The Hitman versus ‘The Wrestler’

This former champion finds the Mickey Rourke movie disturbing and disrespectful

by Bret “Hitman” Hart on Monday, February 16, 2009 1:44pm - 98 Comments

The Hitman versus ‘The Wrestler’

The Wrestler is being lauded as the definitive portrayal of pro wrestling, but I submit that’s only because no one has asked a real wrestling champion about it—until now. In the movie, Randy “The Ram” Robinson was a main-eventer who sold out Madison Square Garden. So was I. The movie opens with a montage of clippings and event posters eerily similar to the ones in my personal collection. I lived that life for real. I liked the movie, and I’m disturbed by it.

In director Darren Aronofsky’s astutely layered vision there are glimpses into a shrouded world considered fake by all but those who live in it—for them, it’s the only reality they know. Nuggets of truth make the story believable. Mickey Rourke’s clairvoyant performance makes it compelling.

The film isn’t so much an exposé of the wrestling business as it really is; rather, it shows us what a lot of people outside the business think it is. With this dark misinterpretation presented in such a plausible and dramatic way, many wrestlers who’ve sacrificed so much to entertain their fans—their bodies, their families—now feel embarrassed by the film’s unbalanced portrayal in which there’s no respect for our art or our dignity. I’m uncomfortable that audiences will unconsciously assume every wrestling has-been comes to a tragic end.

Traditional sports have an off-season but me and the boys were on the road 300 days a year. As a former WWF (now WWE) champion I travelled the world for 23 years straight, 1978 to 2000, wrestling every night, sometimes more than once, plus promotional appearances and working out. It takes over your life 24/7 and, especially before cellphones and email, no matter how hard I tried, it was impossible not to become distant from my family, my kids. Most, maybe all, the boys suffered the same isolation, and soon strangers became family and family became strangers. Almost all who escaped came back, having no clue how to make it on the outside.

Pro wrestlers don’t have medical benefits, a pension plan, or a union. I’m not complaining. Wrestling has been very good to me, despite heart-wrenching disappointments, betrayals, and too many deaths to want to count any more—including my youngest brother, Owen, who fell to his demise from the rafters of an arena on a WWF pay-per- view during an ill-conceived stunt.

I was retired from the ring by an errant kick to the head, on live pay-per-view, which resulted in a concussion so brutal my doctor used the word hamburger to describe the back of my brain. That was followed by a stroke that paralyzed the entire left side of my body. Battling back was the toughest fight of my life by far, and, although I’m left with permanent effects, I’m grateful that when people meet me I can still measure up to their memory of the hero I’d long pretended to be. I still sign autographs all over the world and my fans still come out in droves. I’m humbled when they tell me, time and again, that my wrestling character inspired them in some way to make positive changes in their lives.

Wrestling has given me a great life and for that I thank Vince McMahon. Vince and I have had major differences, but I’ve not minced words and my autobiography (Hitman) is a testament to that. When evaluating the impact of The Wrestler on the wrestling business it’s only fair I give the devil his due, because it’s Vince who succeeded in taking pro wrestling out of back alleys and dingy halls like those in the movie and made it marketable, mainstream and just plain fun to watch. He couldn’t have done it without a talented roster of wrestlers. To go out there and tell a credible and dramatic story with no retakes, in front of a live audience, with nothing but your body, your opponent, and a 20- by 20-foot ring, is an art form that takes dedicated training, physical and mental stamina, athletic agility, charisma and ring psychology to create what I always thought of as mini-movies. Those who perform this art old-school take pride in creating the illusion of realism without actually hurting our opponents.

We don’t know what wrong turn brought Randy the Ram to subsist in desperation on the lowest fringes of some perverted putrefaction that barely resembles the wrestling business I know. Although the film speaks superbly to the speed bumps all pro wrestlers navigate, I’m happy to report most of us don’t swerve off the road quite so severely.

Bret Hart is the author of Hitman: My Real Life in the Cartoon World of Wrestling

Bookmark and Share
  • Tom

    I loved the movie. The only negative (for lack of a better word) thing I have to say about it is that not every wrestler is going to end up like The Ram. Also they seemed to focus mainly on the negative aspects of wrestling, I think they should have done a little more positive things. i hope Mickey wins the Oscar, he deserves it.

  • Mandingo

    Why are people even bothering bringing up the point that “not all wrestlers end up like Randy “Ram” Robinson? Does this really need to be pointed out? Do we see clarifying that not every Italian will become or end up like Rocky Balboa? Seriously. It’s a work of fiction–a story–loosely based on an amalgamation of various personalities who have stood center ring.

