Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

More Canadian than thou

by Aaron Wherry on Tuesday, January 6, 2009 5:43pm - 96 Comments

More Canadian than thou

As noted, last night’s battle of teenage hockey players was very important and deeply meaningful. Indeed, it was nothing less than a profound window into our national soul, and the very hearts of our political leaders.

Stephen Taylor explains.

Hockey games usually provide photo-ops for Canadian politicians to awkwardly rub shoulders with “every day” Canadians and pretend to show interest in the game that the rest of us plebs know and love. However, Stephen Harper, a man with an interest that could be described as a genuine but fanatical love of the game (maintained by his trademark calm) was there not only for the gold medal game, but most – if not all – of team Canada’s games during the entire tournament. As for photo-ops, our country’s leader looked at ease with a shirt-less gold-painted-with-Canada-logo-on-chest superfan as he gave thumbs up for a fan photo. The Prime Minister also took the opportunity of hanging out with the team before games in the dressing room. One reporter explained to me that usually such a moment would have racked the nerves of a team. However, for a man at ease in this element, wearing a leather jacket and jeans, having laced skates, taped sticks and socks many times before, the PM was just another hockey dad.

Michael Ignatieff was also in attendence but only for the gold medal game. The Liberal leader and grandson of a Russian tsar took a break from writing a book on his family history long enough to recognize the tournament and descend to mingle with the masses. Ignatieff had a rare chance of witnessing a Canadian hockey victory while living in Canada – the distinguished academic has been largely abroad since the late 60s. A friend joked that Ignatieff told TSN, “I am a fan of the game of hockey, but not necessarily a hockey fan.” For the two men, Harper and Ignatieff, hockey underscores a vital political strength and a vital political weakness. For the Prime Minister, voters select someone they see in themselves and they pick someone who understands and shares their concerns. For Ignatieff, voters will sever him if he cannot genuinely tie himself with the threads that line our hearts.

We’re a nation bound by our love of hockey.

In fairness, Mr. Ignatieff’s been Liberal leader for nearly a month. It’s really about time his Canadianness was questioned. His predecessor had the job for mere days before doubt was cast on his.

Bookmark and Share
  • Wayne

    Good point by Stephen (great blog blogging tories) and once Obamania has withered on the vine and the reality of the USA problem hits them RE: Even as he promised to make tough budgetary decisions, President-elect Barack Obama said today that the United States could face trillion-dollar deficits for years to come – I think some soon to be former liberal canadians will be re-evaluating it’s poltical leanings as well and with poll numbers already showing Stevie well out and ahead of Iggy (ipsos) I think it will be an interesting year.

    • http://caiti-online.blogspot.com/ Transcanada

      What about drinking around the office? Or sexual harassment around the office. Is that Canadian?

      The Conservative appointee Senator Patrick Brazeau is alleged allow this sort of thing at his previous office.

      How ‘Canadian’ is this? Is Brazeau really the face the Conservatives want in the Senate?

      What does this say about Steve Harper’s judgment?

    • Daniel

      A good point? You can’t be serious.

      I don’t even care that much about hockey. Does that fact alone make me less Canadian? Have we become that superficial?

      I think Jim hits the nail on the head with his comment:

      “It’s really about time [Ignatieff's] Canadianness was questioned.”

      If your notion of being Canadian boils down to going to hockey games, or ignoring one’s own heritage, I think instead that you should be questioning your own values, and what being Canadian is all about.

      I note from your own political career (http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2004/03/my-speech/) you were eager to peddle your family’s roots in your Kingston riding. Is being proud of one’s heritage only applicable if it is a strictly Canadian heritage?

      Do you really think that success in politics should be about whose family has been here the longest, or who likes hockey the most? I really hope that there is more to choosing a leader than that!

  • Bazoo

    Whenever Canadians are drawn together to celebrate with one another, we show our greatness. Hockey is no exception, but nor is it the only thing that draws our people together in collective enjoyment. I don’t mean to talk down Hockey, but it isn’t the game, per se, that makes Hockey a source of genuinely national sentiment. Rather, it is the Canadian people, and what we make of these things like Hockey (and other important cultural celebrations of our people) that is important, and I agree that an appreciation of this is of fundamental importance for a Canadian Politician to be legitimate.

  • John.K

    Ignatieff’s old grandad was the Tsar???? Posthumous promotion?

    • Charles

      Yeah, pretty sure no one alive is the grandson of a tsar, since the Romanov family was killed off en masse.

  • Jonathan

    I love it when anti-intellectualism disguises itself as patriotism.

    Seriously, I love hockey, and I drive my wife nuts with the amount of time I spend watching/following it, but when it comes to the qustion of “Who is best qualified to lead this country?“, that man’s love of the game doesn’t enter into it.

    • Suki

      Excellent point, Jonathon. I 100% agree

  • madeyoulook

    My guy’s a better hockey fan than your guy? Wow, good thing nothing else troubles our political landscape right now…

    Not that the media provided the electorate with a whole lot of POLICY details during the election. Why start now, eh?

