<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do auto workers make too much?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65997</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65997</guid>
		<description>The economic survival of the Ford, GM, and Chrysler squarely in the hands of the Auto Unions; the reality is that without wage and benefit concessions all automakers will eventually fold.

Total unionized worker compensation (wages, pension, severance, paid leave, health care, etc) is at least 1/3 more than that given to non-union autoworkers.

The union&#039;s position to simply blame management (and government) for the Big Three&#039;s financial difficulties is absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economic survival of the Ford, GM, and Chrysler squarely in the hands of the Auto Unions; the reality is that without wage and benefit concessions all automakers will eventually fold.</p>
<p>Total unionized worker compensation (wages, pension, severance, paid leave, health care, etc) is at least 1/3 more than that given to non-union autoworkers.</p>
<p>The union&#8217;s position to simply blame management (and government) for the Big Three&#8217;s financial difficulties is absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65996</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65996</guid>
		<description>hey kc, you have a good point.  Does making money only stem from the elite of our society?  Who shares in the fruits of technological gains?  What about union workers making lots of money like their bosses.  Afterall, don&#039;t our bosses set the example on how to be greedy.  I have never met one boss yet who agreed to work for nothing.

To refresh my belief in humanity, it is no wonder i donate free work for charities.  At least they respect the right to human existance beyond their dollar value.  I love to donate my time to charities.  I only hope people on this blog can understand giving is better than getting.  It is not a business model, but it is most certainly a human model.  Thanks from Ron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey kc, you have a good point.  Does making money only stem from the elite of our society?  Who shares in the fruits of technological gains?  What about union workers making lots of money like their bosses.  Afterall, don&#8217;t our bosses set the example on how to be greedy.  I have never met one boss yet who agreed to work for nothing.</p>
<p>To refresh my belief in humanity, it is no wonder i donate free work for charities.  At least they respect the right to human existance beyond their dollar value.  I love to donate my time to charities.  I only hope people on this blog can understand giving is better than getting.  It is not a business model, but it is most certainly a human model.  Thanks from Ron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65995</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65995</guid>
		<description>hello, hello, are you there?  Union bashing will never solve our economic problems.  Do believe it will?  Well....then you will never get an educational degree in economics.  Bashing other people with whom you diagree with will never solve the world problems.  &quot;currently, if you think otherwise, please move immediately to Gaza, where the Isrealis will help you and your thinking out, LOL.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello, hello, are you there?  Union bashing will never solve our economic problems.  Do believe it will?  Well&#8230;.then you will never get an educational degree in economics.  Bashing other people with whom you diagree with will never solve the world problems.  &#8220;currently, if you think otherwise, please move immediately to Gaza, where the Isrealis will help you and your thinking out, LOL.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65994</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65994</guid>
		<description>Maybe you are very sheltered in your life.  Thank goodness for some Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses who worked at my local ski hill.  Their employer refused to pay overtime.  It was their adherance to law, as a belief, that compelled the employer to pay.  Other workers were afraid to seek lawyers to defend them in law.  The end result was the overtime was paid, only once, then the employer hired enough workers to ensure nobody got full time (40 hours) per week, so no ovetime was ever paid again.   Lovely laws, and great lawyers on this case.  Go keep your secret little concept that justice works as it should.  Bullshit.  Most laws are never automatically enforced.  Lawyers in offices don&#039;t run out to work places to defend workers.  Wake up and smell the stench of reality.   Get rid of unions to see a change in the country says one gentleman earlier in this post.  He must have one terrific (and expensive) lawyer to defend him.  As for the rest of us poor working class....get a union to defend you now!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you are very sheltered in your life.  Thank goodness for some Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses who worked at my local ski hill.  Their employer refused to pay overtime.  It was their adherance to law, as a belief, that compelled the employer to pay.  Other workers were afraid to seek lawyers to defend them in law.  The end result was the overtime was paid, only once, then the employer hired enough workers to ensure nobody got full time (40 hours) per week, so no ovetime was ever paid again.   Lovely laws, and great lawyers on this case.  Go keep your secret little concept that justice works as it should.  Bullshit.  Most laws are never automatically enforced.  Lawyers in offices don&#8217;t run out to work places to defend workers.  Wake up and smell the stench of reality.   Get rid of unions to see a change in the country says one gentleman earlier in this post.  He must have one terrific (and expensive) lawyer to defend him.  As for the rest of us poor working class&#8230;.get a union to defend you now!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65993</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65993</guid>
		<description>Then I invite you to show me a job that today is producing a product that really sells.  Do u make something in your line of employment that everybody is snapping up these days?  Unfortunately i don&#039;t see alot of any products moving, nor a lot of work being created.  In fact the economy is getting poorer by the day.

Why just today the Conference Board of Canada put out its economic warning for Canada....prepare for a 9-month recession.  And to prove it, a nearby coal mine, where lumber workers went to get new jobs in our region, is now laying off, with another virtually closing down.  Even the Alberta oil industry has put its hand out for some bail-out package from government.

