<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maclean&#039;s Interview: Stephen Harper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy mckee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-3/#comment-70106</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy mckee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70106</guid>
		<description>I agree with this article .it had some very insightful things to say .
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jpradahandbags.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prada Handbags&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this article .it had some very insightful things to say .<br />
<a href="http://www.jpradahandbags.com" rel="nofollow">Prada Handbags</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy mckee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-3/#comment-70105</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy mckee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70105</guid>
		<description>This government is the most fiscally incompetent I&#039;ve ever seen. They hold the rare distinction of being less capable of managing money than the Devine government in Saskatchewan was.&quot;

Harper must have got his Economics degree on the Net. He should get his money back.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jpradahandbags.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prada Handbags&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This government is the most fiscally incompetent I&#039;ve ever seen. They hold the rare distinction of being less capable of managing money than the Devine government in Saskatchewan was.&quot;</p>
<p>Harper must have got his Economics degree on the Net. He should get his money back.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jpradahandbags.com" rel="nofollow">Prada Handbags</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-3/#comment-70104</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70104</guid>
		<description>Harper will have a really, really hard time giving up power. I think that because he&#039;s never had a real career, has never been a CEO, never written a book, never been a professor or a lawyer -- this is his first taste of respect, and it&#039;s gone right to his head. They&#039;ll have to pry his hands off the doorknob at 24 Susses, because whereas Ignatieff, Chretien, Rae, Trudeau -- all of those people had established careers that they can go back to -- he really doesn&#039;t have anything to go back to except maybe start up another Reform party.

Mary Alexander
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woodplansprojects.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Woodworking plans&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woodplansprojects.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Woodworking plans&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper will have a really, really hard time giving up power. I think that because he&#039;s never had a real career, has never been a CEO, never written a book, never been a professor or a lawyer &#8212; this is his first taste of respect, and it&#039;s gone right to his head. They&#039;ll have to pry his hands off the doorknob at 24 Susses, because whereas Ignatieff, Chretien, Rae, Trudeau &#8212; all of those people had established careers that they can go back to &#8212; he really doesn&#039;t have anything to go back to except maybe start up another Reform party.</p>
<p>Mary Alexander<br />
<a href="http://www.woodplansprojects.com/" rel="nofollow">Woodworking plans</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.woodplansprojects.com/" rel="nofollow">Woodworking plans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70103</link>
		<dc:creator>LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70103</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE&lt;/a&gt; [url=http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape]LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE[/url] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE&lt;/a&gt; [url= http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape ] LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE [/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape" rel="nofollow">LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE</a> [url=http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape]LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE[/url] <a href="http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape" rel="nofollow">LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE</a> [url= <a href="http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape" rel="nofollow">http://www.dmwmedia.com/user/lindsay-lohan-nude-naked-sex-tape</a> ] LINDSAY LOHAN SEX TAPE [/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70102</link>
		<dc:creator>MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70102</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY&lt;/a&gt; [url=http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378]MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY[/url] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY&lt;/a&gt; [url= http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378 ] MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY [/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378" rel="nofollow">MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY</a> [url=http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378]MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY[/url] <a href="http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378" rel="nofollow">MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY</a> [url= <a href="http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378" rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarloving.com/2680378</a> ] MILEY CYRUS NAUGHTY [/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discord in the ranks at Werner Patels</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70101</link>
		<dc:creator>Discord in the ranks at Werner Patels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70101</guid>
		<description>[...] there is more: In a recent magazine interview, Harper thwarted the hopes of many conservatives when he said that he would not tackle any reform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is more: In a recent magazine interview, Harper thwarted the hopes of many conservatives when he said that he would not tackle any reform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discord in the ranks &#171; The Web Columnist</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70100</link>
		<dc:creator>Discord in the ranks &#171; The Web Columnist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70100</guid>
		<description>[...] there is more: In a recent magazine interview, Harper thwarted the hopes of many conservatives when he said that he would not tackle any reform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is more: In a recent magazine interview, Harper thwarted the hopes of many conservatives when he said that he would not tackle any reform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the lines of Liberal fundraiser e-mail &#171; Crux of the Matter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70099</link>
		<dc:creator>Between the lines of Liberal fundraiser e-mail &#171; Crux of the Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70099</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberals just don&#8217;t seem to get it. If, as the prime minister said in a Macleans interview, they take down the government as a coalition, they will have to run in a forthcoming election as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberals just don&#8217;t seem to get it. If, as the prime minister said in a Macleans interview, they take down the government as a coalition, they will have to run in a forthcoming election as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70098</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70098</guid>
		<description>Here’s a link to the above;

