There is progress in Afghanistan, but the danger is increasing

PAUL WELLS on assignment

by Paul Wells on Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:30am - 28 Comments

081218_wells

On Dec. 5, a sunny Friday morning in Kabul, three SUVs pulled up to a bustling street corner near the north bank of the Kabul River. A dozen people tumbled out onto the sidewalk, including Ron Hoffman, Canada’s ambassador to Afghanistan, his scowling and vigilant bodyguards, and a handful of visitors from home, including me.

We stepped briskly away from the main street along a back lane split down the middle by a shallow V-shaped drainage ditch. Merchants’ stalls lined the lane: a man selling hand-hammered axe blades, another popping formidable quantities of popcorn on an open fire. Our destination, a few dozen metres off the thoroughfare, was the Turquoise Mountain redevelopment site, an ambitious attempt to reclaim one of Kabul’s oldest districts as a haven for traditional arts, crafts and architecture.

Only three years ago the whole area was buried in layers of accumulated trash to a depth of several metres, Sayed Majidi, a handsome German-born Afghan architect, told us. That’s when former British diplomat Rory Stewart wrangled funding from the Aga Khan Foundation and Prince Charles to restore the neighbourhood, known as Murad Khane, to its 18th-century glory. The land was cleared, crumbling buildings rebuilt. Elder craftsmen and a new generation of their students set to work carving intricate woodwork doors and window frames. Ceramic wall fixtures were rebuilt with local clays mixed with a plant fibre called gul-e loch. Students started flocking to Turquoise Mountain from across Afghanistan to relearn the ancient techniques.

Last year the Canadian International Development Agency gave a grant of $3 million to continue Turquoise Mountain’s work as an architectural site, school for the arts, and high-end craft export business. These will seem like lofty concerns in Afghanistan, a war zone and one of the world’s poorest countries. But there is something magical about these elegant buildings tucked away from the clamouring streetscape. No society can get by for long on survival and subsistence alone. Every community needs craft and lore, some living link to the higher aspirations of the mind and heart. “Of course this is good for all of Kabul,” Hedayatullah Ahmadzai, Turquoise Mountain’s head of engineering, told me. “Afghan people don’t know their history. They need to see it. This place is the father and mother of all Kabul. Of all Afghanistan.”

While the engineer spoke, Hoffman, a superbly well-connected diplomat with a lopsided grin and a fly-away shock of greying blond hair, stepped away to take a call on his cellphone. The ambassador listened more than he spoke and ended the call with a quiet, “Well, thanks for letting me know.”

That night, after the next of kin had been properly notified back home, we learned that the call had been to inform Hoffman about the roadside bomb west of Kandahar that killed the 98th, 99th and 100th Canadian soldiers to die in Afghanistan.

The work of life and hope continues in Afghanistan. So does the work of unimaginable savagery. Each task has drawn practitioners of uncommon dedication. Even today, seven years into this mess, it is not clear who is winning. If victory has any decent meaning, we are nowhere close to being able to claim it. And a very dangerous year lies just ahead. Afghans will elect a new government in 2009. The Taliban and other insurgents will try to stop the voting. Drug lords will try to corrupt it. And a massive influx of American troops, perhaps 20,000 by 2010, will mark the arrival of a new American president determined to tip the balance of a stalemated war.

Even soldiers who eagerly await the arrival of U.S. reinforcements worry about what will happen when they arrive. Many—though certainly not all—believe the level of violence will skyrocket in the short term and that the heart of the carnage will be the country’s south, including Kandahar, where most of the soldiers in the Canadian deployment are already stationed. It may be salutary violence; perhaps this war needs to get worse before it gets better. But one U.S. general put it this way.

Bookmark and Share
  • Pingback: Macleans.ca - Afghanistan: wheat seed and worse

  • Jody

    It’s all in vain. Get out.

    • Griffon

      Are you OK with the slaughter the Taliban would inflict on the Afghan civilians if NATO left?