I suspect that this economic situation is bigger and more complex than most people on here might want to realize.  And probably more complex than I can understand.  Debating union versus non-union will not solve our economic woes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then I invite you to show me a job that today is producing a product that really sells.  Do u make something in your line of employment that everybody is snapping up these days?  Unfortunately i don&#8217;t see alot of any products moving, nor a lot of work being created.  In fact the economy is getting poorer by the day.</p>
<p>Why just today the Conference Board of Canada put out its economic warning for Canada&#8230;.prepare for a 9-month recession.  And to prove it, a nearby coal mine, where lumber workers went to get new jobs in our region, is now laying off, with another virtually closing down.  Even the Alberta oil industry has put its hand out for some bail-out package from government.</p>
<p>I suspect that this economic situation is bigger and more complex than most people on here might want to realize.  And probably more complex than I can understand.  Debating union versus non-union will not solve our economic woes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Tom.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65992</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Tom.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65992</guid>
		<description>No one is blaming the car unions you moron, their saying pay Nurses and Teachers more, quit making a product that doesn&#039;t sell, go back to school and get educated, and quit crying because you &quot;Autoworkers&quot; have made way too much money doing something that doesn&#039;t sell. Lumber, Oil, Farming, are currently less fortunate then Autoworkers. Cars are not in demand and layoffs are needed. Get a real job last time i check everyone still drives the car that doesn&#039;t have a car payment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is blaming the car unions you moron, their saying pay Nurses and Teachers more, quit making a product that doesn&#8217;t sell, go back to school and get educated, and quit crying because you &#8220;Autoworkers&#8221; have made way too much money doing something that doesn&#8217;t sell. Lumber, Oil, Farming, are currently less fortunate then Autoworkers. Cars are not in demand and layoffs are needed. Get a real job last time i check everyone still drives the car that doesn&#8217;t have a car payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Tom.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65991</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Tom.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65991</guid>
		<description>As Canadians every Union Autoworker should be ashamed of themselves. Everyone who walks into that plant and does nothing for $77 per hour day in day out, should be the ones that go sit on the street for a year to try and grasp how bad a large percentage of Canadians really have it. Give me a break people I would along with many others commend Harper for driving a hard line and avoiding the panic button. You Ontario Liberals just cry until you get a hand out. Laugh it&#039;s okay, while Western Canada struggles with no bailouts, since there are no jobs since everyone in Ontario and Newfoundland now live in Alberta things are worse then what the papers publish. Handouts are something that Oil and Gas industry, Forestry industry, nor the Medical profession have ever heard about. When Ontario&#039;s autoworkers can&#039;t handle their EI check vs. their $77 per hour there sure is a lot of votes that can make things happen in Ontario isn&#039;t there. You build cars and you make more than someone who puts their life on the line in the Oil patch, or our Medical staff. Our government should have ignored the cries for greed and went on with business. Harper you were right Dion and Iggy are just using &quot;Bailout&quot; as a tool to gain votes and power and you are the one the is seen as the bad guy. Wow Canadians be ashamed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Canadians every Union Autoworker should be ashamed of themselves. Everyone who walks into that plant and does nothing for $77 per hour day in day out, should be the ones that go sit on the street for a year to try and grasp how bad a large percentage of Canadians really have it. Give me a break people I would along with many others commend Harper for driving a hard line and avoiding the panic button. You Ontario Liberals just cry until you get a hand out. Laugh it&#8217;s okay, while Western Canada struggles with no bailouts, since there are no jobs since everyone in Ontario and Newfoundland now live in Alberta things are worse then what the papers publish. Handouts are something that Oil and Gas industry, Forestry industry, nor the Medical profession have ever heard about. When Ontario&#8217;s autoworkers can&#8217;t handle their EI check vs. their $77 per hour there sure is a lot of votes that can make things happen in Ontario isn&#8217;t there. You build cars and you make more than someone who puts their life on the line in the Oil patch, or our Medical staff. Our government should have ignored the cries for greed and went on with business. Harper you were right Dion and Iggy are just using &#8220;Bailout&#8221; as a tool to gain votes and power and you are the one the is seen as the bad guy. Wow Canadians be ashamed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65990</link>
		<dc:creator>jwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65990</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your suggestion to get rid of unions is in itself ridiculous. It’s like saying get rid of defence lawyers. Who would defend the workers?&quot;

Our laws would defend the workers. The only thing unions do now is agitate for more money and benefits in exchange for working fewer hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your suggestion to get rid of unions is in itself ridiculous. It’s like saying get rid of defence lawyers. Who would defend the workers?&#8221;</p>
<p>Our laws would defend the workers. The only thing unions do now is agitate for more money and benefits in exchange for working fewer hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chanie Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65989</link>
		<dc:creator>Chanie Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65989</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s a lot more at play here than simple wage disparity between the automotive and other manufacturing sectors.

As a general rule, companies rot from the top down.

It&#039;s been widespread mismanagement, lack of planning and irresponsible business practices that have been the major contributors to the threatened collapse of the big three. Unions play a role, certainly, but it&#039;s the wrong focus in this case.

Simply saying &#039;the workers make too much&#039; creates a scapegoat... conveniently at the bottom of the pile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a lot more at play here than simple wage disparity between the automotive and other manufacturing sectors.</p>
<p>As a general rule, companies rot from the top down.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been widespread mismanagement, lack of planning and irresponsible business practices that have been the major contributors to the threatened collapse of the big three. Unions play a role, certainly, but it&#8217;s the wrong focus in this case.</p>
<p>Simply saying &#8216;the workers make too much&#8217; creates a scapegoat&#8230; conveniently at the bottom of the pile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65988</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65988</guid>
		<description>I think you would have to go to China and tell a worker he shouldnt have his job.  The people of China want jobs.    Union&#039;s are only good for protecting workers from un-safe work places.    They should stay on of course, but as years go by,  market condtions change,  wages have to change with them.
a &quot;decent wage&quot; is just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you would have to go to China and tell a worker he shouldnt have his job.  The people of China want jobs.    Union&#8217;s are only good for protecting workers from un-safe work places.    They should stay on of course, but as years go by,  market condtions change,  wages have to change with them.<br />
a &#8220;decent wage&#8221; is just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65987</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65987</guid>
		<description>Yes it does spring from class snobbery.......The Auto worker has grown into our upper middle class.   They got these jobs and bought to many houses they couldnt afford,  too many big trucks they didnt need.  While they did this they looked down on the rest of the people makeing under 20 dollars an hour.  They got to to many credit cards,  got to many Tv&#039;s and DVD players on credit.  The Baby Boomers have let us down again.  I hope we can learn from their mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it does spring from class snobbery&#8230;&#8230;.The Auto worker has grown into our upper middle class.   They got these jobs and bought to many houses they couldnt afford,  too many big trucks they didnt need.  While they did this they looked down on the rest of the people makeing under 20 dollars an hour.  They got to to many credit cards,  got to many Tv&#8217;s and DVD players on credit.  The Baby Boomers have let us down again.  I hope we can learn from their mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TobyornotToby</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65986</link>
		<dc:creator>TobyornotToby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65986</guid>
		<description>There are electric cars available. Check out the web sites for Zenn Motors (Don MIlls, Ontario) and
Tesla Motors in Califronia.