http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/01/has-ignatieffs-shift-to-right.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a link to the above;</p>
<p><a href="http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/01/has-ignatieffs-shift-to-right.html" rel="nofollow">http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/01/has-ignatieffs-shift-to-right.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70097</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70097</guid>
		<description>Another one from Ti-Guy, the poster boy for Leftist Mental Disorder;

“I have to conclude that Canadians are just a lot stupider than I’ve been willing to believe. I honestly thought the online dingbats represented a marginal demographic but not anymore.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one from Ti-Guy, the poster boy for Leftist Mental Disorder;</p>
<p>“I have to conclude that Canadians are just a lot stupider than I’ve been willing to believe. I honestly thought the online dingbats represented a marginal demographic but not anymore.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70096</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70096</guid>
		<description>Yet another Ti-Guy gem, these Libs sure like to step in it;

“Look, we’re going to have to resign ourselves to the fact that a huge proportion of the Canadian population is barely sensate enough to even be allowed to vote at this point.”

70 Liberals coronate Iggy and  millions of voters are stupid?

Allowed to vote?

Typical Liberal arrogance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another Ti-Guy gem, these Libs sure like to step in it;</p>
<p>“Look, we’re going to have to resign ourselves to the fact that a huge proportion of the Canadian population is barely sensate enough to even be allowed to vote at this point.”</p>
<p>70 Liberals coronate Iggy and  millions of voters are stupid?</p>
<p>Allowed to vote?</p>
<p>Typical Liberal arrogance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t miss PM Harper&#8217;s Macleans interview &#171; Crux of the Matter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70095</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t miss PM Harper&#8217;s Macleans interview &#171; Crux of the Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70095</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t miss PM Harper&#8217;s Macleans&#160;interview  Prime Minister Stephen Harper is a very shrewd man and Canadians of all political stripes should read the interview in the current issue of Macleans. I would have missed it had I not been at the hairdressers. Readers can access it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t miss PM Harper&#8217;s Macleans&nbsp;interview  Prime Minister Stephen Harper is a very shrewd man and Canadians of all political stripes should read the interview in the current issue of Macleans. I would have missed it had I not been at the hairdressers. Readers can access it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70094</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70094</guid>
		<description>LOL.  Do the seat count ... the road to a majority for Harper is through Quebec.  Alienate Quebec by painting the BQ as the devil and you can kiss that majority goodbye for a decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  Do the seat count &#8230; the road to a majority for Harper is through Quebec.  Alienate Quebec by painting the BQ as the devil and you can kiss that majority goodbye for a decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70093</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70093</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve studied the history of the Reform Party and that history is tied indelibly to Harper.  To say he is an &quot;incredible individual&quot;, as you have, is a clear misnomer.

In what way is he exceptional?  In the fact he took until 32 to get his MA in Economics?  In the fact that he worked in the mailroom at Imperial Oil in Calgary, eventually moving up to the IT department before making the leap into politics?  In that the NCC dropped 50K on his first seat run in Calgary in order to &quot;boost&quot; him and that was returned later when he fled politics to head the NCC?  In that he parachuted in at the very end of the merger process done almost completely by Deb Grey and then took credit for it?

The guy is undoubtedly smart, but there is a pattern of discontent he has established since his youth that paints him as an non-stop whiner.  He&#039;s held party cards in the LPC, the PCs and Reform, leaving all of them in a huff when the leader of the day did something he disagreed with.  That anti-social bent has clearly translated into how he deals on a partisan basis with the other parties now that he&#039;s PM.

