Dude, where's my job?

What happens when the most entitled generation ever hits a recession

by Lianne George on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:30am - 117 Comments

Dude, where's my job?

It was only 18 months ago that the Wall Street Journal ran an article outlining the lavish demands of a new generation of workers, known collectively as Gen Y or Millennials or Net Gen. At the time, the thinking was that this group—ages 30 and under—had employers over a barrel. For one thing, there were relatively few of them, and employers, facing an imminent wave of boomer retirements, would be competing for the best of this young cohort. Also, since this is the Internet generation, they were believed to possess magical and mysterious tech skills that would prove invaluable in the workplace of the future.

Emboldened by these dual advantages, Millennials set their expectations high. Not only did they want fun, fulfilling work, with flexible hours, good salaries, and ample vacation, they wanted to be celebrated, too. Literally, feted. Savvy employers had taken to embracing measures like prize packages for a job well done, “public displays of appreciation,” and, in the case of one manufacturer in Texas, retaining a “celebration assistant” in charge of helium balloons and confetti. This was smart business, according to 30-year-old Jason Ryan Dorsey, a self-appointed Gen Y expert—who consults with companies like Kraft and Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts about the peculiarities and preferences of his generation. “Marking milestones is major,” he told Forbes magazine. “No birthday should go uncelebrated, and the first day on the job should be unforgettable.” Which is great, except for one thing: what happens when the most entitled generation in history slams into the worst job market in 30 years?

At the turn of 2009, in the midst of massive layoffs and hiring freezes, not to mention cut-rate Christmas parties where punch just wasn’t in the budget, these demands seem cringe-worthy—even more so than they did before. If ever there was a sign that the era of the sellers’ employment market is over, it came last month when Google—the Santa Claus of corporate perk-giving—instituted a hiring freeze and, among other things, cancelled its New York office’s decidedly Millennial-friendly tradition of afternoon tea. Almost as soon as they began for this cohort, it would appear its halcyon days are over.

In November alone, 71,000 Canadians lost their jobs—27 per cent of the newly unemployed are people aged 24 and under—and economists predict this is only a bellwether of worse to come. Suddenly, many of those retiring boomers can’t afford to retire. Making matters worse, Millennials are saddled with more debt than any previous generation (an average of $5,631 per year in student debt alone, not to mention the load sitting on their credit cards, and what they’re doling out in car payments). This recession is not what they signed up for.

Also at Macleans.ca: It’s all about you

“They were absolutely told that ‘You’re part of a blessed generation and you are going to be in control of your own destiny,’ ” says Winnipeg native Steven Rothberg, owner of CollegeRecruiter.com, a company that recruits college graduates mostly in the U.S. “The spring 2008 grads have had to do some major adjusting. They graduated with the expectation that it was going to be a sellers’ market, that they were going to have multiple offers, step into an upper management role and have significant strategic impact on a Fortune 500 company, and that’s just not the reality.” Until last year, he said, university and college students in their senior year, even the mediocre ones, could expect job offers as early as Oct. 1 of their final year. Now, employers are waiting until the spring to make hiring decisions, waiting to see how the economy shakes out, and leaving more students graduating into uncertainty.

There will be schadenfreude from those who see Millennial entitlement as a moral failing. “I hear people say this a lot,” says Dorsey of his boomer executive clients. “They say, ‘Your generation just needs one good recession and then they’ll appreciate their jobs.’ ” But this is too simplistic an assessment of why “kids today” are the way they are. They’re not genetically lazy or spoiled, any more than children of the Depression are inherently thrifty. Whatever overblown expectations this generation has are the product of decades of conditioning, and not only by overzealous boomer parents. Well-intentioned attempts to make this generation feel good about itself have, in fact, left them poorly prepared to weather a tough economic storm.