The problem with fully electric cars is that they might have zero emissions from the tailpipe, but what about the emissions from generating the electricity that charges the batteries?

Even with electric vehicles widely used, to address climate disruption we will still need to reduce the use of fossil fuels for electrical generation and we will still need to reduce sinlge occupancy vehicle use  by walking, cycling, carpooling or taking public transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are electric cars available. Check out the web sites for Zenn Motors (Don MIlls, Ontario) and<br />
Tesla Motors in Califronia.</p>
<p>The problem with fully electric cars is that they might have zero emissions from the tailpipe, but what about the emissions from generating the electricity that charges the batteries?</p>
<p>Even with electric vehicles widely used, to address climate disruption we will still need to reduce the use of fossil fuels for electrical generation and we will still need to reduce sinlge occupancy vehicle use  by walking, cycling, carpooling or taking public transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65985</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65985</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We, as unionized forest industry workers, were asked to take a wage cut also. WE SAID NO.&lt;/i&gt;
--Ron Fisher, Dec 30, 2008.

And another goodie:
&lt;i&gt;Since our lumber is not leaving our millsites, it is totally irrelevant as to what wage they pay us. &lt;/i&gt;  Dude, if your product is not moving, stop making product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We, as unionized forest industry workers, were asked to take a wage cut also. WE SAID NO.</i><br />
&#8211;Ron Fisher, Dec 30, 2008.</p>
<p>And another goodie:<br />
<i>Since our lumber is not leaving our millsites, it is totally irrelevant as to what wage they pay us. </i>  Dude, if your product is not moving, stop making product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65984</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65984</guid>
		<description>Your suggestion to get rid of unions is in itself ridiculous.  It&#039;s like saying get rid of defence lawyers.  Who would defend the workers?  YOU?  Or selfless employers who recognize the need for workers to earn a decent wage.  I know there are some very good employers around.  But there are more greedy ones.

The only businesses that I know of who do really well without unions, are those in China.  I only hope the terrible working conditions those workers must endure will change as their employers profit.  But there is nothing to guarantee that.  Why don&#039;t you investigate what kind of awful conditions many Chinese workers have in their workplaces.  Get back to us on that please, and thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your suggestion to get rid of unions is in itself ridiculous.  It&#8217;s like saying get rid of defence lawyers.  Who would defend the workers?  YOU?  Or selfless employers who recognize the need for workers to earn a decent wage.  I know there are some very good employers around.  But there are more greedy ones.</p>
<p>The only businesses that I know of who do really well without unions, are those in China.  I only hope the terrible working conditions those workers must endure will change as their employers profit.  But there is nothing to guarantee that.  Why don&#8217;t you investigate what kind of awful conditions many Chinese workers have in their workplaces.  Get back to us on that please, and thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65983</guid>
		<description>Ron Fisher is the guy, me, who has spent a 35 year career in a good paying job in the forest industry.  The forest industry is now suffering not because of high wages, it is suffering because of lack of demand.  Don&#039;t you read the news?  The housing market has collapsed in the USA, and we sell 90% of our product there.  But not much being sold there these days.

Our management IS NOT demanding lower wages.  Instead they are struggling with a concept of how to make our Company survive when there is no need for the product we produce.  Lord have mercy if you can&#039;t understand the drying up of the American housing market is the root of the employment problem in the Canadian forest industry.  It is time you all relegated yourselves to solving economic issues rather than picking on unions.  I seem to recall all the highly educated economic thinkers are non-union, yet they still have no idea how to get us out of this mess.....Go Figure!  Maybe lower wages on their part would help them off their keisters to provide a real solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Fisher is the guy, me, who has spent a 35 year career in a good paying job in the forest industry.  The forest industry is now suffering not because of high wages, it is suffering because of lack of demand.  Don&#8217;t you read the news?  The housing market has collapsed in the USA, and we sell 90% of our product there.  But not much being sold there these days.</p>
<p>Our management IS NOT demanding lower wages.  Instead they are struggling with a concept of how to make our Company survive when there is no need for the product we produce.  Lord have mercy if you can&#8217;t understand the drying up of the American housing market is the root of the employment problem in the Canadian forest industry.  It is time you all relegated yourselves to solving economic issues rather than picking on unions.  I seem to recall all the highly educated economic thinkers are non-union, yet they still have no idea how to get us out of this mess&#8230;..Go Figure!  Maybe lower wages on their part would help them off their keisters to provide a real solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65982</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65982</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to put all the cards on the table from both labor and management.Let the negotiations begin.Who wants to keep the Auto Industry alive.Not a cent of public money until they come up with a agreement on what both sides are prepared to do to keep these plants open.If they can&#039;t then the Auto industry has to  start realigning their manufacturing and start closing plants down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to put all the cards on the table from both labor and management.Let the negotiations begin.Who wants to keep the Auto Industry alive.Not a cent of public money until they come up with a agreement on what both sides are prepared to do to keep these plants open.If they can&#8217;t then the Auto industry has to  start realigning their manufacturing and start closing plants down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65981</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65981</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info on the car unions - i can&#039;t say i&#039;m that sold on their case as you describe it. if you want to extrapolate from this that all unions are inherantly bad then you&#039;re entitled to be as wrong as the next guy. Iv&#039;ve seen the hits that forest unions have taken on this coast and the often blatant dis-regard for community and enviromental issues that companies have shown. Not to mention their [ conpany] oh so cozy relationship with folks who are elected to represent us all. One day unions wil be no longer necessary ; one day we&#039;ll see fairness and justice for all ; one day...  Enough ranting for one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info on the car unions &#8211; i can&#8217;t say i&#8217;m that sold on their case as you describe it. if you want to extrapolate from this that all unions are inherantly bad then you&#8217;re entitled to be as wrong as the next guy. Iv&#8217;ve seen the hits that forest unions have taken on this coast and the often blatant dis-regard for community and enviromental issues that companies have shown. Not to mention their [ conpany] oh so cozy relationship with folks who are elected to represent us all. One day unions wil be no longer necessary ; one day we&#8217;ll see fairness and justice for all ; one day&#8230;  Enough ranting for one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barbbicycle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65980</link>
		<dc:creator>barbbicycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65980</guid>
		<description>Get rid of the unions and you&#039;ll see change in the country. Business will then flourish.
The idea of having unions is so outdated, it ain&#039;t even funny.
The industrial revolution has not only come and gone, it has now by-passed us for better pastures in the Far East, thus leaving the average North American debt ridden to the gills and mortgaged to his/her grave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get rid of the unions and you&#8217;ll see change in the country. Business will then flourish.<br />
The idea of having unions is so outdated, it ain&#8217;t even funny.<br />
The industrial revolution has not only come and gone, it has now by-passed us for better pastures in the Far East, thus leaving the average North American debt ridden to the gills and mortgaged to his/her grave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65979</link>
		<dc:creator>sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65979</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with your conspiracy theories.