He&#039;s got strengths, but I simply fail to see why he is worshipped by the party faithful as much as he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve studied the history of the Reform Party and that history is tied indelibly to Harper.  To say he is an &#8220;incredible individual&#8221;, as you have, is a clear misnomer.</p>
<p>In what way is he exceptional?  In the fact he took until 32 to get his MA in Economics?  In the fact that he worked in the mailroom at Imperial Oil in Calgary, eventually moving up to the IT department before making the leap into politics?  In that the NCC dropped 50K on his first seat run in Calgary in order to &#8220;boost&#8221; him and that was returned later when he fled politics to head the NCC?  In that he parachuted in at the very end of the merger process done almost completely by Deb Grey and then took credit for it?</p>
<p>The guy is undoubtedly smart, but there is a pattern of discontent he has established since his youth that paints him as an non-stop whiner.  He&#8217;s held party cards in the LPC, the PCs and Reform, leaving all of them in a huff when the leader of the day did something he disagreed with.  That anti-social bent has clearly translated into how he deals on a partisan basis with the other parties now that he&#8217;s PM.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got strengths, but I simply fail to see why he is worshipped by the party faithful as much as he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70092</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70092</guid>
		<description>Corporate taxes, in the long term, are borne in very large part by workers. So lowering corporate taxes is good for Canadians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporate taxes, in the long term, are borne in very large part by workers. So lowering corporate taxes is good for Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70091</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70091</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to believe, but I think the interviewer here is actually more right-wing than Harper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe, but I think the interviewer here is actually more right-wing than Harper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70090</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70090</guid>
		<description>If Harper cares more about people than business why has he given FAR more cuts to corporate taxes than to personal income taxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Harper cares more about people than business why has he given FAR more cuts to corporate taxes than to personal income taxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRB</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70089</link>
		<dc:creator>KRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70089</guid>
		<description>In the smaller provinces of Sask and Manitoba, perhaps.  The NDP nearly crippled Ontario (I ask has any other government anywhere else in a G-7 nation nearly tripled their debt in a little over 4.5 years?!!).

The NDP’s record with the economy and finances of B.C. is not exactly stuff you want showcased in the front window either.