Consider that this is the first cohort to come of age in a time of institutionalized self-esteem. Beginning in the seventies, programs designed to boost children’s self-esteem were installed in schools and at home, in the form of books and TV shows like Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood. Throughout the eighties, according to the research of Jean Twenge, a professor of psychology at San Diego State University, the number of studies published on the benefits of self-esteem programs doubled, and in the nineties, it doubled again. Then came the elimination of competition, harsh red marking pens, and the arrival of books with titles like Celebrate Yourself: Six Steps to Building Your Self-Esteem. “Generation Me’s expectations are highly optimistic,” Twenge wrote in her 2006 book on the narcissistic tendencies of this group. “They expect to go to college, to make lots of money, and perhaps even to be famous.” Unfortunately, there’s a fine line between optimism and confidence, and irrational entitlement.

But it wasn’t just indulgent teachers and coddling parents that formed this generation’s world view. The self-esteem revolution happened to dovetail with a consumer shift toward an ever-greater focus on the individual. Marketers trained their sights on young people more intently than ever before, piggybacking on the self-esteem movement to offer youth heaps of affirmation in the form of a countless array of products—just for them! They realized that parents, flush with credit and disposable income, were inordinately concerned with their kids’ opinions, even when it came to grown-up purchasing decisions (from cars to family vacations). Tweens spend about $2.9 billion a year and influence purchases worth another $20 billion. From the age of eight, Millennials saw themselves reflected everywhere: in ads for tween shampoos, designer fashions, and fragrances. By the time they got to university, credit card companies were handing out application forms along with student orientation packages. The message, as always: if you want it, you should have it.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://ragingranter.blogspot.com Raging Ranter

    Um, Dave S, the boomers were never conscripted. Their dads were conscripted. You’re a confused young man.

    • http://truthseekernz.blogspot.com Steve Withers

      Raging Ranter: Baby boomers were born after WW II and up to about 1960-ish. An 18yo grunt in Vietnam in 1969/70 – the peak – might have been born in 1951 or so. Easily a baby boomer.

  • http://ragingranter.blogspot.com Raging Ranter

    David F, that early ’90s recession was a real ass-kicker that’s for sure. Those who are already screaming about how bad it is right now haven’t seen anything yet. Remember the NOT HIRING signs in the windows?

    Right now, I still see HELP WANTED signs everywhere I go. In the early 1990s, I don’t think there was a such thing as a HELP WANTED sign. People sneer that all the jobs are low-paying McJobs, but at least there still are McJobs. From 1991-94, people were lining up for such jobs. As a student I had a hard time even finding part-time work.

    For everyone who thinks this recession is just the most terrible thing ever, may I cheer you up by stating, It hasn’t even started yet. That’s right. You think it’s bad because you hear on the news and read that it’s bad, and maybe you know someone who’s been laid off, or you’ve been laid off yourself. Well, to paraphrase Churchill, “This is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” Just hope it doesn’t get early 90s kind of bad, or early 80s kind of bad. Now that was bad.

  • Dave S.

    Vietnam, genius. Oh, sorry — this is a Canadian blog.

    • http://ragingranter.blogspot.com Raging Ranter

      You just figured that out? Let me guess, it was the little red maple leaf in the MacLeans header at the top of the page.

  • http://dailyearthnews.wordpress.com ravi

    The world is full of surprises and one should not be worried too much…recession was just one phase of it and u never know what will be the next so just be prepared and work hard…

    http://dailyearthnews.wordpress.com/?s=entrepreneurship

  • Pingback: Random Thoughts 01/17/2009 - New Comm Biz - New media strategies for business

  • Torrance

    Since we’re playing the generalization game, the main group of people I see as having an exaggerated sense of entitlement are those that work for the government…and they come in all ages, shapes and sizes.

  • Richard (old retired soldier)

    Somebody’s gotta be the blame for all this! Please let me know.

  • Cdn in Europe

    Yep, you’ve pretty much summed it up. And you didn’t even mention the monster debt loads for those who go to university. Boomers didn’t have those, either.

