Canada’s love affair with Barack Obama

We like him more than Americans do, with some small concerns

by Charlie Gillis on Friday, February 13, 2009 9:30am - 184 Comments

That broad sentiment will come as no surprise to Stephen Harper, who has held to his election promise to end Canada’s military mission there in 2011. Still, resolution of the Afghanistan issue may prove the least of the Prime Minister’s worries when it comes to U.S. relations. Harper scored well below Michael Ignatieff in our poll on two key measures of confidence, with fully 40 per cent of respondents saying the Liberal leader would be better at maintaining relations with Obama, compared to 29 per cent who thought Harper would. Ignatieff also topped the Prime Minister on the question of who would stand up to Obama if Canadian interests were threatened (36 per cent of those polled chose the Grit leader; 28 per cent picked Harper). All of this points to some serious approval problems for the PM.

The question is whether anything he does during this week’s visit will ease those problems. Canseco, for one, has his doubts. The pollster points to Harper’s 38 per cent job approval rating in the Maclean’s survey, which lags four points behind Ignatieff’s, and marks a stunning decline from the double-digit leads Harper enjoyed over Ignatieff’s predecessor, Stéphane Dion, before the government’s catastrophic fiscal update last fall. Canseco cites growing awareness of Ignatieff’s qualifications for the remarkable shift (“he’s a professor, he lived in the States”) along with a steady drift of support from the NDP back to the Liberals. Others suspect the numbers have less to do with Ignatieff’s foreign policy credentials than concern about Harper’s judgment. “His problem is that Canadians have to some extent lost confidence in his leadership,” says Hampson. “Harper’s political challenge in this upcoming summit is to see if he can get some of the Obama glow to shine on him.”

It is the sort of thing to which Obama has become accustomed—this faith in his power to raise the fortunes of others. And it’s not like the Conservatives are the only ones sidling up to him. Ignatieff lodged his own request for an audience with the President, lest the Conservatives revive their fortunes under the man’s reflected light. Given the depth of Canadian ardour for the new Leader of the Free World, that’s probably not a bad play. For now, at least, everyone’s ignoring the asterisk.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://mooseandsquirrel.ca/ natasha

    From Wacko Jacko (J@ck M!tchell) – “Out of curiosity, are you guys from David Duke’s site, or what?”

    So, because some Canadians are not swooning for Obama or having wet dreams about him (http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/sometimes-a-president-is-just-a-president/), according to Wacko Jacko we’re all white supremacists.

    Gee, thanks, I never would have recognized that NOT worshipping at the feet of “O” makes me a racist.

    I simply prefer to wait and see what accomplishments he’ll actually make, and I don’t consider signing into law the most massive spending package ever to be a “great” accomplishment.

    But you go on worshipping your hero if that makes all of you happy.

    “Hero-worship is strongest where there is least regard for human freedom.” – Herbert Spencer, British philosopher (1820-1903)

  • cc

    i wish i would be interviewed when they take their polls. I haven’t agreed with one yet!

  • Whatever

    Liberals = children. Canadians = liberals.

    By the way, how’s tourism going up there these days?…

  • Ann

    I wanted to refute the notion that the American media is liberal, but after providing key evidence to state my case, I accidently killed my message, and, having a job that takes quite a bit of my time (in another popular field, politics) I was unable to post anything further until now. But I just ran across this story on a university research study that backs me up, if you care to read it. One of the study’s authors explained her take on it: “In attempting to account for the pattern of favoring Republicans in four consecutive election cycles (during both Democratic and Republican administrations), Maria Elizabeth Gabe, one of the study’s authors explained, “We don’t think this is journalists conspiring to favor Republicans. We think they’re just so beat up and tired of being accused of a liberal bias that they unknowingly give Republicans the benefit in coverage.” In other words, “working the refs” works.”

    The article, which follows, can be found at fair.org

    A side note: Did none of you doubters ever hear of the many instances of news media using material from shills paid under the table by republicans in high places? You have NEVER heard that happening on the liberal side.

    Adios, me amigos, it’s been fun.

    Liberal Bias Debunked (Again)
    Tuesday, February 24th, 2009
    More bad news for right-wingers longing to peddle the myth of liberal bias in the corporate media. Indiana University released a comprehensive study of the visuals used in presidential campaign coverage from 1992-2004, finding that the three major broadcast networks–NBC, CBS and ABC–all favored Republicans in each election.