Durward below is half-right in saying that Mulroney definitely played a big part in curtailing the vicious deficit/debt spiral that we were in.  Mulroney inherited Canada’s biggest ever peacetime deficit (8.2% of GDP, equivalent to a $127 billion deficit today), and an operating deficit (i.e. a deficit even before debt servicing charges).  Trudeau (with miscalculations about revenue robustness in the late 70’s) left us in a truly terrible mess, easily the worst fiscal shape we’ve ever been in.  We were spending $1 in program spending for every 97 cents in revenue!  To get to a balanced budget, Mulroney would’ve had to immediately cut one-third of all program spending!  Mulroney fixed that first deficit that had to be addressed, the operating deficit.  Over his nine years in power, he was in surplus on that score.  He brought the deficit-to-GDP down to 4% (in other words, half that of what he inherited), but those plans were thrown off by the ’91 recession, when it again spiked up over 5%.  But he did manage to bring in (with great political cost to himself and his party) the two policies which were largely the reason why it was even possible to get to a balanced budget in the 90’s: Free Trade, and the GST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the smaller provinces of Sask and Manitoba, perhaps.  The NDP nearly crippled Ontario (I ask has any other government anywhere else in a G-7 nation nearly tripled their debt in a little over 4.5 years?!!).</p>
<p>The NDP’s record with the economy and finances of B.C. is not exactly stuff you want showcased in the front window either.</p>
<p>Durward below is half-right in saying that Mulroney definitely played a big part in curtailing the vicious deficit/debt spiral that we were in.  Mulroney inherited Canada’s biggest ever peacetime deficit (8.2% of GDP, equivalent to a $127 billion deficit today), and an operating deficit (i.e. a deficit even before debt servicing charges).  Trudeau (with miscalculations about revenue robustness in the late 70’s) left us in a truly terrible mess, easily the worst fiscal shape we’ve ever been in.  We were spending $1 in program spending for every 97 cents in revenue!  To get to a balanced budget, Mulroney would’ve had to immediately cut one-third of all program spending!  Mulroney fixed that first deficit that had to be addressed, the operating deficit.  Over his nine years in power, he was in surplus on that score.  He brought the deficit-to-GDP down to 4% (in other words, half that of what he inherited), but those plans were thrown off by the ’91 recession, when it again spiked up over 5%.  But he did manage to bring in (with great political cost to himself and his party) the two policies which were largely the reason why it was even possible to get to a balanced budget in the 90’s: Free Trade, and the GST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XTory</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70088</link>
		<dc:creator>XTory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70088</guid>
		<description>Nice try, but it is going to be anything but Harper.
He is the meanest spirited politcian in Canadian history.   I did not like Stephane Dion, but his treatment of him was diplorable and showed him to be the nasty person he really is.  Despite this free ride agaist dion, he could not muster a majority.  It should have been a landslide victory for the Tories and would have been if Harper was not leader.  The faster the leader is changed the better chance the Tories will have against Ignatieff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try, but it is going to be anything but Harper.<br />
He is the meanest spirited politcian in Canadian history.   I did not like Stephane Dion, but his treatment of him was diplorable and showed him to be the nasty person he really is.  Despite this free ride agaist dion, he could not muster a majority.  It should have been a landslide victory for the Tories and would have been if Harper was not leader.  The faster the leader is changed the better chance the Tories will have against Ignatieff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XTory</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70087</link>
		<dc:creator>XTory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70087</guid>
		<description>The looney left is better than the new mean nasty lying right of Stephen Harper.  Time for new leadership before he completely wrecks the Conservative party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The looney left is better than the new mean nasty lying right of Stephen Harper.  Time for new leadership before he completely wrecks the Conservative party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spike</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70086</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70086</guid>
		<description>Next election slogan: vote anything but Bloc, i.e. Coalition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next election slogan: vote anything but Bloc, i.e. Coalition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig O.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70085</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70085</guid>
		<description>A party should be judged on the merits of its platform, not the depth of the pockets of its supporters. Even if it is only individual contributions, money should not be deciding elections. Political parties are not businesses. Their goal is not, or should not, be to make money. Do we really want our political parties to be focused on fundraising rather than on doing their jobs, which, unless I&#039;m mistaken, is representing the people of Canada in parliament?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A party should be judged on the merits of its platform, not the depth of the pockets of its supporters. Even if it is only individual contributions, money should not be deciding elections. Political parties are not businesses. Their goal is not, or should not, be to make money. Do we really want our political parties to be focused on fundraising rather than on doing their jobs, which, unless I&#8217;m mistaken, is representing the people of Canada in parliament?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70084</guid>
		<description>Um, because it&#039;s a book about Neo-Nazis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, because it&#8217;s a book about Neo-Nazis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70083</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70083</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that somebody realizes that Canada&#039;s most dangerous person is Kinsella. Read his book :&quot;Web of Hate- the backjacket featuring a swastika; the contents comprise a bunch of extremists of the far right, who never had any power,  but not a leftist mentioned from cover to cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that somebody realizes that Canada&#8217;s most dangerous person is Kinsella. Read his book :&#8221;Web of Hate- the backjacket featuring a swastika; the contents comprise a bunch of extremists of the far right, who never had any power,  but not a leftist mentioned from cover to cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70082</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70082</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. But with the three &quot;coalition&quot; jackals, it will be touch and go until an election, which the Ottawa-Toronto,Montreal triumvirate are exploiting with the contiual mantra BUT CANADIANS DONT WANT AN  ELECTION- at least until the liberals get their house in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. But with the three &#8220;coalition&#8221; jackals, it will be touch and go until an election, which the Ottawa-Toronto,Montreal triumvirate are exploiting with the contiual mantra BUT CANADIANS DONT WANT AN  ELECTION- at least until the liberals get their house in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70081</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70081</guid>
		<description>[god i hate my computer]  pad over to SH and said: &quot; hear you try.&quot; Has Harper ever faced a hostile interview?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[god i hate my computer]  pad over to SH and said: &#8221; hear you try.&#8221; Has Harper ever faced a hostile interview?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70080</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70080</guid>
		<description>the interview wasn&#039;t that bad when you consider what whyte represents, Maude Barlow i didn&#039;t expect. the big spending libs must have been where a bored whyte handed his</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the interview wasn&#8217;t that bad when you consider what whyte represents, Maude Barlow i didn&#8217;t expect. the big spending libs must have been where a bored whyte handed his</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougrogers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70079</link>
		<dc:creator>dougrogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70079</guid>
		<description>Last time i heard that was in grade 9...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time i heard that was in grade 9&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agathe Lapointe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70078</link>
		<dc:creator>Agathe Lapointe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70078</guid>
		<description>The art of interviewing is similar to that of polling. You ask a leading question, you get the answer you want and-or a lie. On at least two questions (human rights and big spending liberals, Mr. Whyte does not make journalism proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The art of interviewing is similar to that of polling. You ask a leading question, you get the answer you want and-or a lie. On at least two questions (human rights and big spending liberals, Mr. Whyte does not make journalism proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70077</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70077</guid>
		<description>Durward; Shake your head! Bulroney spent use deeper into debt after he took power, to the point his party was down to historic lows after he jumped ship and Kim Campbell to over. He read thehand writing on the wall and bailed out. In fact it was Paul Martin who set the rules and paid down the debt, which continued until Harpy took over.