The primary technological reasons holding back the electric car is the size and weight of batteries large enough for the car to travel a significant distance.  That is why all electric cars also have gasoline engines.

Even the Chevy Volt will fall back to a gasoline motor.

Have you not noticed this obvious fact?  Once the battery is depleted, you cannot just pop into a service station and fill it up on a matter of minutes!  So if you like getting stuck halfway to where you are going, then go ahead and find yourself an electric car.

And, to top it off, where do you think the electicity is coming from?  In many places, the electricity in your electric car is coming from fossil fuels, including coal and natural gas!  In a hybrid, the electricity is coming from the gasoline in the tank!

So, unless the car can run on electricity efficiently (which they cannot), you are consuming more fossil fuels than you would be consuming from a gasoline car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with your conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>The primary technological reasons holding back the electric car is the size and weight of batteries large enough for the car to travel a significant distance.  That is why all electric cars also have gasoline engines.</p>
<p>Even the Chevy Volt will fall back to a gasoline motor.</p>
<p>Have you not noticed this obvious fact?  Once the battery is depleted, you cannot just pop into a service station and fill it up on a matter of minutes!  So if you like getting stuck halfway to where you are going, then go ahead and find yourself an electric car.</p>
<p>And, to top it off, where do you think the electicity is coming from?  In many places, the electricity in your electric car is coming from fossil fuels, including coal and natural gas!  In a hybrid, the electricity is coming from the gasoline in the tank!</p>
<p>So, unless the car can run on electricity efficiently (which they cannot), you are consuming more fossil fuels than you would be consuming from a gasoline car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65978</link>
		<dc:creator>jwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65978</guid>
		<description>&quot;unions almost always seek to improve the benefits of existing workers at the expense of newly arriving workers&quot;

The UAW allows retirees to vote as well as current workers and there are 4.6 retirees for each worker now employed (at GM at least).  It is why it can be accurately claimed that GM is now basically a health care provider that also happens to produce vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;unions almost always seek to improve the benefits of existing workers at the expense of newly arriving workers&#8221;</p>
<p>The UAW allows retirees to vote as well as current workers and there are 4.6 retirees for each worker now employed (at GM at least).  It is why it can be accurately claimed that GM is now basically a health care provider that also happens to produce vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65977</link>
		<dc:creator>sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65977</guid>
		<description>&quot;class snobbery?&quot;

Frankly, the only reason I care about what goes on inside these companies is because they are taking taxpayer money, even though their employees are paid far beyond what others are paid.  Why on earth should the rest of Canada be paying these employees&#039; inflated salaries?  The unions think this is perfectly fine.

Management salaries should be cut as well.

And I agree with myl, unions almost always seek to improve the benefits of existing workers at the expense of newly arriving workers, so if there is any snobbery involved you should be talking to the unions themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;class snobbery?&#8221;</p>
<p>Frankly, the only reason I care about what goes on inside these companies is because they are taking taxpayer money, even though their employees are paid far beyond what others are paid.  Why on earth should the rest of Canada be paying these employees&#8217; inflated salaries?  The unions think this is perfectly fine.</p>
<p>Management salaries should be cut as well.</p>
<p>And I agree with myl, unions almost always seek to improve the benefits of existing workers at the expense of newly arriving workers, so if there is any snobbery involved you should be talking to the unions themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65976</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65976</guid>
		<description>kc, without having much focus on R Fisher (is he the guy who wants us to believe that demand for his output would suffer if he and his buddies accepted a pay cut?  I confess my reality-based brain lost him there), I can assert that in fact I have responded to it as I chat with you.  To help you out on the Big Three &quot;union stuff,&quot;  at this or the last (or both?) contract renewals, the union recognized the insanity of their weight on the good ship Big Three that they allowed that incoming NEW union members (who, go figure, did not yet have a vote because they were not yet hired to become members) would be subjected to different working conditions than the gold-plated standard of living to which the existing comrades had become accustomed.  I have not heard whether or not the lyrics have been changed from &quot;Solidarity Forever&quot; to &quot;Solidarity Up Until This Point in Time.&quot;  If ever you see Buzz in retirement, ask him if he&#039;s got it on his Ipod.

