SenateWatch: No, the PM didn't appoint *that* Michel Rivard.

by kadyomalley on Monday, December 22, 2008 1:40pm - 75 Comments

The newly minted senator is not, alas, the beloved Quebecois songwriter behind the cult hit video from the last election, “Culture en peril” -   but another Michel Rivard — former Parti Quebecois (!) MNA circa 1994-1998, who has apparently since been won over by the subtle charms of federalism. (Despite the near impossibility in Googling the non-musical Rivard, it’s safe to say this probably isn’t a case of life imitating that episode of Yes, Prime Minister with the name-colliding Rons Joneses.)

Oh, and just in case anyone was worried that Rivard’s former Piquisteness might inadvertantly put the PM in an awkward situation after he repeatedly suggested that a Liberal-NDP government might appoint separatists to the Senate, fear not:  the official announcement of the new senators notes that “each incoming Senator has also declared his or her unwavering commitment to support Canadian unity and oppose the coalition.”

UPDATE: As pointed out by a reader with a far better memory than ITQ: This is almost certainly the same Michel Rivard that the Bloc Quebecois wanted to add to the witness list for last summer’s Ethics committee hearings on in-and-out. He didn’t make the final cut, but did get a shoutout from former Conservative candidate Liberato Martelli, as noted in the liveblog from that session. Rivard’s fellow incoming senator Irving Gerstein was also supposed to go before the committee, but didn’t wind up doing so due to some sort of confusing confusion involving the process server and his – Gerstein’s, that is – housekeeper. (Didn’t I warn you it was confusing?)


Bookmark and Share
  • TobyornotToby

    Attempts to whip the Senate vote with conditions on the appointment is unseemly, and unhelpful in attempting to reform the institute, but I think that once in the role of elder, even the narrowest partisan will rise to the expectations of the office.

    The use of the Senate as a patronage appointment has abased its role, but the concept of a committee of elders taking a view that is longer than the 4 year election cycle or the corporate fiscal year, is more than sound and more necessary today than ever. If we didn’t have it already we’d be wondering how to create a body that can respectfully suggest a longer view, a mroe temperate response to perceived crises. Shouldn’t we be trying to do better than in the past, find a way to temper the fear, anxiety and rash judgment that has led to reactionary attacks on civil liberties and arbitrary mistreatment of unpopular or minorities like the head tax, the Japanese internment, residential schools, Maher Arar?

    Isn’t this what Canadians want when they return minority after minority government to office because they are afraid of what one party or another will do?

    Call me an idealist, but as the baby boomers pass beyond 65 as a generation it could become popular to rehabilitate the role of elder in our society. Maybe that will create an opportunity to begin to repair and strengthen the Senate. And maybe the concept of “good government” will be in fashion once more, too.

    Or maybe I’ve just been hearing too many Christmas Carols while I’m working …

    • Jack Mitchell

      “Or maybe I’ve just been hearing too many Christmas Carols while I’m working …”

      Sober thought, second thought
      Not dismayed, not distraught,
      In yon Chamber of dignified Red
      Where the infamous never shall tread
      Keeping Canada sane,
      Keeping Canada sane.

      Sober thought, second thought,
      Can’t be sold, can’t be bought,
      Scrutinising the laws of the land,
      Passing nothing ad-lib or offhand
      Free from partisan strife,
      Free from partisan strife.

      Sober thought, second thought,
      What you’re worth some forgot,
      Shield against a repressive decree,
      Borne by ancient dignity,
      Senate, long may you thrive!
      Senate, long may you thrive!

  • keith by the Bruce

    PMO has limited RCMP pay raises in this time of economic trouble to 1.5% or approx. $1,081 / officier . If PMO decides to hold Parliament Hill CAW to 1.5% their average pay raise this year will be only $2960 .33 each .

From Macleans