If you&#039;re going to make a statement, make sure you know what you&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Durward; Shake your head! Bulroney spent use deeper into debt after he took power, to the point his party was down to historic lows after he jumped ship and Kim Campbell to over. He read thehand writing on the wall and bailed out. In fact it was Paul Martin who set the rules and paid down the debt, which continued until Harpy took over.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to make a statement, make sure you know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70076</link>
		<dc:creator>Estelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70076</guid>
		<description>Sorry I&#039;m at the point where I don&#039;t believe anything Mr Harper says. He has backed off on so many of his statements and promises. All we get from him are the words he thinks we want to hear, then he follows his own agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I&#8217;m at the point where I don&#8217;t believe anything Mr Harper says. He has backed off on so many of his statements and promises. All we get from him are the words he thinks we want to hear, then he follows his own agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maudie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70075</link>
		<dc:creator>maudie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70075</guid>
		<description>But first we had to wait for the US to tell us what to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But first we had to wait for the US to tell us what to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70074</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70074</guid>
		<description>&quot;Arbitration is continuing on the company’s claim for what has been reported to be up to $500 million in extra payments.&quot;

Yes, but unlike Chretien&#039;s 500 million charge for cancelling a previous helicopter order, the country will at least get new helicopters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Arbitration is continuing on the company’s claim for what has been reported to be up to $500 million in extra payments.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, but unlike Chretien&#8217;s 500 million charge for cancelling a previous helicopter order, the country will at least get new helicopters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70073</guid>
		<description>The PM&#039;s an economist?  Uh, since when?  An MA does not an economist make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PM&#8217;s an economist?  Uh, since when?  An MA does not an economist make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ti-Guy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ti-Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70072</guid>
		<description>Did you hear about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timescolonist.com/news/Another+botched+military+purchase/1154663/story.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;delays&lt;/a&gt; in military equipment that&#039;s costing the government hundreds of millions of dollars?

&quot;Instead of imposing the $36-million penalty for late delivery called for in the contract, the government has agreed to pay Sikorsky, the U.S. manufacturer, an extra $117 million. Arbitration is continuing on the company&#039;s claim for what has been reported to be up to $500 million in extra payments.&quot;

Penny-wise, pound foolish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear about the <a href="http://www.timescolonist.com/news/Another+botched+military+purchase/1154663/story.html" rel="nofollow">delays</a> in military equipment that&#8217;s costing the government hundreds of millions of dollars?</p>
<p>&#8220;Instead of imposing the $36-million penalty for late delivery called for in the contract, the government has agreed to pay Sikorsky, the U.S. manufacturer, an extra $117 million. Arbitration is continuing on the company&#8217;s claim for what has been reported to be up to $500 million in extra payments.&#8221;</p>
<p>Penny-wise, pound foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James R. Halifax</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70071</link>
		<dc:creator>James R. Halifax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70071</guid>
		<description>Sorry Sue.....I&#039;ll take the Politician with an Economics Degree......over Politicians who steal from the taxpayer any day.