    • http://macleans.ca kc

      Are you seriously blaming the media for that? The perenial shallowness of media bugs me too. However the pols need to take their share of the blame. Let’s see puffin poop and litle blue sweaters not to mention Dion’s love of shinny or dog- sledding or whatever. Sh had to be shamed into releasing his platform at all. Yea let’s blame the media.

  • cam

    Canadians have had three chances to allow Harper to “tie himself to our hearts” (barf) and have each time passed on giving him a majority. As for this long rumored book on hockey that Harper is supposedly writing, I think he may have some more time on his hands by the end of the year to finish it.

    And I don’t think Harper has ever played hockey! OMG how did Taylor ever allow him to become Conservative leader.

    What a bunch of embarrassing mush. Taylor should start a political Tiger Beat Blog.

  • PeteTong, It’s all gone

    I remember when Michael Ignatieff won his first election in 2006. Paul Martin immediately announced his resignation and a reporter than immediately asked Ignatieff about his intentions and he responded:
    “I’m going home to vacuum my house”. I was reminded of this shortly after he was appointed leader when he said that he grew up in barns.

    On the one hand I find him rediculous when he makes these statements, but on another, quite charming. Contrast this with Stephen Harper, who makes his own rediculous statements, and the lack of charm is quite apparent.

    Stephen says: For the Prime Minister, voters select someone they see in themselves and they pick someone who understands and shares their concerns. For Ignatieff, voters will sever him if he cannot genuinely tie himself with the threads that line our hearts.

    Quite frankly, I don’t think the PM has done a very good job of demonstrating that he understand or shares voters concerns. Sure he campaigns in a blue sweater and makes platitudes to the needs of families etc., but from a policy development and program delivery perspective not so much.

    In terms of a leader tying themselves to the threads that line our hearts, I think Stephen Taylor is forgetting that voters for the most part don’t give a phoque.

  • DianeG

    Soon it will be discovered that hockey was actually invented elsewhere – in Russia perhaps, Yup, that theory is just as silly as the blog above.

  • Ti-Guy

    What am I reading here? An entry from my daughter’s Brownie diary?

    For Ignatieff, voters will sever him if he cannot genuinely tie himself with the threads that line our hearts.

    This doesn’t work. Ignatieff would have to remove the threads that…*urgh*…line our hearts in order to tie himself with them before the said severing.

    I think Taylor was attempting to craft (with a hammer and anvil, apparently) a metaphor that would evoke an image of Canada’s Beloved Leader tethered to Canadians with some sort of twine or yarn…or quite possibly jute…that unravels from a woven fabric that encases our hearts (a cardiac cosy, as it were), but when that’s all done, all I can picture is congestive heart failure.

    I have to give it is a check minus.

  • Sisyphus

    This was for comic relief …… right ? Aaron ?

  • catherine

    “I’m going home to vacuum my house”?? Okay, I’ll take that over some guy who apparently can’t skate but keeps trying to convince us he is a hockey nut.

  • DR

    This is what I love about the Blogging Tories/Full Comment. They’re beyond parody.

    • http://macleans.ca kc

      How true. These guys are a parody of a parody.

  • Will

    Michael Ignatieff: Not a hockey fan.

    • Dannad

      Stephen Harper. Not a fan of the environment.

  • http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com Scott Tribe

    Well, at least Stephen posted the original at his own blog and not as one of his guest blogging columns here at Macleans.

  • http://myblahg.com Robert McClelland

    Oh crap. Layton didn’t attend a single game. My team is sooooooo screwed.

  • Dee

    “For the Prime Minister, voters select someone they see in themselves and they pick someone who understands and shares their concerns. ”

    How does he share our concerns? Canadians don’t have an entourage, dog sniffers and taxpayer sweat to pay for everything. Most Canadians can’t afford to have their kids play hockey.

    Nothing worse than having a chrome coloured dome politician ruining sports with their form of smoochy gushy glad handing.

    I’m with Ignatieff, I’m a fan of the game of hockey Not a hockey fan. Hockey has become too commercial and Disneyesque.

  • http://macleans.ca kc

    Someone please tell me Taylor wrote this tongue in cheek. Mildly amusing and poking gentle humour at his opponent. If, however this is what passes for serious consevative blogging then gawd help them. Apart from the cloying sentiment the piece reads like a brainstorming session [ and a very obvious and unimaginative one too] of the juniour staff at the pmo hitting on all the utterly unimportant reasons why Ignatieff shouldn’t be PM. Nah! It wasn’t serious. Or do these guys, as ti-guy said earlier today, actually believe this is important?

    • Ti-Guy

      Someone please tell me Taylor wrote this tongue in cheek.

      I doubt it.

      • Mtl_dude

        I think it was tongue in cheek. But not his own cheek, and not the cheek you normally see in public.

    • john g

      I was hoping someone would tell me that Wherry wrote this tongue in cheek.

      Good God Wherry, how does this post question Ignatieff’s Canadian-ness, other than (accurately) pointing out that until returning to Canada recently he’s lived abroad since the 60′s?

