<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look at us, we&#039;re doing stuff (II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76644</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76644</guid>
		<description>No I`m just sick of the whining of pinkos like youself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I`m just sick of the whining of pinkos like youself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76643</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76643</guid>
		<description>So the woman is losing her eyesight and Dan the jerk thinks it`s funny---the irresponsible  &quot;  journalism &quot; of Wherry only encourages A  Holes like Dan the Jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the woman is losing her eyesight and Dan the jerk thinks it`s funny&#8212;the irresponsible  &#8221;  journalism &#8221; of Wherry only encourages A  Holes like Dan the Jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan in van</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76642</link>
		<dc:creator>dan in van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76642</guid>
		<description>Well, I bet it took Aaron a heckuva lot less time than the heavy-handed thinking of CON footmen who had to draw up the map and present it before the king. So you&#039;re against any effort in commenting about overthinking partisan furniture moving, but fine with the buffoons who practice the actual fluff of moving furniture for a photo op sake? Wow, you must be a card-carrying CON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I bet it took Aaron a heckuva lot less time than the heavy-handed thinking of CON footmen who had to draw up the map and present it before the king. So you&#8217;re against any effort in commenting about overthinking partisan furniture moving, but fine with the buffoons who practice the actual fluff of moving furniture for a photo op sake? Wow, you must be a card-carrying CON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan in van</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76641</link>
		<dc:creator>dan in van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76641</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s the case, they should have included an infrastructure bill that gave all males a pair of Diane Finley sunglasses to prevent us from going blind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s the case, they should have included an infrastructure bill that gave all males a pair of Diane Finley sunglasses to prevent us from going blind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76640</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76640</guid>
		<description>It warrants the attention, because this behaviour is extremely revealing as to the motivation and culture of the Harper government and PMO. Honestly, distributing a seating plan to an informal chat with ministers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It warrants the attention, because this behaviour is extremely revealing as to the motivation and culture of the Harper government and PMO. Honestly, distributing a seating plan to an informal chat with ministers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76639</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76639</guid>
		<description>I`m just sarcastically suggesting that a man of Aaron`s obvious talents could find a more substantive way  to constructively criticize a massive budgetary document in these earth-shattering times we live in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`m just sarcastically suggesting that a man of Aaron`s obvious talents could find a more substantive way  to constructively criticize a massive budgetary document in these earth-shattering times we live in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ti-Guy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76638</link>
		<dc:creator>Ti-Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76638</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t like the posts, no one&#039;s forcing you to read them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t like the posts, no one&#8217;s forcing you to read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76637</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76637</guid>
		<description>Nitpicker: def.-----One who manages to post two stories about one photograph........ex.------the Entertainment Tonight reporter posted two stories about the Lohan photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitpicker: def.&#8212;&#8211;One who manages to post two stories about one photograph&#8230;&#8230;..ex.&#8212;&#8212;the Entertainment Tonight reporter posted two stories about the Lohan photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76636</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76636</guid>
		<description>If you look at the whole group, you see the two women appear to be sitting on booster seats to elevate them above all the sitting men.  Did any reporters ask the reason for the CPC strategy of giving women booster seats?  It does show off part of their legs as they are wearing skirts.  Likely, they were told to wear skirts for this purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the whole group, you see the two women appear to be sitting on booster seats to elevate them above all the sitting men.  Did any reporters ask the reason for the CPC strategy of giving women booster seats?  It does show off part of their legs as they are wearing skirts.  Likely, they were told to wear skirts for this purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burlivespipe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76635</link>
		<dc:creator>burlivespipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76635</guid>
		<description>An unoriginal thought... Well, how else would the media know what were the ministers and what were the lamps and stuffed chairs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An unoriginal thought&#8230; Well, how else would the media know what were the ministers and what were the lamps and stuffed chairs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin So</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/look-at-us-were-doing-stuff-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76634</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin So</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=31581#comment-76634</guid>
		<description>Puahahahahah~!

Austin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puahahahahah~!</p>
<p>Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