You are absolutely correct that I am no fan of unions at the best of times, so feel free to view any of my bloviating through that filter.  But when even the unions want to eat their young in favour of protecting the ill-gotten gains of existing members (yes, yes, collective agreement, management didn&#039;t have to sign, etc.), trust me, I&#039;ve had it with &#039;em.  Now they show up, cap in hand to the taxpayer to protect this insanity from a well-deserved death?  Please do not expect me to be quiet, or polite.  Let management, the unions, and the shareholders suffer for this stupidity.  The taxpayer will be on the hook enough in the social safety net we&#039;ve built.  The taxpayers of the future should not be forced to build bad cars nobody wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kc, without having much focus on R Fisher (is he the guy who wants us to believe that demand for his output would suffer if he and his buddies accepted a pay cut?  I confess my reality-based brain lost him there), I can assert that in fact I have responded to it as I chat with you.  To help you out on the Big Three &#8220;union stuff,&#8221;  at this or the last (or both?) contract renewals, the union recognized the insanity of their weight on the good ship Big Three that they allowed that incoming NEW union members (who, go figure, did not yet have a vote because they were not yet hired to become members) would be subjected to different working conditions than the gold-plated standard of living to which the existing comrades had become accustomed.  I have not heard whether or not the lyrics have been changed from &#8220;Solidarity Forever&#8221; to &#8220;Solidarity Up Until This Point in Time.&#8221;  If ever you see Buzz in retirement, ask him if he&#8217;s got it on his Ipod.</p>
<p>You are absolutely correct that I am no fan of unions at the best of times, so feel free to view any of my bloviating through that filter.  But when even the unions want to eat their young in favour of protecting the ill-gotten gains of existing members (yes, yes, collective agreement, management didn&#8217;t have to sign, etc.), trust me, I&#8217;ve had it with &#8216;em.  Now they show up, cap in hand to the taxpayer to protect this insanity from a well-deserved death?  Please do not expect me to be quiet, or polite.  Let management, the unions, and the shareholders suffer for this stupidity.  The taxpayer will be on the hook enough in the social safety net we&#8217;ve built.  The taxpayers of the future should not be forced to build bad cars nobody wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65975</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65975</guid>
		<description>jwl, I suspect there may be something about the Japanese design that helps efficient production, as well, otherwise I am with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jwl, I suspect there may be something about the Japanese design that helps efficient production, as well, otherwise I am with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65974</link>
		<dc:creator>jwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65974</guid>
		<description>What really needs to happen is that UAW needs to reduce their absurd work place, and other fiddly, rules. Have you seen that photo of the last contract signed by Detroit 3 and UAW? The contract is massive, weighs 22 pounds. The last numbers I recall reading said it takes about 1.2 days for foreign automaker to produce one vehicle in US while the Detroit 3 took around 1.9 days, which adds up over time. Detroit 3 lose money on every small car they sell and a big reason for that is that it takes so long, at a higher wage, to produce.