    Can we not leave it at that?

  • JohnBoy

    Bret Bret Bret, I highly respect the work you’ve done in the past, you were one of the best there was, but frankly, you’re stuck in the past and whinning about it.

    The Wrestler was a movie of one man, to intone that it was more of a portrayal of one wrestler in one instance is ludicrous.

    This movie took from many to make it bigger more outstanding. But you cannot deny that these things in life DO happen. That drugs were taken, that some “over the hill” wrestlers didn’t know when to quit or could not let themselves quit. Nothing in this movie disparages wrestlers. Much like insinuating that Rocky (Sly Stallone) was claiming all boxers were the same.

    To pick at a movie because you feel it does not do justice or glamourizes your past or the past of wrestling as 100% accurate is just silly.

    Please watch the movie as a person, enjoy the role played, the interaction the pain and suffering in the movie for what it is. a damn good story with some accurate and some innacurate assesments.

    P.S. Please stop living in the past, it makes you look like a bitter person who can’t grow up and forget about the past.

    You’ve said many times you’ve “gotten over” and been able to forgive Vince? Then stop rehashing the past.

  • http://noberthabutt.blogspot.com/ Angela Shortt

    I haven’t seen the movie yet, but I will. After I see Coraline, of course! (I love Neil Gaiman’s books!) Fantastic commentary, Bret. And I loved the book. The Hitman versus Shawn Michaels and Vince McMahon argument will probably go on ad nauseum. As far as I’m concerned, that was then, and this is NOW. And what’s happening so is you FINALLY published your memoirs! Congratulations on a job well done!

    Now I’m going to my blog and do some remembering….

  • Brian

    Im a huge Hitman fan, from since I was a little kid. Hes one of the reasons Im a big wrestling fan today. And I certainly respect everything hes done for this business. But I disagree with him that this movie disrespects the business and makes non-wrestling fans think that all or most has beens turn out as Randy the Ram did. Its just the portrayal of one aging wrestler. It wasnt meant to be a portrayal of all or most aging wresters. Could they have gotten in a line like, “I know most aging wrestlers arent like me (Randy)”? Sure. But they were in the business of storytelling, not telling casual fans or non-fans of whats going on in the actual world of pro wrestling. If people are going to jump to conclusions based on a fictional movie, without doing the research, then who really cares *what* their opinions are? And if they really want to know what this business is like theyll just do some research. And while Randy the Ram isnt a portrayal of any one wrestler you can definitely say that *many* wrestlers have experienced many of the same lows. I wont go into the names as I think thats disrespectful, but those who intensely follow this business know who Im talking about. I do think that some of the things in the movie are a bit fantastical. For example, the drug dealing in the locker room. From what i know that just…doesnt happen. Nor do you see many ex-main eventers wrestling *that* much of a hardcore style. Unless they did when *during* their main event days (i.e. Terry Funk, Abdullah the Butcher, etc). And the movie made you think that Randy the Ram wasnt a ‘hardcore wrestler’ during his prime. But still…the movie isnt meant to be a portrayal of most ex-stars. I really enjoyed the movie. It was quite the emotional rollercoaster. I actually dont think Marissa Tomei’s character was as ‘heart of gold’ as some people make her out to be (or maybe I expect too much of people)…which is one of the things alot of people really liked about the movie. But she is a compelling, sympathetic and still loving character. And is a vital part of the movie. I cant wait to see the movie again. And I hope I read the reviews of many other current and ex-wrestler’s views on the movie…good, bad, indifferent, inbetween, etc.

  • dan

    I agree that the movie may be a little extreme but the bottom line is it’s pretty accurate. I remember watching Junkyard Dog and Wahoo McDaniel in their primes, and then 7 years later I saw both of them with Tommy Rich at a local Walmart for an independent wrestling show in a high school gym. When the gravy train stops it stops. It DOES happen, sometimes in a blink of an eye!

    I realize that Bret is trying to defend the business especially in light of the Chris Benoit tragedy and steroid abuse that has cast a cloud over all of sports. But the Bret Hart’s, Ric Flair’s and Hulk Hogan’s are the lucky ones in the business. Their the ones that retire with millions of dollars in their bank accounts. The other mid- card guys aren’t as lucky.

