or a little embarrassing?

or a little embarrassing?

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Contrary to popular belief, the ceremonial lighting of the Olympic flame at the Opening Ceremonies is, in fact, a decidedly modern affair. The culmination of the torch relay in a grandiose display at the Opening Ceremonies is a relic of the 1936 Berlin Games—just one of many attempts by the Nazi regime to lend a mythical air to the Games. Still, despite its dubious history, the lighting of the cauldron has evolved into one of the most spectacular and ostentatious displays at the Games. And the secretiveness that surrounds the lead-up to the ceremony only lends to the hype.
When it comes to the 2010 Games, the speculation about who will be selected to light the cauldron has coalesced around whether VANOC will go the traditional route and opt for a former Olympian or take the road less-travelled and pick someone from outside the sports world. Facebook groups have popped up promoting everyone from Terry Fox’s mother, Betty, to former Vancouver Canucks captain Trevor Linden. So far, Vancouver’s Olympic organizers have kept a tight lid on who the potential candidates might be. We’ve assembled a list of the names making the rounds, but feel free to add your own in the poll or in the comments below.

A pathogen found in cattle may lead to a cure for Crohn’s disease

ANDREW COYNE: Obama’s banking reforms would make the U.S. and Canadian systems even less alike than they are at present

In all sorts of ways, it’s difficult to imagine him ever stopping

The ‘American Idol’ runner-up shares his views on gays on TV and the ‘closed-minded’

Colby Cosh on the current state of the Super Bowl halftime show—and how to fix it

In a wealthy suburb, a writer discovers people who take celebrating to a whole new level

Newsmakers of the week
Maclean's is Canada's only national weekly current affairs magazine. Maclean's enlightens, engages, and entertains 2.8 million readers with strong investigative reporting and exclusive stories from leading journalists in the fields of international affairs, social issues, national politics, business and culture.
Well, that might depend on where that is, no? If it was at school, definitely not cool. Somewhere else? Maybe cool.
I confess though that I’m likely out of touch with what is or is not cool to a ten year old and a seven year old. Frankly, I would have thought a 7 year old would think that was kinda cool (though maybe not a ten year old). Then again, I wouldn’t consider a 7 year old a “pre-teen” either, as technically correct as that is (Where’s the dividing line on that anyway? I mean, a 5 year old’s not really a “pre-teen” are they? Sure, a 6 month old is technically “pre-teen” but you’d never call them that. What about an eight year old?).
My best guess is that with a ten year old and a seven year old, one would find it cool, the other embarassing. Then again, kids do certainly seem to grow up much faster these days (and keep in mind, I’m only in my 30s and I’m saying that) so who knows. I don’t recall having a well developed sense of relative “coolness” in the second grade.