How anyone can support the Liberal Party, knowing that they have been stealing from taxpayers hand over fist is beyond comprehension.  The only folks who should be supporting the LIberals are those who received the stolen loot.....and those who don&#039;t pay taxes.

Which are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Sue&#8230;..I&#8217;ll take the Politician with an Economics Degree&#8230;&#8230;over Politicians who steal from the taxpayer any day.</p>
<p>How anyone can support the Liberal Party, knowing that they have been stealing from taxpayers hand over fist is beyond comprehension.  The only folks who should be supporting the LIberals are those who received the stolen loot&#8230;..and those who don&#8217;t pay taxes.</p>
<p>Which are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70070</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70070</guid>
		<description>For those who haven&#039;t lived through the Pearson, Trudeau, Mulroney and Chretian years, the Prime Minister&#039;s attempts to mislead the Canadian public can be pretty convincing.  I wonder if he really believe the things he says.  We have gone from guaranteed surplus, to balanced budget, to minor defecit to who knows what.  Lets not forget income trusts, trhe cancelling of those bad 40 year mortgages which were introduced by - guess who - the conservatives in their 2006 budget.  I won&#039;t go into transparency in government, cancellation of social programs and deliberate disruption of the work of parliament etc. etc.

Flaherty, who is now talking about stimulating car loans (who wants to buy a car from a company about to go down the tubes) instead of needed infrasturcture, ruined the Ontario economy and is about to do the same for the whole country.  These guys are winging it and are not up to the job. The one thing that is true of this century is that the Liberals knew how to run the country and did a damned good job at it.  Wait &#039;til the smoke clears, although more years will have been lost because of Conservative ineptitude.

This is not an economist speaking but a politician with an economics degree, something very different.  Canadians have never has so many reasons to dump a politician who has shown such limited vision, partisanship and failure to lead the country to be the best that it can be.  Even if Harper is willing to change the rules when it suits him, (aka &quot;proroguing parliament when it is clear that you are going down&quot; ), the reason  why there is a coalitian is that our the majority of our elected parliamentarians are really fed up, as am I.

This interview is the worst of Ottawa bafflegab, designed to confuse those who don&#039;t know the system or don&#039;t have the inclination to follow the history of administration in this country - the lowest common denominator who can be convinced by simple messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who haven&#8217;t lived through the Pearson, Trudeau, Mulroney and Chretian years, the Prime Minister&#8217;s attempts to mislead the Canadian public can be pretty convincing.  I wonder if he really believe the things he says.  We have gone from guaranteed surplus, to balanced budget, to minor defecit to who knows what.  Lets not forget income trusts, trhe cancelling of those bad 40 year mortgages which were introduced by &#8211; guess who &#8211; the conservatives in their 2006 budget.  I won&#8217;t go into transparency in government, cancellation of social programs and deliberate disruption of the work of parliament etc. etc.</p>
<p>Flaherty, who is now talking about stimulating car loans (who wants to buy a car from a company about to go down the tubes) instead of needed infrasturcture, ruined the Ontario economy and is about to do the same for the whole country.  These guys are winging it and are not up to the job. The one thing that is true of this century is that the Liberals knew how to run the country and did a damned good job at it.  Wait &#8217;til the smoke clears, although more years will have been lost because of Conservative ineptitude.</p>
<p>This is not an economist speaking but a politician with an economics degree, something very different.  Canadians have never has so many reasons to dump a politician who has shown such limited vision, partisanship and failure to lead the country to be the best that it can be.  Even if Harper is willing to change the rules when it suits him, (aka &#8220;proroguing parliament when it is clear that you are going down&#8221; ), the reason  why there is a coalitian is that our the majority of our elected parliamentarians are really fed up, as am I.</p>
<p>This interview is the worst of Ottawa bafflegab, designed to confuse those who don&#8217;t know the system or don&#8217;t have the inclination to follow the history of administration in this country &#8211; the lowest common denominator who can be convinced by simple messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wilbee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70069</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wilbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70069</guid>
		<description>Our dictator prime minister should be ashamed to be showing his face in public, let alone granting interviews.