    • Kathy M

      I did…. I owed 10,000. at the end of my “university career”, that may seem small by today’s standard but a starting job for a grad was 13-15K at that time if you were lucky. It took me years to pay off (and I did). At times I was working two jobs to get anywhere.

      I think you are out of line to make assumptions.

      • hosertohoosier

        I respect your experiences but they may be atypical. A few things have happened in the past few decades.

        1. The income advantage of a university degree is lower than it used to be. As more people get university degrees, the advantage they confer gets competed down, as they know longer signify membership in the top quintile in terms of education. Some studies have even found that there is no advantage to getting a university education any more (or rather, the opportunity cost is greater than the benefits).

        2. University has never been cheap but increases in tuition have outpaced inflation for decades. This is, I think, also a function of more people wanting to go to university – there is a lot of demand such that educational institutions can charge as much as they want (FYI: I am not a low tuition advocate, I do think fewer people should go to university, though).

        3. While many items are cheaper (in real terms) than ever before, the same is not true of housing – the critical expense that pushes people to live with their parents longer. In 2006 houses were 71% more expensive than in 1987 (a period of relatively low inflation).
        http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/09/23/weekinreview/0923BAJAJ.782.1000.jpg

        4. Often jobs require people to work as interns for a period of time, because they have no experience. Intern salaries are very low and make it nigh-on-impossible to pay off loans. In the big Ontario survey I was able to find (of 2002 graduates), the median income of graduates was $36,000 (I suspect that number is on the high side, since only 23% of those surveyed responded – those who were say, unemployed, were probably less likely to answer the survey).

        Tuition fees in Ontario were about 5,000 a year on average (doubled since 1990, but still incredibly low compared to US tuition where debt loads are often ~$50-60,000), so the average student would graduate with $20,000 in debt, and a much higher cost of living than in the past.
        http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/030812/dq030812a-eng.htm

        Again, I don’t mean to diminish your hardship – your experience sounds more onerous than that of the average grad today. Past generations faced enormous challenges as well. Gen Y will never have to worry about being drafted, nuked, getting polio and while it is more expensive for them to move out on their own, that they have the option of staying with the folks is an edge in itself.

        The recession may make Gen Y a bit more like past generations:
        -economic stimuli may succeed in creating next-gen BLUE COLLAR jobs, taking pressure off the credential inflation machine that is the education system. On the other hand more people tend to go to school during a recession because the opportunity cost is lower (it is hard to find a good job in a recession).
        -Lower housing prices may help Gen Y start to buy property, and move out of their parents homes.

        • Kathryn H

          I believe that each graduating class entering the workforce has challenges. The education system needs to change to enlighten students of where opportunities are. Teachers have gone the university, teachers college route. They don’t have any idea of what else is “out there”, having said that, these are the influencers of what students may choose as their future.

          In Canada we have a huge shortage of people going into trades as a career. Trades are not for “dummies” and they are experiencing a huge shortage of people. Trades are not “grunt work”, and if money is what is going to make you happy then take a look at the trades. These people are the entreprenuers, making 100K is possible very early in your career. Plumbers don’t just fix your toilet, they work in transport of fluids of all kinds. I need electricians, carpenters, cooks (just to name a few).

          I am tired of hearing of “entitlement”. Those that are willing to work will find their way… the rest.. good luck.. win a lottery The illusion that a diploma or a degree is a guarantee of a great job because “you have one” (a diploma or degree) is nonsense, all it does is guarantee the people working in post secondary education have a job.

          I work in career development and one thing I told my children ( aged 24 and 22) is get any job, prove yourself and the rest will come, yes, they have post secondary education, my son is in the trades and my daughter is in business… their jobs are not impressive but, they live on their own, pay their bills (including monster debt of OSAP) and accept that this is what life is like. I have every confidence that they will be able to survive. I am able to catch them if they fall, but I sincerely believe that it won’t be needed, they are realistic about work. When the time comes they will move up, in my opinion they are better people for starting at the bottom and show the willingness to do whatever it takes to get to better jobs when the time comes.