American Honda workers in Ohio are not that much faster than their counterparts at GM in Michigan. It all comes down to the workplace rules and regs the unions love to impose on company/workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really needs to happen is that UAW needs to reduce their absurd work place, and other fiddly, rules. Have you seen that photo of the last contract signed by Detroit 3 and UAW? The contract is massive, weighs 22 pounds. The last numbers I recall reading said it takes about 1.2 days for foreign automaker to produce one vehicle in US while the Detroit 3 took around 1.9 days, which adds up over time. Detroit 3 lose money on every small car they sell and a big reason for that is that it takes so long, at a higher wage, to produce.</p>
<p>American Honda workers in Ohio are not that much faster than their counterparts at GM in Michigan. It all comes down to the workplace rules and regs the unions love to impose on company/workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65973</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65973</guid>
		<description>I think you may be mis-informed re: union [auto] saleries. I may be wrong on this but i think you&#039;ll find that take home saleries for all unions, domestic and import is in the $25 - 28 range. The problem is much more the differences in benefit packages, dental etc. You see how all this has been framed - unions making $ 70/hr or more. Completely dishonest. If the benefits are the issue then lets talk about that. Personally i don&#039;t blame the unions for going after such luxuries as dental, and so on. Particularly when the Big Boys spend so much time at the trough themselves. What&#039;s that old saying about leadeship starting at the top. Anyway it looks like the parties over for everyone now, and the public is certainly not obliged to underwrite programmes that many others outside of unions don&#039;t enjoy themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may be mis-informed re: union [auto] saleries. I may be wrong on this but i think you&#8217;ll find that take home saleries for all unions, domestic and import is in the $25 &#8211; 28 range. The problem is much more the differences in benefit packages, dental etc. You see how all this has been framed &#8211; unions making $ 70/hr or more. Completely dishonest. If the benefits are the issue then lets talk about that. Personally i don&#8217;t blame the unions for going after such luxuries as dental, and so on. Particularly when the Big Boys spend so much time at the trough themselves. What&#8217;s that old saying about leadeship starting at the top. Anyway it looks like the parties over for everyone now, and the public is certainly not obliged to underwrite programmes that many others outside of unions don&#8217;t enjoy themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truemuse</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65972</link>
		<dc:creator>truemuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65972</guid>
		<description>While McGuinty takes on teacher federation after teacher federation, one by one, working arduously by negotiation to retain the status quo of low-paid women&#039;s work, it is quite noticeably sexist when he pitches in and sides with Harper to subsidize companies who make cars no-one wants.   Teachers Federations should take a page from the Auto Workers and unite.  The bellweather of any society is the degree to which it protects and preserves the teaching profession as an honored and well-paid workforce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While McGuinty takes on teacher federation after teacher federation, one by one, working arduously by negotiation to retain the status quo of low-paid women&#8217;s work, it is quite noticeably sexist when he pitches in and sides with Harper to subsidize companies who make cars no-one wants.   Teachers Federations should take a page from the Auto Workers and unite.  The bellweather of any society is the degree to which it protects and preserves the teaching profession as an honored and well-paid workforce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65971</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65971</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t blame car unions. It&#039;s simply hard to empathize when you compare these salaries with those of teachers, nurses, social workers, etc. Obviously I feel sorry for those out of work and their families. However, one would hope that someone making this kind of money woul dhave a significant chunk socked away, so I feel that their plight is less immediate than that of, say, coal miners in Cape Breton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t blame car unions. It&#8217;s simply hard to empathize when you compare these salaries with those of teachers, nurses, social workers, etc. Obviously I feel sorry for those out of work and their families. However, one would hope that someone making this kind of money woul dhave a significant chunk socked away, so I feel that their plight is less immediate than that of, say, coal miners in Cape Breton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65970</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65970</guid>
		<description>teachers are probably underpaid. But don&#039;t blame car unions. Presumably they&#039;re well paid for the same reasn that oil-field workers are. They both produce something that is in demand ; even if you banned unions from car plants, market forces would still create a demand for well paid skilled people, unless we give up our addiction to cars, in which case the demand and rewards would dry up.
Personally i would set teachers needs ahead of both the other parties, but then i don&#039;t set the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>teachers are probably underpaid. But don&#8217;t blame car unions. Presumably they&#8217;re well paid for the same reasn that oil-field workers are. They both produce something that is in demand ; even if you banned unions from car plants, market forces would still create a demand for well paid skilled people, unless we give up our addiction to cars, in which case the demand and rewards would dry up.<br />
Personally i would set teachers needs ahead of both the other parties, but then i don&#8217;t set the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65969</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65969</guid>
		<description>MYL - not sure what you mean about &#039;new hires&#039;. I should fess up that i&#039;m not as aware of the  car union stuff as i probably should be. It sounds to me yr talking about a seniority issue, which is contentious in itself. I live on the w/coast, so my focus is more on the forestry unions and unions generally.
 I see you don&#039;t care to address R Fishers pt earlier, that unions have made major concssions in return for better paid and more productive jobs. You may not like taxpayers bailing out the Detroit 3, fair enough, i don&#039;t particularly like proftable oil conpanies getting tax breaks at a time of record oil profits. I&#039;m sure a case can be made for both. People should stop pretending that there is anything remotely like &#039; free enterprise&#039; out there. It;s all just a bunch of self-interested parties jockeying for position and advantage.
As an aside, personally i think public money should usd to retool for a presumably greener future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MYL &#8211; not sure what you mean about &#8216;new hires&#8217;. I should fess up that i&#8217;m not as aware of the  car union stuff as i probably should be. It sounds to me yr talking about a seniority issue, which is contentious in itself. I live on the w/coast, so my focus is more on the forestry unions and unions generally.<br />
 I see you don&#8217;t care to address R Fishers pt earlier, that unions have made major concssions in return for better paid and more productive jobs. You may not like taxpayers bailing out the Detroit 3, fair enough, i don&#8217;t particularly like proftable oil conpanies getting tax breaks at a time of record oil profits. I&#8217;m sure a case can be made for both. People should stop pretending that there is anything remotely like &#8216; free enterprise&#8217; out there. It;s all just a bunch of self-interested parties jockeying for position and advantage.<br />
As an aside, personally i think public money should usd to retool for a presumably greener future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65968</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65968</guid>
		<description>No kidding. I&#039;m working my towards a teaching degree at the moment- and there is &lt;i&gt;no way&lt;/i&gt; I&#039;ll make anywhere near this much money before I&#039;m in my forties. Turns out I shouldn&#039;t have bothered with going thousands of dollars into debt for my schooling and looked for a job in the auto industry instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding. I&#8217;m working my towards a teaching degree at the moment- and there is <i>no way</i> I&#8217;ll make anywhere near this much money before I&#8217;m in my forties. Turns out I shouldn&#8217;t have bothered with going thousands of dollars into debt for my schooling and looked for a job in the auto industry instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65967</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65967</guid>
		<description>kc, if you want me to believe that &quot;the union has made sacrifices,&quot; you will have to hide from view the issue of new hires working under conditions nowhere near what the existing overpaid union members voted to keep for themselves.  If that&#039;s what counts for sharing the pain, you can keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kc, if you want me to believe that &#8220;the union has made sacrifices,&#8221; you will have to hide from view the issue of new hires working under conditions nowhere near what the existing overpaid union members voted to keep for themselves.  If that&#8217;s what counts for sharing the pain, you can keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65966</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65966</guid>
		<description>MyL - ok, you don&#039;t like unions, that&#039;s yr perogative. I never meant to impl that unions shouldn&#039;y share the pain, obvoiusly they will. But what bugs me is this implication, said or unsaid, that unions never take a hit. Ron Fisher [ above] makes a much better arguement than me, that unions already have made sacrifices. Take a look at the number of people employed today as opposed to say 20yrs ago. It&#039;s more than obvious that unions [ and others] have made major trade offs for a share in the resulting increase in productivity. This is what bugs me in particular the blanket assertion that unions always take and never contribute or sacrifice. Too many people hold on to the outdated belief that if only labour would be happy with, say $10/hr every would be dandy. Maybe i&#039;m missing the pt about lavash benefits, if everthing reported on them is true then they are too generous.
As to getting rid of mamagement , well the people who atually build the cars could hardly do any worse. Lastly try and remember that most of those union folks pay taxes too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MyL &#8211; ok, you don&#8217;t like unions, that&#8217;s yr perogative. I never meant to impl that unions shouldn&#8217;y share the pain, obvoiusly they will. But what bugs me is this implication, said or unsaid, that unions never take a hit. Ron Fisher [ above] makes a much better arguement than me, that unions already have made sacrifices. Take a look at the number of people employed today as opposed to say 20yrs ago. It&#8217;s more than obvious that unions [ and others] have made major trade offs for a share in the resulting increase in productivity. This is what bugs me in particular the blanket assertion that unions always take and never contribute or sacrifice. Too many people hold on to the outdated belief that if only labour would be happy with, say $10/hr every would be dandy. Maybe i&#8217;m missing the pt about lavash benefits, if everthing reported on them is true then they are too generous.<br />
As to getting rid of mamagement , well the people who atually build the cars could hardly do any worse. Lastly try and remember that most of those union folks pay taxes too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niraj Chandra</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65965</link>
		<dc:creator>Niraj Chandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65965</guid>
		<description>sf
Not quite true - there is no technological reason holding back the electric car. The auto companies, and the oil companies never wanted an electric car as it would destroy the market for gasoline-based cars.

