Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

New Wells column, with schnitzel

by Paul Wells on Monday, February 16, 2009 11:06am - 8 Comments

My full report, from the print edition, on last week’s Munich Security Conference.  I like to think it’s all pretty interesting, but here’s an excerpt that, perhaps, stands out:

And where was Canada in all this? Not absent, for the first time in a while. Defence Minister Peter MacKay showed up in Munich, making him the first Canadian cabinet minister to attend since the Conservatives were elected in 2006. (Liberal foreign ministers John Manley and Bill Graham both used to attend in their time.)

MacKay is said to be campaigning for the job of secretary-general of NATO, which Jaap de Hoop Scheffer is slated to vacate later this year. Such campaigning, if it takes place, is done sotto voce; European sources interviewed by Maclean’s could not come up with any reliable list of candidates. One senior NATO source said MacKay is highly regarded in the organization for his blunt talk, but as a Canadian with a short CV he has a long way to go in convincing people he can navigate the Byzantine relationship between NATO and the European Union.

Appearing on the same panel as Holbrooke and Petraeus, MacKay pitched Canada as a determined ally that is already implementing the sort of well-coordinated, “whole of government” approach to military and civilian intervention in Afghanistan that the Americans hope to lead.

“We have more to do,” MacKay said, quoting Robert Frost: “Miles to go before we sleep.” He added, “I don’t think we can ever abandon the effort, to have more countries, to have more effort on the ground, until we tip the balance.” And to make sure nobody had any question of his steadfastness, he concluded, “As a country that believes very strongly in this multilateral process, Canada remains very committed.”

What he did not mention, not once, is that the commitment runs until 2011 and that Stephen Harper insists Canada’s military deployment in Afghanistan will substantially end then.

Bookmark and Share
  • Dot
  • Paul Wells

    Dot? One polite warning: Stop that now. I’ll let that one post stand, but any further attempt to pursue your lame little vendettas on my blog will be deleted. If you keep it up I’ll have you banned from the Maclean’s blogs.

    • Dot

      Boy, aren’t we snarky today. Go ahead, delete it then, as well as this one. Seemed pretty light hearted and harmless to me. For that matter, how about deleting all my posts? Be consistent. You have my blessing. I recall you did that to Ti-Guy once when he made some VERY offensive comments about a foreign reporter.

    • cwe

      The Sarge avatar really seems to suit you, Wells. Imagine trying to lay the smack down on a lame vendetta while rocking a Tweety Bird or something.

  • http://macleans.ca kc

    On what evidence does Mackay base his assertion that Canada is implementing a ” whole govt” approach in Afganistan?
    As to our leaving surely the reality is that we have done as much militarily as our limited resources will allow? We have no fresh troops to throw into the breech, not fully trained ones anyway. If SH sticks to the planned departure, he will have earned the first measure of respect from me in a very long time.

  • de

    I guess Mackay sees the writing on the wall. He won’t be the last rat off Steve’s sinking ship.

  • Scott M.

    Yeah but MacKay? Head of NATO? He doesn’t have a hope in hell.

  • Anon

    “One senior NATO source said MacKay is highly regarded in the organization for his blunt talk”

    Diplospeak translated as “the guy is a blowhard but we humor him.”

From Macleans