          The person working at Tim Hortons has a better chance of success in the workplace and moving up to that dream job than the person thay says “I’m better than that”

  • Sophie

    This article irritated me. I have worked hard for everything I have, as do all of my peers. I work three jobs and attend school full-time. Young workers didn’t cause the recession, but we will bear the brunt of it.

  • Shirley

    There has always been, always will be, tension between generations. Empires rise and fall, economices rise and fall and your fortune, or lack thereof, depends upon where you are when the tides change.

    I have enormous respect for the 20 year old I know who left for the west to persue her dreams. She pays for her rent, her own car loan, her bills, and has fun while learning about life. She and her friends have games night (board games), pot lucks, art and bi-monthly martinis at the local bar. They don’t spend time whining. The ‘mommy’ contribution amounts to paying a cell phone bill and flying the kid home once a year. This is not the mark of a generation that feels entitled. Too often we ascribe to the many the benefits that in reality accrue to a minority within the population.

    This generation is neither entitled nor disenfranchised. It does not collecitvely feel any more or less entitled than any “next” generation has felt throughout time. Boomers felt they had the answers when they were in their tweenties, they felt ‘special’ they felt ‘entitled’. Why would you think this new generation of youth would feel any differently that previous “new” generations? It is the ‘right’ of each generation to set its’ own tone.

    Make of the world what you will, you will be living here longer than most of us!

  • Kathryn H

    I am truly saddened by “generational warfare” it is truly pathetic. Why is it necessary to lump people into groups and then blame based on age. I have worked with Veterans, Baby Boomers, Gen X and Millenials and have had the opportunity to work with the best and worst of each. I find that everyone has the same goal, to be the best that they can be and work to achieve that goal. The road may be different but the intended result is the same.

    Let’s get rid of the generational fences and learn from each other!

  • http://www.donjuan.com Don Juan

    The article should read: What happens when the most entitled members of the most arrogant generation in history get excessively greedy and ruin the economy for everyone else. Thanks rich, white boomers.

  • canary singh

    For twenty years, the definition of a job has not held water. It is a meaningless word. Even lawyers aren’t sure what it is. I believe that’s the core of the meltdown. If a job doesn’t hold water then how are you gonna pay your bills? It makes sense to someone but not me.

  • Pingback: Are We Being Unfair to Generation Y?

  • Vic

    More of the same…. generation gap and complaints about “coddled” kids have been around since the dawn of time. Go read Cicero’s complaints about the younger generation in ancient Rome if you have any doubt. And just like generations past, this generation of kids will mature, take their place in the world and do just fine, and last long enough to bemoan the next generation coming after them.

  • John D

    Am I the only 30-something that would be mortified if my first day on the job, much less my birthday, was “celebrated” at the office?

    That being said I am sooooo tired of the pop-psychological narrative that “this generation” has been spoiled with too much self esteem by parents, teachers, TV, etc. Every generation has been spoiled and coddled compared to their predecessors. And the members of every generation, upon hitting ~24 (probably earlier) begin whining about how the younger generation is even more spoiled. This post has been written a billion times before.

    Now get off my lawn.

  • justin

    i’m a part of the y generation and i haven’t had anything handed to me. i have a good job that i worked my ass off to get and it’s a struggle just to keep that. i don’t celebrate my birthday and i have terrible self-esteem but that hasn’t stopped me from surviving. why? because i was brought up with a good work ethic. i was taught how to tough out the rough times and how to rise above when you need to get noticed. it has nothing to do with “feel good” tactics or trust funds. i’m unaware of both of these concepts.

    also, i have no debt and no credit card. it can be a bit inconvenient when opening a blockbuster account but the stress of debt just isn’t worth it. i wouldn’t want to be part of the problem if i’m supposed to be a part of a solution generation.

    so who exactly are you talking about in this article? because you sure as hell aren’t talking about a large portion of my generation and quite frankly i’m a little bit insulted that you’ve made this broad sweeping generalization.