  • Diver Rob

    In contrast to those, like the comment above, that think we should just “cut and run” from Afghanistan, I believe we need to stay until the job is done. I am headed to Afghanistan next year with the CF, and am proud to be doing so. Many people in Canada take safe streets, schools, and a functionning government for granted (very much so, as evinced by the appalling voter turnout this year). We are trying to provide at least the bare minimum of that in Afghanistan. The news stories tend to accentuate the negative, but we have achieved enomrous succeses over there already – schools are built, women can work in many places without risk, and the government and ANA have taken the lead in most aspects. To simply abandon what we have acheived before Afghanistan is ready to stand on its own feet would not only be disrepsectful to those who have given their lives, but would be immoral to those Afghan citizens we have promised to help, and go against every value which we profess to hold dear in Canada.

  • Shenping

    Thanks you Diver Rob. I have only partial use of one arm & leg, so I can’t myself.

    About ten years ago I took part in one of the world’s hardest 10km races (in China), which had a 2.5km vertical climb on stone in 40C heat. I got 5th place, but at the top I got food poisoning from contaminated water which required hospitalization. A contestant from Afghanistahn, after running up the mountain, carried me down on his shoulders. People like him deserve a good and just society.

  • Jack Mitchell

    Terrific piece, makes you feel like you were there. Well, here’s hoping things start to turn around, as in the Piper’s tune.

    I don’t get the logic of not arming the tribes. If it’s so complex, why not figure it out? Hasn’t the whole Western world got one Pushtu-speaker who can understand complex tribal diplomacy? Like, anthropologists? It’s worked very well in Iraq.

    • Griffon

      From the article:

      “Arming or paying one faction could have repercussions nobody could predict or control. “On a scale from smart to dumb,” one officer said, holding his hands apart in front of him, “arming the tribes is over here.” He nodded at the “dumb” end of his scale.”

      You want to do dumb? The problem with Afghanistan is the tribes have too much power & the central government not enough. Arming tribes only increases that problem.

      The Canadian Forces have plenty of Pashtu speakers to advise on local culture. In fact, an Afghan-Canadian has just been appointed governor of Kandahar

      • Jack Mitchell

        Pakistan, with one of the world’s largest armies, can’t control its Pathans, so how soon will the ANA be able to do so? 2408? Meanwhile they’re wildcards. I say, bring them in on our side. They can do tons of things our guys can’t do.

        The question wasn’t “advising on local culture,” it was understanding extremely complex Pashtun tribal politics — where this whole war will be won or lost. We have guys who understand that? They’d have to be expert scholars or people who had grown up in those tribes.

        • Griffon

          Yes, we have such experts and they advise against arming the tribes. The approach that worked in Iraq, the ‘surge” cannot be copied “cookie cutter” style to Afghanistan. The culture is different. The problem is not the cultural complexities of the Pashtun tribes. It’s the long standing tradition of corruption & nepotism, the lack of sufficient troops to clear, hold & build, and the open sanctuary in Pakistan.

          • Jack Mitchell

            Nepotism and corruption — you mean in the Pashtun tribes? I thought that was practically the definition of a tribal culture. Why should that prevent their being used as auxiliaries? Forgive me if I don’t find an appeal to authority convincing.

    • Mike T.

      Arm locals with questionable loyalties? How do people think we got the Taliban in the first place?

