Alberta: An embarrassment of riches gives way to sacrifice

What will Premier Stelmach decide he has to give up in the province’s toughest budget in over 10 years?

by macleans.ca on Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:10am - 3 Comments

Today, for the first time since the holidays, Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach is meeting with his caucus to discuss the state of the economy. It ain’t good, not even in Alberta, which only a few months ago still boasted an embarrassment of riches. But what to do? “While governments in other provinces, Ottawa and Washington are talking about boosting spending to stimulate the sagging economy, the Stelmach government is contemplating what to do as it prepares Alberta’s toughest budget in more than a decade,” writes the Calgary Herald’s Renata D’Aliesio. And Alberta may not go the stimulus route. “The Tories have raised a range of options in the past few days, including spending cuts, seeking union concessions and raising taxes. Infrastructure spending and dipping into the province’s $7.7-billion ‘rainy day’ fund are also on the table.” Whatever the solution, it’s going to involve sacrifice (D’Aliesio runs through a crowd of worried folks). It’s a strange detour for a province that not long ago was wondering what to do with all its dough.

Calgary Herald

Tags:

Bookmark and Share
  • T. Thwim

    Well.. at least it’ll be an interesting case study to see which fares better.. deficits or cutbacks.

  • Terry

    I’m glad at least somebody will actually follow conservative principles of governance.

    Of course, everyone knows the energy prices are going to rise again within the next year or two, while zombie corporations and the service economy of Ontario run on seed money from the government.

    • Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)

      Oh, Terry.

      What would have made more sense would have been for Alberta to have put a brake on development, to help control costs in the oil sands, and build on that Heritage Fund thingy. Now that there is some slack in the economy, it is a better time than ever for places like Ft. McMurray to catch up on infrastructure. Unless you’re down with having refineries but not schools.

From Macleans