  • Governor

    I respect Bret Harts opinion but he has led a very “sheltered” wrestling career. Even in his own words “he has only wrestled for his Dad in Canada, Vince McMahon in the WWE and Turner with WCW”. He was smart enough that he saved his money and now can live comfortably. The portrayel of the small indy promotions that exist almost everywhere is very, very accurate. I personally ran events back from 1995-2000 and they were in community centers, high school gyms, american legion halls etc. and the locker room was almost exactally like in the movie. I also booked several older wrestlers that had to continue to wrestle because that is all they knew how to do to make $$$ to live. I will give one example because she has now passed away, that is “Sensational” Sherri Martel. She worked for both WWE & WCW and had made some bad choices that ate up all her money she had made over the years. When she started wrestling for me she was living in Birmingham, AL and she worked as at Exxon gas station because of her bad knees she was not managing or wrestling but ended up having to go back and do it to be able to pay for her monthly living expences. So “The Wrestler” was almost like a autobiography of her life.

  • Chad

    Everything is disrespectful and disturbing to Brett Hart. Every interview he’s given since 1997 has been bitter, angry, and since his HOF introduction, ass-kissing at the same time to the “sport” that has “been good to him” but cost him dearly.

    Notice that he never says WHY he thinks this movie disrespectful.

    Too many wrestlers die at age 50.
    For every Brett Hart there’s 20 guys who you’ve never heard of or never heard from again and die.
    Brett, you got to the Big Show, got hurt, and retired. You never had to go to the depths of many others.

    What you wrote was a nice McMahon puff-piece, but how you feel about him is irrelavent.
    Davey Boy died. Curt Henning died. Big Boosman died.

    Clearly, something’s wrong. This movie was honest – even if it doesn’t fit your rose colored glasses.

  • Twizted

    The Best there is…..the best there was and the best there ever will be !!!!!

    0oo0 !!

  • http://tiny.cc/mINvR Movietrailers9

    Check Out My Movie Trailers on Youtube!

  • http://www.treklens.com/members/mark25 Muhammad Muhsin

    in his review of the movie, The Wrestler, Bret Hart talks about how his wrestling character brought positives changes to the lives of his fans :)

    I, for one, would like to share the positive impact Bret Hart has had on me.

    I live in Quetta City, Pakistan, a place where hunting is a popular sport. I remember sharing a photo online where i shared my feelings about my hatred towards hunting.

    Bret Hart once wrote an article/column about hunting in which he specifically pointed out Grizzly Bear hunting, that article touched me so much that it inspired me to take a photo and dedicate it to Bret Hart. The photo was titled ‘Homebound’ and can be found here: http://www.treklens.com/gallery/photo320149.htm

    Back in the late 80′s, we used to watch every episode of WWF wrestling on VHS, especially for Bret’s matches… Photography is my hobby, and i used to introduce myself as ‘the best there is, was and ever will be’ as a photographer :)

    I am not very good with words, just wanted to share the positive impact Breat has had on my life…

    Bret, wherever you are, may Allah bless you. You really truly are my Hero.

    Muhammad Muhsin

  • Carlo

    An odd review. Bret Hart doesn’t explain why this is a “dark misinterpretation” or merely the way some people think wrestling is. What about Jake the Snake? Could this movie not have been taken directly from his life. Sure many wrestlers do well when they fall out of the limelight, but others end up dead before they’re 50 and put meat on the table by wrestling in bars.

  • hitman4ever

    It’s unfair to try and second guess what the man’s interpretation of the movie was. He just gave his opinions like any of us will. There are movie critics that will give contrasting reviews to a movie they like/or don’t. Some giving 5-star while another might label it crap.

    I personally think that if they had gotten a true life account from a once great wrestler(who’s now dead) and labeled the movie “based on a true story”(like they always did with “American gangster”, “Catch me if you can”, Pursuit of Happiness” etc…), it would leave the movie with more credibility and at the same time not represent the entire business.

  • daryl barenholtz

    I just saw The wrestler today…i want someone who knows what is going on to dispute my feelings if they can…The Robinson character is a fictionalized account of Jake “The Snake” Roberts” real life…if you doubt me see the 1999 documentary “Beyond the Mat”…the relationship with his daughter, his addictions, even his driving that van are all part of Roberts’ real life during the time the documentary was made…Even Robinson’s belly slide into the ring is Roberts’ trademark entrance…

  • Hessama1

    Bret, your the greatest wrestler that ever lived.

  • Shannon Taylor

    Bret, You are right. They should’ve asked a real champion about what happens behind the curtain. And, Vince did alot to get wrestling out there, but he couldn’t have done it without you or the fans. If he didn’t have a great champion to carry the show for all those years(YOU) vince wouldn’t be where he is today. People only tune in to watch the wrestlers, not him. It is not the same without you, Bret. We miss you. You had a remarkable career and You should be very proud of all you accomplished.