There is also a movie out there - &quot;who killed the electric car?&quot; It gives plenty of info about how the auto makers decided to kill the electric car even after it was developed. Ford once made the electric car and there was a two-year backlog of orders. then, it suddenly stopped production and withdrew the product from the market.

Sure, there are limitations to electric cars. But even within those limitations, there is a good market for daily commuting etc. I&#039;m suggesting the car companies should exploit this market and stop making gas-guzzlers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sf<br />
Not quite true &#8211; there is no technological reason holding back the electric car. The auto companies, and the oil companies never wanted an electric car as it would destroy the market for gasoline-based cars.</p>
<p>There is also a movie out there &#8211; &#8220;who killed the electric car?&#8221; It gives plenty of info about how the auto makers decided to kill the electric car even after it was developed. Ford once made the electric car and there was a two-year backlog of orders. then, it suddenly stopped production and withdrew the product from the market.</p>
<p>Sure, there are limitations to electric cars. But even within those limitations, there is a good market for daily commuting etc. I&#8217;m suggesting the car companies should exploit this market and stop making gas-guzzlers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65964</link>
		<dc:creator>Shazia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65964</guid>
		<description>Blog have good information.  These information is useful and important.  I find these information is very lovely and reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog have good information.  These information is useful and important.  I find these information is very lovely and reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65963</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65963</guid>
		<description>Maybe someone should ask Lee Iacocca to come out of retirement to teach these idiots how to make an inexpensive automoblie that actually sells and doesn&#039;t carry the stigma of FORD F(fix) O(or) R(repair)
D(daily)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe someone should ask Lee Iacocca to come out of retirement to teach these idiots how to make an inexpensive automoblie that actually sells and doesn&#8217;t carry the stigma of FORD F(fix) O(or) R(repair)<br />
D(daily)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65962</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65962</guid>
		<description>OK, kc, you keep harping on this, obviously deaf to the well-deserved choruses of scorn that HAVE been heaped on incompetent management.  But, I&#039;ll bite...

Kill off every CEO, Vice President, and regional and local manager of every department.  Go ahead, do it.  Let the UAW and CAW run GM, Ford &amp; Chrysler.  Keep the fat undeserved pension and health care packages, don&#039;t surrender a penny in hourly wages, and for heaven&#039;s sake don&#039;t lay off a single worker without paying them full price for staying in some pool of idle workers playing Sudoku on their Nintendo DS.

Just don&#039;t come crying to the taxpayer to bail out this mess, &#039;cuz the taxpayer is only too happy to buy Hondas and Toyotas built in North America and elsewhere, and will be forgiven for not looking too kindly on keeping the UAW Impala, Neon and Taurus in the showrooms.  OK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, kc, you keep harping on this, obviously deaf to the well-deserved choruses of scorn that HAVE been heaped on incompetent management.  But, I&#8217;ll bite&#8230;</p>
<p>Kill off every CEO, Vice President, and regional and local manager of every department.  Go ahead, do it.  Let the UAW and CAW run GM, Ford &amp; Chrysler.  Keep the fat undeserved pension and health care packages, don&#8217;t surrender a penny in hourly wages, and for heaven&#8217;s sake don&#8217;t lay off a single worker without paying them full price for staying in some pool of idle workers playing Sudoku on their Nintendo DS.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t come crying to the taxpayer to bail out this mess, &#8216;cuz the taxpayer is only too happy to buy Hondas and Toyotas built in North America and elsewhere, and will be forgiven for not looking too kindly on keeping the UAW Impala, Neon and Taurus in the showrooms.  OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Champoux</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65961</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Champoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65961</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that auto workers are overpaid, but clearly teachers and nurses are underpaid. In my province, it takes fifteen years for a teacher to make thirty dollars an hour, and that&#039;s with a university degree. Kind of hard to tell kids that an good education pays off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that auto workers are overpaid, but clearly teachers and nurses are underpaid. In my province, it takes fifteen years for a teacher to make thirty dollars an hour, and that&#8217;s with a university degree. Kind of hard to tell kids that an good education pays off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65960</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65960</guid>
		<description>Yr right Ron, what Ford said is still true; if you pay yr workers adequately, they may even be able to buy some of yr products. Not to mention pay taxes that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yr right Ron, what Ford said is still true; if you pay yr workers adequately, they may even be able to buy some of yr products. Not to mention pay taxes that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65959</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65959</guid>
		<description>Why is it you guys only seem to be upset about overpaid unions? What&#039;s wrong with pouring a little scorn on the incompetent, over-compensatd managment. I don&#039;t think the guys and gals on the lines had too much say in crappy management  decisions. As to being over-paid, why shouldn&#039;t everyone share in the fruits of technological progress and productivity gains, it happens in other industries. Could some of this animosity towards labour unions in particular spring from a little old fashioned class snobbery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it you guys only seem to be upset about overpaid unions? What&#8217;s wrong with pouring a little scorn on the incompetent, over-compensatd managment. I don&#8217;t think the guys and gals on the lines had too much say in crappy management  decisions. As to being over-paid, why shouldn&#8217;t everyone share in the fruits of technological progress and productivity gains, it happens in other industries. Could some of this animosity towards labour unions in particular spring from a little old fashioned class snobbery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65958</link>
		<dc:creator>sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65958</guid>
		<description>For technological reasons, fully electric cars have not yet reached the market.  So I don&#039;t think you can blame them for that.  In fact, the Chevy Volt is possibly the most promising electric car of the future, although it remains to be seen if it survives this crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For technological reasons, fully electric cars have not yet reached the market.  So I don&#8217;t think you can blame them for that.  In fact, the Chevy Volt is possibly the most promising electric car of the future, although it remains to be seen if it survives this crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65957</link>
		<dc:creator>sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65957</guid>
		<description>Certainly, high productivity is a good thing.   There are many ingredients to successful companies, and in my opinion ingenuity and innovation is the most valuable.

