UPDATED: Was this the kind of story he had in mind?

by kadyomalley on Monday, January 19, 2009 8:00am - 29 Comments

UPDATE: Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff weighs in on the controversy during his post-caucus scrum- very, very carefully and likely mindful of the fact that parliamentary privilege does not extend to the Hall of Honour:

“Serious questions have been  raised by Mr. Brazeau. Every person in Canada is  entitled to be considered  innocent until proven guilty,  particularly in relation to  sexual harassment allegations,  which I understand have been dealt with by a tribunal. So I don’t want to make any  presumptions of guilt in  respect of Mr. Brazeau. But I think it’s fair to say that there’s an accumulation  of doubt as to whether Mr. Brazeau meets the criteria for  a senate appointment. And I’ll just leave it at  that.”

From a post to then-national chief Patrick Brazeau’s blog  ”No Reservations” (May 20, 2o08):

In the midst of the increasing amount of stories pertaining to accountability or lack thereof and CAP’s call for greater accountability, I’ve decided to post stories that justifies the need to deal with this issue for the benefit of grassroots Aboriginal people all across Canada.

If you have stories you would like to share, which could include governance, accountability, discrimination, election procedures/issues, mismanagement, fearmongering, intimidation and bullying, please forward these stories so they could be shared to highlight the day-to-day activities that many people are faced with each day.

Please forward any news or information links regarding the subject matter.

From today’s Globe and Mail:

Health Canada is demanding the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples return up to $260,000 in ineligible expenses after an audit found directors of the native advocacy group divvied up thousands of dollars in federal cash with insufficient evidence of where the money went.

The federal department has suspended all funding to the organization, led until recently by new Conservative Senator Patrick Brazeau, until the group comes up with a plan to pay back the money and respond to the government’s concerns. [...]

Mr. Brazeau, 34, was vice-chief of the organization in 2005 and rose to president and national chief in February of 2006. During his nearly three years in charge of the advocacy group for off-reserve aboriginals, he attracted attention with his blunt calls for native leaders to be more transparent and accountable with taxpayers’ money.

The draft Health Canada audit disputes $16,050 in payments to the congress president and vice-president, but the organization said the salaries of those two office-holders are usually adjusted based on the number of programs in which they participate.

Auditors took issue with a practice whereby thousands of dollars in cash would be handed out at board meetings.

“The audit found that large amounts of money (varying between $11,000 and $18,000 – exceptionally $65,000 for the Annual General Assembly) were sometimes disbursed to the Finance Officer to enable the distribution of cash allocation to the CAP Directors when they attended meetings. It was also noted that the accounting records only showed ‘Miscellaneous’ instead of showing the payees’ names on some of the cheques issued.” [...]


Bookmark and Share
  • Anon

    Who vetted this clown and is he still working for Harper?

    • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

      As a senator-to-be, technically, he’s working for all of us.

      • Anon

        No, Kady, I was talking of the “vetter”. Also, is there any way to remove a Senator — like an impeachment process?

  • DR

    Forget about the Senate, what about all the media appearances he’s made over the last 3 years? Hasn’t any journalist ever bothered to check up on the guy who so reliably supports the Con’s over this time?

    • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

      Theoretically, the media doesn’t see itself as the attack dog for Libs/NDP but I have my suspicions.

    • MJ Patchouli

      Yeah, Duffy’s been on the watch…

  • http://BobbyWonderful Bob Larocque

    How did Mike Duffy miss that story?

    • Sisyphus

      John Baird told him it wasn’t important.

  • John D

    Our very own Sarah Palin

    • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

      I don’t know about that. Sounds like he was learning from the masters, the Liberal Party, what with all this talk about unaccounted for cash payments or for work that never occurred.

      • John D

        Today’s bipartisan talking point: “learned from the masters.” Brought to you by jwl and NPoV

      • Trent

        I believe he was referring to Palin/Brazeau’s (Palizeau?) lack of vetting. But congrats on blaming Conservative corruption and incompetence on the Liberals.

        • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

          I don’t know about Brazeau’s vetting procedure but Palin’s was just fine. Nothing came out about Palin that McCain campaign wasn’t aware of.

      • cam

        but what’s important here jwl is that you think Brazeau is in the wrong, correct? Two wrongs don’t make it right.

        • http://carnewsandviews.com jwl

          If the audit allegations are accurate, I think the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples is getting off lightly if their only punishment for fraud/embezzlement/non-payment of taxes (???) is to give money back.

  • http://macleans.ca kc

    I just love these hoist by yr own petard stories. Speaking as someone who’s immune to hypocracy i regard it as the media’s top priority to highlight these kind of stories no matter which pols wind up with egg on their faces. When pols are doing their jobs i’m personally not so interested, it’s after all what we pay them for. Public ridicule is essential in this sort of case. All pols are going to fail from time to time, it’s when they set themselves up as such obvious targets a la messrs Brazeau and Harper, who ran on squeeky clean tickets that they have the farthest to fall from grace. As someone who has lived on reserve i can tell you there will be more than a few chuckles around the kitchen table this morning.