  • Blues Clair

    I hope to meet a real Canadian one day, they sound super weird.

    • Tintin

      What’s a “hockey”?

  • Ti-Guy

    As anyone ever seen Harper skate?

    • Mtl_dude

      I saw a picture circulated last winter of him, wearing skates and on what appeared to be ice. Could’ve been photoshopped (him, or the ice, or both. Or maybe they airbrushed out the supporting structure). In any case he looks like he doesn’t know how to skate.

  • Mark

    If he prorogues Parliament again, he could catch every NHL home game for the rest of the season. What a patriot. What a leader. He’s more of a hockey fan of any Liberal ever could be.

    • seaandthemountains

      exactly….. this one should be filed under: What PMs who take extra time off in the midst of potential depression can do with their free time (watch hockey and hang out with teenage hockey players).

      as for the common man bunk, how many commoners ’round here could afford those tickets to ‘most if not all’ of the games and have access to dressing rooms?

  • Just visiting

    I was at the Gold medal game, and Harper was right below where I was seated. I found it odd that he was wearing a suit and tie, but figured it probably meant he would be part of the official ceremonies at the end of the game. This possibility was reinforced when he and his son up and left with the security people shortly before the game ended (I think after the first empty net goal pretty well decided the game).

    But he didn’t appear in the ceremonies, which was surprising, since it seemed logical that, as PM, he would have handed out the gold plate or something. So I don’t know why he left when he did. While I’m not a big Harper supporter, I know he is a true hockey fan, so he had every right to be there, but why was he one of the few in attendance who left the building and missed the celebrations at the end?

    Here’s another odd thing: I just checked google news, and Harper did issue a statement congratulating Team Canada for winning gold. Makes sense, pretty standard, except the statement isn’t on the PMO website, it’s on the PC Party web site. What’s with that?

    Maybe Stephen Taylor can explain.

    - JV

    • Ti-Guy

      and Harper was right below where I was seated.

      Were you overcome by the Aquanet fumes wafting up from his coiffe?

      • MJ Patchouli

        Aquanet, hell — that hair, if indeed it is human hair, is simonized. That, or a hat of some sort.

    • Sisyphus

      Minister Lunn was there to hand stuff up …. way up … to some of the players. Very impressive.

    • john g

      Harper appeared on TSN’s coverage of the game. The other broadcasters were in a suit and tie as well. Harper’s dress was appropriate for that setting.

      • Geiseric the Lame

        Which provided me with proof positive Lunn is being hung out to dry.

        • hfang

          Could Lunn see above the boards or did he need a booster seat?

          • Geiseric the Lame

            No need for a booster seat. It was a hockey game, not a Cabinet meeting.

          • Sisyphus

            Well, he was only sporadically visible when he moved between the officialdom on the carpet. But he was easily distinguishable because he was wearing a team jersey amidst the guys in suits. I thought he was one of the stick boys at first.

          • Geiseric the Lame

            “I thought he was one of the stick boys at first.”

            Judging by the look in his eyes I’d say you weren’t too far off the mark.

  • Geiseric the Lame

    Nothing a goofy hat and clapper at the Briar can’t clear up.

    I get the impression the intent is to convince us of what WE want, not Iggy. We’re so market whipped no doubt in some places it’ll get lots of traction. Ring around the collar, anyone?

  • http://myblahg.com Robert McClelland

    Maybe Iggy should take up watching lacrosse. It is after all, Canada’s other national sport according to Canada’s National Sport Act passed in `94.

  • http://macleans.ca kc

    I’ve just re-read this bilge, i wish i hadn’t. On second reading this isn’t even parody it’s a parody of a parody. A love ode to Steve that’s obsequious to the pt of puppy love. The para on Ignatieff should bare the disclaimer: uncanadian, un-hockey book writing, limp wristed, foreign royalty come down to hobnob with tim horton’s loving fans and their cool hockey dad PM. And did i mention Iggy wasn’t even aware the Russians were already bounced [ ok made that up, although Taylor probably ran out of space ] S, Taylor the Ritta Skeeta of journalism!! Apologies to Mr Taylor if SH made him write this. .

  • Liz

    Stephen Harper is writing a book about hockey? I thought that was a myth, an old wives’ tale. When will it be finished? Will he accept a grant for publishing, or publish on his own? What house has picked it up? Has a retainer been paid? When’s the due date? Is there a working title? Perhaps along the lines of: Hockey, I Hardly Knew Ye, or maybe, Those Who Can’t Write About Hockey.

    So many questions. So few answers.

    While I wish Stephen Harper well in his literary endeavours I would prefer if he would spend some time governing. How many days off has he had since his last needless election? Time to put the selectric away, Stephen, and get on with some action. Legal of course. Don’t you have minions to look after your sidelines? If not, why not. You’re in charge of the spendiest government in Canadian history and the best Canadians get is a paid update on your dreams of hockey relevancy through your much-delayed ruminations?

    Please. Spare us.

    • SAB

      I’d prefer him spending time on his literary endeavours!

From Macleans