Since December 4, as far as I am concerned, Herr Harper’s government has been illegitimate, and Canada has no prime minister.

Mr. Ignatieff should be demanding that the Governor General recall Parliament, so that this toxic government can be brought down and replaced by the Coalition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our dictator prime minister should be ashamed to be showing his face in public, let alone granting interviews.</p>
<p>Since December 4, as far as I am concerned, Herr Harper’s government has been illegitimate, and Canada has no prime minister.</p>
<p>Mr. Ignatieff should be demanding that the Governor General recall Parliament, so that this toxic government can be brought down and replaced by the Coalition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70068</guid>
		<description>I like the part where Goldberg single-handedly cripples 100 Liberal fascists with his bare hands and a can opener.  Now &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; was enlightening!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the part where Goldberg single-handedly cripples 100 Liberal fascists with his bare hands and a can opener.  Now <i>that</i><i> was enlightening!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LindaL</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70067</link>
		<dc:creator>LindaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70067</guid>
		<description>Perhaps every last member does not -- however, I would guess that the those who do not have $10 are probably spread across the political spectrum -- everyone does not have to donate -- but a lot can, most can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps every last member does not &#8212; however, I would guess that the those who do not have $10 are probably spread across the political spectrum &#8212; everyone does not have to donate &#8212; but a lot can, most can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Thwim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70066</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Thwim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70066</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re assuming that the supporters of the party have 10 bucks spare. Elitist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re assuming that the supporters of the party have 10 bucks spare. Elitist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caz</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70065</link>
		<dc:creator>Caz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70065</guid>
		<description>OMG do your homework insteadof listening to yourself shriek about his eneptness. There are plenty of sources to educate your small litlle mind about what this Leader has actually accomplished in 3 years.  read it and weep because NO LIBERAL and certainly NO NDp leader could even come close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG do your homework insteadof listening to yourself shriek about his eneptness. There are plenty of sources to educate your small litlle mind about what this Leader has actually accomplished in 3 years.  read it and weep because NO LIBERAL and certainly NO NDp leader could even come close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James R. Halifax</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-2/#comment-70064</link>
		<dc:creator>James R. Halifax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70064</guid>
		<description>Alex wrote:
&quot;Look at Canada’s tarnished reputation recently with other countries on pollution. We look like assholes. Assholes run by a bunch of ornery generation jones babies trying to compensate for their insecurity.&quot;

In your case....I would agree with your assessment.  At least you understand your own limitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex wrote:<br />
&#8220;Look at Canada’s tarnished reputation recently with other countries on pollution. We look like assholes. Assholes run by a bunch of ornery generation jones babies trying to compensate for their insecurity.&#8221;</p>
<p>In your case&#8230;.I would agree with your assessment.  At least you understand your own limitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caz</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70063</link>
		<dc:creator>Caz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70063</guid>
		<description>You are so frieking pathetic it&#039;s painful. ” I’d like to know more about Harper and what makes him tick. It might make him more likeable and vote worthy”  There&#039;s a lot of great material out there about Harper&#039;s
history in politics that started in the late 80&#039;s. I&#039;m astounded at how little people do know about him. It&#039;s tragic really. He&#039;s an incredible individual who is  seriously misunderstood and misrepresented.  Do your homework people and try and read more than the Star and the Globe. Get a balanced education about this man that you so love to bash. Most of the negatives about Harper are a complete media and opposition fabrication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so frieking pathetic it&#8217;s painful. ” I’d like to know more about Harper and what makes him tick. It might make him more likeable and vote worthy”  There&#8217;s a lot of great material out there about Harper&#8217;s<br />
history in politics that started in the late 80&#8242;s. I&#8217;m astounded at how little people do know about him. It&#8217;s tragic really. He&#8217;s an incredible individual who is  seriously misunderstood and misrepresented.  Do your homework people and try and read more than the Star and the Globe. Get a balanced education about this man that you so love to bash. Most of the negatives about Harper are a complete media and opposition fabrication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/08/macleans-interview-stephen-harper-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1335#comment-70062</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  The question, as put, probably does not adequately reflect the author&#039;s quite valid point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  The question, as put, probably does not adequately reflect the author&#8217;s quite valid point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

