It may still come to this. India’s moderate government, led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Congress party, is weak and will face demands for revenge—both from the general public and the opposition Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, which may whip up anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistani rhetoric in an upcoming election. Already there has been heated public anger on both sides of the border.

And yet the governments of the two nuclear-armed nations, which have been creeping toward peace since 2004, have so far shown restraint. Pakistan has promised to co-operate with India in its investigation, and its Muzaffarabad raid suggests Islamabad is willing to back up its words with action. The Pakistani government fears an Indian military strike. It is also facing enormous pressure from the U.S., which has provided Pakistan with more than US$10 billion in military and economic assistance since 2001. But with suspected Islamist terrorists attacking civilian targets in Pakistan, even in the aftermath of the assault on Mumbai, it is becoming unavoidably apparent that the two countries share a common enemy. It’s too soon to know what all the ramifications of the assault on Mumbai will be. But if, as seems likely, the attacks were designed to push India and Pakistan toward a deeper conflict, it’s not unrealistic to hope that they will backfire.

With Adnan R. Khan

Bookmark and Share
  • http://www.crusaderknight.blogspot.com James Pawlak

    The essential problem is NOT Pakistan BUT that trans-national and criminal-terrorist ideology known as “Islam” which relies on the force of murder, rape, genocide, robbery and perpetual war with others to furthe the perverse goals of its adult, male, members.

  • Liviu

    Im surprised It took you guys this long to say that these acts “strong ties to al-Qaeda”. What you didn’t say is that the “Terrorism Chief” was on the verge of unveiling the discoveries of his terrorism investigation linking people within the Indian government. He was murdered and silenced to suppress the truth. Clearly this is a false flag terrorism act to add new fuel to the fraud that is the war on terror. The majority of terrorists in the world are trained and funded by intelligence agencies (criminal agencies) like Mossad, CIA, BND, MI6, ISI.

    Looking at the first comment from James, makes me think that if a lot of people share his erroneous views then the world doesn’t have any hope.

    We can overcome this

  • http://baronsview.blogspot.com barbbicycle

    The free world is just going to have to start showing these cowards, it means business when combatting terrorism…and yes…this means using limited nuclear strikes to deter anyone, anywhere from using acts of barbarisms, genocides, rapes, indiscriminate killings by suicide bombers. Countries sheltering or hosting terrorists should be put on notice that limited and targeted nuclear strikes will be used against them and we’ll see how fast everyone cleans up their act.

    • Mike T.

      _____________________

      Everyone above this line is seriously crazy.

  • Syed

    I disagree with barbbicycle , Acts of barbarism against barbarism only perpetuates the cycle. I believe that barbarism is being exploited and fed here by ISI or who knows ? CIA , these Lunatics have always been around there is someone who is arming and encouraging them . The only hope is universal Liberal education that teaches people not to take religion seriously . learn to grow out of primitive ideology and belief systems. Primitive Ideology is a threat not only in Islamic world, but all over the world. People in US have been taught to ridicule Liberal thought . Intellectuals must be ridiculed .Some people in Israel are trying to do God’s work by endless bloodshed and people in US are supporting the bloodshed in God’s name ,we can not have two parties justifying barbarism in the name of God ,I think they deserve the kind of enemy they have.Good people are being crushed in the battle of two lunatic ideologies. Jonathan Swift was so right in his satire of small endians and big endians. Two armies at war for they could not agree on how to break an egg before you eat it.

From Macleans