  • Northern PoV

    Can’t blame this guy as he has leraned from his masters:
    If you are a conservative, accountability is a wonderful thing …. for everyone but you!

    • Douglass

      Kady can the GG just refuse to appoint him to the Senate? When is his confirmation?

      • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

        Well, I know Duffy is being sworn in next Monday; I’m not sure if Brazeau has had his ceremony or not yet, but for some reason, I have this thought stuck at the back of my mind that the Senate itself can expel a member, although I think that has to be based on something they did while in office, and not based on their past actions. I’ll see if I can find a better answer to your question, though.

        • Douglass

          Thanks.

  • baskins

    Wow this is an int4resting conversation. First to bad that Mike got it wrong in his comment. Brazeau according to articles was never cleared by a tribunal. The issues has yet to be heard by a tribunal. It has how ever been investigated by an external investigator who was hired by Brazeau’s Lawyer and paid for the Tax payers. To top it all off according to other sights brazeau and his lawyer are the only ones who have ever actually seen the final report and the board accepted an executive summary instead of asking ot se the final report.
    As for the recent allocations I would bet that this is not the first time thar CAP has been in financial hot water with the feds. I would also ask what role the CEO would have played on all of this especially given that a CBC blog in relation to an earlier story informs us that the CEO has up and quit. I dunno this whole thing smells to high heaven.
    I have hte feeling tht this is only the tip of hte iceburg and that we will never ever really know what is going on there

  • MJ Patchouli

    I recommend today’s column by aboriginal columnist Doug Cuthand, found today’s Regina Leader Post and online at canada.com — here’s a couple of excerpts:

    “In June, First Nations people across the country gathered to witness the historic residential school apology from the federal government. All the national leaders were allowed to speak at a special session of the House of Commons. It was a historic moment and our leaders rose to the occasion — all except one.

    “Patrick Brazeau, the leader of the Congress of Aboriginal People (CAP), gave a shallow unscripted speech that lasted less than two minutes. He basically stated that he was proud to be an aboriginal Canadian and that was it. Phil Fontaine, the leader of the Assembly of First Nations, gave a written address that reflected the gravity of the issue and the historic act that was taking place. He did his people proud. Brazeau did not….

    “Harper has a history of pounding wedges between groups and this is another very obvious example. Last summer Harper turned down an invitation to speak at the annual meeting of the Assembly of First Nations but chose instead to speak at the CAP annual meting….

    “It’s common knowledge that Brazeau is the prime minister’s favourite Indian, but did Harper have to insult us by appointing Brazeau to the Senate when there were so many other deserving First Nations and aboriginal people? Any one of the other leaders present in the Commons for the residential school apology would have made far better Senate material.”

  • madeyoulook

    Huh. Even the aboriginal organization that is clamouring for accountability in aboriginal organizations is caught up in allegations of embezzling. Clearly we need to spend more money in the native issues portfolio. Somebody throw the chiefs a few more billion — surely that will bring drinkable water, health care and education to every aboriginal Canadian, right?

    This native reservation apartheid crap is a pathetic stain on this otherwise great country. A system that intends to make certain Canadians more-than-equal to everyone else has had the perversely opposite effect. Since a very long time. And nobody has the guts (non-native leaders) or the will (native leaders) to put an end to it, so the suffering continues.

    But of course, silly me, my mind wanders, let’s focus on the embarrassment this Senator’s appointment will bring to the PM. That’s the Native corruption story that matters.

  • maggie

    Who knew that appointees had to, “meet the criteria for a senate appointment?”

    I wonder if MI thinks that Francis Fox met that criteria?

  • baskins

    I don’t believe that there is much to speak of by way of criteria for a senate appointment. I think that all that is required is that you own property in the province where you are appointed that has a value of 4000 dollars or more. As far as getting kicked out I think that once you are in you are in until you die. or retire or cease to own proerty in that province. As for retirement according to the Senate of Canada website Brazeau is due to retire in 2049. Yikes!!!!

  • Liz

    I think Stephen Harper knows exactly what the deal is with Brazeau regarding the sexual harassment allegations and the cash deals. But he went ahead and appointed Brazeau to the Senate in order to further disgrace First Nations Canadians AND the Senate.

  • baskins

    Liz
    Well said

  • Stan

    The media wouldn’t touch this guy with a ten foot pole until Harper appointed him to the senate, now he’s lost his immunity by being openly conservative.
    Before that the media used a hands off approach because he’s native.

  • baskins

    actually the media has always had a hay day with him. The mainstream just hasnt paid attention until now. read any cuthand articles or press for the west

From Macleans