With regards to your example, I think that it&#039;s likely the big 3 has improved productivity, but have failed to match the productivity of the foreign auto companies.  This is due to substantially higher legacy costs such as pensions and excessive dealerships, higher wages, inferior quality and reliability.

They have simply failed to compete.

The forestry industry, which is shrinking, has not failed to compete.

So I don&#039;t see these two things as the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly, high productivity is a good thing.   There are many ingredients to successful companies, and in my opinion ingenuity and innovation is the most valuable.</p>
<p>With regards to your example, I think that it&#8217;s likely the big 3 has improved productivity, but have failed to match the productivity of the foreign auto companies.  This is due to substantially higher legacy costs such as pensions and excessive dealerships, higher wages, inferior quality and reliability.</p>
<p>They have simply failed to compete.</p>
<p>The forestry industry, which is shrinking, has not failed to compete.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t see these two things as the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65956</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65956</guid>
		<description>Because, apparently, it is bad to let &quot;good jobs&quot; go.  Never mind that inherent in the phrase &quot;good job&quot; is the implication that the reward for this career exceeds the personal input.  If someone has lucked in to a &quot;good job,&quot; it is therefore a necessity for the rest of us shmoes without the &quot;good jobs&quot; to support that someone.

Or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because, apparently, it is bad to let &#8220;good jobs&#8221; go.  Never mind that inherent in the phrase &#8220;good job&#8221; is the implication that the reward for this career exceeds the personal input.  If someone has lucked in to a &#8220;good job,&#8221; it is therefore a necessity for the rest of us shmoes without the &#8220;good jobs&#8221; to support that someone.</p>
<p>Or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65955</link>
		<dc:creator>sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65955</guid>
		<description>Too true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter D. Friesen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65954</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter D. Friesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65954</guid>
		<description>Why should the Canadian taxpayers, most of whom earn significantly less then the Auto Workers, bail out the Auto Industry? Why doesn&#039;t the Auto Workers Union, which by the way is obscenly wealthy, step in and bail out the Auto Industry? The golden goose can only lay so many golden eggs and the Auto Workers Union has them all !!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should the Canadian taxpayers, most of whom earn significantly less then the Auto Workers, bail out the Auto Industry? Why doesn&#8217;t the Auto Workers Union, which by the way is obscenly wealthy, step in and bail out the Auto Industry? The golden goose can only lay so many golden eggs and the Auto Workers Union has them all !!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/18/auto-workers-make-a-lot-of-money%e2%80%94but-not-that-much/comment-page-1/#comment-65953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=24371#comment-65953</guid>
		<description>You have missed the point of high productivity.  Again, I refer the the troubled forest industry in which I am employed.  The forest industry has over the years reduced manpower by more than half.  In my own mill, what at one time in the past employed over 200 workers for two shifts, currently employes less than 100 workers for three shifts, thus now producing more lumber with less workers.  Isn&#039;t that a lower price per unit?  It certainly hasn&#039;t been about paying everyone lower wages that kept a smart forest industry successful during the good times.  Now we are on bad times, guaranteed that lower the wages for forest industry workers will never make anybody buy a stick of lumber, or especially enough sticks of lumber to keep this large forest industry running at historic successful levels.

To be sure some forest industry workers are working elsewhere, some for more wages, as in the mines, and some for less wages, as in the service industry.  But that was months ago.  Word is out that hiring of workers who are &quot;free to work elsewhere&quot; is drying up.  Hmmmm.....go figure.  Maybe even these jobs don&#039;t have low enough wages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have missed the point of high productivity.  Again, I refer the the troubled forest industry in which I am employed.  The forest industry has over the years reduced manpower by more than half.  In my own mill, what at one time in the past employed over 200 workers for two shifts, currently employes less than 100 workers for three shifts, thus now producing more lumber with less workers.  Isn&#8217;t that a lower price per unit?  It certainly hasn&#8217;t been about paying everyone lower wages that kept a smart forest industry successful during the good times.  Now we are on bad times, guaranteed that lower the wages for forest industry workers will never make anybody buy a stick of lumber, or especially enough sticks of lumber to keep this large forest industry running at historic successful levels.</p>
<p>To be sure some forest industry workers are working elsewhere, some for more wages, as in the mines, and some for less wages, as in the service industry.  But that was months ago.  Word is out that hiring of workers who are &#8220;free to work elsewhere&#8221; is drying up.  Hmmmm&#8230;..go figure.  Maybe even these jobs don&#8217;t have low enough wages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