  • Cdn in Europe

    We aren’t likely to succeed in turning Afghanistan into a well-functioning modern state in any case, but we certainly won’t if we don’t address each of the root causes of the conflict. One of those root causes (not the only one) is the spread of Wahabi fundamentalism via Saudi-funded madrassahs in Pakistan. This generates an endless supply of jihadi volunteers. To address it, we need, in essence, to reform the madrassahs, boot out the fundamentalist headmasters, and pay real teachers… expensive, but necessary, and less expensive than cruise missiles in any case. Another root cause is Pashtun xenophobia and general backwardness. What kind of culture condones shooting girls or throwing acid in their faces for the ‘crime’ of going to school? We can’t kill all the twits who hew to these ideas. The madrassahs and the Pashtun granddads ranting over their teacups keep manufacturing more of this sort of twit, with extra help from American bombing campaigns targetting wedding parties (oops! well, golly gosh, don’t git so dern angry, we dint mean no harm, we wuz only tryin’ te help). What we should focus on is killing the bad ideas, by replacing them with better ones. Pashtunistan needs a massive, comprehensive public education campaign. Perhaps we could start by gifting every Pashtun family a TV and radio, and then ceaselessly playing Pashtun-language reruns of Discovery Channel shows on sciences and arts, and BBC specials on comparative religion, among many other secular, modern topics. If that amounts to ‘cultural imperialism’, well, tot it up against a cultural preference for killing girls for going to school, and I’ll sign up for some straightforward Western-enlightenment cultural imperialism, merci bien.

    • Steve Wart

      To paraphrase Sting, the Taliban love their children too.

      I am shocked by what passes for cultural norms in tribal Afghanistan, but last time I checked, they didn’t ask for my opinion.

      It’s one thing to feel moral outrage at how another society functions, quite another thing to believe you have the means to change it.

      • Cdn in Europe

        They didn’t ask for your opinion? I dunno. I rather think they demanded our opinion when they decided to host a gang of fundamentalist Islamist crackpots who went around blowing up embassies and office towers in various Western countries. Having thus captured attention, we’ve noticed that “they”, i.e. the angry males in their culture, are viciously punishing women for trying to learn to read, growing most of the world’s opium crop, etc. Are we supposed to ignore all this shit out of some kind of obsession with cultural sovereignty? At what point is a culture so off the rails that a combination of self-defense, and ‘responsibility to protect’ the vulnerable folks trapped within that culture, require us to take action? I’d say the Pashtuns are way over that particular line. As are, for that matter, the Saudis, who are at the root of much of these problems — but they have oil money and corresponding influence, so we pretend otherwise, at our own peril.

        • Steve Wart

          Clearly we need to do what’s in our best interests. I am not sure that trying to control a vast desolate and ungovernable place is the right way to do that, either by sending groups of soldiers to various remote locations or by trying to build them a national broadcaster in the image of the CBC.

          Currently we are doing something, which is somehow better than nothing, because it’s something.

          Tough talk sounds good, but spending hundreds of millions of dollars and sending soldiers in to fight the enemy as if it’s a conventional war is having the opposite effect of what we want. You want to target the enemy, that’s all good, but we don’t even know who they are.

          • Cdn in Europe

            I agree that soldiers are fundamentally not the answer in Afghanistan. At best they are a necessary prelude, required to establish enough order to get on with some reconstruction and, dare I say it, reformation of Afghan culture and governance. At worst they are a flaming stick in a hornet’s nest, making everything worse. I have no in-field experience in Afghanistan and don’t feel qualified to judge which side of this divide is closer to the truth. However, it does seem very clear to me that we should be taking a massive public education campaign to the Afghans and Pakistanis, and especially the Pashtuns, because if we don’t, all they get to hear is the rantings of mullahs and tribal elders. Garbage in, garbage out. So yes: let’s give them a Pashto-language CBC, a Discovery Channel, radios, TVs, newspapers, whatever it takes, and attempt to spread the same Enlightenment values and updated information that freed our own civilization from our version of mad mullahs. It wasn’t so long ago that the Church was burning heretics, was it? We don’t feel it was wrong to challenge the Church theocracy in medieval Europe on the basis of ‘cultural sovereignty’ arguments. Nor is it wrong to challenge the cultural reign of obscurantist mad mullahs and vicious misogynists who nurture dreams to destroying the infidel West. This is a war of ideas, being fought inappropriately with bullets and bombs.

      • Griffon

        The Taliban have been using children as suicide bombers. Do you really think they love them?