  • mike d

    I think Bret is worried the movie will make the masses think every wrestler ends up a washed up trailer junkie………but who cares………real fans of wrestling understand that the movie draws some true of what some wrestlers actually become……and its the truth…..now someone come out with a shiny happy movie about the positive side of wrestling so Bret can be happy……..wait I know a movie on the life of Bret since he thinks so highly of himself……..

  • Jesse

    Beret Hart is the best ever. For the fans that dont like what he said, go watch HBK or something. First of all, bret LIVED this effin job, he done more then most wrestlers have ever done in his 23 years. For you to say he is wrong, is inaccurate. HE LIVED IT, DID IT, AND MADE IT. Don;t tell bret si wrogn when none of you have ever even experienced such a thing. Wrestlers know what there lives are and where.. if they believe this is not correct im sure they know what they are talking about.

    BRET HART IS MY HERO.

  • Laurian

    I totally agree with Bret's comments. I disliked the movie myself. I grew up watching the WWF (WWE) of the 90's and while this movie may depict possible realities, it fails badly because it never explains why Randy the Ram ended up so tragically in the first place. Of course Bret talked a lot about himself, that's the point of the article, comparing reality to fiction, for God's sake! You people seem to forget that Bret is the most complete wrestler of all time, he grew up IN the business and WTH the business ran by his family in Calgary! He has seen it all, and he's the most entitled person to criticize and compare. And I perfectly understand why he finds it that disrespectful, because I felt the same thing about it. The wrestling world I grew up with is totally different, and this movie will lead millions of people who never actually watched wrestling to the conclusion that there's nothing more to wrestling than drugs, poverty, people hurting each other till they bleed and tragedy. Any true wrestling fan and worker should feel offended by this movie. Of course there is a dark side to this business, not everyone ends up being a superstar, but doesn't every single business have a dark side? To release a movie that is completely misleading for millions around the world is totally unfair and disrespectful. And Bret couldn't be more right when he's saying he doesn't know what wrong turn brought Randy the Ram to subsist in desperation on the lowest fringes of some perverted putrefaction that barely resembles the wrestling business he knows. I feel exactly the same way, and I don't even work in the business, so a professional's anger doesn't surprise me at all. It's totally justified.

  • gunit

    well randy the ram is no bret hart. it seems to me like the randy character was a popular wrestler in the 80s but dropped off the map after that due his own indulgences. like drugs (cocaine, steroids) drinking and just not taking care of himself or his family in general. all of which was not so much the case with bret hart.

    so all in all i think this was a believable story and could have been possible and i dont think you can compare this character to bret hart because the character in the movie dropped off the map after being at the top, while bret was a star when he retired and would still have been a star wrestler if he still wrestled today, unlike "randy the ram."

  • http://www.no5000.com Big Bully Busick

    Hitman nailed it!

  • http://www.google.com Guest

    Bret Hart is truly the best there is, was, and ever will be. The detractors know nothing. This is a man that has given his all to the sport and some, only to be screwed over in the end. Unless you have lived a life like Bret Hart has, it can be extremely hard to relate, but if you have lived a life like Bret, it shouldn't be.

    Bret you are the best. Your true fans will never forsake you. Thank you for all you have given professional wrestling. You deserve the best of what life has to offer. People call you a crybaby, egotistical, a whiner, deluded….. However, I see you in a different light. We all have our hangups. Again, unless you have lived a life like Bret Hart has, it will probably be hard for you to relate to him. Bret's been through so many obstacles in life, Screwjob, concussion, stroke, and he has overcame a many of things. The average person wouldn't have been able to deal with what Bret has. He is the best there is, was, and ever will be.

  • Paul M

    Bret, I don’t think they were trying to portray Randy The Ram as someone in your or even Hulk Hogan’s league. I took it as a Ric Flair type, an NWA star from the 80′s.

    As a wrestling fan and someone who followed your career, wcw and wwf for almost 25 years, this movie is a true reflection of the disconnect, pauverty and world wrestlers from the 80′s and 90′s experience today. A live crowd is a drug for some of those guys, reliving the glory from their past. As you mentioned, people who come up to you for autographs and at appearances, isn’t that a continuation of the same drug you were on for over 20 years? You’re a performer and live for your audience, for their reaction, cheering or booing. That’s your “family”, that’s who you strieve to please. I think The Wrestler is a great contrast to how Hulk Hogan portrays himself in his reality show.

From Macleans