    The study focused on the visual production of news: where each story was placed in the newscast, editing techniques and manipulations related to camera angles, shot lengths, eyewitness perspectives and zoom movement. Among the most negative visual representations or “image bytes” is the “lip-flap shot,” where a reporter’s narration is placed over a candidate talking, which the report calls a “violation of professional television news production standards.”

    “Not only is lip-flap unflattering for the candidate who appears,” the report notes, “but it also distracts from the reporter’s narration because viewers focus attention on making sense of what the lip flapper appears to be saying.” The technique was found to be used more often with Democratic candidates than with Republicans. A similar partisan bias was found in which candidates were given the last word, which were videotaped in flattering low-angle shots and which were given unflattering extreme close-ups and high angles.

    In attempting to account for the pattern of favoring Republicans in four consecutive election cycles (during both Democratic and Republican administrations), Maria Elizabeth Gabe, one of the study’s authors explained, “We don’t think this is journalists conspiring to favor Republicans. We think they’re just so beat up and tired of being accused of a liberal bias that they unknowingly give Republicans the benefit in coverage.” In other words, “working the refs” works.

  • Andrew Yu-Jen Wang

    Speaking of Barack Obama:

    Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.

    George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

    George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

    And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

    Many people know what Bush did.

    And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

    Bush was absolute evil.

    Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

    Bush is a psychological prisoner.

    Bush has a lot to worry about.

    Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

    In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

    Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    “GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
    ______________________
    I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

  • Saywhatyouwant

    Hello, I am a resident from Barrie Ontario, Canada. I am in grade 10 currently and this is what Canada is being exposed to as far as Obama goes. When he was doing his speech at the White house, almost everybody in my school was watching him do the speech. Shortly after that, people were selling Obama T-shirts and they were popular at my school. Nobody really researches what he says or does, but Canada loves him because he's gone against racial boundaries. So as far as people in the age 14-15 range, most of us have no idea about Obama. :D I love him.

  • Sangai Doulmesh

    haha….a few of the posters predictions here are coming true…this guy has no integrity…like most liberals and neo cons.
    Liberals especially make me sick, and due to the fact they won't go away, i have to laugh them off. They look, sound and act so smart, but when faced with the harshness of reality they fail time and time again.

    Obama is a one termer. Canada ….you are exceptionally lame ( no, i am a canadian citizen), and have never fooled me for a minute. I would gladly hand over my canadian passport for an american one. No one can help where they are born of course.

    How many canadians move to the u.s per year again?????……50,000 or so…..! haha CANADUH SUCKS. to heck with all canadas propaganda and canadian b.s.

  • CR

    And the “Big Lie” is exactly what Bush/Cheney laid on the American people, again, and again, and again.

    Out of fear, perhaps, Americans said, “Enough, already!” to Bush/Cheney, and rejected a person who was (in all likelihood) going to continue the Bush/Cheney version of “politics as usual.” That may not have been the only reason for rejecting McCain as a person; there may have been other considerations which this Canadian did not fully uderstand. Nonetheless, fear can move people in strange ways.

  • cc

    Charliehorse..

    Well said..pay no mind to the programed regurgitated messages from the media. Bush was hardly evil. And frankly I had no trouble understanding his speech. I do have trouble with Obama’s, He does read well, I will give him that, but as for spontaneous speech, give me a break..

    Many Canadians travel to Cuba, and wouldn’t want to live that way, but that is the way we are heading. That or the Swedish economic program.. Aside from the actual wealthy, if you work and make say, 21000 kroner, after taxes you would be left with 14000. the lad that makes 7000 kroner, is then given through entitlements, a further 7000 and they both end up with 21000. I just wonder how many people would really want to be the guy earning 21, donating 7 and getting what the other guy gets merely for breathing., Crazy. and that is sadly the way Obama thinks.
    That and the socialized medicine, same as Canada, its for the people, the masses, and not for those running the masses….Keep the people down, and controllable, for if you let them have the freedom to earn to their own potential, the government loses control..It just makes me crazy,,, i hope you Americans are going to stand up to this government before it is too late. Canada has no method to getting away from socialism, except complete collapse.

From Macleans