        The Taliban are drawn only from a few tribes of only one of the Afghan ethnic groups. Why do you assume they have the right to dictate to the rest of the country? There are also plenty of Chechens, Arabs & Pakistanis, also known as Al Qaeda, fighting for the Taliban. The Taliban in no way represents Afghanistan’s interests.

  • http://relationary.wordpress.com/ grant czerepak

    Afghanistan is not the problem, Pakistan is.

    It’s time for the global community to focus its attention on the problem and deal with it.

    • Cdn in Europe

      Agreed. Though the problem is wider than Pakistan (Saudi Arabia is the source of much of the spreading problem: read The Looming Tower for some background), perennially-failing-state Pakistan is the most dangerous country on Earth. Loose nukes, fanatics, poverty, sexual frustration, paranoia, sectarian hatreds, frequent bombings, tribal rivalries, corruption and incompetence, all rolled up into one cute furry little ball. Gadzooks.

    • Mike T.

      And if this nuclear power says “thanks but no thanks”, should we declare yet a third war in the mid-east?

  • Brad

    “No society can get by for long on survival and subsistence alone. Every community needs craft and lore, some living link to the higher aspirations of the mind and heart.”

    Or a winning hockey team. Bryan Murray needs to do something right now or Ottawa is going to be nothing but subsistence living.

    But I digress. Those words really resonated. Thanks.

  • Pingback: Everything Is In/Flux · Bookmarks for December 17th through December 18th

  • Clive Addy

    Excellent article Paul.

    I wonder how Canadians felt after Dieppe in 42?

    Things looked much worse then.

    Good thing we will stick at least to our original commitment.

    Clive

  • Lisa

    Excellent article. The problems do seem to be ginormous but it is heartening to hear that so many good people are dedicating themselves wholeheartedly to the task of getting Afghanistan back on its feet. I hope they can take a moment to pat themselves on the back! However, coordinated efforts, perhaps one region at a time, must be the norm, focusing on eliminating opium production and corruption. The Millenium Development villages come to mind as an example. Treat the whole body, and the patient’s health will be restored.

  • Pingback: Macleans.ca - Afghanistan: Introducing ‘Task Force Kandahar’

  • Randy Shantz

    Is there a possibility of getting an audio clip of “Task Force Kandahar” as a link or podcast?

  • http://baronsview.blogspot.com barbbicycle

    I’m not sure who’s advising our politicians. Also not sure why the Allies, Nato, the Co-allition does not see a simple fact. It is not possible to bring Democracy to the Middle East. These are tribal people used to behead one another for trivial matters. The minmute, the USA and the coallition withdraws from Iraq, political chaos will prevail, their newly established parliament will be demolished, the puppet politicians will be murdered and another strong man will emerge taking over where Saddam Hussein left off. This is the sad reality of their lives. In short, it’s their way and customs.
    Same theory applies to Afghanistan. The minute we leave, there will be another gang of bandits ready to take over and terrorize the population. Look at what happened and is still happening in Darfur…. Only stable countries in the Middle East are ruled by autocratic, friendly ditactorships who know how to keep their populace under control…cases in point: Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Morrocco, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Lybia, Tunis. Name it what you want or will but just think what would happen in aqny one of these countries if the current regime was overthrown

  • wayne moores

    Careful what you say Paul…progress in Afganistan…now that’s just not cricket…not part of the media narritive that is supposed to get out don’t you know. If your not careful you will be pronounced as being politically incorrect and banished. Canadians are only supposed to hear about Canadian deaths, not schools reopening and new ones being built, or girls being allowed to go to any school for the first time in their lives. Layton wants us to cut and run and leave the civilian population, espcially the female population to the devices of the Taliban. Funny, he’s so worried about not enough female representation in parliment here, but seems perfectly ok to let women over there not be let out of the house or have acid thown on them. Glad we had better leadership than him after the Dieppe raid. I guess he would have just packed up and come home. After all, what the heck were we doing in Europe anyway in the 40′s.

From Macleans