  • Pingback: How not to do generational analysis | eaves.ca

  • http://www.crawfish.com/ Kevin Daste

    The number of Gen Y’ers living with their parents could be misleading. How were college students treated in the survey? While attending college, I was still listed as a dependent on my parents’ tax returns and lived at home for half of my college career. If you assume that undergraduates are in college until 22 or 23, with post graduates in college for 2 or 3 more years, the results could be skewed to give the impression that Gen Y’ers are simply living at home due to lack of work or low paying jobs instead of attending college.

  • SAD

    Some very valid comments in these pages, but other…
    A bold move on the part of the Conservatives would be to make Canada a ” right to work society” at this point.
    Further and maybe, off topic, they should try to accomodate a coalition with the greens!!! Now it is still possible, for the price of …a few windmills. Before you know it, the greens will become powerful. The best part about it is, that it would take the wind out of the Liberals, NDP maybe even Bloc`s sails, while pretty much guaranteeing endless majorities for this coalition.
    Just my .02$

  • Mike

    I agree with the 2nd last paragraph to the article. Simple praise of employees goes a long way. My boss at work is very technically minded and incredibly smart, but lacks the knowledge of when to say, “hey, that was some really good work you just did – good job!”. His “second in command” compliments us all the time, and it makes a huge difference in attitude and environment. I think everyone likes to be acknowledged and told they’re doing a good job – it’s easy and it does make for a better work environment.

  • Pingback: Dude, where’s my job? « Tome of the Unknown Blogger

  • lisa

    wow mcleans, you found your very own ann coulter. great! i can’t wait to hear some more skewed facts. ann usually starts out with something like “single moms raise rapists and criminals”. don’t worry, she has plenty of “polls” to back up her position too. i really think you’re on to something with this lianne george character as well. but don’t stop at print. too many will miss out on her perls of wisdom. maybe you can lend her out to some talk radio shows like bill o’reilly’s or rush limbaugh.

  • David

    In reading some of these comments, it’s difficult to not pick points. There are, however, some accuracies in this article about previous generations and the one coming up behind us now. I’m 42, graduated in the recession of the 80′s with 3 degrees and couldn’t find decent work. I was a mediocre student at best but managed to obtain a BA, B.Ed and an MA – not without considerable financial support from my parents (who were teachers at the elementary and post-secondary levels). There’s some truth to the coddling influence and “self-esteem” movement comments – those under 25 have been told that they’re “special” and unique and deserving. There’s an interesting book out by two U of Waterloo professors describing (in detail) how current attitudes and educational practices have left entire cohorts of young students woefully unprepared for the rigors of university work and pin pointing such things as wide spread total inability to spell, count, write grammatically, research, prepare papers and follow deadlines. I’ve travelled between Edmonton and Toronto in my working career and had many failures (even firings) before figuring out what I was good at and having the lucky opportunity to own my own business. I’m not entitled to benefits, EI or anything else that many workers receive as par for the course with their employment. I’ve even rented space in my home to students and younger people over the years and I can tell you first hand that their expectations (of those I’ve met) and work ethics leave a great deal to be desired when compared to the majority of people that I went to school with in the 70′s and 80′s. The very fact that 70% report that they’re “above average” in academic ability is quite telling. Think about it boys and girls, if “average” is the mid-point between poor and excellent, then it’s statistically quite impossible for 70% of the population to be “above average”. The sad fact is, the vast majority of us ARE of only average intelligence or academic ability and there are much smaller pockets of people at either end of the scale who are actually quite exceptional or, conversely, exceptionally stupid. My experiences and observations have shown that the majority of the 20-somethings I’ve met over the years have an over-inflated sense of their own abilities and worth and are long overdue for a reality check. As Judge Judy so often says, most of them just don’t “get it”.
    David T
    Kitchener, Ontario

  • jacques M

    Wall street journal hasnt been helping the little people for a hundred year., what would start now.

    Jacques M author Blogger @ Woodworking plans for Woodworking projects

From Macleans